INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

(Elementary/Secondary Teachers I, II, III )

SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF OLONGAPO CITY

Gordon Ave., Barangay New Asinan, Asinan Elementary School Compound, Olongapo City

Name of Employee: MARVIN JAY ROSAPAPAN

Name of Rater: ZOSIMO A. MENDOZA
Position: Teacher I
Position: Head Teacher III
School/District:
Date of Review:
Rating Period: June 2017 to March 2018
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS Q E T Ave. Score
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
KRA
Basic Teaching-
Education Learning 35 %
Service Process

1. Prepared lesson log, 15% 5-prepared lesson log 9-10 times every quarter,
and school forms/records June 2017
class records quarterly and school forms regularly
to
( f-2, f-5, item analysis, and submitted them on scheduled time with
March
class records) regularly complete and correct entries.
2018 4 4
and submit them on the 4- prepared lesson log 7-8 times every quarter, 4 4 0.6
given schedule with class records quarterly and school forms regularly Submitted on time the ff:
complete and correct and submitted them on scheduled time with Q1: 10 lesson logs, class
entries. (15%) complete and correct entries. record and Form 138
3- prepared lesson log 5-6 times every quarter, Q2: 9 lesson logs, class record
class record quarterly and school forms regularly and Form 138
with 1day late submission, but with complete and Q3: 8 lesson logs, class record
correct entries. and Form 48
2- prepared lesson log 3-4 times every quarter, Q4: 8 lesson logs, class record,
class record quarterly and school forms regularly Form 137, Form 138 and Form
with 2-3 days late submission, but with complete 18
and correct entries.
1- prepared lesson log 1-2 times every quarter,
class record quarterly and school forms regularly
with 4-5 days late submission, but with complete
and correct entries.

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /1

Basic Teaching- Weight
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS T Ave. Score
Education Learning OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS Q E
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
Service Process KRA
June 2017
2. Employed/Utilized
to 15 %
effective teaching
March 5-employed 9-10 different effective teaching Use of:
strategies and utilized
2018 strategies and utilized instructional materials 1. video lessons
instructional materials
which are significant to learning and suited to the 2. power point
which are significant to
needs. presentations, 5 5 5 5
learning and suited to the
4- employed 7-8 different effective teaching 3. educational games, 0.75
needs of the learners.
strategies and utilized instructional materials 4. cooperative learning
which are significant to learning and suited to the strategies,
MOV: video lessons and
needs of the learners. 5. group dynamics,
power point presentations,
3- employed 5-6 effective teaching strategies 6. ICT integration,
educational games,
and utilized instructional materials which are 7. Localization
cooperative learning
significant to learning and suited to the needs of /indigenization
strategies, group
the learners .
dynamics, ICT integration
2- employed 3-4 effective teaching strategies and Documentation, DLL/DLP
localization, indigenization
utilized instructional materials which are significant showing the use of the
etc.
to learning and suited to the needs of the learners. teaching strategy & instructional
1- employed 1-2 effective teaching strategies and materials.
Documentation, DLL/DLP
utilized instructional materials which are significant
showing the use of the
to learning and suited to the needs of the learners.
teaching strategy &
instructional materials

3. Provided June 2017 5% 5-provided intervention/remediation activities to all Conducted remediation on

intervention/remediation to
all the failing/low
performing students
having positive results with
complete documentations.
to the failing/low performing students resulting to 5% (January 19,26 & February 2,9,
March increase in their fourth quarter grade. & 16, 2018) to (number of
2018 4-provided intervention/remediation activities to all failing students) with the
the failing/low performing students resulting to 4% following increase in grades:
increase in their fourth quarter grade
3-provided intervention/remediation activities to all 8 students from grades of 71 to 5 5 5 5
the failing/low performing students resulting to 3% 80. (9%)
increase in their fourth quarter grade.
2-provided intervention/remediation activities to all
the failing/low performing students resulting to 2%
increase in their fourth quarter grade.
1-provided intervention/remediation activities to all
the failing/low performing students resulting to 1%
increase in their fourth quarter grade.

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /2

 Weight T Ave.
OBJECTIVES PERFORMANCE INDICATORS E
MFOs KRAs TIMELINE per Q
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS
KRA
Basic Student
Education Outcomes 35 %
Service
Participated in:
5-participated in 5 TLE/ALS Club activities with 1. School Festival of Talents on
15% complete documentations.
1. Participated in School June 2017
4- participated in 4 TLE/ALS Club activities with 2. Division Festival of Talents
activities that could to
March complete documentation.
enhance students’ skills, 3- participated in 3 TLE/ALS Club activities with 3. ALS Drug Awareness
2018
talents, competence and complete documentation. 0.75
knowledge. 4. ALS Technical Skills Training 5 5
2- participated in 2 TLE/ALS Club activities with 5 5
complete documentation. 5. KNHS Sports Fest 2017
1- participated in 1 TLE/ALS Club activity with
complete documentations. 6. Nutrition Month Culminating
Activity

5- Attained extraordinary level of achievement The Comparative Analysis for the

10% First and Last Quarter MPS of
and commitment over the established standard.
Grades 7 and 10 results the
4- Attained exceeded expectations over the following:
established standard.
Grade 7 5 5 5 5 0.5
3- Performance and expectations are met.
- An increase of 12.66%
2- Performance failed to meet expectations from 1st to 2nd grading and
1- Performance was consistently below a decrease of 7.36% in
2. Increase in student’s
expectations the 3rd quarter. In
progress as evident by the comparison of the 3rd and
increase in MPS of TLE 10 Last quarter MPS resulted
students. an increase of 8.78%
Grade 10
- There is an exponential
incrase of 17.22%from for
the 2nd quarter but
declined with 2.86% on
the 3rd quarter. On the last
quarter it had a radical
incrase of 17.93%. (see
attached MPS
comparative result table)

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /3

 Weight
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS T Ave. Score
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS Q E
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
KRA

Basic Student
Education Outcomes
Service
5-Conducted 5 home visitations to learners-at-risk
3. Conducted home within a year which resulted to zero drop-out rate
visitations to all ALS 5% and 95-100% promotion rate. No. of Home Visits- 8
Learners-at-risk of 4- Conducted 5 home visitations to learners-at- Promotion Rate:
dropping-out or failing 79 learners out of 81 or (49÷50
risk within a year which resulted to 1 drop-out and
having positive results with x 100 )=98%
94% promotion rate.
complete documentations. 3- Conducted 5 home visitations to learners-at-
risk within a year which resulted to 2 drop-outs
and 93% promotion rate.
2- Conducted 5 home visitations to learners-at-
risk within a year which resulted to 3 drop-outs
and 92% promotion rate.
1- Conducted 5 home visitations to learners-at-
risk within a year which resulted to 4 drop-outs
and 91% promotion rate

5%
4. Increased the General No. of students/pupils: 191
Students’ Average (GSA)
of students in their final 5-increased 5% students’ General Students’ GSA in Q1: 79 4 4 0.2
Average (GSA) in their final grades. GSA in Q4: 83 4 4
grades.
4-increased 4% students’ GSA in their final
grades. 83-79= 4%
(baseline- 1st Quarter 3-increased 3% students’ GSA in their final grades
Grades) 2-increased 2% students’ GSA in their final grades
(See attached
1-increased 1% students’ GSA in their final grades
Summary of Grades)

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /4

 Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS Q E T Ave. Score
KRA
Basic Community
Education Involvement 15 %
Service

1. Participated in the
different community
activities or June 2017
outreach programs with
complete documentations.
-Government or non-
government.
Required Evidences:
a. Memorandum
b. Certificates if
available
c. Documentation (pic)
Participated in:
1, ALS Tree Planting on August
5-participated in 5 different community activities or 11, 2017.
15% outreach programs in a year (Coastal clean-up, 2. Coastal Clean-up on
to
Riverth, Tree Planting, Feeding, Clean-up, etc.). ___________________.
March
2018 4-participated in 4 different community activities or
outreach programs in a year. 3. Fun Run
5 5 5 .75
on ___________________. 5
3-participated in 3 different community activities or
outreach programs in a year. 4. Symposium on Drug
2- participated in 2 community activity or outreach Awareness on.
program in a year.
1- participated in 1 community activity or outreach 5. Orientation in Reproductive
program in a year. Health and Responsible
Parenthood on March 13, 2018.

