Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 2

Documentary Film Judging Criteria

Exemplary Accomplished Developing Limited Score


Criteria 20 points 15 points 10 points 5 points

Nga Pakiwaitara o Excellent and appropriate Obvious and consistent use Good references to Nga No or minimal use of
Ngati Porou use of references to Nga of references to Nga Pakiwaitara o Ngati Porou references to Nga
Pakiwaitara o Ngati Porou Pakiwaitara o Ngati Porou Pakiwaitara o Ngati Porou

Narrative flow The narrative/story telling The narrative/story telling The narrative/story telling The narrative/story telling
flowed seamlessly. It was flowed consistently. It was showed signs of developing flowed disjointedly. It was
also strong, original, occasionally compelling and in to an interesting and uninteresting and only
compelling, and interesting, entertaining to viewers. entertaining story. It mildly occasionally captured the
always attracting the There were some original captured the viewer’s viewer’s attention.
viewers attention ideas used. attention.

Performances The performances were The performances were The performances were The performances looked
(acting, interviewing, always engaging, strong, consistent, well done and adequate. At times the unconfident and
presenting) original, compelling, and entertaining. performances rose above uninteresting to the viewer.
interesting, always attracting this level to become
the viewers attention interesting to the viewer.
Production Design Excellent and extremely Interesting and creative Adequate and sometimes Poorly executed production
(props, costumes, creative production design. production design. Good interesting production design. Poor choice of
sets, locations) Original and appropriate and appropriate choice of design. Some inspired props, costumes, sets and
choice of props, costumes, props, costumes, sets and choices of props, costumes, locations used.
sets and locations used. locations used. sets and locations used.

Visual Composition/ Film consistently showed Film occasionally showed Film showed average Film showed poor visual
Cinematography excellent and creative visual excellent and creative visual creative visual composition/cinematography
composition/cinematography composition/cinematography composition/cinematography (camera angles, camera
(camera angles, camera (camera angles, camera (camera angles, camera movement, lighting, framing
movement, lighting, framing movement, lighting, framing movement, lighting, framing of shots)
of shots) of shots) of shots)

Use of Audio High quality sound and Very good quality sound and Good quality sound and Poor quality sound and
Enhancements excellent use of music for good choice of music for the good choice of music for the limited or inappropriate use
(sound and music) the soundtrack. soundtrack. soundtrack. of music for the soundtrack.

Editing and Use of Excellent and appropriate Very good editing and use of Editing was adequate Poor editing and no use or
Visual editing and excellent use of visual enhancements. Trying however visual inappropriate use of
Enhancements visual enhancements to be innovative with enhancement tools used but enhancements.
(Transitions, titles, production and presentation. not always appropriate or
credits, special effective.
effects)

General TOTAL SCORE


Comments (140 POINTS
MAX)

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi