Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
Regional Office No. VII, Cebu City
ON
BARANGAY AWIHAO
TOLEDO CITY, CEBU
We are pleased to transmit the Annual Audit Report on the audit of the Barangay of Awihao,
Toledo City Province of Cebu for Calendar Years 2016 and 2017, prepared by our Audit Team
headed by Ms. Esperanza L. Obatay as Team Leader, in compliance with Section 2, Article IX-D
of the Philippine Constitution and Section 43 of Presidential Decree No. 1445, otherwise known
as the Government Auditing Code of the Philippines.
Our audit was made to (a) ascertain the level of assurance that may be placed on management
assertions on the financial statements; (b) recommend agency improvement opportunities; and
(c) determine the extent of implementation of prior years’ unimplemented audit
recommendations.
We expressed a qualified opinion on the fairness of the presentation of the financial statements of
Barangay Awihao for the years ended 2016 and 2017 due to the following as discussed in Part II
and III of this report:
1. Unreliable balance of the Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) accounts for CY 2016 and
2017 amounting to P1,170,706.01 and P1,167,713.41, respectively, due to the non-
conduct of physical inventory, non-preparation of Subsidiary Ledgers by the Accounting
Section; and no turn-over of property records from the previous to the current officials.
2. Unreliable Cash in Bank account balance owing to the difference of P10,000.00 between
the balances of the accounting record and the bank as of December 31, 2017 due to
delayed submission of the monthly Bank Reconciliation Statements (BRS) of the
Barangay to the Auditor within the prescribed period.
The above and other audit observations, together with the recommended courses of action which
were communicated to you and your Staff through Audit Observation Memoranda are discussed
in detail on Part II and III of the report.
We request that the recommended remedial measures be immediately implemented and we will
appreciate being informed of the action(s) taken thereon by submitting the duly accomplished
Agency Action Plan and Status of Implementation (form attached) within 60 days upon receipt
hereof.
We acknowledge the support and cooperation that you and your Staff extended to the Audit Team
which facilitated the completion of this Report.
Copy furnished:
INTRODUCTION
Barangay Awihao, which name was derived from a tree, is one of the midland barangays
of Toledo City. This can be reached by two feeder roads from the national highway: the
Bato-Awihao road, which was built before the outbreak of the Second World War; and the
Awihao-Cabitoonan road. Both roads have an average distance of not less than 4
kilometers starting from the hearth of the barangay down to either two end places of the
coastal barangays of Bato and Cabitoonan.
Organizational Set-up:
Barangay Awihao, Toledo City has a total personnel of Ten (10) as of December 31, 2017,
broken down as follows:
Nature of Appointment to
Quantity
Office
Elective Officials 8
Appointive Officials 2
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
i
The following graph illustrates the increase of Appropriations, Allotments and and a
decrease in Expenditures during the year:
SCOPE OF AUDIT
A financial and compliance audit was conducted on the accounts of Barangay Awihao,
Toledo City for the calendar years 2016 and 2017. The objectives of the audit were to
ascertain the fairness of presentation and reliability of the financial reports, financial
position and results of operations, to determine whether the programs, projects and
activities for the year were attained in an efficient, economical and effective manner. We
also conducted compliance audit to check the validity and propriety of the transactions
and adherence to pertinent laws, rules and regulations.
1. Unreliable balance of the Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) accounts for CY
2016 and 2017 amounting to P1,170,706.01 and P1,187,713.41, respectively, due
to the non-conduct of physical inventory, non preparation of Subsidiary Ledgers
by the Accounting Section; and no turn-over of property records from the
previous to the current officials.
ii
2. Unreliable Cash in Bank account balance owing to the difference of P10,000.00
between the balances of the accounting record and the bank as of December 31,
2017 due to delayed submission of the monthly Bank Reconciliation Statements
(BRS) of the Barangay to the Auditor within the prescribed period.
The following are the summary of significant observations and recommendations in the
audit and/or evaluation of the operations of Barangay Awihao for the years ended 2016
and 2017. These and other observations are fully discussed in Part II of this report:
1) Ensure that the accountable officer as well as the other officials of the
barangay liquidate cash advances granted within the prescribed period as
stated in COA Circular No. 97-002 and Section 89 of P.D. No. 1445;
3) Notify the previous BT through the issuance of demand letters for the
liquidation or settlement of his/her obligations with the barangay. File
iii
appropriate legal action, if warranted after exhausting all appropriate means
to recover the resources of the barangay and no liquidation is effected.
4) Furnish our office of the copy of the demand letters sent to the accountable
officer/s with unliquidated cash advances.
3. The existence and correctness of the recorded fixed assets with a net book value
of P1,170,706.01 could not be ascertained as the Barangay did not to conduct the
physical inventory of its properties as required under Item 3 of the policies and
procedures on Supplies and Materials, Property, Plant and Equipment, Public
Infrastructure and Reforestation Projects of the Systems and Procedures Manual
on the Management of Barangay Funds and Property, Volume I.
4. Properties of the barangay with insurable risk totaling P2,895,906.39 are not
insured with the Property Insurance Fund of the Government Service Insurance
System (GSIS) contrary to the provision of the Systems and Procedures Manual
on the Management of Barangay Funds and Property, thus the barangay will not
be indemnified of the value of the properties in case of loss due to fire and other
fortuitous events.
We recommend that the barangay allocate funds for the insurance of their
properties with insurable risks and insure these properties with the Property
Insurance Fund of the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS).
SETTLEMENT OF ACCOUNTS
There were no suspensions and disallowances that remained unsettled as of December 31,
2017.
Of the twelve (12) audit recommendations embodied in the 2012 Barangay Annual Audit
Report, one (1) was fully implemented and eleven (11) were not.
iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part Page
I Audit Financial Statements
-Independent Auditor's Report 1-2
-Statement of Management's Responsibility
For the year ended December 31, 2017 3.1
For the year ended December 31, 2016 3.2
-Financial Statements
- Comparative Balance Sheet for the years ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016 4-5
- Comparative Statement of Income and Expenses for
the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017 6-7
- Comparative Statement of Changes in Government
Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 8
2016
- Comparative Statement of Cash flows for the years
9
ended December 31, 2016 and 2017
- Notes to Financial Statements 10-13
II Detailed Observations and Recommendations 14-26
The management of the Barangay Awihao, Toledo City is responsible for the preparation
and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with state accounting
principles, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable
the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
Auditor’s Responsibility
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s
judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial
statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor
considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the
financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of
1
accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to
provide a basis for our qualified audit opinion.
1. Unreliable balance of the Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) accounts for CY
2017 and 2016 amounting to P1,170,706.01 and P1,167,713.41, respectively, due
to the non-conduct of physical inventory, non preparation of Subsidiary Ledgers
by the Accounting Section; and no turn-over of property records from the
previous to the current officials.
Qualified Opinion
In our opinion, except for the effects or possible effects of matter described in the Basis
for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Barangay Awihao, Toledo City as at December 31, 2017
and 2016, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the years then ended in
accordance with State accounting principles.
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
By:
ESPERANZA L. OBATAY
State Auditor IV
Audit Team Leader
2
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Barangay Awihao, which name was derived from a tree, is one of the midland
barangays of Toledo City. This can be reached by two feeder roads from the
national highway: the Bato-Awihao road, which was built before the outbreak of
the Second World War; and the Awihao-Cabitoonan road. Both roads have an
average distance of not less than 4 kilometers starting from the hearth of the
barangay down to either two end places of the coastal barangays of Bato and
Cabitoonan.
The Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with the generally
accepted state accounting principles and standards. Systems and procedures Manual
on the Management of Barangay Funds and Property (Volume I, II and III),
Accounting System Manual for Barangay (Volume IV) and COA Circular No. 2010
dated March 2, 2010 were also observed in the preparation of the financial reports.
Barangay transactions were analyzed and journalized in the Journal Entry Voucher
(JEV) which will be compiled at the General Journal and posted in the General
Ledger, Philippine Peso is the monetary denomination used in recording.
Fundamental errors of prior year’s corrected using the Prior Year’s Adjustment
account, while errors affecting the current year’s operation are affected in the
current year accounts.
Cash
Imprest system has been observed in the handling of the cash. All collections were
deposited to the bank intact and all payments were made of checks.
Receivables
Due from the Local Government Unit represents barangay share in Real Property
Tax (RPT) and Community Tax and Community Tax which is still in the city awaits
for remittance to the barangay. RPT income is recognize d when it is collected.
Inventories
27
All requisitions are released directly to the requesting offices.
Prepayments
All cost incidental to the acquisition of property are considered part of the cost of
the property. The barangay does not provide depreciation for construction in
progress. However, straight-line method of depreciation has been applied in the
computation of the depreciation for all depreciable assets. Computation of
depreciation will commence on the month following of purchase.
Liabilities
Government Equity
Current year’s result of operations (income/loss) and Prior Year’s Adjustments are
closed to government equity account. Public Infrastructure and reforestation
projects during the year were transfer to respective registry which cause a reduction
in Government Equity account.
Modified accrual is applied in the recognition of income and expenses. But most of
the time, it was on cash basis.
Note 3 – Cash
2017 2016
Cash in Vault P- P360.00
Cash in Bank 3,625,360.87 2,921,240.41
Total Cash P3,625,360.87 P2,921,600.41
28
Note 4 – Receivables
2017 2016
Accounts Receivables P2,200.00 P2,200.00
Due from LGUs 1,278.79 1,278.79
Advances to Officers & Employees 23,680.00 2,680.00
Other Receivables 62.08 62.08
Total Receivables P27,220.87 P27,220.87
Due from LGUs in the amount of P1,278.79 represents barangay share in Real
Property Tax and Community Tax which is still in the City awaits for remittance to
the barangay.
The barangay has no receivables pledge of assigned as security for liabilities and no
write-off during the year.
2017 2016
Land P377,000.00 P377,000.00
Land Improvements 65,509.86 78,755.25
Electrification, Power & Energy 159,689.86 215,416.29
Structures
Office Buildings 68,414.43 83,112.01
Other Structures 106,818.18 124,651.02
Office Equipment 8,777.00 8,777.00
Furniture & Fixtures 190,344.62 161,151.58
IT Equipment and Software 52,313.66 59,786.58
Library Books 4,190.00 4,190.00
Communication Equipment 9,588.08 15,653.54
Motor Vehicles 18,550.00 18,550.00
Other Transportation Equipment 629.70 629.70
Other Property, Plant and Equipment 108,880.62 40,040.44
Total Property, Plant and Equipment P 1,170,706.01 P 1,187,713.41
29
2017 2016
Accounts Payable P47,571.12 P47,571.12
Due to BIR 2,670.75 898.16
Due to LGUs 384,159.64 372,359.64
Other Payables 3,638.27 3,638.27
Total Current Liabilities P438,039.78 P424,467.19
2017 2016
Government Equity, beginning P3,712,067.50 P1,701,318.08
Retaining Operating Surplus
Net Income 673,180.47 929,088.35
Prior Years’ Adjustments - -
Total 4,385,247.97 3,859,995.50
Transfer from/ (to)
Projects to Registry Public Infrastructures - -
Irrigation, Canals and Laterals - (99,070.00)
Waterways, Aqueducts and Seawalls - (48,858.00)
Government Equity, end P4,385,247.97 P3,712,067.50
30
PART II
“The present of Local Calamity Fund shall henceforht be known as the Local
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund (LDRRMF). Not less than five percent
(5%) of the estimated revenue from regular sources shall be set aside as the LDRRMF to
support disaster risk management activities such as, but not limited to, pre-disaster
preparedness programs including training, purchasing life-saving rescue equipment,
supplies and medicines, for post-disaster activities, and for the payment of premiums on
calamity insurance. Xxx...
Of the amount appropriated for LDRRMF, thirty percent (30%) shall be allocated
as Quick Response Fund (QRF) or stand-by fund for relief and recovery programs in
order that situation and living conditions of people in communities or areas stricken by
disasters, calamities, epidemics, or complex emergencies, may be normalized as quickly
as possible.
Unexpended LDRRMF shall accrue to a special trust fund solely for the purpose of
supporting disaster risk reduction and management activities of the LDRRMC within the
next five (5) years. Any such amount still not fully utilized after five (5) years shall revert
back to the general fund and will be available for other social services identified by the
local sanggunian.”
