Faculty of Accountancy,

Finance and Business

ASSESSMENT #2
Course Code BBMF3063
Course Title Financial Statement Analysis
Program/Level Bachelor of Finance and Investment/ Year 3
Academic Year 2017/2018
Course Coordinator Pamela Sivam
Due Date Week 8
Overall Weightage 60%
Course Tutor Pamela Sivam
Tutorial Group RFI 3

Students Name Student ID Total Marks

1. ANG ZI ENN 15WBR11554

2. YONG POH YUN 15WBR11624

3. YONG LI TING 15WBR12335

4. TAN AN LYNN 15WBR12333

5. CHAI PEI KEI 15WBR12001

Name:
Student ID:
Name of Company:

Marking Scheme for Part A

Introduction ( 1 page) Allocated Scored
Appear unfocussed and quite limited in scope. 0 - 2 marks

Appears relevant to topic and task; possibly little limited in scope. 3 - 5 marks
Appears focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage with only
6 - 8 marks
minor aspects missing.
Appears well focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage; wide
9 - 10 marks
scope.
Ratio Analysis (relevant ratios & interpretation) Range Scored
Very limited analysis
Unsatisfactory cohesion makes comprehension very difficult; appears incoherent 0 - 10 marks
and lacking in flow.
Limited analysis
Lack of sentence transitions interferes at times with comprehension making
11- 20 marks
relationship between sentences unclear; flow of text abrupt.

Sufficient analysis
Only minor inconsistencies in the use of cohesive and discourse markers, not 21 - 35 marks
affecting overall coherence; smooth flow of text.
Very comprehensive analysis
Cohesive and discourse markers appropriately used; forms a coherent whole;
36 - 50 marks
close, intelligible relationship between sentences; smooth flow of text.

Conclusion
Comparative analysis 10 marks

Common-size analysis 10 marks

Company selection based on results obtain from analysis 10 marks

Overal Presentation of Report 10 marks

TOTAL 100 marks

Marking Scheme for Part B

Assessment Criteria (100 marks) PART B

Executive Summary
1 Brief summary focused on important analysis results; it launches the analysis report. Scored
Appear unfocussed and quite limited in scope. 2
Appears relevant to topic and task; possibly little limited in scope. 3
Appears focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage with only minor
4
aspects missing.
Appears well focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage; wide
5
scope.
Analysis Overview (Business environment/Industry/Sector)
2 Background material on the company, its industry, and its economic development.
Appear unfocussed and quite limited in scope. 0-5
Appears relevant to topic and task; possibly little limited in scope. 6-10
Appears focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage with only minor
11-15
aspects missing.
Appears well focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage; wide
16-20
scope.
3 Evidential Matter (Calculation/Interpretations)
This is the individual component of the group coursework, therefore marks allocated 20
based on individual marks obtain in part A of this coursework.
Assumptions (Business Strategy)
Identification of important assumptions regarding a company’s industry and business environment, and
4 other important assumptions for estimates and
Appear unfocussed and quite limited in scope. 0-5
Appears relevant to topic and task; possibly little limited in scope. 6-10
Appears focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage with only minor
11-15
aspects missing.
Appears well focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage; wide
16-20
scope.
Crucial factors (Weakness & Strengths)
Listing of important favorable and unfavorable factors, both quantitative and qualitative, for company
5 performance-usually listed by areas of analysis.
Appear unfocussed and quite limited in scope. 0-5
Appears relevant to topic and task; possibly little limited in scope. 6-10
Appears focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage with only minor
11-15
aspects missing.
Appears well focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage; wide
16-20
scope.
Inferences (Conclusion)
Includes forecasts, estimates, interpretations, and conclusions drawing on all prior sections of the report.
6
Appear unfocussed and quite limited in inference. 0-4
Appears relevant to topic and task; possibly little inference. 5-8
Appears focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage with appropriate
9-12
level of inference.
Appears well focussed and relevant to topic and task; thorough coverage; good
13-15
inference.
Total 100 marks
Final Marks Calculations

Part A
Student Name Part B Total
y * 0.20
ANG ZI ENN
YONG POH YUN
YONG LI TING
TAN AN LYNN
CHAI PEI KEI

Note: y is the total marks each student scored in part A

respectively.
 Plagiarism Form

All students’ works submitted for assessment must be attached with the Coursework
Declaration in the form and contents as follows:‐
Semester:________________ Course Code & Title: ________________________________

Declaration

I/We confirm that I/we have read and shall comply with all the terms and condition of TAR
College’s plagiarism policy. I/We declare that this assignment is free from all forms of plagiarism
and for all intents and purposes is my/our own properly derived work.

I/We further confirm that the same work, where appropriate, has been verified by antiplagiarism
software ________________________ (please insert).

Signature(s):__________________________________________________________________
Name(s):______________________________________________________________________
Date: ___________________
BBMF3063 FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS

Group Member Appraisal Form

The basis of this evaluation is your group member’s commitment to completing the assignment
and to their regard for other members of the group. It should be based on the contribution given
by each member and his or her involvement in this assignment.

Group members should be appraised using the following basis:

100% o Group member attended all group meetings or if unable to attend,

contacted the group in advance and came to an alternative arrangement
that the majority of group members were happy with.
o Group member contributed to group discussion.
o Group member always offered to help or volunteered for tasks.
o Group member had assigned tasks completed on time.
50% o Group member missed group meetings without making alternative
arrangements with other group members.
o Group member assigned tasks were only partly completed or poorly
completed.
o Group member did not contributed to the group effort or volunteer for
tasks.
0% o Group member attend few meetings and made no contribution to the
assignment.

Instructions:
Place the name of each of the members in your group in the space provided below.
Appraise each of the members in your group by circling one of the totals shown below.
(i.e. 100%, 50% or 0%)

Group Member Assessment

1. ANG ZI ENN 100% 50% 0%
2. YONG POH YUN 100% 50% 0%
3. YONG LI TING 100% 50% 0%
4. TAN AN LYNN 100% 50% 0%
5. CHAI PEI KEI 100% 50% 0%
6. 100% 50% 0%
7. 100% 50% 0%
8. 100% 50% 0%

Note: Failure to submit a Group Member Appraisal Form will result in a ZERO appraisal being
recorded against your name.