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /5

 Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RESULTS Q E T Ave. Score
KRA
Professional
Basic
Growth & 15%
Education
Development
Service

1. Completed an
June 2017 2% 5- completed an action research relevant in TLE, 2 2 2 2 .04
action research that will
to submitted and approved by the SDO..
help in strengthening
March 4- completed an action research relevant in TLE Completed the action
skills in the subject
2018 research/research proposal
taught. (5%) can be for approval in the Division Office. entitled “TARDINESS AT
CBAR, BERF or Non- 3- completed an action research proposal SCHOOL OF GRADE 10
BERF. relevant in TLE approved by the SDO. STUDENTS”
2- completed an action research proposal
relevant in TLE for approval in the school level.
1- completed an action research proposal
relevant in TLE for checking in the school
level.

Prepared/ Conceptualized SIM

3% 5-prepared a SIM in TLE with proposal entitled:
2. Prepared a strategic approved by the SDO with evidence of “PC HARDWARE
intervention material in COMPONENTS”
utilization.
TLE with evidence of
June 2017 4- prepared a SIM in TLE with proposal which
utilization. Checked and approved at the
to was approved by the Division Office.
SIM maybe replaced by Schools Division Office on 3 3 3 3 .09
March 3- prepared a SIM in TLE with proposal which
other innovative outputs- February 8, 2017.
2018
video lessons, worksheets was submitted for approval in the SDO.
etc. 2- conceptualized a SIM in TLE for checking in
the school level.
1- started conceptualizing a SIM in TLE.

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

OBJECTIVES (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) T Ave. Score
MFOs KRAs TIMELINE per ACTUAL RESULTS Q E
KRA
3. Attended relevant 10% 5-attended one international level training or 64
trainings to enhance one’s hours of combined school/district/division level Attended the following trainings:
skill and knowledge about trainings or seminars. 1. Contextualization in

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /6

 the newest trends in 4- attended one national level training or 56 Basic Education 5 5 5 5 .5
education with proper hours of combined school/district/division level Conferene, (March 10,
documentations. trainings or seminars 2018-UP Diliman,
Quezon City)
3- attended one regional level training or 48
2. Division Capacity
hours of combined school/district/division level Building Activity of ALS
trainings or seminars Field, (December 7-9,
2- attended 40 hours of combined 2017-SDO Olongapo
school/district/division level trainings or City)
seminars 3. Developmet of ALS
1- attended 32 hours of combined Indigenous Peoples
(IP) Learning Materials,
school/district/division level trainings or
(November 13-22,
seminars 2017)
4. Basic Training Course
on ALS for Mobile
Teachers and DALSC,
(October 15-21, 2017-
La Fortuna Hotel, Cebu
City)

Total: 168 hours

Plus Factor This is another KRA
which is not part of the
regular KRA of Teachers
i-III. This is applicable
only if 95% is the sum of
all KRAs.
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned
5% Possible Plus factors 1. 3rd Place in OCPSTEA 5 5 5 5 .25
Coordinator/Adviser of Class/ Club (overload) Logo Making Contest
Special assignment, Speakership/Trainer 2. District ALS
Coordinator
Demonstration Teacher
3. Project Proposal
Winnings (Coach)
Other acceptable evidences
OVERALL RATING FOR 4.68
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority

ZOSIMO A. MENDOZA MARVIN JAY ROSAPAPAN RICARDO M. AGGABAO

Head Teacher III Teacher I-III Principal IV

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /7

Note: 1. Percentage per KRA may vary depending on the situation. Teachers handling first sections may not conduct remediation and instead will have 5% plus
factor for the accomplishments within the School Year.
2. Non-Advisers may not have conducted PTA meeting but can be replaced by constant communication /dialogue with parents.
3. If the Non-Advisers have no Home Visitation, the percentage intended for this KRA can be replaced by the Plus factors and an additional percentage to the Increase of the pupil/student’s GSA.
4. With the sample Actual Results and Computation (Write opposite points and score).
5. Notes shall be deleted and the Actual results of the teachers shall replace the given sample.

DEPED RPMS Form for Staff /8