Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

ManagementCornea

Management Protocols: Protocols

Corneal Opacity
Management Kumari Reena Singh
MD

Kumari Reena Singh MD, Kavita Duraipandi MD, DNB, FICO

Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences,


All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

C ornea is an optically clear and transparent structure.


Corneal disorders can results in deposition of additional
material (e.g., fluid, scar tissue, inflammatory debris,
Keratitis and trauma are the most frequent causes of corneal
blindness in developing countries. Important causes of
corneal opacity includes following:
metabolic) byproducts within one or multiple layers of the
cornea causing loss of corneal clarity. This loss in corneal Prevention and Early Detection
transparency is called as corneal opacity .Corneal diseases • Neonatal corneal opacification caused by forceps
represent the second leading cause of blindness in most injury, herpes simplex keratitis, or bacterial keratitis
developing world countries. Nearly 80% of all corneal can be prevented.
blindness is avoidable. • Use of protective eyewear at work, in sports, and in
armed conflict can reduce trauma.
• Early diagnosis and treatment of bacterial keratitis can
reduce scarring and opacification.
• Appropriate treatment of the trichiasis, corneal
exposure, dry eye, neurotrophic cornea, and
autoimmune disease can reduce the incidence of
ulcerative keratitis associated with them.
Managements
Therapeutic strategy includes optical, medical, and surgical
alternatives.
Different aspects of managements
Rationale for treatment is only when corneal opacity is
associated with functional visual loss or discomfort. Less
commonly, cosmesis is an indication for treatment. Stromal
or endothelial dysfunction or disease may necessitate
intervention to stabilize the ocular surface to prevent further
complications. Few important things should be considered
before any planning for treatment, like;
1. Severety, site and depth of opacity:

Figure 1: Paracentral/peripheral (full


a. Small central /paracentral/peripheral (full thickness
thickness or partial thickness) but involving or partial thickness) but involving part of pupillary
part of pupillary opening opening (Figure 1).

www. dosonline.org l 53
Corneal Opacity Management

Congenital Nutritional Degenerations Inflammatory Neoplastic Trauma Doctor caused


1.Axenfeld- Vitamin A 1.Calcific and 1.Conjunctival/ 1.Corneal (iatrogenic)
Rieger deficiency band immunologic corneal abrasion 1.Pseudophakic
anomaly (xerophthalmia) keratopathy 1.Infection intraepithelial predisposing bullous
2.Peter’s Metabolic 2.Crocodile (bacterial, neoplasia to microbial keratopathy
anomaly 1.Mucopoly- shagreen fungal, 2.Melanosis/ keratitis 2.Inadvertent
3.Sclerocornea saccharidosis Spheroidal parasitic, and melanoma 2.Penetrating exposure of the
4.Dermoid 2.Mucolipidoses degeneration viral) trauma cornea to topical
5.Leukoma Lipidosis 3.Salzmann 2.Interstitial 3.Chemical chlorhexidine
3.Hypolipo- nodular keratitis injury 3.Drugs
proteinemias degeneration (nonsterile (Tamoxifen,
4.Cystinosis Pterygium and sterile) Phenothiazines,
5.Fabry disease Dystrophies 3.Mooren’s Antimalarials)
Epithelial, ulcer 4.TASS(Toxic
stromal and 4.Steven’s anterior shock
endothelial Johnson syndrome)
Syndrome

Classifications
ICD 9 CM ICD 10 CM
Minor corneal opacity 371.01 H17.81
Peripheral corneal opacity 371.02 H17.82
Central corneal opacity 371.03 H17.1
Adherent leukoma 371.04 H17.0
Phthisical cornea. 017.3, 371.05* A18.59, H44.52
CM = Clinical Modification used in the United States; (–) = 1, right eye; 2, left eye; 3, bilateral * Code first underlying tuberculosis (017.3).

Refraction with corrective glasses or contact lenses corrections PTK, lamellar surgical corrections
(both assessed with dialated and undialated pupil (manual, microkeratome, femtolaser assisted)
to consider for optical iridectomy), with or without (Figure 2a,b,c).
cosmetic corneal tattooing /cosmetic contact
• If deeper corneal involvement then depending
lenses.
on depth of involvement LK, DALK (manual,
b. Small, peripheral opacity not involving part microkeratome, femtolaser assisted) .Rotation
of pupillary opening (full thickness or partial autograft is another option.
thickness).
• If full thickness corneal involvement/adherent
These opacities may still compromise vision by leukomatous opacity is there and eye bank
inducing distortions of the corneal curvature. facility is present then pkp could be options
Refraction over a rigid contact lens can be helpful (Figure 3).
in assessing potential visual acuity and may in
2. Associated other vision decreasing problems
itself improve visual acuity. Also corrective glasses
can be prescribed. Like cataract, astigmatism, posterior segment disorders etc.
should be evaluated first then appropriate treatment should
c. Larger size corneal opacity involving pupillary
be planned.
opening ,no improvement in vision after dilation
3. End stage disorders without visual potentials
• If only nebular corneal opacity and visual
requirement is not much or any systemic Like in phthisical cornea or end stage glaucoma patients
or local disorders not allowing for surgical with opacity, should be treated for pain and discomfort also
correction then refraction for fitting glasses for cosmesis like corneal tattooing, contact lenses, artificial
and contact lenses , otherwise laser assisted eyes etc.

54 l DOS Times - Vol. 20, No. 9 March, 2015


Management Protocols

(a) (b) (c)

Figure 2(a),(b),(c): Larger size corneal opacity involving pupillary opening, no


improvement in vision after dilation

Vision impairment may be reduced or eliminated by


spectacle or contact lens correction. Contact lenses are
good option for treatment of corneal scaring1. Corneal
tattooing/cosmetic contact lens can be an option for
rehabilitation, especially in patients where there was no
option of functional improvement by other treatments2.
Surgical Treatment
Selection of the surgical procedure is determined by the
depth and location of the opacity. The proposed surgery
should have an acceptable risk/benefit ratio with the
potential to reduce the patient’s disability significantly.
Procedures that may improve vision include the following:
• Optical iridectomy: where cornea overlying the
potential iridectomy site is clear and there is a high risk
of complications for PK, e.g., Peter’s anomaly.
• Chemical treatment/EDTA chelation: used for removal
of calcific band keratopathy.
• Limbal stem cell graft: may be useful to restore the
corneal epithelium. An amniotic membrane graft
Figure 3: Full thickness corneal involvement/adherent
leukomatous opacity
may be considered as a supportive substrate for the
epithelium.
• Lamellar procedure: (Involves selective removal and
Treatment
replacement of diseased corneal layers)
Depending on the etiology of the opacity, severity, needs
1. Lamellar keratectomy: may improve corneal
and health status of patient, treatment may be optical,
clarity and smoothness in cases of anterior stromal
medical, surgical, or a combination.
scarring associated with normal endothelial
Optical and Medical Treatment function.
Treatment of conditions like epithelial corneal edema, a. Mechanical superficial keratectomy: works
poor ocular surface, high IOP or intraocular inflammation, best for opacities overlying Bowman’s
helps to improve visual and overall function also alleviate layer and superficial degenerations such as
discomfort or pain (Figure 4a,b). Treatment may be epithelial membrane dystrophy and Salzmann
necessary for underlying systemic disorders such as nodular degeneration.
immunocompromised status or connective tissue disease.

www. dosonline.org l 55
Corneal Opacity Management

(a)
(b)

