Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 16

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMIT

Name of Employee:
Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division:
Rating Period: June 2017- March 2018

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING


Weight per PERFORMA
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA QUALITY
Basic 1. Teaching/ a. Prepared and submitted 140 year
Education Learning functional lesson plans with round 5 - Completed all the data in the DLL
Services Process complete parts and submitted it
on time. 10%
4 - Submitted DLL/Lesson Plans to the
SH/Chairman without the reflection part
3 - Prepared DLL/Lesson Plans with 2
missing parts
2 - Made DLL/Lesson Plans with 3 or more
missing parts

1 - Wrote notations only on the DLL/LP

b. Facilitated learning through 3 year 5 - Rated an average VS Rating in all


classroom observations and round classroom observations.
utilized effective strategies 4 - Rated an VS Rating in 2out of 3
which resulted to maximum classroom observartions.
students participation and high
test results for the whole year 3 - Utilized the
5% recommendations/suggestions given by the
observer in the next observation of classes

30% 2 - Postconed by the observer and accepted


all the recommendations and suggestions

1 - Facilitated learning through classroom


observations

c. Initiated discipline of the year


5 - Manifested discipline upon students as
students including school and round
shown in their actual behavior
classrrom rules and regulation
which resulted to no cases
reported to the guidance office 4 - Monitored students' discipline in and out
for the whole year (per subject of the classroom
teacher) 5%
which resulted to no cases
reported to the guidance office
for the whole year (per subject
teacher) 5%
3 - Made monitoring tools like attendance
checklist, cleanliness of the room, etc.

2 - Implemented /imposed discipline to


students in and out of the classroom

1 - Initiated classroom rules & regulations to


students in every classroom
2.Pupils/ a.Monitored and evaluated quarterly
Students’ students’ progress and 5 - Compiled, summarized and evaluated all
Outcomes submitted all the monitoring the monitoring tools (CR, GS)
tools quarterly
10%

4 - Made a quarterly monitoring tool to track


students' progress

3 - Prepared and submitted completely all


the grading sheets and class records
2 - Made complete records of students'
written work, performance task and quarterly
assessment
1 - Prepared and checked the attendance of
students
b.Conducted remediation/ year round
enrichment/enhancement for at 5 - Improved academic performance of
30% students at risk
least 30 days to students to
improve academic performance
10% 4 - Submitted progress report of students at
risk

3 - Conducted remediation activities

2 - Made action plan for the remediation


Activities.

1 - Identified the list of Students at risk


C. Increased the target MPS by year 5 - Showed an increased MPS as reflected
at least 5% in periodical test as round on the achievement rate compared to
compared to diagnostic test diagnostic test results
10%
4 - Maintained an increasing MPS as
reflected on the quarterly periodical tests
3 - Created a plan of activities on how to
attain the target MPS
2 - Made a target MPS for each quarter
1 - Recorded diagnostic test results
3. Community a. Visited /called up parents of year round 5 - Submitted the compiled narrative,
Involvement at least 20 students needing pictorial reports with agreement and
academic monitoring or follow- progress report of the students to the
up with submitted progress SH/Chairman
report ahead of time 4 - Made a written agreement between the
2% parents, students and teachers
3 - Visited the identified STAR to their
respective homes

2 - Called up parents of the identified STAR

1 - Prepared and submitted the List of STAR


to the SH/Chairman
b.Participated/Acted as year 5 - Participated in 3 school activities and
Committee/Chairman/member round played as a member of the committee
in at least 5 school/community
Activities and evaluated a VS 4 - Participated and palyed as member of
rating as reflected in the the committee in 2 school activities
monitoring tool 5% 3 - Participated as committee member in 1
10%
school activity
2 - Participated committee member in 5
school activities
1 - Served as participant in 10 school
activities
c.Conducted regular/periodic year round 5 - Involved parents in any culminating
PTA meetings or conferences activity of the school
with an average parents'
4 - Prepared and submitted a quarterly
attendance of at least 60%
narrative and pictorial reports about the
3%
conduct of PTA meetings
3 - Conducted/assisted quarterly PTA
meeting to parents with attendance sheets
signed by the attendees
2 - Send comunication letters to parents for
information dissemination
1 - Drafted an activity on how to conduct
PTA Meetings
4. Professional a.Participated/attended at least 5 - Participated/attended training in
Growth 72 hours of International/National Level/TM
year round
seminar/training/INSET
5% 4 - Participated/attended training in Regional
Level
3 - Participated/attended training in
District/Division Level
2 - Participated/attended 2 INSETs

1 - Participated/attended 1 INSET

b. Enrolled in a post graduate year round 5 - Earned at least 9 units of Masteral OR


OR Acted as acted as facilitator/speaker/trainer/ demo
trainer/facilitator/speaker/demo teacher
teacher/presenter in any
training/seminar /LAC session 5 - Earned at least 6 units of Masteral OR
5% acted as facilitator/speaker/trainer/ demo
teacher

3 - Earned at least 3 units of Masteral OR


acted as facilitator/speaker/trainer/demo
teacher

15% 2- Earned at least 3 units of Masteral OR


acted as facilitator/speaker/trainer/demo
teacher

1- Serves as facilitator/trainer/speaker or
demo teacher
c. Conducted Action Research year round 5 - Submitted full paper of the action
to at least one grade level to research to the division research
improve students' academic coordinator/Participate
performance and submitted it in
the division level 5% 4 - Conducted action research in the school
level

3 - Submitted proposal of the action


research/Participated in the implementation
of CI project

2 - Made a title proposal of an action


research

1 - Identified the problem for action


research/Served as a member of the CI
project

5. PLUS a. Acted as key teacher to year round


FACTOR monitor teachers' progress,
5 - Became a project coordinator of the
disseminate informations,
school program and conducted consultative
conduct consultative meetings
meetings to report teachers' progress and to
OR acted as Demonstration
disseminate informations or acted as
Teacher Trainer/Coach/YLC/
Demonstration Teacher/Trainer/Coach/YLC/
Club Adviser/Project
Club Adviser/Project Coordinator/SPA
Coordinator/SPA
Club Adviser/Project
Coordinator/SPA

4 - Became a member of a committee and


was part of consultative meetings to report
teachers' progress and to disseminate
informations and acted as Demonstration
Teacher/Trainer/Coach/YLC/ Club
Adviser/Project Coordinator/SPA

5%
3 -Acted as Demonstration
Teacher/Trainer/Coach/YLC/ Club
Adviser/Project Coordinator/SPA

2 - Prepared and participated in planning


school activities or programs

1 - Made monitoring tools to check teachers


work

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

___________________
Rater Teacher I
Department Chairman Ratee
COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review: NOVEMBER 2017

LANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION


PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timelines) ACTUAL RATING
Score
EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS RESULTS Q E T Ave

5 - Prepared and executed at least 140 5 -Submitted DLL/ lesson plan 1 day
functional lesson plans ahead of time

4 - Prepared and executed at least 120- 4 - Submitted DLL/ lesson plan few
139 functional lesson plans hours before the start of the class
3 - Prepared and executed at least 100-
3 - Submitted DLL/ lesson plan on time
138 functional lesson plans
2 - Prepared and executed at least 50- 2 - Submitted DLL/Lesson Plan 1 -2
99 functional lesson plans days after the due date
1 - Prepared and executed 49 and 1 - Submitted DLL/Lesson Plan 3 - 5
below functional lesson plans days after the due date 0 0.00
5 - Observed at least 3 times by the HT 5- Observed every 3 months by the
or Chairman HT/Chairman
4 - Observed 1 time by the HT or 4-Observed every 4 months by the HT/
Chairman Chairman

3 - Observed times by the SH or


3-Observed every 5 months
Chairman

2 - Observed 3 times by the SH or 2-Observed once a year by the HT/


Chairman Chairman

1 - Observed twice by the SH or


1-Never observe by the HT/ Chairman
Chairman 0 0.00

5 - No reported cases from the guidance 5-Resolved the cases of the students
office and prefect of discipline outright

4 - Only 1 case was reported to the 4-Resolved cases of students within a


guidance office and prefect of discipline day
3 - Only 2 cases were reported to the 3- Resolved cases of students within a
guidance office and prefect of discipline week

2 - Only 3 cases were reported to the 2-Resolved cases of students within 2-3
guidance office and prefect of discipline weeks

1 - At least 5 cases were reported to the 1-Resolved cases of the students within
guidance office and prefect of discipline a month 0 0.00

5 - 100% of the handled students were


5 - Submitted the reports on time
monitored

4 - 80% of the handled students were 4 - Submitted the reports 1 day after the
monitored deadline

3 - 60% of the handled students were 3 - Submitted the reports 2 days after
monitored the deadline

2 - 40% of the handled students were 2 - Submitted the reports 3 days after
monitored the deadline

1 - 20% of the handled students were 1 - Submitted the reports 4-5 days after
monitored the deadline 0 0.00
5 - At least 85% to 100% students were 5 - Conducted
given remediation/enhancement classes remediation/enhancement for 30 days

4 - 76% to 84% students were given 4 - Conducted


remediation/enhancement classes remediation/enhancement for 25 days
3 - 75% students were given 3 - Conducted
remediation/enhancement classes remediation/enhancement for 20 days
2 - 51% to 74% students were given 2 - Conducted
remediation/enhancement classes remediation/enhancement for 15 days
1 - 50% below students were given 1 - Conducted
remediation/enhancement classes remediation/enhancement for 10 days 0 0.00
5-Increased the MPS in Pre-test,Post-
5 - Increased the target MPS by 5% test to atleast 5 % from the baseline
within the rating period

4 - Increased the target MPS by 3%


4-Increased the MPS in Pre-test

0 0.00
3 - Attained the target increased in the
MPS
2 - Decreased the MPS by 3%
1 - Decreased the MPS by 5% 0 0.00
5 - Submitted the reports 2-3 days
5 - Improved the academic performance ahead of time
of 20 identified STAR

4 - Improved the academic performance 4 - Submitted the reports 1 day ahead of


of 15 identified STAR time
3 - Improved the academic performance
of 10 identified STAR 3 - Submitted the reports on time
2 - Improved the academic performance 2 - Submitted the reports 2 days after
of 5 identified STAR the due date
1 - Improved the academic performance 1 - Submitted the reports 3-5 days after
of 3 identified STAR the due date 0 0.00

5 - Attended 4 school activities


5-Observed punctuality at all times

4 - Attended 3 school activities


4-Observed punctuality half of the time

3 - Attended 2 school activities 3-Observed punctuality in at least 3


school activities
2-Observed punctuality in at least 2
2 - Attended 1 school activities
activities
1 - No Attendance in any school 1-Observed punctuality in at least 1
activities activity 0 0.00
5 - An average of at least 60% of the 5-Conducted quarterly PTA meetings or
parents attended the PTA meetings conferences

4 - An average of 50% of the parents 4-Conducted at least 3 PTA meetings or


attended the PTA meetings conferences

3 - An average of 40 % of the parents 3-Conducted at least 2 PTA meetings or


attended the PTA meetings conferences

2 - An average of 30 % of the parents 2-Conducted at least 1 PTA meeting or


attended the PTA meetings conference
1 - An average of 20 % of the parents 1-Have not conducted any meeting or
attended the PTA meetings conference 0 0.00
5 - Attended at least 64 hours (8 days) 5-Observed Punctuality at all times
of training/seminar
4 - Attended 56 hours (7 days)of
training/seminar 4-Observed punctuality 90% of the time
3 - Attended 40 hours (5 days) of 3-Observed punctuality in at least 80%
training/seminar of the time
2 - Attended 24 hours (3 days) of 2-Observed punctuality in at least 70%
training/seminar of the time
1 - Attended 8 hours (1 days) of 1-Observed punctuality in at least 50%
training/seminar of the time 0 0.00
5 - Attained an average grade of 1.5 or 5- Enrolled in a year or facilitated/served
certification of speakership/ as demo teacher/served as speaker
trainer/facilitator twice

4 - Attained an average grade of 1.75 or 4-Enrolled in a semester or facilitated/


certification as facilitator served as a demo teacher/served as
speaker once
3 - Attained an average grade of 2.0 or
certification as demo 3-Served as Facilitator, Demo teacher,
teacher/facilitator/trainer/ speaker trainer

2 - Attained an average grade of 2.25 or


certification as committee member
2-Served as Facilitator and Trainer
1 - Attained an average grade of 2.5 or
1- Served as either Trainer/Facilitator/
certification as participant
Demo Teacher 0 0.00
5 - Implemented the action research to
one class OR Documented the progress 5-Continued the implementation of the
of the CI Project CIP project within rating period
4 - Implemented the action research to 4- Sustained intervetion program like
75% of the class OR executed/piloted remedial, tutorial, summer camp and
the solution reading corner within half a semester

3 - Implemented the action research to


50% of the class OR created action plan 3-Conducted Remedial Classes or
Tutorial classes within a quarter
2 - Implemented the action research to
24% of the class OR identified priority 2- Conducted classroon interventions or
improvement area reading sessions

1 - Implemented the action research to


10% of the class OR talked with the
customers
1-No intervetions made 0 0.00
5- Served as project coordinator,
5 - As project coordinator, programs has Demonstration
been Implemented and sustained by Teacher,Trainer/Coach /YLC/ Club
the school OR as Demonstration Adviser/Project Coordinator/SPA at least
Teacher strategies was adapted by the twice a year
Department OR as Trainer/Coach /YLC/
Club Adviser/Project Coordinator/SPA
reached National/Regional Level
4-Served as Project Coordinator,
4 - As project coordinator, programs has Demonstration
been Implemented and sustained by Teacher,Trainer/Coach /YLC/ Club
the school OR as Demonstration Adviser/Project Coordinator/SPA at least
Teacher strategies was adapted by the once a year
Department OR as Trainer/Coach /YLC/
Club Adviser/Project Coordinator/SPA
reached Division/District Level

3-Served as Project Coordinator,


3 - Served as Demonstration
Demonstration
Teacher/Trainer/Coach /YLC/ Club
Teacher,Trainer/Coach /YLC/ Club
Adviser/Project Coordinator/SPA
Adviser/Project Coordinator/SPA and
reached Division/District Level and
participated in the District Level
participated in District/Division Level
2-Served as Project Coordinator,
2 - Served as Demonstration Demonstration
Teacher/Trainer/Coach /YLC/ Club Teacher,Trainer/Coach /YLC/ Club
Adviser/Project Coordinator/SPA Adviser/Project Coordinator/SPA and
reached Division/District Level and participated in the School level
participated in School Level

1-No participation

1 -No participation

0 0.00
OVERALL

_______________________
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS
P 0.00
I Principal
Approving Authority
4-
Conducted
remediatio
n/enhance
ment for
25 days
#NAME?
PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION
Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating
Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

Rater - Ratee Agreement

The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior agreed on content of this appraisal form and the performance rating.

Name of Employee: Name of Superior:


Signature: Signature:
Date: Date:

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS


Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental
Intervention)
_______________________
Principal III
Rater Teacher
Ratee
SION

the performance rating.

Timeline Resources Needed


___________________________
OIC - Schools Division Superintendent
Approving Authority

DEPED RPMS Form for Staf

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi