Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Akuntansi
Manajemen
Variable costing & Absorption
costing
06
Economic & Business Accountancy 84033 Alfiandri, MAcc
Abstract Kompetensi
Diisi dengan abstract
1. Understand Variable costing
2. Understand Absorption costing
Pembahasan
1. Introduction
Beginning to understand variable and absorption costing, it should focus on the three
key concepts.
1. Both income statement format include product cost and period cost even though they
e.g., variable and absorption costing, defines and classify differently.
3. Variable and absorption costing net operating income figure often differ from one
another. The differences between them which always about income statement
account for fixed manufacturing overhead that recognize differently.
Variable costing
Under variable costing, manufacturing costs which vary are treated as product cost.
This includes direct material, direct labor the variable portion of manufacturing overhead.
Fixed manufacture overheads are not treated as product cost under this method, instead
treated as periodic cost. Such fixed manufacture overhead as, selling and administration
Absorption cost
Absorption cost on the other hand, treats all manufacturing cost as product costs,
regardless variable or fixed cost. The cost of unit product under absorption cost consists
of direct material, direct labor and both variable and fixed manufacturing overhead. Thus,
absorption costing allocates a portion of fixed manufacturing overhead cost to each unit
of product, along with the variable manufacturing costs. Because absorption costing
includes all manufacturing costs in product costs, it is frequently referred to as the full
cost method
Basically, selling and administrative expenses are never treated as product costs.
This because that costs are not directly attach in making the products and therefore, the
managers obtain pure cost information of the products. However, under absorption and
variable costing, variable and fixed selling and administrative expenses are always
treated as period costs and are expensed as incurred.
The essential difference between variable costing and absorption costing is how
each method accounts for fixed manufacture overhead costs. The rest of the costs are
treated the same under both of that method.
In variable costing, fixed manufacturing overhead costs are considered to be period cost
like selling and administrative costs and threaten and recognize in the income statement
as period cost.
Weber Light Aircraft, a company that produces light recreational aircraft, Data
concerning the company’s operations appear below:
As the table above shows selling price per aircraft, variable cost per aircraft and total
fixed expenses monthly never change. The only variable change are number of unit
produce (January = 1, February = 2 and March = 4) and number of unit sold (January =
1, February = 1 and March = 5).
Next, we will construct firstly the company’s variable costing income statement and next
will construct under absorption costing approach.
Under variable costing, product cost consists of direct material, direct labor and variable
manufacturing overhead. The total variable production cost is $ 25.000. See it below:
And next is the calculation of period cost i.e., Selling and Administrative expenses :
If it put all together then variable costing income statement would appear as follow:
A simple method for understanding how Weber Light Aircraft computed its variable
costing net operating income figures is to focus on the contribution margin per aircraft sold,
which is computed as follows
The variable costing net operating income for each period can always be computed
by multiplying the number of units sold by the contribution margin per unit and then
subtracting total fixed costs. For Weber Light Aircraft these computations would appear as
follows
Under absorption costing method, all manufacturing costs include fixed manufacture
overhead cost are consider as product cost. The first step in preparing Weber’s absorption
costing income statement is to determine the company unit product cost monthly.
Figure above shows that, fixed manufacturing overhead costs of $ 70.000 is divided by
number of unit produced to determine the fixed manufacturing overhead cost per unit.
The sales amounts of three month are same with variable costing income statement.
January’s COGS consists of one unit product in the month multiple absorption costing unit
product cost in a month, so total January’s COGS is $95.000, February’s COGS is $60.000
and March’s COGS is $230.000 (1 produce in Feb x $60.000 + 4 produces in March x
$42.500)
Take note that, although sales exactly same between January and February and cost
structure is not change, but net operating income $35.000 higher in February than January.
This is because a unit aircraft produce in February is not sold on February until March. This
aircraft has $35.000 of fixed manufacturing overhead incurred on February but is not
recorded as cost of goods on February until the aircraft sell on March.
Based on the example calculation above, it finds that net operating incomes under
both approaches are not same. Take case of Weber light aircraft, the net operating income
are the same on January but differ on the other two months. This is because under
absorption costing, some fixed manufacturing overhead is capitalized in inventories e.g.,
included product cost, rather than currently expensed in the income statement.
For example, there are two aircraft were produced in February with each of product
carried $35.000 in fixed manufacturing overhead ($70.000 / 2 aircraft produced). Because
only 1 product sold in February, then $35.000 fixed manufacturing overhead recognized on
February’s absorption costing income statement and it is part of cost of goods sold. The rest
of $35.000 fixed manufacturing overhead is recognized in the Balance Sheet as part of
finished goods inventories.
This was reversed in March, while 4 units were produced but 5 units were sold.
Under absorption costing, $105.000 of fixed manufacturing overhead was included in cost of
goods sold (rest of $35.000 unit produced on February and Sold in March + $17.500 for
each four unit produced and sold in March). Under variable costing on the other hand,
$70.000 fixed manufacturing overhead was recognized as periodic expenses. Therefore, the
comparability between both approaches is the net operating income in March was $35,000
lower under absorption costing than under variable costing.