Figure 4(a),(b): Corneal edema, poor ocular surface and intraocular inflammation

2. Lamellar keratoplasty: useful in anterior to mid- rejection, efficient visual rehabilitation relative to PK, and
stromal opacities in which endothelial function is also fewer complications including expulsive hemorrhage,
normal. anterior synechia, postoperative endophthalmitis, and
glaucoma in comparison to PK. This procedure also
a. Superficial Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty
requires less rigid criteria for donor corneal tissue selection
(SALK): Particularly when treating deeper
that is often weighted toward donor endothelium in PK.
lesions which can not be treated by PTK.
There are different methods of dissections of host cornea
This procedure can be Automated or Hemi-
like ; direct Open Dissection (Anwar in 1972), closed
automated (HALK, cutting host bed with
Dissection (Melles Technique, 1999), dissection with
microkeratome) suture assisted or sutures less
Hydrodelamination (Sugita and Kondo), dissection with Big
with glue.
Bubble Technique, (Anwar’s 2002), Big Bubble technique
Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (ALK): Manual,
b. Combined with Femtosecond Laser Trephination. (Suwan-
Automated (microkeratome assisted) donor Apichon et al. 2006 and Price Jr. et al. 2009).
graft can be sutured into the recipient bed or
e. Posterior Lamellar Keratoplasty or Endothelial
suture assisted with glue.
Keratoplasty (EK)
c. Sutureless Femtosecond Laser - Assisted
Attempting to replace endothelial pathology, the first (PLK)
Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (FALK)
procedure was described by Barraquer in 1950. Melles
Depth of the recipient corneal pathology is measured using et al. offered sutureless PLK in 1998, using an air bubble
anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT). A femtosecond laser is for graft fixation. In 2001, Terry and Ousley introduced
used to create the lamellar cut in the recipient with donor endothelial keratoplasty (EK) and deep lamellar endothelial
corneas. Donor cut is adjusted according to the depth of keratoplasty (DLEK). Later in 2005 Price Jr. and Price
the lesions with an additional 10-20% thickness adjusted to performed Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty
compensate for donor tissue swelling. After putting donor (DSEK). A year later, Gorovoy added automation using
lenticule the incision is dried, and flap adhesion is checked. a microkeratome for Descemet stripping automated
A bandage soft contact lens is placed over the cornea. endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Subsequently, Descemet
membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) was described
d. Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK)
by Melles et al. allowing transplantation of an isolated
(Figure 5a,b).
endothelium-Descemet membrane layer (EDM) without
It removes and replaces total or near-total corneal stroma adherent corneal stroma. Later on Price et al. described
while preserving host endothelium. The advantages Descemet membrane automated endothelial keratoplasty
of DALK include reducing the risk of endothelial graft (DMAEK). Endothelial keratoplasty has lesser risk of

56 l DOS Times - Vol. 20, No. 9 March, 2015


Management Protocols

(a) (b)

Figure 5(a),(b): Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK)

endothelial graft rejection, early visual rehabilitation for visualization of the anterior chamber before triple
relative to PK and also fewer complications. Two most procedure can be done4.
common early complications following DSAEK surgery
• Keratoprosthesis:
are graft dislocation (1 to 82%) and primary graft failure
(0-29%). Used for severe corneal bilateral opacity where other
surgical options are not viable.
• Rotation Autograft:
• Conjunctival flap:
Rotational autograft can be an effective alternative to
standard penetrating keratoplasty for some patients Surgical procedures to reduce the pain of corneal edema
with corneal scars. Area of clear cornea is placed in the (bullous and microcystic) in patients who are not candidates
geometric center of the cornea and the opacity is rotated for corneal transplantation.
toward the limbus. The objective is to achieve the largest
So each case of corneal opacity should be evaluated
possible optically clear zone. Mathematical variables
properly then managed. After visual rehabilitation,
are set to maximize postoperative visual acuity and for
postoperative care as well as treatment of complications
generalization of the geometric model3.
and recurrent disease is also important.
• Penetrating keratoplasty:
References
Penetrating keratoplasty should be performed when 1. Grünauer Kloevekorn C , Habermann A, Wilhelm F et.al.; Contact
nonsurgical measures or less invasive procedures not lens fitting as a possibility for visual rehabilitation in patients after
provide satisfactory visual outcome. Long term follow-up open globe injuries; [Article in German] Klin Monbl Augenheilkd.
care and patient cooperation are required to ensure success. 2004;8):652-7.
Patients remain at risk for allograft rejection throughout 2. S Pitz, R Jahn, L Frisch, A Duis, N Pfeiffer et. al.; Corneal tattooing: an
life. There are various complications following Penetrating alternative treatment for disfiguring corneal scars optimal Size and
keratoplasty including Intraoperative and Postoperative Location for Corneal Rotational Autografts A Simplified Mathematical
Model; British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2002;86:397-99
complications.
3. Natalie A. Afshari,Scott M. Duncan, Tasha Y et. al.; Optimal
• Triple procedure: Size and Location for Corneal Rotational Autografts A Simplified
Mathematical Mode. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;3:410-13.
It involves cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation
along with lamellar, DSEAK and PKP procedure. Mostly 4. N Ardjomand, P Fellner, M Moray, C Wohlfart,et.al.; Lamellar
corneal dissection for visualization of the anterior chamber before
open sky cataract surgery done in PKP with cataract surgery triple procedure; Eye 2007;21:1151–54.
in case of PKP planned with closed chamber cataract
surgery to increase visibility, Lamellar corneal dissection

www. dosonline.org l 57

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi