Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Recommended Varieties/Species
A research paper by Tolentino (2017) cited the study of Sarmiento and
Varela (2015) which came up with biomass estimates of various species
and age in different tree farms in Caraga, Mindanao, Philippines (Table
5). They used existing allometric equations of various species measuring
height and diameter. The study however did not mention spacing or
density and site characteristics or whether the measurements included
big branches and other tree components that can qualify as fuelwood.
Table __. Biomass estimated of various species and age in Mindanao (Sarmiento
& Varela 2015)
Biomass (Mg ha -1)
Tree Species
1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years
Acacia mangium 14.38 29.23 48.66 70.61 110.64
Paraserianthes falcataria 0.09 18.16 25.36 31.93 125.25
Leucaena leucocephala 8.21 38.13 56.61 70.41 77.36
Eucalyptus deglupta 0.14 5.76 23.96 40.00 58.20
VARIOUS FOREST
COVER Retailers
Shrubland
Brushland
FUELWOOD
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGES
National Production
Processing and Utilization
Financial Analysis
Wood-Based Panels
Fiberboard
The major sources of woodfuel and woody biomass for bioenergy in the
country can be classified into forestry and non-forestry sources. Forestry
sources include sustainable biomass harvests from natural forest,
logging and wood processing residues, and dedicated forest plantations.
Non-forestry sources include woody agricultural crop residues and
backyard trees (Elauria et al, 2003).
A research paper by Tolentino (2017) cited the study of Sarmiento and
Varela (2015) which came up with biomass estimates of various species
and age in different tree farms in Caraga, Mindanao, Philippines (Table
5). They used existing allometric equations of various species measuring
height and diameter. The study however did not mention spacing or
density and site characteristics or whether the measurements included
big branches and other tree components that can qualify as fuelwood.
Table __. Biomass estimated of various species and age in Mindanao (Sarmiento
& Varela 2015)
Woodfuel and other woody biomass have always been important traditional
sources of energy in the Philippines. Woodfuel accounts for the largest
share of biomass energy supply in the Philippines. Samson et al. (2001) as
cited by Tolentino (2017) reported that 56.1% represents the share of
woodfuel in the country’s biomass resources. According to the FAO 2010
report, the overall estimated woodfuel consumption in the Philippines is 25
million MT/annum, charcoal consumption at 2.7 million MT/annum (wood
equivalent of 16.2 million MT), and biomass residue consumption at 17
million MT/annum. This translates into 41.2 million MT/annum of
woodfuel (after converting charcoal to wood equivalent), and 57.2 million
MT of overall woodfuel and biomass fuel consumption.
Woodfuel demand includes the requirement of both households and
industries. Of the total demand 82% constitutes the household
consumption and the remaining 18% are from utilized for commercial and
industrial purposes. Domestic household demand for energy are mostly
intended for cooking needs, especially those in rural areas. Rural people
usually cut trees and gather fuelwood from the nearest area within close
access to their homes. Rural users generally collect rather than purchase
fuelwood (76 percent in the Philippines) thus large part of the consumption
are not monetized. However, there are also those that gather fuelwood and
sold as firewood or charcoal. Urban areas purchase wood-based fuel.
Charcoal are preferred than firewood in the urban areas.
Industrial fuel demand on the other hand, is partly used for steam power
generation and/or electricity for use in the factory or in nearby settlements.
Other industrial demand in rural-based enterprises includes those for
curing barns of tobacco: brick, ceramics and pot making; bakery; lime
production; tobacco processing, bakeries and, small scale food processing.