Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Lancashire + South Cumbria Some anticipated clinical outcomes Low percentages as supporting
Cardiac Network, 2007 changed on basis of ECG evidence
interpretation.
BMJ, Jonathan Mant, 2007 GPs detected 79/99 cases Misinterpreted 114/1355 cases of
(Birmingham?), (mainly atrial sinus rhythm as atrial fibrillation.
fibrillation), trial on elderly Practitioners had no other
patients information about patients, pure Many primary care professionals
yes/no answer based on ECG can’t accurately detect atrial
fibrillation from an ECG.
JAMA (the Journal of American Follow up of 8 years (more than Conclusion of study was arguments
Medical Association), 2012 Philip 20% had major/minor ECG for ECG screening were not
Greenland abnormalities) found slight link compelling.
between abnormalities and
increased risk of CHD.
US Preventive Services Task Force Reclassification into a higher risk Potential harms equal/exceed
2004/revised 2012 (mainly CHD) category might lead to more benefits.
intensive medical management
that could lower the risk for CHD Might result in harms including
events. medication adverse effects such as
gastrointestinal bleeding + hepatic
Risk-benefit trade off would be injury.
most favourable if persons can be
accurately reclassified from Too many risk factors for CHD so
intermediate to high risk. ECG not extensive anyway.
Conclusion: No real value in annual scans for the elderly. Only useful if already risk factors e.g.
diabetes, hypertension etc. More likely to increase paranoia/worry patients.