Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
5.1 Purpose
The purpose of the Change Readiness Assessment tool is to support GTOs to gauge the level of
preparedness among staff for the new service and to determine staff perceptions of the organisational
capability required. It provides essential information to help minimize barriers to the implementation
and change process, including poor communication, leadership and operational capability, cultural
issues, change fatigue etc. In addition to change readiness, the assessment tool also covers the areas of
organisational change capability, strategy and mindsets and behaviours.
The results of the change readiness assessment will be used to guide the activities undertaken in the
Change Management phase, as well as to ensure a successful implementation phase.
For the purposes of this toolkit, the Change Readiness Assessment tool is presented in the online survey
format. However the questions detailed in the survey can be used as the basis of the alternative
assessment approaches highlighted in the table above.
| 1 |
Group Training Australia
Tool 5: Change Readiness Assessment Tool
Survey questions
The following list provides an outline of the key questions to include in a change readiness survey.
Demographics
1. Which area do you mostly work in?
a. List options [what makes sense in terms of section, team or location]
2. How long have you been at this organisation?
a. 0-2 years
b. 2-5 years
c. 5+ years
| 2 |
Group Training Australia
Tool 5: Change Readiness Assessment Tool
8. I am confident this organisation has the resources required to introduce the new workforce
development service successfully.
9. The introduction of this service poses significant risks to this organisation.
10. My immediate supervisor understands and supports the introduction of the new service.
11. The senior management team is committed to ensuring the introduction of the new service is a
success.
12. All staff will need to support the introduction of the new service for it to be a success.
13. The communication about the new workforce development service has been effective.
14. I have had the opportunity to provide feedback about the introduction of the new service to my
immediate supervisor.
15. The communication about the new service explains how it will ensure a successful future for this
organisation.
16. I feel the communication about the introduction of the new service has been open and honest.
| 3 |
Group Training Australia
Tool 5: Change Readiness Assessment Tool
Survey administration
Survey administration process
When the survey is delivered to staff, the questions are presented without the category names and in a
random order. Staff are asked to answer each question based on their knowledge and experience. The
first set of questions use a 1-4 scale, from 1 = strongly disagree, to 4 = strongly agree. The remaining
questions are open-text responses. Responses should not be tagged to respondents and all individual
responses should be treated as confidential unless otherwise agreed in advance.
Group Training Organisations will be responsible for initiating the survey immediately following the
Capability Assessment workshop. The survey should be accompanied by an email outlining to staff the
purpose and nature of the survey. It is recommended that the Group Training Organisation issue the
survey for a period of two weeks (i.e. 10 working days). It is also useful to send a short reminder email a
few days before the survey closes to encourage all remaining staff to complete it. Figure 1 outlines the
proposed timeline of the survey.
| 4 |
Group Training Australia
Tool 5: Change Readiness Assessment Tool
The survey includes four demographic questions which will provide organisations with the ability to
analyse the responses across particular groups. The demographic questions ask respondents to specify
their section / team, job role, primary location and years of service at the organisation. Analysing results
across these categories will allow organisations to respond to significant variations among sections of
the staff that might present a risk through the implementation phase. This is particularly useful for larger
organisations with distinct staff groups.
| 5 |