Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

By continuing to browse this site you permit us and our partners to place identification cookies on your browser and

agree to our use of cookies to identify


you for marketing. Review our cookies policy for details or change your cookies preferences.

Subscribe

Prospero

21st Century Schizoid Bands

Why prog rock still deserves your time


It demonstrates ambition of a kind that popular music has rarely seen since

Prospero
Jul 3rd 2017 | by D.H.

DAVID WEIGEL’S “The Show That Never Ends: The Rise and Fall of Prog Rock”
has an impossible job: to elucidate 20 years of musical history in 350-odd pages.
To make matters worse, Mr Weigel must do this with a genre of music
unfamiliar to the average reader thanks to a dearth of hit singles, radio play or
cultural touchstones. Prog (progressive) rock is ambitious, difficult, long-form,
often instrumental music that freely mixes high and lowbrow elements and is
frequently created by musicians with long hair, tall boots and monster chops.
Despite its success in the 1970s, prog rock remains trapped in amber: listening
to a 20-minute song with subtitled movements is no longer the norm.

If the fall of prog at the brass-knuckled hand of punk is well known, its
beginnings are less so. Mr Weigel finds the genre’s birth in the heart of the 1960s
psychedelic era: the progenitors of prog were young, talented and unsatisfied
with the typical three-minute song structure. In their desire to chart new
territory, they threw away the map. Labels allowed bands to experiment, and
prog was lauded by critics who recognised the ambition.

Get our daily newsletter

Upgrade your inbox and get our Daily Dispatch and Editor's Picks.

Email address Sign up now

Latest stories
Winter races are less popular than summer
ones, but more exciting
GRAPHIC DETAIL
GRAPHIC DETAIL

Germany remains reluctant to pull its weight in


the world
KAFFEEKLATSCH

The Prada Foundation will transform Milan’s


contemporary art offering
PROSPERO

See more

Advertisement

It is a shame that Mr Weigel devotes so little time to his descriptions of the


scenes at the Marquee, UFO and Middle Earth clubs in London, and his sketches
of the watershed proto-prog albums by The Beatles, The Moody Blues, Procol
Harum and Pink Floyd feel cursory. He is anxious to move on to the main
players in the Canterbury scene that blossomed when Kevin Ayers, Daevid Allen,
Richard Sinclair and Robert Wyatt, a close-knit band of hippies, collectively
founded The Soft Machine, Caravan and Gong, among other outfits legendary
among the prog cognoscenti.

From this communal house, Mr Weigel pivots to his exemplar, King Crimson (in
prog circles, there is King Crimson and then there is everybody else). Mr Weigel
uses Robert Fripp, the band’s leader and experimental guitarist, as his Great Man
of Prog—much like Ken Burns deployed Louis Armstrong to try and explain all of
jazz. Mr Weigel traces Mr Fripp’s every movement and collaboration, depicting
him as prog’s invisible hand, motivated by infallible intuition. It is a convenient
trope, but eventually it gets tiresome.

To round out the book, Mr Weigel outlines the careers of his other first-tier prog
bands: Yes, Genesis and Emerson, Lake, & Palmer (his prog is largely an English
phenomenon: no Captain Beefheart or Frank Zappa here). Along the way, the
author throws in passing nods to Rush, Jethro Tull, Mike Oldfield and Van der
Graaf Generator, with just the barest mentions of Magma, Gentle Giant,
Hawkwind and Tangerine Dream (the pace of the material leaves the reader
feeling not so much sitting in the studio as viewing it from a high-speed train).
Even still, the overlooking of titles such as “Tommy” by The Who, Pink Floyd’s
“Dark Side of the Moon” and Queen’s “Bohemian Rhapsody” is glaring. These are
works that should be considered at the heart of prog by any criterion—unless
the genre’s definition is marked by the obscure and unknown.

But Mr Weigel’s book still succeeds as a defence of a much-maligned genre. It


asks: what’s wrong with long instrumental or symphonic sections? What’s
wrong with concept albums? What’s wrong with being a virtuoso? What’s wrong
with making use of found sounds? Prog bands, despite any sins—real or
imagined—did some brave and musically adventurous deeds. They illuminated
the future by shining a light backwards onto classical, folk and jazz elements.
They wrote songs that weren’t about love, but about self-discovery or
communion with the divine, and couched these ideas in bizarre, dystopian
Tolkien-meets-Heinlein dreamscapes. The results were something totally new.

The hope of a book like “The Show That Never Ends” is not only to extol Keith
Emerson’s hands, Peter Gabriel’s wardrobe or Jon Anderson’s elfin tenor. It
works as an invitation to explore the dark corners of prog: its international
reach, its cultish esotericism and its fondness for ostentatious album covers
adorned with flying teapots, armadillo tanks and fantasy landscapes as detailed
as the music.

Will this book inspire a comprehensive re-evaluation of prog by critics, or win


the genre legions of new fans? Will it turn readers towards the contemporary
post- and neo-Prog scenes? Probably not. What is hoped for is that music fans
fatigued by cut-and-paste Pro Tools songs might prick up their ears when they
catch King Crimson’s “21st Century Schizoid Man” sampled by Kanye West
(“POWER”), or hear Rush at a baseball game. They may even find themselves
downloading an album out of curiosity. Books like these are a testament to a
period of music-making that struck a chord, and serve as proof that prog didn’t
die out with Moogs, mellotrons and double-necked guitars. As Mr Weigel
succinctly states, this was “music that copied nothing, and could be replicated
by nobody”.

Prospero
Jul 3rd 2017 | by D.H.

Reuse this content

About The Economist

Advertisement
Stop speculating, start living
China is trying new ways of skimming housing-market froth
The party wants people to rent

CHINA

KAFFEEKLATSCH

EUROPE

GRAPHIC DETAIL

Tell us what you think of Economist.com

Leave feedback

Need assistance with your subscription?

Contact us

Subscribe Contact us Help

Keep updated

Sign up to get more from The Economist

Get 3 free articles per week, daily newsletters and more.

Email address
Sign up

About The Economist

Advertise Reprints
Careers Media Centre

Terms of Use Privacy

Cookies Accessibility

Modern Slavery Statement

Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2018. All rights reserved.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi