Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
FARHANA.K
EP/330
3rd Semester, 2nd Year
Maters in Environmental
TSUNAMI RISK ASSESSMENT Planning, SPA Delhi
FOR THE PORT CITY OF GALLE
1
TSUNAMI RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSIGNMENT-1
Table of Contents
1. Tsunami .............................................................................................................................. 2
2. Subduction zone earthquake sources .................................................................................. 2
2.1 City of Galle, Srilanka .................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Approach to tsunami hazard analysis ............................................................................. 4
2.3 Scenario-based tsunami hazard analysis (stha) ................................................................ 4
2.3.1 Hazard analysis for risk assessment .......................................................................... 6
3. Vulnerability assessment .................................................................................................... 6
4. Risk assessment .................................................................................................................. 7
5. Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................... 7
5.1 Measures that mitigate impact of Tsunami ...................................................................... 7
5.2 Measures that mitigate exposure and vulnerability to the tsunami hazard ...................... 8
5.3 Measures that promote successful evacuation from tsunami hazard ............................... 8
6. Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 8
7. Reference ............................................................................................................................ 8
Table 1 Source details and the maximum and minimum wave amplitudes from the
propagation modeling………...5
1
2
TSUNAMI RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSIGNMENT-1
1. Tsunami
A tsunami is a series of waves with a long wavelength and period (time between crests). Time
between crests of the wave can vary from a few minutes to over an hour. Tsunamis are often
incorrectly called tidal waves; they have no relation to the daily ocean tides. Tsunami (soo-
NAH-mee) is a Japanese word meaning harbour wave. Tsunamis can occur at any time of day
or night. Tsunamis are generated by any large, impulsive displacement of the sea bed level.
Earthquakes generate tsunamis by vertical movement of the sea floor. If the sea floor movement
is horizontal, a tsunami is not generated. Earthquakes of M > 6.5 are critical for tsunami
generation. Tsunamis are also triggered by landslides into or under the water surface, and can
be generated by volcanic activity and meteorite impacts.
On the average, there are two tsunamis per year in the Pacific Ocean somewhere, which cause
damage near the source. Approximately every 15 years a destructive tsunami occurs in Pacific.
The destructive tsunami on Dec 26th, 2004 on the Indian Coast in terms of its impact seems to
have occurred for the first time in the history.
2
3
TSUNAMI RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSIGNMENT-1
Figure 1 Major plates and subduction zones that are potential sources of Indian Ocean tsunamis. Major
accumulations of seabed sediments shown in pale blue to orange. Source: modified from Burbidge et
al., 2009. The Sunda Arc is referred to as the Bengal-Sumatra-Sunda subduction zone in this account.
Figure 2 Galle Bay and headland: Headland – concentration of energy and spreading around the
headland
3
4
TSUNAMI RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSIGNMENT-1
Table 1Source details and the maximum and minimum wave amplitudes from the propagation modeling
1 2 3 4
Figure 7 Snapshots of tsunami propagation in four scenarios 180 minutes after the earthquake
5
6
TSUNAMI RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSIGNMENT-1
2.3.1 Hazard analysis for risk assessment
Hazard analysis for risk assessment can be undertaken either via a multi-scenario-based or an
event-based approach. In developing hazard maps for risk assessment, it is necessary to develop
hazard levels for which many approaches are available. In a multi-scenario-based approach,
the superimposition of the impact of scenarios will clearly indicate areas which have a greater
likelihood of being affected. The probability of inundation and its magnitude can be assessed
by several methods. In an event-based approach, attention is focused on individual events, for
example, on a worst-case event with specific frequencies of occurrences and impacts.
For the City of Galle, it was decided to develop an initial risk assessment based on the IOT,
which represents the worst-case hazard scenario.
Hazard levels were developed based on inundation and flow speeds. The four hazard levels
were classified as given below.
• High – Inundation level above 0.5m with high flow/current speeds (>1.5 m/sec)
• Medium – Inundation level between 1m and 2m with low flow speeds
• Low – Inundation level less than 1m and low flow speeds
• Very low (zero) – Very small or no inundation impacting humans
3. Vulnerability assessment
The critical parameters applicable to the City of Galle were:population and its distribution,
buildings, infrastructure and their status, exposure to the hazard, distance from the sea,
elevation, capacity to evacuate (within the broader framework of awareness, preparedness,
early warning, response and safe evacuation), impact on livelihoods.
6
7
TSUNAMI RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSIGNMENT-1
4. Risk assessment
The risk map can be prepared by superimposing the hazard and vulnerability maps. In doing
so, the method adopted must be clearly identified so as to recognize potential limitations in
applications. In this study, the hazard and vulnerability maps, each comprising four levels of
classification – high, medium, low and very low (zero) – have been prepared. For
superimposing them, it is necessary to establish the criteria for risk levels. A high level of
hazard superimposed on high, medium or low levels of vulnerability (or vice versa) is classified
as a high level of risk. A medium level of hazard with a medium level of vulnerability is also
rated as a high level of risk. A medium level of hazard with a low level of vulnerability is rated
as a medium level of risk or vice versa. Finally a low level of hazard with low-level
vulnerability is rated as a low level of risk. If either the hazard or vulnerability is very low
(zero), then risk is considered to be zero.
The IOT certainly represents a worst-case scenario but other scenarios can be used to identify
the potential impacts from events with a higher possibility of occurrence.
5. Mitigation Measures
5.1 Measures that mitigate impact of Tsunami
1. The implementation of artificial measures for protection, including tsunami breakwaters,
dikes and revetments. A protection wall (tsunami dyke) of modest proportions along the
coastline could supplement the tsunami breakwater.
2. The effective use of natural coastal ecosystems including coral reefs, sand dunes and coastal
vegetation (mangrove forests)
3. Hybrid systems of artificial and/or natural systems
7
8
TSUNAMI RISK ASSESSMENT
ASSIGNMENT-1
5.2 Measures that mitigate exposure and vulnerability to the tsunami hazard
1. Land-use planning
2. Regulatory interventions such as setback of defence lines
3. Hazard-resilient buildings and infrastructure
5.3 Measures that promote successful evacuation from tsunami hazard
1. Early warning systems (local and regional)
2. Public warning systems
3. Evacuation routes and structures
4. Community education, including community maps and other measures for community
preparedness.
6. Conclusion
Risk knowledge is a critical component of coastal community resilience and represents the
awareness of the community regarding potential hazards, vulnerability and the extent to which
the community is prone to hazard impacts. Risk knowledge therefore plays a vital role in
building a hazard-resilient community. It requires a full understanding of hazards both episodic
and chronic, the frequency of occurrence, the time scale over which they occur, and the
geographic extent of impact. The community should be aware of the impacts on human life,
ecosystems, agriculture and infrastructure.
7. Reference
UNESCO, ‘Tsunami risk assessment and mitigation in the Indian Ocean; Knowing your
tsunami risk – and what do about it’, IOC Manuals and Guides No 52, UNESCO: Paris,
2009.
UNDP, ‘risk assessment and management For tsunami hazard’, IOTWS Working
Group on Risk Assessment under the UNESCO/IOC framework, Thailand,2011
Case Study of the Port City of Galle’