Examination of the annual budget of the barangay disclose that they have
appropriated the amount of P182,724.75 for Disaster Risk Reduction and Management
for CY 2017, as shown below:
Appropriated
Program/Project/Activity
Fund
A. Disaster Prevention and Mitigation
Program 60,000.00
31
Appropriated
Program/Project/Activity
Fund
Command center office equipment or 20
uniforms ,000.00
20
Rescue Training
,000.00
10
Contingency Planning
,000.00
10
Information Driving
,000.00
B. Risk Reduction & Climate Change
Adoptation 60,000.00
15
Greening Program
,000.00
15
Planting of Trees
,000.00
30
Integrated Open Drainage Rehabilitation
,000.00
C. Disaster Preparedness, Response &
Recovery Program 62,724.75
20
Relief / Operation Supplies
,000.00
10
Communication System Installation
,000.00
Establish Post Damage Analysis Need 2
Assessment and Feedback ,724.75
Mobilizationm of all operation team, medical, 20
search & rescue, relief & law enforcement ,000.00
10
Maintenance of emergency equipment
,000.00
1
Total
82,724.75
The amount set up as LDRRMF complied with the requirement of Section 21 of R.A.
10121 of not less than 5% of the estimated revenue from regular sources, as shown
below:
32
Review of the Status of Appropriations, Commitments and Balances (SACB) for
CY 2017 showed that there was only one commitments charged to the above
appropriations, thus said big portion of the appropriation remained unexpended as of
December 31, 2017. However, the said amount was not transferred to a Special Trust
Fund (STF) as required in R.A. 10121.
Further, under the Manual on Financial Management for Barangays which was
prescribed to be used by COA Circular No. 2015-011 dated December 1, 2015 provides
under Chapter IX, Item No. 11.1.5 thereof that, “any unspent balance from the
appropriation for the current year appropriation of LDRRMF shall at the end of the year
be transferred to the STF”.
P.D. No. 1445 otherwise known as The State Audit Code of the Philippines
provides:
Item 5.1, COA Circular No. 97-002 dated February 10, 1997 states that the
prescribed periods that an accountable officer shall liquidate his cash advance depending
on the nature and purpose as follows:
“5.1.1 Salaries, Wages, etc. – within five days after each fifteen (15)
day/end of the month pay period.
33
5.1.3 Official Travel – within 60 days after return to the Philippines in the
case of foreign travel or within 30 days after return to his permanent official
station in the case of local travel.
Failure of the AO to liquidate his cash advance within the prescribed period
shall constitute a valid cause for withholding of his salary and the
instruction of other sanctions as provided for under paragraphs 9.2 and 9.3
hereof.”
Meanwhile, COA Circular No. 2012-004 dated November 28, 2012 was issued
requiring the Agency Officials to demand the immediate liquidation and settlement of all
cash advances as of December 31, 2011 as provided for under Item 6.0 of said Circular.
Also provided in the Barangay Manual are the following procedures when there
are transfers of accountabilities:
1) All cash held shall be refunded/account closed and any unused accountable
forms shall be surrendered and property accountabilities returned;
4) All AOs shall seek clearance from the Punong Barangay (PB);
6) The approved clearance shall serve as one of the supporting documents to the
last claim for salaries/honoraria of the officials.
34
Financial statements showed that as of December 31, 2017 the balance of
Advances to Officers and Employees (Code 148) stands at P23,680.00 which represents
unliquidated cash advances as follows:
It is evident that concerned barangay officials did not strictly monitor whether the
existing regulation on the liquidation of cash advance are faithfully complied with as
evidenced by the accumulated cash advances of the previous BT which remains
unliquidated to date, exposing barangay funds to misapplication/misappropriation.
On the other hand, the procedures when there are transfers of accountabilities
outlined in the barangay manual were not also adhered to resulting to the unliquidated
cash advances of the previous BT. The liquidation/settlement of said advances could not
be immediately required since the accountable officer is no longer connected with
barangay operations.
1) Ensure that the accountable officer as well as the other officials of the
barangay liquidate cash advances granted within the prescribed period
as stated in COA Circular No. 97-002 and Section 89 of P.D. No. 1445;
35
3) Notify the previous BT through the issuance of demand letters for the
liquidation or settlement of his/her obligations with the barangay. File
appropriate legal action, if warranted after exhausting all appropriate
means to recover the resources of the barangay and no liquidation is
effected.
4) Furnish our office of the copy of the demand letters sent to the
accountable officer/s with unliquidated cash advances.
3. The existence and correctness of the recorded fixed assets with a net book value
of P1,170,706.01 could not be ascertained as the Barangay did not to conduct
the physical inventory of its properties as required under Item 3 of the policies
and procedures on Supplies and Materials, Property, Plant and Equipment,
Public Infrastructure and Reforestation Projects of the Systems and Procedures
Manual on the Management of Barangay Funds and Property, Volume I.
Item 3 of the Policies and Procedures on Supplies and Materials, Property, Plant
and Equipment (PPE), Public Infrastructures and Reforestation Projects of the Systems
and Procedures Manual on the Management of Barangay Funds and Property, Volume I
provides the following:
e) Any unaccounted PPE shall be verified and in case of loss, the AO shall
be held accountable.
As of December 31, 2017, the Balance Sheet of the Barangay showed Fixed
Assets with a net book value of P1,170,706.01. However, physical existence, valuation as
well as correctness of the account balances could not be ascertained because the
36
Barangay Treasurer did not to conduct the physical count of all Barangay properties,
much less submit the required inventory report and reconcile with the records of the City
Accountant as of December 31, 2017 as follows:
The Systems and Procedures Manual on the Management of Barangay Funds and
Property, provides that a physical count of all Property, Plant and Equipment (PPE) shall
be conducted by an inventory committee headed by the Punong Barangay (PB) as
chairman or his authorized representative and Barangay Treasurer (BT) as member at
least once a year. Upon completion of the physical inventory, a Report on the Physical
Count of Property, Plant and Equipment (RPCPPE) shall be prepared by the inventory
team. The report shall be submitted to the Barangay Record Keeper and the City
Accountant for reconciliation with the recorded Property, Plant and Equipment.
37
The inventory-taking is an indispensable procedure for checking the integrity of
property custodianship. The non-conduct of an inventory on properties caused difficulty
in ascertaining the correctness and existence of the assets taken up in the Barangay books
kept by the City Accounting Office, as well as in determining their physical condition and
whereabouts. Any addition, which may be through donations, etc., or loss thereof could
not be detected; hence appropriate action thereon could not be acted upon immediately.
The barangay did not submit a report of physical count of PPE due to non-
conduct of physical inventory of PPE items owned by the barangay contrary to the
stipulations set forth in the barangay and NGAS manuals.
4. Properties of the barangay with insurable risk totaling P2,895,906.39 are not
insured with the Property Insurance Fund of the Government Service
Insurance System (GSIS) contrary to the provision of the Systems and
Procedures Manual on the Management of Barangay Funds and Property, thus
the barangay will not be indemnified of the value of the properties in case of
loss due to fire and other fortuitous events.
Item 6 of the Policies and Procedures on Supplies and Materials, Property, Plant
and Equipment, Public Infrastructures and Reforestation Projects of the Systems and
Procedures Manual on the Management of Barangay Funds and Property, Volume 1
provides the following:
“All PPE with insurable risk shall be insured with the Property Insurance
Fund of the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS).”
As of December 31, 2017 the barangay did not insure the buildings and other
physical assets of the totaling 2,895,906.39 with the Property Insurance Fund of the
Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) as enumerated below:
38
Account Title Amount
Office Equipment 87,770.00
Furniture and Fixtures 350,143.20
IT Equipment and Software 99,638.80
Library Books 41,900.00
Communication Equipment 67,394.00
Other Transportation Equipment 6,297.00
Other Property, Plant and Equipment 392,062.40
Totals 2,895,906.39
The non-compliance with the requirement denies the government adequate and
reliable protection against damage to or loss of its properties or assets and interests due to
fire, earthquake, storm, or other fortuitous events/casualty.
We recommend that the barangay allocate funds for the insurance of their
properties with insurable risks and insure these properties with the Property
Insurance Fund of the Government Service Insurance System (GSIS).
5. The barangay did not utilize the seventy percent (70%) component of the Local
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund (LDRRMF) amounting to
P127,907.33 for disaster preparedness defeating the purpose of establishing the
fund as set under Section 1 and 2 of Rule 18 of RA 10121 or the Philippine
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010, thereby depriving the
barangay of the strengthened capacity in addressing disaster risk to the
detriment of its constituents.
39
disasters, calamities, epidemics or complex emergencies, may be normalized
as quick as possible.
Verification of the Barangay Budget for the CY 2017 disclosed that the barangay
has appropriated P182,724.75 for LDRRMF. The requirement set forth under Section 1,
Rule 18 of Republic Act 10121 that “not less than five percent (5%) of the estimated
revenue from regular sources shall be set aside as the LDRRMF to support disaster risk
management activities” was found to have been complied with. Of this amount,
P54,817.42 or 30% is necessarily allocated as the Quick Response Fund (QRF) pursuant
to Section 2, Rule 18 of the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act 10121
while P127,907.33 or 70% is for the implementation of disaster preparedness programs.
(k) Recognize the local risk patterns across the country and strengthen the
capacity of LGUs for disaster risk reduction and management through
decentralized powers, responsibilities and resources at the regional and
local levels;
6. The Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund Investment Plan
(LDRRMFIP) and the Report on Sources and Utilization of Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Fund (DRRMF) for as of December 31, 2017 were
not prepared and submitted by the Barangay contrary to the provision of COA
40
Circular No. 2012-002 dated September 12, 2012, thus, projects/activities
funded by LDRRMF could not be evaluated and monitored.
Section 5.1.2 of COA Circular No. 2012-002 dated September 12, 2012 provides
that Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund Investment Plan
(LDRRMFIP) shall be prepared annually. It shall present the 30% allocation for QRF in
lump-sum and the allocation for disaster mitigation, prevention and preparedness with
details as to projects and activities to be funded. The LDRRMFIP shall also include under
a separate caption, the list of projects and activities charged to the unexpended LDRRMF
of previous years. A sample format of the LDRRMFIP as provided in the said COA
Circular is shown in Annex A.
Further, Section 5.1.5 of the same circular requires the Local Accountant to
prepare a Report on Sources and Utilization of DRRMF using the format in Annex B.
The Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Officer (LDRRMO) shall submit
the report on or before the 15th day after the end of each month through the LDRRMC
and Local Development Council to the COA auditor of the LGU.
The LDRRMFIP and the Report on Sources and Utilization of DRRMF shall also
be submitted to the Office of the Civil Defense (OCD) and the Department of Interior and
Local Government – Local Government Operations Office (DILG-LGOO) as per Section
5.1.6 of the above-cited circular.
Records showed that the Barangay did not prepare and submit the LDRRMFIP
and the Report on Sources and Utilization of DRRMF as of December 31, 2017 which
precluded us from determining whether or not the projects/activities funded by LDRRMF
were carried out as programmed.
We recommend that the management prepare and submit the Local Disaster
Risk Reduction and Management Fund Investment (LDRRMFP) as required under
COA Circular No. 2012-002 dated September 12, 2012 indicating the 30% allocation
of QRF and the allocation for disaster mitigation, prevention and preparedness with
details as projects and activities to be funded.
41
Section 287 of RA 7160 states that “Local Development Projects – Each local
government unit shall appropriate in its annual budget no less than twenty percent (20%)
of its annual internal revenue allotment for development projects”
a. Social Development
b. Economic Development
c. Environmental Management
42
Appropriat Commit Balanc
Program/Project/Activity
ed Fund ments e
,000.00 111.25 8.75
Extension Water System at Sitio 40 40,00
Sun-ok ,000.00 0.00
30,69
Landscaping at Awihao Brgy. Hall
30,699.00 9.00
660, 242,5 418,1
Total
699.00 37.25 61.75
COA Circular No. 94-013 dated December 13, 1994 was issued to ensure that:
Paragraph 6.7 of the above mentioned circular which prescribed the rules,
regulations in the grant, utilization and liquidation of funds transferred to Implementing
Agencies (IA) provides that the IA shall return to the Source Agency (SA) any unused
balance and refund of disallowance upon completion of the project.
Audit as of December 31, 2017 disclosed that the Barangay still has an
outstanding balance in the Due to LGUs account (Code 418) totaling P384,159.64 for
various projects as shown below.
Moreso, this practice also deprives the City and other source agency on the use of
the remaining balance of the financial assistance for other priority projects of the local
government. Furthermore, the Barangay will be deprived on the grant of additional
43
financial assistance by the City Government and other source agency for other projects
unless the previous cash advance granted are first settled.
9. Accounts Payable (401) totaling P47,571,12 were not supported with list of
valid claimants and remained outstanding for five years but were not reverted
to the Unappropriated Surplus, contrary to Section 98 of P.D. 1445 and
paragraphs 3.1 and 3.3 of DBM-COA Circular No. 99-6, thus the validity,
existence and correctness of the balance cannot be relied upon.
Moreover, paragraph 3.1 of DBM-COA Joint Circular No. 99-6 provides that all
documented Accounts Payable which remain outstanding for two (2) years shall be
reverted to the Cumulative Result of Operations – Unappropriated (CROU), except
ongoing capital outlays projects. Paragraph 3.3 thereof provides that all undocumented
Accounts Payable, regardless of the year they were incurred shall immediately be
reverted to CROU.
Further, paragraph 2, Section 111 of Presidential Decree No. 1445 provides that:
44
“The highest standards of honesty, objectivity and consistency shall be observed
in the keeping of accounts to safeguard inaccurate or misleading information.”
The Trial Balance for CY 2013 – 2017 showed that the Accounts Payable account
(Code 401) amounting to P47,571.12 remained unchanged for the period of five years
and were not supported with complete list of creditors for which the payables are due.
10. Due to BIR (Code 412) totaling P2,670,75 cannot be relied upon due to some
over/underremittance recorded during the year amounting P3,680.17, thus
affecting the fairness of the financial statements.
Review of the tax withheld and remitted for each month showed the following:
45
3,332. 1,290. 8,214.1 8,259.
June 3,591.64 55 00 9 19 -45.00
6,457. 1,605. 11,653. 11,653
July 3,591.64 05 00 69 .69 0.00
6,191. 1,200. 10,983. 10,983
August 3,591.64 97 00 61 .61 0.00
2,606. 1,275. 7,473.2 7,472.
September 3,591.64 63 00 7 47 0.80
2,944. 1,290. 7,826.4 7,826.
October 3,591.64 76 00 0 40 0.00
1,950. 1,215. 6,757.0 6,757.
November 3,591.64 41 00 5 05 0.00
1,799. 6,350.9 6,350.9
December 3,591.64 28 960.00 2 0.00 2
43,099.6 40,89 16,05 100,94 98,27 2,670.7
Totals 8 7.35 0.00 5.19 4.44 5
The above listed discrepancies are very substantial which need to be seriously
addressed to identify cause/s thereof as these may affect adversely the fairness of the
financial statements of the barangay.
11. The balance of Cash in Bank account (Code 111) per Financial Statement
differs by P10,000.00 from the Bank Statement thus casting doubt on the
accuracy, validity and existence of the said balance contrary to Section III of
Presidential Decree (P.D.) No. 1445.
46
Keeping of Accounts:
Further, it was also noted that balance per Bank Reconciliation Statement was
P3,614,609.72 which have added to its unreliability.
12. The concerned Barangay Officials did not observe strictly the conduct of
Inventory and Turn-over of all Barangay Properties, Financial Records,
Documents (BPFRDs) and Money Accountabilities within the timelines
contrary to DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2018-12 dated February 1, 2018
which could affect the realization of systematic transition from the outgoing
barangay officials to the incoming newly elected barangay officials.
DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2018-12 dated February 1, 2018 provides the
following:
47
3. It provides specific activities and timelines to be undertaken by concerned
local officials in the conduct of inventory and turnover of all BPFRDs and
money accountabilities.
Duties and Functions – The Punong Barangay / BIT shall undertake the following
activities within the prescribed period such as:
48
the public.
9. Plan and organize the PB Not later than 12
conduct of formal Turnover noon of June 30, 2018
Ceremony
10.Notify the City/Municipal
Mayor, local officials; local
COA; the DILG City Director
or C/MLGOO; and the newly
elected barangay officials for
the conduct of turnover
ceremony.
11.Conduct the Turnover
Ceremony
Per our monitoring, the timelines required in the above-mentioned activities from
Activity 1 to 7 were not strictly observed by the Punong Barangay and the BIT. Thus, the
required accomplished Inventory and Turnover Reports using the prescribed forms were
not provided / submitted to COA office. Further, the expected systematic transition from
the outgoing barangay officials to the incoming newly elected barangay officials could
not be attained.
We recommend that the concerned barangay officials should fast tract the
conduct of inventory and turnover of all barangay properties, financial records,
documents (BPRDs) and money accountabilities to avoid legal consequences thereof
pursuant to DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2018-12 dated February 1, 2018.
AUDITOR’S
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION TAKEN BY
REF. VALIDATION
RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT
RESULTS
Fully Implemented
1. Purchase Orders for supplies and BAAR
49
AUDITOR’S
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION TAKEN BY
REF. VALIDATION
RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT
RESULTS
materials lacked 2012
important/necessary information
such as date, number, and
term/conditions as prescribed
under the Systems and Procedures
Manual on the Management of
Barangay Funds and Property thus
delayed deliveries of items
purchased could not be
ascertained.
50
AUDITOR’S
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION TAKEN BY
REF. VALIDATION
RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT
RESULTS
3. The City Accountant did not BAAR
submit all the Financial 2012
Statements and schedules
required under Accounting
System Manual for Barangay,
Volume IV, thus all necessary
financial information were not
disseminated to the users of the
financial statements.
Land xxx
Income from Grants and
And Donations Or Prior
xxx
Year’s Adjustment (as the
case may be)
5. The City Accountant did not BAAR
transfer at the end of the year the 2012
Public Infrastructures account to
the respective Registry of Public
Infrastructure contrary to the
51
AUDITOR’S
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION TAKEN BY
REF. VALIDATION
RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT
RESULTS
provision of the Systems and
Procedures Manual on the
Management of Barangay Funds
and Property, Volume IV, thus
resulted to the overstatement of the
total asset and understatement of
Government Equity by
P125,470.00, adversely affecting
the fair presentation in the
Balance Sheet.
Not Implemented
1. The existence of the PPE accounts BAAR
amounting to P1,136,44.27 could 2012
not be ascertained due to the non- 2015
conduct of physical inventory,
non-preparation of Subsidiary
Ledgers by the Accounting
Section; and no turn-over of
property records from the
previous to the current officials.
52
AUDITOR’S
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION TAKEN BY
REF. VALIDATION
RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT
RESULTS
53
AUDITOR’S
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION TAKEN BY
REF. VALIDATION
RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT
RESULTS
4. Cash advances amounting to BAAR
P23,680.00 remained 2015
unliquidated as of December 31,
2015 due to the non-liquidation
of cash advances by the
accountable officer within the
prescribed period and the
absence of a proper turnover
from the former to the current
Barangay Treasurer (BT). Also,
the barangay did not institute
sanctions provided for under
COA Circular No. 97-002 or
implement other measures to
require settlement thereof.
54
AUDITOR’S
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION TAKEN BY
REF. VALIDATION
RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT
RESULTS
officials to submit the required
documents to establish the
validity and regularity of the
funds transferred and their
adherence to the provision of
COA circular 94-013.
55
AUDITOR’S
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION TAKEN BY
REF. VALIDATION
RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT
RESULTS
Barangay to the City Accounting
Office.
56
AUDITOR’S
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION TAKEN BY
REF. VALIDATION
RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT
RESULTS
9. The Monthly Report of BAAR
Accountability for Accountable 2015
Forms (RAAF) were not prepared
and submitted by the Barangay,
thus information as to inventory,
receipts and issuances of
accountable forms at any given
month could not be immediately
ascertained.
57
AUDITOR’S
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION TAKEN BY
REF. VALIDATION
RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT
RESULTS
Accomplishment Report (GAD
AR) following the prescribed
form and procedures pursuant
Joint Memorandum Circular No.
2013-01.
58
AUDITOR’S
AUDIT OBSERVATIONS AND ACTION TAKEN BY
REF. VALIDATION
RECOMMENDATIONS MANAGEMENT
RESULTS
reconciliation of balances
between the books and the bank
accounts monthly and submit the
monthly bank reconciliation
statements promptly together with
the pertinent documents relative
thereto. Further require the city
accountant to record in the books
all reconciling items so as to
present accurate Cash in Bank
account balance.
13. Delayed remittance of taxes BAAR
withheld to the Bureau of Internal 2012
Revenue amounting to P5,332.63
was contrary to Section 29 (1) of
P.D. 1445 and the rules and
regulations of the National
Internal Revenue Code, and
exposed the fund to possible
mismanagement.
59