Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
223
Review
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension
Evangelia Kintraki,1 Sophia Papakatsika,2 George Kotronis,2
Dimitrios G. Goulis,1 Vasilios Kotsis2
1
Unit of Reproductve Endocrinology and Unit of Human Reproducton, First Department of Obstetrics and
Gynecology,
2
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
AbstrAct
pregnancy-induced hypertension (pIh) complicates 6-10% of pregnancies. It is defined as
systolic blood pressure (sbp) >140 mmhg and diastolic blood pressure (dbp) >90 mmhg. It
is classified as mild (sbp 140-149 and dbp 90-99 mmhg), moderate (sbp 150-159 and dbp
100-
109 mmHg) and severe (SBP ≥160 and DBP ≥110 mmHg). PIH refers to one of four
conditions: a) pre-existing hypertension, b) gestational hypertension and preeclampsia (pe), c)
pre-existing hypertension plus superimposed gestational hypertension with proteinuria and d)
unclassifiable hypertension. pIh is a major cause of maternal, fetal and newborn morbidity
and mortality. women with pIh are at a greater risk of abruptio placentae,
cerebrovascular events, organ failure and disseminated intravascular coagulation. fetuses of
these mothers are at greater risk of intrauterine growth retardation, prematurity and
intrauterine death. ambulatory blood pressure monitoring over a period of 24 h seems to
have a role in predicting deterioration from gestational hypertension to pe. antiplatelet
drugs have moderate benefits when used for prevention of pe. treatment of pIh depends
on blood pressure levels, gestational age, pres- ence of symptoms and associated risk
factors. non-drug management is recommended when sbp ranges between 140-149 mmhg
or dbp between 90-99 mmhg. blood pressure thresholds for drug management in
pregnancy vary between different health organizations. according to 2013 esh/esc
guidelines, antihypertensive treatment is recommended in pregnancy when blood pressure
levels are ≥150/95 mmHg. Initiation of antihypertensive treatment at values
≥140/90 mmHg is recommended in women with a) gestational hypertension, with or without
proteinuria, b) pre-existing hypertension with the superimposition of gestational
hypertension or c) hypertension with asymptomatic organ damage or symptoms at any time
during preg- nancy. methyldopa is the drug of choice in pregnancy. atenolol and
metoprolol appear to be safe and effective in late pregnancy, while labetalol has an efficacy
comparable to methyldopa. angiotensin-converting enzyme (ace) inhibitors and
angiotensin II antagonists are contrain- dicated in pregnancy due to their association with
increased risk of fetopathy.
key words: Antihypertensive treatment, Gestational hypertension, Methyldopa, Pre-eclampsia,
Pregnancy-induced hypertension
pathophysIoLoGy
PIH and especially
PE is considered to be
216 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension 217
placental implantation, misbal- ance between angiogenesis and in PE and the sFlt-
vascularization or antioxidant and pre- promote vascular 1/PlGF ratio has been
function together with oxidant factors and dysfunction. sFlt-1 proposed as an
the contribution of increased production binds to VEGF and additional diagnostic
maternal factors can of ROS results in PlGF, and sEng or predictive tool for
lead to PE.53 Factors vascular endothelium impairs binding of PE.72-74
that have been dysfunction in women TGF-β1 to its A meta-analysis
implicated in PE with PE.60 One study receptor, blocking showed increased
pathophysiology are showed that women their actions.68,69 Both concentrations of
cardiovascular with early-onset of them are expressed placental and maternal
maladap- tation and severe preeclampsia by normal placenta.70,71 sFlt1 and sEng and
vasoconstriction, have increased NK cell Many studies have decreased
genetic predisposition, function related to amplified the theory of concentrations of
immunologic cytokine production.61 the misbalance of PIGF in pregnancies
intolerance between circulating angiogenic which devel- oped PE.
Angiogenic factors, VEGF was lower,
feto-placental and factors
such as VEGF family though not
maternal tissue,
members (VEGF, significantly different,
platelet activation and
PIGF), angiopoietins between the women
vascular en- dothelial
and their receptors, are who developed PE and
dysfunction.54
thought to be those who did not.75
Moreover, coexisting
significant for the
metabolic factors can Several studies have
regulation of placental
contribute to shown an increased risk
growth and vascular
endothelial of PIH and PE in
development.62
dysfunction, and pregnancies with
Angiopoietin 1 binds
hyperlipidaemia and positive familial
to Tie receptors,
insulin resistance have history of PE.76,77 The
whereas angiopoietin
been associated with latter implies a genetic
2 acts as an
preeclampsia.55-57 predisposition. Many
antagonistic ligand.63
Immune factors, Impaired expression of single nucleotide
such as auto- demonstrated polymorphisms
antibodies, oxida- tive decreased VEGF levels (SNPs) in candidate
stress and natural in the umbilical cord genes of clotting
factors, vascular
killer (NK)-cell from pregnancies
growth factors,
abnormalities, cause complicated by
vasoactive proteins,
placental dysfunction hypertension as
oxidative stress related
and impaired placental compared to normal
factors, immunoactive
perfusion. The latter pregnancies.66 The
mediators and
acts as a stimulus of angiopoietin
components of the
placental release of 1/angiopoietin 2 ratio
renin-angiotension-
anti-angiogenic and was found significantly
aldodterone system
inflammatory media- lower in women who
have been associated
tors that eventually developed
with PE
cause endothelial preeclampsia than in
development.78,79
dysfunction and organ normal pregnant
damage.58 Increased women.67
numbers of activated f
Anti-angiogenic o
monocytes and
factors, such as sFlt1 L
macrophages have
[soluble Flt1 (fms-like L
been described in the
tyrosine kinase 1)] and o
endometrium of
soluble endoglin w
women with PE.59 A
(sEng), inhibit -
218 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
u gestational weeks 28-
p 30 and 32-
34. Cardiotocography
The assessment of
is suggested if fetal
women with pregnacies
activity is abnormal.
compli- cated by PIH
Fetal follow-up is also
includes clinical
recommended for
follow-up, serological
cases of mild or
investigation and fetal
moderate gestational
ultrasound
hypertension. For
evaluation.80,81 The
cases with severe
type and frequency of
gestational
follow-up depends on
hypertension or PE,
the kind and severity
fetal ultrasound,
of the hypertensive
amniotic fluid volume
disorder.
assessment and
Clinical follow-up umbilical Doppler
includes blood pressure velocimetry is
measure- ments using recommended to be
mercury performed not more
sphygmomanometry frequently than every
(Korotkoff phase V), two weeks.
in the sitting position, Cardiotocography is
and evaluation of any recommended if
signs or symptoms abnormal
indicative of clinical
detero- riation.82
Biochemical and urine
tests include urine
dipstick, urinalysis for
proteinuria, if urine
dipstick has >1+, full
blood count
(haematocrit,
haemoglobin,
platelets), liver
enzymes, serum urea,
creatinine, eloctrolytes
and serum uric acid.
Similarly, frequency of
fetal monitoring
depends on the type of
hyperten- sive
disorder. In
pregnancies
complicated by
chronic hypertension,
fetal ultrasound,
amniotic fluid volume
assessment and
umbilical artery
Doppler velocimetry
are recommended at
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension 219
220 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
fetal activity, vaginal detection of that group cases of PIH had group. 99,100
Other
bleeding or of women with WCH conflicting results. RCTs resulted in
deterioration of the who are going to Prospective controlled better pregnancy
pre-existing condition develop PE is studies of metoprolol- outcome in the treated
is observed.83 important for hydralazine, groups. In contrast to
pregnancy outcome. nifedipine and the above findings,
Non-invasive
ABPM contributes to labetalol-methyldopa atenolol and labetalol
ambulatory blood
the achievement of treatment administered prevented proteinuria
pressure monitor- ing
both the above goals, to pregnant women in the treatment group
(ABPM) seems to be a
in parallel with the with mild PIH, as compared to the
useful tool for the
evaluation of unclassifiable control group.101-103
diag- nosis,
treatment hypertension or mild RCTs with
differential diagnosis
efficacy.84,89,91,92 PE showed no methyldopa pointed to
and follow-up of PIH.
It contributes to significant better pregnancy
identification of cases t improvement of outcome in cases of
with white-coat r pregnancy outcome as mild PIH and mild PE
hypertension (WCH), e compared to the non- with regard to mid-
prediction of PE, a treated group.95-98 pregnancy abortions
prognosis in late t Labetalol had no effect and progres- sion to
pregnancy and m on development of severe PE,
treatment e proteinuria in a trial of respectively. 104,105
Acute severe
hypertension in
pregnancy is consid-
ered a medical
emergency and
requires hospitaliza-
tion. Labetalol,
hydralazine and
nifedipine are used as
first line treatment.148
A double-blind
randomized trial
228 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
table 3. Treatment of severe hypertension (Modified by SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline 2014)148
anti-hypertensive dosage onset duration comments
agent
Labetalol 20 mg IV, repeat 20 to 80 mg IV q 30 min, 5 min 4h Contra indications:
or 1 to 2 mg/min, max 300 mg (then switch to asthma, cardiac failure
oral)
Nifedipine 5 to 10 mg capsule to be swallowed or bitten, every 30 min 5-10 min 6h
Hydralazine 5 mg IV, repeat 5 to10 mg IV every 30 min, or 5 min Ιncreased risk of
0.5 maternal hypotension
to 10 mg/hr IV, to a maximum of 20 mg IV (or 30 mg
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension 229
for the prophylaxis of 1. World Health
HS, 2013 Descriptive 8. Khumanthem PD,
seizures in cases of epidemiology of Chanam MS,
Organization, 2011
chronic hyper- Samjetshabam RD,
severe preeclampsia WHO Recommen-
tension, gestational 2012 Maternal
or eclampsia.150 dations for
hypertension, and mortality and its
prevention and
Therapeutic preeclampsia in New causes in a tertiary
treatment of pre-
York State, 1995- center. J Obstet
options for severe eclampsia and
Gynaecol India 62:
2004. Matern Child
hypertension are eclampsia.
Health J 18: 168-171.
shown in Table 3. 148 2. Visintin C,
8 9. You F, Huo K, Wang
Mugglestone MA,
2 R, et al, 2012
Almerie MQ,
9 Maternal mortality in
concLusIons Nherera LM, James - Henan Province,
D, Walkinshaw S, 8
In conclusion, PIH China: changes
2010 Management 3 between 1996 and
is a common health of hypertensive 8 2
problem with adverse disorders during . 0
effects for both mother pregnancy: 5. Schneider S, 0
summary of NICE Freerksen N, Maul H, 9
and fetus/neonate. It is
guidance. BMJ 341: Roehrig S, Fischer B, .
believed to be a c2207. Hoeft B, 2011 Risk
multifactorial health 3. Helewa ME, groups and maternal- P
condition the Burrows RF, Smith neonatal L
pathogenetic J, Williams K, Brain complications of o
mechanism of which P, Rabkin SW, 1997 preeclampsia--current S
Report of the results from the
is not as yet fully Canadian Hyperten- national German O
understood. More sion Society Perinatal Quality n
studies clarifying the Consensus Registry. J Perinat e
latter will also Conference: 1. Med 39: 257-265.
contribute to more Definitions, 6. Klungsoyr K, Morken 7
effective medical evaluation and NH, Irgens L, Vollset :
classification of SE, Skjaer- ven R,
treat- ment and hypertensive 2012 Secular trends in e
optimization of disorders in the epidemiology of 4
pregnancy outcome. pregnancy. CMAJ pre- eclampsia 7
The use of 157: 715-725. throughout 40 years 1
antihypertensive 4. Savitz DA, Danilack in Norway: 5
VA, Engel SM, Elston prevalence, risk
treatment, especially 3
B, Lipkind factors and perinatal .
in cases of mild
survival. Paediatr 10. Chhabra S, Kakani
hypertension, is Perinat Epidemiol A, 2007 Maternal
meanwhile of great 26: 190-198. mortality due to
concern. More 7. Wildman K, Bouvier- eclamptic and non-
randomized controlled Colle MH, 2004 eclamptic
studies are necessary Maternal mortal- ity hypertensive
for further evaluation as an indicator of disorders: a
obstetric care in challenge. J Obstet
of the ratio of Europe. BJOG Gynaecol 27: 25-29.
maternal-fetal benefit 1 11. Brichant G,
to risk for fetal 1 Dewandre PY, Foidart
adverse effects. 1 JM, Brichant JF,
: 2010 Management
of severe
confLIct of 1 preeclampsia. Acta
Interests 6 Clin
4 B
All authors declare - e
no potential conflicts 1 l
of interest. 6 g
9
. 6
references
230 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
5
:
1
6
3
-
1
6
9
.
12. Duley L, 2009 The
global impact of pre-
eclampsia and
eclampsia. Semin
Perinatol 33: 130-
137.
13. Rattray DD,
O’Connell CM,
Baskett TF, 2012
Acute disseminated
intravascular
coagulation in
obstetrics: a tertiary
centre population
review (1980 to
2009). J Obstet
Gynaecol Can 34:
341-347.
14. Matsuda Y, Hayashi
K, Shiozaki A,
Kawamichi Y, Satoh
S, Saito S, 2011
Comparison of risk
factors for placental
abruption and
placenta previa:
case-cohort study. J
Obstet Gynaecol Res
37: 538-546.
15. Bhattacharya S,
Campbell DM, 2005
The incidence of
severe complications
of preeclampsia.
Hypertens Pregnancy
24: 181-190.
16. Gong YH, Jia J, Lu
DH, Dai L, Bai Y, Zhou
R, 2012
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension 231
232 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
Outcome and risk BJOG 119: 1521- : pregnancy and
factors of early 1528. cognitive decline in
onset severe pre- 21. Masoura S, 8 the offspring up to
eclampsia. Chin Kalogiannidis I, 4 old age. Neurology
Med J (Engl) 125: Margioula-Siarkou 5 79:
2623-2627. C, et al, 2012 .
17. Tuuli MG, Neonatal outcomes 26. Feig DS, Shah BR,
Rampersad R, of late preterm Lipscombe LL, et
Stamilio D, deliveries with pre- al, 2013 Pre-
Macones G, Odibo eclampsia. Minerva eclampsia as a Risk
AO, 2011 Perinatal 64: 109-115. Factor for Diabetes:
outcomes in women 22. Liu CM, Chang SD, A Population- Based
with preeclampsia Cheng PJ, 2012 Cohort Study. PLoS
and superimposed Relationship Med 10: e1001425.
preeclampsia: do between prenatal 27. Tuovinen S,
they differ? Am J care and maternal Raikkonen K, Pesonen
Obstet Gynecol 204: complications in AK, et al, 2012
508e1-7. women with Hypertensive
18. Bakker R, Steegers preeclampsia: disorders in
EA, Hofman A, Jaddoe implications for pregnancy and risk
VW, 2011 continuity and of se- vere mental
Blood pressure in discontinuity of disorders in the
different gestational prenatal care. offspring in
trimesters, fetal Taiwan J Obstet adulthood: the
growth, and the risk Gynecol 51: 576- Helsinki Birth
of adverse birth 582. Cohort Study. J
outcomes: the 23. Mitka M, 2013 Any Psychiatr Res 46:
generation R study. hypertension during 3
Am J Epidemiol pregnancy raises 0
174: 797-806. risk for several 3
19. Yucesoy G, Ozkan chronic diseases: -
S, Bodur H, et al, JAMA 309: 3
2005 Maternal and 1
9
perinatal outcome in 0
7
.
pregnancies 1
- 28. Miettola S,
complicated with
9 Hartikainen AL,
hypertensive
7 Vaarasmaki M, et al,
disorder of
2 2013
pregnancy: a seven
. Offspring’s blood
year ex- perience of a
24. Mannisto T, pressure and
tertiary care center.
Mendola P, Vaarasmaki metabolic phenotype
Arch Gynecol Obstet
M, et al, 2013 after exposure to
2
Elevated blood gestational
7
pressure in hypertension in utero.
3
pregnancy and Eur J Epidemiol 28:
:
subsequent chronic 87-98.
disease risk. 29. Kajantie E, Eriksson
4
Circulation 127: JG, Osmond C,
3
681-690. Thornburg K,
-
25. Wilson BJ, Watson Barker DJ, 2009
4
9 MS, Prescott GJ, et Pre-eclampsia is
. al, 2003 Hyper- associated with in-
20. Ahmad AS, tensive diseases of creased risk of stroke
Samuelsen SO, 2012 pregnancy and risk of in the adult offspring:
Hypertensive hypertension and the Helsinki birth
disorders in stroke in later life: cohort study. Stroke
pregnancy and fetal results from cohort 40: 1176-1180.
death at different study. BMJ 30. Tuovinen S,
gestational lengths: a 3 Raikkonen K, Kajantie
2 E, et al, 2012
population study of 2
6 Hypertensive
121 371 pregnancies.
disorders in
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension 233
1578-1582. national German An- tiphospohlipid
31. Tuovinen S, Eriksson Perinatal Quality syndrome in
JG, Kajantie E, et al, Registry. J Perinat obstetrics. Best Pract
2013 Ma- ternal Med 39: 257-265. Res Clin Obstet
hypertensive 37. Bener A, Saleh NM, Gynaecol 26: 65-76.
disorders in 2013 The impact of 43. Clark EA, Silver RM,
pregnancy and self- socio-economic, Branch DW, 2007 Do
reported cognitive lifestyle habits, and antiphos- pholipid
impairment of the obesity in developing antibodies cause
offspring 70 years of pregnancy- preeclampsia and
later: the Helsinki induced hypertension HELLP syndrome?
Birth Cohort Study. in fast-growing Curr Rheumatol Rep
Am J Obstet Gynecol country: global 9: 219-925.
208: 200e1-200e9. comparisons. Clin 44. Wei SQ, Qi HP, Luo
32. Roberts JM, Pearson Exp Obstet Gynecol ZC, Fraser WD, 2013
G, Cutler J, Lindheimer 40: 52-57. Maternal vitamin D
M, 2003 38. Lucovnik M, Tul N, status and adverse
Summary of the Verdenik I, Novak pregnancy outcomes:
NHLBI working Z, Blickstein I, 2012 a systematic review
group on research on Risk factors for and meta-analysis. J
hypertension during preeclampsia in twin Matern Fetal
pregnancy. pregnan- cies: a Neonatal Med 26:
Hypertension 41: population-based 889-899.
437-445. matched case-control 45. Tabesh M, Salehi-
33. Koual M, Abbou H, study. J Perinat Med Abargouei A, Tabesh M,
Carbonnel M, Picone 40: 379-382. Esmaillzadeh
O, Ayoubi JM, 2013 39. Mostello D, Catlin A, 2013 Maternal
Short-term outcome TK, Roman L, Vitamin D Status and
of patients with pre- Holcomb WL Jr, Risk of Pre-
eclampsia. Vasc Leet T, 2002
Health Risk Manag Preeclampsia in the
9: 143-148. parous woman: who
34. Coghill AE, Hansen is at risk? Am J
S, Littman AJ, 2011 Obstet Gynecol 187:
Risk factors for 425-429.
eclampsia: a 40. Dalmaz CA, Santos
population-based KG, Botton MR,
study in Washington Roisenberg I, 2011
State, 1987-2007. Am Risk factors for
J Obstet Gynecol hypertensive
205: 553e1-7. disorders of
35. Anderson NH, pregnancy in
Sadler LC, Stewart southern Brazil. Rev
AW, Fyfe EM, Assoc Med Bras 57:
McCowan LM, 2012 692-696.
Ethnicity, body mass 41. Melamed N, Hadar E,
index and risk of pre- Peled Y, Hod M,
eclampsia in a Wiznitzer A, Yogev
multiethnic New Y, 2012 Risk for
Zealand population. recurrence of
Aust N Z J Obstet preeclampsia and
Gynaecol 52: 552- outcome of
558. subsequent
36. Schneider S, pregnancy in women
Freerksen N, Maul H, with preeclampsia in
Roehrig S, Fischer B, their first pregnancy.
Hoeft B, 2011 Risk J Matern Fetal
groups and maternal- Neonatal Med 25:
neonatal 2248-2251.
complications of 42. Danza A, Ruiz-
preeclampsia--current Irastorza G,
results from the Khamashta M, 2012
234 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension 235
Eclampsia: A 2 Andarieh M, 61. Bueno-Sanchez JC,
Systematic Review 6 Farokhfar A, Ah- Agudelo-Jaramillo
and Meta-Analysis. J - mady S, 2014 B, Escobar-
Clin Endocrinol 1 Estimating rate of Aguilerae LF, et al,
Metab 98: 3165-173. 3 insulin resistance in 2013 Cytokine
46. Ouzounian JG, 1 patients with production by non-
Elkayam U, 2012 . preeclampsia using
Physiologic changes 50. van Drongelen J, HOMA-IR index and
during normal Hooijmans CR, comparison with
pregnancy and Lotgering FK, Smits nonpreeclampsia
delivery. Cardiol P, Spaanderman ME, pregnant women.
Clin 2012 Adaptive Biomed Res Int
3 changes of mes- 2014: 140851.
0 enteric arteries in 57. Spracklen CN,
: pregnancy: a meta- Smith CJ, Saftlas
analysis. Am J AF, Robinson JG,
3 Physiol Heart Circ Ryckman KK, 2014
1 Physiol 303: H639- Maternal
7 657. hyperlipidemia and
- 51. Hunter S, Robson the risk of
3 SC, 1992 Adaptation preeclampsia: a
2 of the maternal heart meta-analysis. Am J
9 in pregnancy. Br Epidemiol
. Heart J 68: 540-543. 1
47. Valdes G, Corthorn 52. Savu O, Jurcut R, 8
J, 2011 Challenges Giusca S, et al, 2012 0
posed to the Morphological and :
maternal circulation functional adaptation
by pregnancy. Integr of the maternal heart 3
Blood Press Control during pregnancy. 4
4: 45-53. Circ Cardiovasc 6
48. Valdes G, Kaufmann Imaging 5: 289-297. -
P, Corthorn J, Erices 53. Roberts JM, Hubel 3
R, Brosnihan KB, CA, 2009 The two 5
Joyner-Grantham J, stage model of 8
2009 Vasodilator preeclampsia: .
factors in the variations on the 58. Wang A, Rana S,
systemic and local theme. Placenta 30: Karumanchi SA,
adaptations to Suppl A: S32-37. 2009 Preeclamp-
pregnancy. Reprod 54. Santillan MK, sia: the role of
Biol Endocrinol 7: Santillan DA, Sigmund angiogenic factors in
79. CD, Hunter SK, its pathogenesis.
49. Seeliger C, 2009 From Physiology
Brueckmann A, molecules to (Bethesda) 24: 147-
Schleussner E, 2012 medicine: a future 158.
Mater- nal cure for 59. Faas MM, Spaans F,
endothelial function preeclampsia? Drug De Vos P, 2014
in the course of News Perspect 22: Monocytes and
pregnancy and 531-541. macrophages in
postpartum - 55. Al-Nasiry S, pregnancy and pre-
ultrasound-based Ghossein-Doha C, eclampsia. Front
longitudinal Polman S, et al, 2014 Immunol 5: 298.
assessment using Metabolic syndrome 60. Sanchez-Aranguren
flow-mediated after pregnancies LC, Prada CE,
dilatation (FMD). complicated by pre- Riano-Medina CE,
Ultraschall Med eclampsia or small Lopez M, 2014
3 for gestational age: a Endothelial
3 retrospec- tive dysfunction and
: cohort. BJOG: DOI: preeclamp- sia: role
10.1111/1471- of oxidative stress.
E 0528.13117. Front Immunol 5:
1 56. Abhari FR, Ghanbari 372.
236 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
stimulated peripheral complicated by vasodilation and
blood NK cells and hypertensive disorder angiogenic challenge
lymphocytes in early- with different from pregnancy
onset severe pre- severity. Biomed Res onwards? Cytokine
eclampsia without Int 2014: 982159. Growth Factor Rev
HELLP. J Reprod 67. Bolin M, Wiberg-Itzel 24: 411-425.
Immunol 97: 223- E, Wikstrom AK, et al, 73. Stubert J, Ullmann
231. 2009 S, Bolz M, et al,
62. Burton GJ, Angiopoietin- 2014 Prediction of
Charnock-Jones DS, 1/angiopoietin-2 ratio preeclampsia and
Jauniaux E, 2009 for prediction of induced delivery at
Regulation of preeclampsia. Am J <34 weeks gestation
vascular growth and Hypertens 22: 891- by sFLT-1 and PlGF
function in the hu- 895. in patients with
man placenta. 68. Park JE, Chen HH, abnormal midtrimester
Reproduction 138: Winer J, Houck KA, uterine Doppler
895-902. Ferrara N, velocimetry: a
63. Fagiani E, 1994 Placenta growth prospective cohort
Christofori G, 2013 factor. Potentiation analysis. BMC
Angiopoietins in an- of vascular Pregnancy Childbirth
giogenesis. Cancer endothelial growth 14: 292.
Lett 328: 18-26. factor bioactivity, in 74. Forest JC, Theriault S,
64. Baker PN, Krasnow vitro and in vivo, and Masse J, Bujold E,
J, Roberts JM, Yeo KT, high affinity binding Giguere Y,
1995 to Flt-1 but not to Flk- 2014 Soluble Fms-
Elevated serum levels 1/ KDR. J Biol Chem like tyrosine kinase-1
of vascular 269: 25646-25654. to placental growth
endothelial growth 69. Jang YS, Choi IH, factor ratio in mid-
factor in patients 2014 Contrasting pregnancy as a
with preeclampsia. roles of different predictor of preterm
Obstet Gynecol endoglin forms in preeclampsia in
8 atherosclerosis. asymptomatic
6 Immune 14: 237-240. pregnant women.
: 70. Clark DE, Smith Clin Chem Lab Med
SK, He Y, et al, 52: 1169-1178.
8 1998 A vascular 75. Kleinrouweler CE,
1 endothelial growth Wiegerinck MM,
5 factor antagonist is Ris-Stalpers C, et al,
- produced by the 2012 Accuracy of
8 human placenta and circulating placental
2 released into the growth
1 maternal circulation.
. Biol Reprod 59:
65. Aref S, Goda H, 1540-1548.
Abdelaal E, 2013 71. Guller S, Tang Z, Ma
Circulating vascular YY, Di Santo S, Sager
growth factor R, Schneider H, 2011
(VEGF) Protein composition of
angiopoietin-1 microparticles shed
(Angi-1) and soluble from human placenta
tie-2 receptor in during placental
pregnancy perfusion: Potential
complicated with pre- role in angiogenesis
eclampsia: A and fibrinolysis in
prospective study. J preeclampsia.
Obstet Gynaecol India Placenta 32: 63-69.
63: 316-320. 72. Conti E, Zezza L,
66. Bhavina K, Radhika Ralli E, et al, 2013
J, Pandian SS, 2014 Growth factors in
VEGF and eNOS preeclampsia: a
expression in vascular disease
umbilical cord from model. A failed
pregnancy
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension 237
238 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
factor, vascular Guidelines on the 84. Kazimierak W, pregnancy induced
endothelial growth management of Kowalska-Koprek U, hypertension. Acta
factor, soluble fms- cardiovascular Karowicz-Bilinska A, Obstet Gynecol
like tyrosine kinase 1 diseases during et al, 2008 24-hour S
and soluble endoglin pregnancy: the Task Holter measurement c
in the prediction of Force on the of blood pressure in a
pre-eclampsia: a Management of pregnant women and n
systematic review Cardiovascular effectiveness of the d
and meta-analysis. Diseases during treatment. Ginekol
BJOG 119: 778-787. Pregnancy of the Pol 79: 174-176. 7
76. Bezerra PC, Leao European Society of 85. Davis GK, 6
MD, Queiroz JW, et Cardiol- ogy (ESC). Mackenzie C, Brown :
al, 2010 Family Eur Heart J 32: MA, et al, 2007 Pre-
history of 3147-3197. dicting 8
hypertension as an 81. Lowe SA, Brown transformation from 2
important risk factor MA, Dekker GA, et gestational 9
for the development al, 2009 Guide- lines hypertension to -
of severe for the management preeclampsia in 8
preeclampsia. Acta of hypertensive clinical practice: a 3
Obstet Gynecol disorders of possible role for 24 3
Scand 89: 612-617. pregnancy 2008. hour ambulatory .
77. Esplin MS, Fausett Aust N Z J Obstet blood pressure 88. Hermida RC, Ayala
MB, Fraser A, et al, Gynaecol 49: monitoring. DE, Iglesias M, 2003
2001 Pater- nal and 2 Hypertens Pregnancy Circadian rhythm of
maternal components 4 26: 77-87. blood pressure
of the predisposition 2 86. Giannubilo SR, challenges office
to preeclampsia. N - Dell’Uomo B, Tranquilli values as the “gold
Engl J Med 344: 2 AL, 2006 standard” in the
867-872. 4 Perinatal outcomes, diagnosis of
78. Williams PJ, 6 blood pressure gestational
Broughton Pipkin F, . patterns and risk hypertension.
2011 The genetics of 82. Mancia G, De assessment of Chronobiol Int 20:
pre-eclampsia and Backer G, Dominiczak superimposed 135-156.
other hypertensive A, et al, 2007 preeclampsia in 89. Brown MA, Mangos
Guidelines for the mild chronic G, Davis G, Homer C,
disorders of
management of hypertensive 2005
pregnancy. Best
arterial hyperten- pregnancy. Eur J The natural history of
Pract Res Clin
sion: The Task Force Obstet Gynecol white coat
Obstet Gynaecol 25:
for the Management Reprod Biol 126: 63- hypertension during
4
of Arterial 67. pregnancy. BJOG
0
5 Hypertension of the 87. Biswas A, Choolani 112: 601-606.
- European Society of MA, Anandakumar 90. Brown M, 2013 Is
4 Hypertension (ESH) C, Arulkuma- ran S, there a role for
1 and of the European 1997 Ambulatory ambulatory blood
7 Society of blood pressure pressure monitoring
. Cardiology (ESC). monitoring in in pregnancy? Clin
79. Yang J, Shang J, Eur Heart J 28: Exp Pharmacol
Zhang S, Li H, Liu 1462-1536. Physiol 41: 16-21.
H, 2013 The role of 83. National 91. Benedetto C, Zonca
the renin- Collaborating Centre M, Giarola M, Maula
angiotensin- for Women’s and V, Chiarolini L,
aldosterone system Chil- dren’s Health Carandente F, 1997
in pre- eclampsia: (UK), 2010 NICE 24-hour blood
genetic Clinical Guidelines, pressure monitor- ing
polymorphisms and No. to evaluate the effects
microRNA. J Mol 107. In: Hypertension of nifedipine in pre-
Endocrinol 50: R53- in pregnancy: The eclampsia and in
66. management of chronic hypertension
80. Regitz-Zagrosek V, hypertensive in pregnancy. Br J
Blomstrom disorders during Obstet Gynaecol
Lundqvist C, Borghi pregnancy. London: 104: 682-688.
C, et al, 2011 ESC RCOG Press. 2010 92. Staessen JA, Asmar
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension 239
R, De Buyzere M, et in Gravidanza. Br J 1983 Placebo-
al, 2001 Task Force Obstet Gynaecol 105: controlled trial of
II: blood pressure 7 atenolol in treatment
measurement and 1 of pregnancy-
cardiovas- cular 8
outcome. Blood -
Press Monit 6: 355- 7
370. 2
93. Magee LA, Abalos 2
E, von Dadelszen P, .
Sibai B, East- erling 97. Sibai BM, Barton
T, Walkinshaw S, JR, Akl S, Sarinoglu
2011 How to manage C, Mercer BM,
hyper- tension in 1992 A randomized
pregnancy prospective
effectively. Br J Clin comparison of
Pharmacol nifedipine and bed
7 rest versus bed rest
2 alone in the
: management of
preeclampsia remote
3 from term. Am J
9 Obstet Gynecol 167:
4 879-884.
- 98. Sibai BM, Mabie
4 WC, Shamsa F,
0 Villar MA, Ander-
1 son GD, 1990 A
. comparison of no
94. Szczepaniak-Chichel medication versus
L, Tykarski A, 2012 methyldopa or
Treatment of arterial labetalol in chronic
hypertension in hypertension during
pregnancy in pregnancy. Am J
relation to current Obstet Gynecol 162:
guidelines of the 960-966.
Polish Society of 99. Cruickshank DJ,
Arterial Robertson AA,
Hypertension from Campbell DM, Mac-
2011. Ginekol Pol Gillivray I, 1992
83: 778-783. Does labetalol
95. Hogstedt S, influence the devel-
Lindeberg S, opment of
Axelsson O, et al, proteinuria in
1985 A prospective pregnancy
controlled trial of hypertension? A
metoprolol- randomised
hydralazine treatment controlled study.
in hypertension during Eur J Obstet
pregnancy. Acta Gynecol Reprod
Obstet Gynecol Biol 45: 47-51.
Scand 64: 505-510. 100. Barton JR, Mercer
96. Gruppo di Studio BM, Sibai BM,
Ipertensione in 1997 The effect of
Gravidanza, 1998 nifedipine on
Nifedipine versus urinary excretion of
expectant calcium in pre-
management in mild eclampsia. Am J
to moderate Perinatol 14: 609-
hypertension in 612.
pregnancy. Gruppo di 101. Rubin PC, Butters
Studio Ipertensione L, Clark DM, et al,
240 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension 241
associated blind study. Int J 8 1990 Atenolol in
hypertensio Gynaecol Obstet 25: . essential
n. Lancet 35-40. 111. Darcie S, Leone CR, hypertension during
1: 431-434. 107. Molvi SN, Mir S, Calil VM, pregnancy. BMJ
102. Pickles CJ, Symonds Rana VS, Jabeen F, Malik Prescinotti EP, Kah- 301:
EM, Broughton AR, 2012 hale S, Zugaib M, 1
Pipkin F, 1989 The Role of 2004 Glycemia in 1
fetal outcome in a antihypertensive newborns of 0
randomized double- therapy in mild to hypertensive mothers 3
blind controlled trial moder- ate according to .
of labetalol versus pregnancy-induced maternal treatment.
placebo in hypertension: a Rev Hosp Clin Fac
pregnancy-induced prospective Med Sao Paulo 59:
hypertension. Br J randomized study 244-250.
Obstet Gynaecol 96: comparing labetalol 112. Butters L, Kennedy
38-43. with alpha S, Rubin PC, 1990
103. Pickles CJ, methyldopa. Arch Atenolol in essential
Broughton Pipkin F, Gynecol Obstet 285: hypertension during
Symonds EM, 1992 1553-1562. pregnancy. BMJ
A randomised 108. Phippard AF, Fischer 301:
placebo controlled WE, Horvath JS, et 5
trial of labetalol in al, 1991 Early blood 8
the treatment of mild pressure control 7
to moderate improves pregnancy -
pregnancy induced outcome in 5
hypertension. Br J primigravid women 8
Obstet Gynaecol 99: with mild 9
964-968. hypertension. Med J .
104. Redman CW, 1976 Aust 154: 378-382. 113. Sibai BM,
Fetal outcome in Gonzalez AR, Mabie
109. Ismail AA, Medhat
trial of antihy- WC, Moretti M,
I, Tawfic TA, Kholeif
pertensive treatment A, 1993 1987 A comparison
in pregnancy. Lancet Evaluation of of labetalol plus
2: 753-756. calcium-antagonist hospitalization
105. Elhassan EM, (Nifedipine) in the versus
Mirghani OA, Habour treatment of pre- hospitalization
AB, Adam I, eclampsia. Int J alone in the
2002 Methyldopa Gynaecol Obstet 40: management of
versus no drug 3 preeclampsia
treatment in the 9 remote from term.
management of - Obstet Gynecol 70:
mild pre-eclampsia. 4 3
East Afr Med J 3 2
7 . 3
9 110. Wide-Swensson -
: DH, Ingemarsson I, 3
2
Lunell NO, et al,
7
1 1995 Calcium
.
7 channel blockade
114. Plouin PF, Breart G,
2 (isradipine) in
Llado J, et al, 1990
- treatment of
A randomized
1 hypertension in
7 comparison of early
pregnancy: a
5 with conservative use
randomized placebo-
. of antihyper- tensive
controlled study.
106. Weitz C, Khouzami drugs in the
Am J Obstet
V, Maxwell K, Johnson management of
Gynecol 173:
JW, 1987 pregnancy-induced
8
Treatment of hypertension. Br J
7
hypertension in 2 Obstet Gynaecol 97:
pregnancy with - 134-141.
methyl- dopa: a 8 115. Cruickshank DJ,
randomized double 7 Campbell DM,
242 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
116. von Dadelszen P, growth and gestational
Ornstein MP, Bull development of the hypertension.
SB, Logan AG, infant in the first Cochrane Database
Koren G, Magee LA, year of life. Early Syst Rev 2011: 7;
2000 Fall in mean Hum Dev 1: 59-67. CD006907.
arterial pressure and 121. Ounsted MK, Moar 126. Gaillard R, Steegers
fetal growth VA, Good FJ, Redman EA, Hofman A, Jaddoe
restriction in CW, 1980 VW, 2011
pregnancy Hypertension during Associations of
hypertension: a pregnancy with and maternal obesity
meta-analysis. without spe- cific with blood pressure
Lancet 355: 87-92. treatment; the and the risks of
117. Cockburn J, Moar development of the gestational
VA, Ounsted M, Redman children at the age hypertensive
CW, of four years. Br J disorders. The
1982 Final report of Obstet Gynaecol 87: Generation R Study.
study on 19-24. J Hypertens 29:
hypertension during 122. Bortolus R, Ricci E, 937-944.
pregnancy: the Chatenoud L, Parazzini F, 127. Task Force
effects of specific 2000 Members, 2013
treatment on the Nifedipine ESH/ESC
growth and administered in Guidelines for the
development of the pregnancy: effect on management of
children. Lancet 1: the development of arterial
6 children at 18 hypertension: The
4 months. BJOG 107: Task Force for the
7 7 management of
- 9 arterial hypertension
6 2 of the European
4 - Society of
9 7 Hypertension (ESH)
. 9 and of the European
118. Moar VA, Jefferies 4 Society of
MA, Mutch LM, . Cardiology (ESC).
Ounsted MK, 123. Abalos E DL, Steyn Eur Heart J 34:
Redman CW, 1978 DW, Henderson-Smart
2159-2219.
Neonatal head DJ, 2007
128. Hypertension in
circumference and Antihypertensive
Pregnancy: The
the treatment of drug therapy for
Management of Hy-
maternal mild to moderate
pertensive Disorders
hypertension. Br J hypertension during
During Pregnancy.
Obstet Gynaecol 85: pregnancy. Cohrane
National Col-
933-937. Database Syst Rev
laborating Centre for
119. Mutch LM, Moar 2007: 1; CD002252.
Women’s and
VA, Ounsted MK, 124. Magee LA, Elran E,
Children’s Health.
Redman CW, Bull SB, Logan A, Koren
London: RCOG
1977 Hypertension G,
Press; 2010.
during pregnancy, 2000 Risks and
with and without benefits of beta-
specific hypotensive receptor blockers
treatment. I. for pregnancy
Perinatal factors and hypertension:
neonatal morbidity. overview of the
Early Hum Dev 1: randomized trials.
47-57. Eur J Obstet
120. Mutch LM, Moar Gynecol Reprod
VA, Ounsted MK, Biol 88: 15-26.
Redman CW, 125. Nabhan AF,
1977 Hypertension Elsedawy MM, 2011
during pregnancy, Tight control of mild-
with and with- out moderate pre-
specific hypotensive existing or non-
treatment. II. The proteinuric
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension 243
244 E. KINTIRAKI ET AL
129. Magee LA, Cham C, 2012 ACE inhibitor acting O
Waterman EJ, fetopathy: a case antihypertensive b
Ohlsson A, von series and survey of agent: Current s
Dadelszen P, 2003 opinion amongst usage t
Hydralazine for New Zealand considerations. Adv e
treatment of severe paediatricians, Ther 27: t
hypertension in obstetricians, 426-443. B
pregnancy: meta- neonatologists, and 141. Carles G, Helou J, i
analysis. BMJ 327: ne- phrologists. N Z Dallah F, Ibrahim o
955-960. Med J 125: 51-61. N, Alassas N, l
Youssef M, 2012 R
130. Khedun SM, 136. Bullo M, Tschumi
Use of injectable e
Maharaj B, Moodley S, Bucher BS,
urapidil in pregnan- p
J, 2000 Effects of Bianchetti MG,
r
antihypertensive Simonetti GD, 2012 cy-induced
o
drugs on the unborn Pregnancy outcome hypertension and
d
child: what is following exposure preeclampsia. J
known, and how to angiotensin- Gynecol
4
should this converting enzyme
1
influence inhibi- tors or :
prescribing? angiotensin receptor 6
Paediatr Drugs 2: antagonists: a 4
419-436. systematic review. 5
131. Solomon CG, Seely Hypertension 60: -
EW, 2011 444-450. 6
Hypertension in 137. Polifka JE, 2012 Is 4
preg- nancy. there an 9
Endocrinol Metab embryopathy .
Clin North Am 40: associated with first- 142. Vigil-De Gracia P,
847-863. trimester exposure to Lasso M, Ruiz E,
132. Folic M, Folic N, angiotensin- Vega-Malek JC, de
Varjacic M, converting enzyme Mena FT, Lopez JC,
Jakovljevic M, inhibitors and 2006 Severe
Jankovic S, 2008 angiotensin receptor hypertension in
Antihypertensive antagonists? A pregnancy:
drug for therapy for critical review of hydralazine or
hyper- tensive the evidence. Birth labetalol. A
disorders in Defects Res A Clin randomized clinical
pregnancy. Acta Mol Teratol 94: trial. Eur J Obstet
Medica Medianae 576-598. Gynecol Reprod
47: 65-72. 138. Duley L, Henderson- Biol 128:
133. Churchill D, Smart DJ, Meher S, 1
Beevers GD, Meher S, 2006 Drugs for 5
Rhodes C, 2007 treatment of very 7
Diuretics for high blood pressure -
preventing pre- during pregnancy. 1
eclampsia. Cochrane Database 6
Cochrane Syst Rev 2006: 3; 2
Database Syst Rev CD001449. .
2007: 1: 139. Brogden RN, Sorkin 143. Baggio MR, Martins
CD004451. EM, 1990 WP, Calderon AC, et al,
134. Cooper WO, Ketanserin. A 2011
Hernandez-Diaz S, review of its Changes in fetal
Arbogast PG, et al, pharmacodynamic and maternal
2006 Major and pharmacokinetic Doppler parameters
congenital prop- erties, and observed during
malformations after therapeutic potential acute severe
first- trimester in hypertension and hypertension
exposure to ACE peripheral vascular treatment with
inhibitors. N Engl J disease. Drugs 40: hydralazine or
Med 903-949. labetalol: a
354: 2443-2451. 140. Buch J, 2010 randomized
135. Deva M, Kara T, Urapidil, a dual- controlled trial.
Pregnancy-Induced hypertension 245
Ultrasound Med P, 2014 SOGC 3
Biol 37: 53-85. Hypertension 7
144.Hennessy A, Guideline 7
Thornton CE, Makris Committee, .
A, et al, 2007 A ran- 2014 Diagnosis, 152. Telang MA, Bhutkar
domised comparison Evaluation, and SP, Hirwani RR,
of hydralazine and Management of the 2013 Analysis of
mini-bolus di- Hypertensive patents on
azoxide for Disorders of preeclampsia
hypertensive Pregnancy: executive detection and
emergencies in Sum- mary. J Obstet diagnosis: a
pregnancy: the Gynaecol Can 36: perspective.
PIVOT trial. Aust N 575-576. Placenta 34: 2-8.
Z J Obstet Gynaecol 149. Raheem IA, Saaid
47: 279-285. R, Omar SZ, Tan
145. Wacker JR, Wagner PC, 2012 Oral
BK, Briese V, et al, nifedipine versus
2006 Antihy- intravenous labetalol
pertensive therapy for acute blood
in patients with pre- pressure control in
eclampsia: A hypertensive
prospective emergencies of preg-
randomised nancy: a randomised
multicentre study trial. BJOG 119:
comparing 78-85.
dihydralazine with 150. Committee on
urapidil. Eur J Obstetric Practice,
Obstet Gynecol 2011 Committee
Reprod Biol 127: Opinion no. 514:
160-165. emergent therapy
146. Manzur-Verastegui for acute-onset,
S, Mandeville PB, severe hypertension
Gordillo-Mos- coso with preeclampsia
A, Hernandez-Sierra or eclampsia. Obstet
JF, Rodriguez- Gynecol 118: 1465-
Martinez M, 1468.
2008 Efficacy of 151. Sibai BM, 2002
nitroglycerine Chronic hypertension in
infusion versus sub- pregnancy.
lingual nifedipine in O
severe pre- b
eclampsia: a s
random- ized, triple- t
blind, controlled e
t
trial. Clin Exp
Pharmacol Physiol
35: 580-585. G
147. Raheem IA, Saaid y
R, Omar SZ, Tan n
e
PC, 2012 Oral
c
nifedipine versus
o
intravenous labetalol
l
for acute blood
pressure control in
1
hypertensive
0
emergencies of preg-
0
nancy: a randomised
:
trial. BJOG 119:
78-85.
3
148. Magee LA, Pels A,
6
Helewa M, Rey E, von
9
Dadelszen
-