Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

COMNIIl'11E OFCALFORNIA

TECHNICAL INFORMATION & PRODUCTSERVICE

SEPTEMBER 1985

FIREPROOFING
OPEN-WEB JOISTS & GIRDERS

Due to the increased usage of open-web joists and For the minimum insulating material thickness re-
truss girders in the design of larger, taller buildings, quirement for a particular fire-resistive period (hour-
their fireproofing requirement data is increasingly rating) contact the fireproofing manufacturer2 or con-
sought by the architect and engineer. This paper sult the latest issue of the U.L. Fire Resistance
outlines a few of the major points the designer should Directory.3 The thickness required for wide flange
consider when fireproofing of these members is structural shapes cannot be used in every case as
required. a direct comparison to joists and truss girder con-
struction. Consideration must be given as to whether
Use of a fire-rated ceiling will generally give an the member is a primary or secondary structural
economical solution if the requirement is just for a member. Requirements for roofs are different than
protective envelope.1 But since each penetration of for floors. 1,4
the ceiling must take extra protection, such as fire
dampers, this Iow first-cost is often offset by the For members of equal vertical load carrying capac-
added cost of the dampers. ity, an open-web joist or truss girder will generally
be deeper than a wide flange structural shape.
Occupancy will influence the decision on whether However, since the joist or truss girder has very
to use a fire-rated ceiling. For example, offices have little web surface there is a tendency to over-spray.
many penetrations for H.V.A.C., whereas residen- The total effect is that the cost per square foot of
tial has relatively few requirements for ceiling floor area for spray-on fireproofing of joists and
penetrations. truss girders will be approximately the same as with
Spray-on fireproofing of open-web joists and truss wide flange structural shapes.
girders is done with the same crews and equipment Due to the thickness of the fireproofing there is
employed in fireproofing wide flange structural some reduction in the available open space within
shapes. However, some variations in methods and the webs for utility ducts and pipes, and should be
techniques must be used. taken into consideration by the design engineer.
"LH" Series joists and "G" Series girders are Another fireproofing option is intumescent mastic
generally made of angles with flat surfaces. The (swells or expands with heat). Required thick-
fireproofing is sprayed on directly in the same man- nesses range up to 1/2". Generally, the greater cost
ner as with structural steel beams. While it is gener- of this type fireproofing tends to limit its use.
ally preferred that the joists or truss girders not be
painted when they are to be fireproofed, this is not References:
as critical as for wide flange shapes since there are Uniform Building Code (1982 Edition), Chapter 43, Fire-Resistant
no large flat areas to create adhesion problems. The Standards, Table No. 43-C.
individual members are small, and as applied the 2 Most manufacturers have a research report or product evalua-
fireproofing actually wraps the member and creates tion for their fireproofing material on file with a City or the Interna-
tional Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, California.
its own adherence. Generally it is the adherence of
3 Underwriters Laboratories, Inc., 333 Pfingsten Rd., Northbrook,
the paint to the steel that governs not the adherence IL 60062
of the fireproofing to the paint, therefore, do not 4 Designing Fire Protection for Steel Trusses, Second Edition, 1981,
specify paint where fireproofing is required. American Iron & Steel Institute, Washington, D.C.
THE STEEL COMMITTEE OF CALIFORNIA

Ace & Stewart Detailing, Inc. Kaiser Steel Corporation


Allied Steel Co., Inc. Lee & Daniel
Artimex Iron Co., Inc. McLean Steel, Inc.
Bannister Steel, Inc. Martin Iron Works, Inc.
Baresel Corporation Nelson Stud Welding Co.
Bethlehem Steel Corporation Palm Iron & Bridge Works
C. A. Buchen Corporation Pascoe Steel Corporation
Butler Manufacturing Co. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Corporation
Central Industrial Engineering Co., Inc. Riverside Steel Construction
Cochran-lzant & Co., Inc. H.H. Robertson Co.
Dovell Engineering, Inc. Ross-Carter Corporation
The Herrick Corporation Schrader Iron Works, Inc.
Hoertig Iron Works Stockton Steel
Hogan Mfg., Inc. Stott Erection, Inc.
Industrial Steel Corp. USS Fabrications
Inland Steel Company United States Steel Corporation
Inryco, Inc. Verco Manufacturing, Inc.
Junior Steel Co. Western States Steel, Inc.

Northern California Southern California


1250 Pine St. No. 301 9440 Telstar Ave. No. 103
Walnut Creek, CA 94596 El Monte, CA 91731
(415) 932-0909 (818) 444-4519

Funding for this publication provided by the California Field Iron Workers Administrative Trust.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi