¡Felicitaciones! ¡Aprobaste!: Module 4 Quiz (4A To 4H)

1/12/2017 Coursera | Online Courses From Top Universities.
Join for Free | Coursera
 Module 4 quiz [4A to 4H] 10/10 points (100 %)

Cuestionario, 10 questions
 ¡Felicitaciones! ¡Aprobaste! Próximo artículo
1/1
 puntos
1.
A quick note about this quiz in general: it is a tough one. Take your time (there is no time limit), write out R
codes, sketches and analyses by hand and rewatch/reread some of the course content. This is an important
topic to master for practical real-world experimentation. We have written detailed help in the quiz solutions,
so please take a second or third time to truly master and understand the concepts. Good luck!
---
Je , a baker at a bakery shop is helping his manager prepare for their grand opening bake sale. He has been
instructed to optimize the taste of the chocolate chip cookies on a scale from 1 to 10, with level 10 being the
best tasting, judged by his boss and a panel of testers.
Flickr: inspirekelly
Je has only 4 hours each day to conduct experiments on the bakery's chocolate chip cookie recipe. There are
just 2 days until the opening, so he doesn't have that much time.
After practicing the recipe he can successfully make a batch of cookies in 1 hour. Je has considered the
following factors that he might use in his experiment.
A = Baking temperature: low level was 250°C, and high level was 275°C.
B = Number of minutes he stirs the dough for: low level was 3 minutes, and high level was 5 minutes.
C = Mass of chocolate chips per batch: low level was 200 grams, and high level was 250 grams.
D = Baking duration: low level was 15 minutes, and high level was 20 minutes.
E = Type of flour: low level was All-purpose flour, and high level was Cake flour
Select all correct statements below.
If Je considers using only 4 factors then he has time to run a half fraction factorial experiment,
where he can confound a main e ect with a three factor interaction e ect, such as: D = ABC
Correcto
Je can run at most 8 experiments in the remaining time: 8 = 2
4−1
= 2
3
If Je considers just 2 factors then he can run the experimental design twice.
Correcto
Je can run at most 8 experiments in the remaining time: 8 = 2 × 4 = 2 × 2
2
https://www.coursera.org/learn/experimentation/exam/vTcwy/module-4-quiz-4a-to-4h 1/20
1/12/2017 Coursera | Online Courses From Top Universities. Join for Free | Coursera
If Je considers using only 3 factors then he can run a full factorial experiment.
Module 4 quiz [4A to 4H] 10/10 points (100 %)

Correcto
Je can run at 8 experiments (8 = 2 )
3
in a full factorial in the remaining time.
Je would like to consider using all 5 factors in his experiments, but he doesn't have enough time
before opening day, even if he were to use a fractional factorial design.
Deseleccionado es lo correcto
1/1
 puntos
2.
Parvin works at a food processing company, and wanted to use a factorial DOE to optimize their yogurt
making process. The outcome variable that she is measuring is the total quantity (amount) of yogurt product
Module 4 quiz
at the end of the[4A to in4H]
process, kilograms. 10/10 points (100 %)
Flickr: vialbost
She considered the following factors for her experiment:
T = Temperature: low level was 31°C, and high level was 37°C.
S = Sugar: low level was 5kg, and high level was 7kg
C = Amount of live yogurt culture: low level was 400g, and high level was 450g.
She only has enough money in her budget, to run 4 experiments. Knowing this, she decides to run a fractional
factorial experiment by hastily making the main e ect C an alias for interaction e ect TS.
After conducting her experiments and analyzing the data she comes up with the following Pareto plot:
What conclusions can Parvin make about the process? Select all correct options below
Factor C can be removed - it's not important - so the experiment collapses to a 2-factor full factorial
experiment in factors T and S.
Parvin concludes that the main e ect factor C , which happens to be aliased with TS, is the largest
e ect. And further, it appears that factors T and S are both large, and cannot be ignored.
There seems to no other way around this, other than to use this as evidence to convince her
manager to let her complete a full factorial (4 more experiments) to really predict what is going on,
Module 4asquiz [4A to
she expects 4H]interactions are present.
several 10/10 points (100 %)
Correcto
Correct - this can be observed from the Pareto plot. Because the aliasing in this case was not optimally
assigned, a full factorial will be needed to interpret the results.
The three factor interaction TSC e ect is confounded with factor C .
She can conclude that the main e ect T can be neglected, because it is not as signi cant as factor C
.
1/1
 puntos
3.
Aditi, an EFI student, wants to understand the e ects related to the preparation of uncooked, breaded
chicken strips. She wants to investigate several factors with the objective of maximize the taste of her cooked
chicken strips. Her outcome variable is a quanti ed taste level (1 to 10, 10 being the best tasting chicken strip).
She identi ed 3 factors in her design:
D = Cooking duration: low level was 15 minutes, and high level was 22 minutes.
R = Position of oven rack: low level = middle rack, and high level = low oven rack (The coding here was done
intentionally, because the lower rack of the oven applies more heat than the middle).
P = Preheating of oven: low level was preheat for 30 seconds, and high level was a complete preheat to the
desired final temperature
desired final temperature.
She then conducted the following experiments in random order and reported her results in a standard order
Module
table: 4 quiz [4A to 4H] 10/10 points (100 %)
Experiment D R P y = Taste (1 to 10)
1 15 (−) middle (−) 30 sec (−) 3
2 22 (+) middle (−) 30 sec (−) 9
3 15 (−) low (+) 30 sec (−) 3
4 22 (+) low (+) 30 sec (−) 7
5 15 (−) middle (−) complete (+) 3
6 22 (+) middle (−) complete (+) 10
7 15 (−) low (+) complete (+) 4
8 22 (+) low (+) complete (+) 7
The predictive model from the full factorial was found to be:
^
y = 5.75 + 2.5xD − 0.5xR + 0.25xP − 0.75xD xR − 0.25xD xR xP
The DP and RP interaction terms were found to be insigni cant (zero).
Now assume that Aditi only had enough time to do 4 experiments.
Using the example above, select all correct responses.
The e ect of P in the half-fraction factorial run didn't remain the same because it was aliased with
a relevant interaction factor DR. This is seen by comparing the full factorial model with the half-
fraction model.
Correcto
We can observe from the predictive model that the two-factor interaction DR is not zero, so it will
confound the e ect of factor P.
The e ect of D in the half-fraction factorial remains the same because it is aliased with an irrelevant
factor RP. This is seen by comparing the full factorial model with the half-fraction model.
Correcto
This is correct; in the question text we are told that RP is zero.
The e ect of R in the half-fraction factorial run remains the same because it is aliased with a small
factor DP. This is seen by comparing the full factorial model with the half-fraction model.
Correcto
This is correct; in the question text we are told that DP is zero.
If Aditi only had enough time to do 4 experiments, the fractional factorial table that she would get,
assuming she used the following generator +P = DR, would be:
D R P y = Taste (1 to 10)
15 (−) middle (−) 30 sec (−) 3
22 (+) middle (−) 30 sec (−) 9
15 (−) low (+) complete (+) 4
22 (+) low (+) complete (+) 7
The predictive model that she would get would be:
^
y = 5.75 + 2.25xD − 0.25xR − 0.75xD xR

If Aditi only had enough time to do 4 experiments, the fractional factorial table that she would get,
assuming she used the following generator +P = DR, would be:
D R P y = Taste (1 to 10)
15 (−) middle (−) complete (+) 3
22 (+) middle (−) 30 sec (−) 9
15 (−) low (+) 30 sec (−) 3
22 (+) low (+) complete (+) 7
The predictive model that she would get would be:
^
y = 5.5 + 2.5xD − 0.5xR − 0.5xP
Correcto
This is the correct option; found by isolating the correct rows [5, 2, 3, and 8] from the original full
factorial table.
1/1
 puntos
4.
Inspired by Je 's design in question 1, Jennifer wants to understand the e ects related to the preparation of
her chocolate chip cookies on a smaller scale. She wants to investigate several factors with the objective of
Module 4 quiz
maximize [4A
the taste to cookies.
of her 4H] Her outcome variable is a quanti ed taste level (1 to 10, with10/10
10 being the(100 %)
points
best tasting cookie). She has identi ed 3 factors in her design:
D = Cooking duration: low level was 15 minutes, and high level was 25 minutes.
T = Oven temperature: low level = 350°C, and high level = 375°C
N = Number of chocolate chips: low level was 30 per batch, and high level 40 per batch.
She then created the following experimental table for her full factorial:
Experiment D T N
1 15(−) 350(−) 30(−)
2 25(+) 350(−) 30(−)
3 15(−) 375(+) 30(−)
4 25(+) 375(+) 30(−)
5 15(−) 350(−) 40(+)
6 25(+) 350(−) 40(+)
7 15(−) 375(+) 40(+)
8 25(+) 375(+) 40(+)
However, Jennifer has a problem. In order to run all 8 experiments in her allotted time frame, she will need to
conduct all of her experiments in the same day. How should she randomize her experiments to eliminate any
disturbances (known or unknown) that occur during the day?
Select one of the following options, which best illustrates the order in which Jennifer should conduct her
experiments.
Experiment D T N Time the experiment was run
1 15(−) 350(−) 30(−) 07:05
2 25(+) 350(−) 30(−) 09:02
3 15(−) 375(+) 30(−) 15:04
4 25(+) 375(+) 30(−) 17:10
5 15(−) 350(−) 40(+) 11:00
6 25(+) 350(−) 40(+) 13:05
7 15(−) 375(+) 40(+) 19:20
8 25(+) 375(+) 40(+) 22:05
1 15(−) 350(−) 30(−) 07:05
2 25(+) 350(−) 30(−) 09:02
3 15(−) 375(+) 30(−) 11:00
4 25(+) 375(+) 30(−) 13:05
5 15(−) 350(−) 40(+) 15:04
6 25(+) 350(−) 40(+) 17:10
7 15(−) 375(+) 40(+) 19:20
8 25(+) 375(+) 40(+) 22:05
Module 4 quiz
1 [4A to 4H]15(−) 350(−) 30(−) 11:00 10/10 points (100 %)
2
Cuestionario, 10 questions 25(+) 350(−) 30(−) 09:02
3 15(−) 375(+) 30(−) 19:20
4 25(+) 375(+) 30(−) 22:05
5 15(−) 350(−) 40(+) 15:04
6 25(+) 350(−) 40(+) 17:10
7 15(−) 375(+) 40(+) 07:05
8 25(+) 375(+) 40(+) 13:05
Correcto
Since Jennifer is running all of the experiments in the same day, there may be uncontrollable variables
that a ect the outcome like fatigue. Fatigue might cause her to not stir the cookie mixture as well or
make mistakes in the recipe. She must randomize her experiments to ensure that any disturbances
are not confounded with any of the factors.
1/1
 puntos
5.
Continuing from the previous question (Question 4), Jennifer now has a new problem: in addition to when to
conduct her experiments, her attempt to expedite her process introduces another variable.
In order for her to conduct her experiments at a faster pace, she needs to use two di erent mixing bowls, a
glass one and a wooden one. She cannot measure the e ects of this variable, so she is going to use blocking
to remove any confounding e ects the di erent bowls might have. In other words she has considered this
variable a nuisance variable.
Select one of the following options: which is the best choice to confound the mixing bowl variable, using
blocking?
She should confound the mixing bowl variable with the interaction factor DTN
Experiment D T N Mixing bowl
1 15(−) 350(−) 30(−) Glass
2 25(+) 350(−) 30(−) Wooden
3 15(−) 375(+) 30(−) Wooden
4 25(+) 375(+) 30(−) Glass
5 15(−) 350(−) 40(+) Wooden
6 25(+) 350(−) 40(+) Glass
7 15(−) 375(+) 40(+) Glass
8 25(+) 375(+) 40(+) Wooden
Correcto
She should confound the mixing bowl variable with factor D , because she expects D won't be an
important variable in the experiment.
1 15(−) 350(−) 30(−) Wooden
2 25(+) 350(−) 30(−) Glass
3 15(−) 375(+) 30(−) Wooden
Module 4 quiz
4 [4A to 4H] 25(+) 375(+) 30(−) Glass 10/10 points (100 %)
5
Cuestionario, 10 questions 15(−) 350(−) 40(+) Wooden
6 25(+) 350(−) 40(+) Glass
7 15(−) 375(+) 40(+) Wooden
8 25(+) 375(+) 40(+) Glass
She should confound the mixing bowl variable with the interaction factor TN because the number
of chocolate chips and oven temperature shouldn't interact.
1 15(−) 350(−) 30(−) Wooden
2 25(+) 350(−) 30(−) Wooden
3 15(−) 375(+) 30(−) Glass
4 25(+) 375(+) 30(−) Glass
5 15(−) 350(−) 40(+) Glass
6 25(+) 350(−) 40(+) Glass
7 15(−) 375(+) 40(+) Wooden
8 25(+) 375(+) 40(+) Wooden
1/1
 puntos
6.
Gatei is interested in optimizing the gas mileage in his car; his goal is to maximize his car's miles per gallon or
MPG. He has considered the following 4 factors, which he feels in uence his car's MPG the most:
A = Air conditioning: low level was off, and high level was on.
R = Type of road: low level was city, and high level was highway.
T = Time of day: low level was off hours (less cars), and high level was rush hour (high traffic levels).
E = Grade of engine oil: low level was low grade oil, and high level was high grade synthetic oil.
Gatei can run 2 experimental runs per day, and wants to complete the experiments between Monday and
Friday.
Which of the following are confounding / aliasing consequences of Gatei running a half-fraction factorial, with
the following generator: E = ART ?
The two factor interaction AT will be aliased with the two factor interaction term ER.
Correcto
Use the generator to create the de ning relationship for the experiment design: I = AERT. Then
nd the aliases by multiplying AERT by the factor or interaction for which you want to nd the alias.
For example, for the two-factor interaction AR: (AR)(AERT) = [AA]E[RR]T = [I]E[I]T = ET
The intercept term will be aliased with AERT.
The main e ect A will be aliased with the interaction term ERT.
Correcto
The intercept will be aliased with the ART interaction term.
The main e ect E will be aliased with the interaction term ART.
Correcto
This4
Module is a correct
quiz [4Aalias;to
it is given in the question.
4H] 10/10 points (100 %)
The two factor interaction AR will be aliased with the two factor interaction term ET.
Correcto
1/1
 puntos
7.
Like Gatei in Question 6, Robert is trying to explore di erent factors in the pursuit of maximizing his car's fuel
economy or miles per gallon (MPG) for his commute to work. However, he decides to investigate some
di erent factors from Gatei.
In order to do this he will conduct experiments, using a factorial DOE method, where he will commute to and
from work, and manipulate several controlled variables. He has considered the following factors:
A = Tire pressure: low level was 30psig, and high level was 35psig.
B = Air conditioning: low level was off, and high level was on.
C = Route to work: low level was City route, and high level was Highway route.
D = Cargo: low level was 75kg, and high level was 100kg.
Due to time constraints, Robert was only able to conduct 8 experiments. Therefore he ran a randomized half-
fraction factorial experiment: 24−1=8, using the generator: D=ABC. Yielding the following results, reported in a
standard order table:
y = Miles Per Gallon

Experiment A B C D
(MPG)
off
1 30(−) City (−) 75(−) 26
(−)
off
2 35(+) City (−) 100(+) 27
(−)
on
3 30(−) City(−) 100(+) 24
(+)
on
4 35(+) City(−) 75(−) 26
(+)
off Highway
5 30(−) 100(+) 33
(−) (+)
off Highway
6 35(+) 75(−) 37
(−) (+)
on Highway
7 30(−) 75(−) 32
(+) (+)
on Highway
8 35(+) 100(+) 33
(+) (+)
Based on Robert's experimental setup and results, identify all the correct statements below.
The main e ect A is aliased with the three factor interaction BCD.
Module 4 quiz [4A to 4H]

Correcto 10/10 points (100 %)
The predictive model that he would get would be:
^
y = 29.75 + 1xA − 1xB + 4xC − 0.5xD − 0.25xAB + 0.25xAC − 0.25xAD
Correcto
The predictive model that he would get would be:
^
y = 29 + 2xA − 1.5xB + 4xC − 0.5xD − 0.5xAB + 1.25xAC − 0.25xAD
The two factor interaction AB is aliased with the two factor interaction CD.
Correcto
The two factor interaction AC is aliased with the two factor interaction BD.
Correcto
1/1
 puntos
8.
Jordan, an amusement park manager, wants to investigate ways in which he can improve the pro t that his
amusement park makes in a week, operating within the summer season.
Flickr: arpik
To investigate this he has considered several factors:
R = Number of rides that are open: low level was 18, and high level was 24.
F = Advertising predominantly focusses healthier options (−), and less healthy fried carnival foods (+).
P = Number of employees hired for each ride: low level was 10 employees, and the high level was 13
employees.
Jordan is only able to conduct 4 experiments, due to the amount of money and time each one will take to
conduct. Therefore, Jordan conducted a half-fraction factorial experiment, using the generator: P = RF.
He conducted the following experiments in random order, over 4 weeks, and reported the results in a
standard order table:
Experiment R F P y = Profit (millions)
1 18 Healthier 13 1.0
2 24 Healthier 10 0.75
3 18 Unhealthy 10 2.0
4 24 Unhealthy 13 1.25
Based on Jordan's experimental setup and results, identify all the correct statements below.
The predictive model that he would calculate for the system would be:
^
y = 1.25 − 0.25xR + 0.375xF − 0.125xP
Correcto
Run the code below in RStudio to help you solve the question.
1 R <- F <- c(-1, +1)
2 design <- expand.grid(R=R, F=F)
3 R <- design$R
4 F <- design$F 10/10 points (100 %)
P <- R * F
6 y <- c(1, 0.75, 2, 1.25)
7 summary(lm(y ~ R*F*P))
The predictive model that he would calculate for the system would be:
^
y = 1 − 0.50xR + 0.45xF − 0.2xP
A disturbance could be the number of ride malfunctions that occurred during the week.
A covariate that he could use with his experiments could be the amount of rain the park received
during the week.
Correcto
Yes, this is measurable, but not controllable.
Jordan cannot tell the di erence between the e ect of food advertisement from the interaction
between the number of rides open with the number of employees the park hires.
Correcto
Yes, the factor F is confounded with the two-factor interaction RP in his experiment design.
1/1
 puntos
9.
Emil is trying to optimize the conversion of a product that his company produces. The outcome variable he is
measuring is the y = percent conversion that is achieved. The "conversion" is the amount of usable material
Module 4 experiment:
after the quiz [4Asotohigher4H]values are desirable. 10/10 points (100 %)
He has considered the following 3 factors to investigate:
F = Amount of feed material: low level was 100 litres/minute, and high level was 125 litres/minute.
T = Temperature: low level was 120°C, and high level was 130°C.
S = Agitator motor speed: low level was 200RPM, and high level was 250RPM. (RPM = revolutions per minute,
and is a measure of the mixer's speed)
Emil ran a full factorial experiment and recorded his results in a standard order table:
T: S: Mixer y=
Amount of feed
Experiment Temperature motor speed Conversion
[litres/minute]
[°C] [RPM] (%)
1 100 120°C 200 RPM 80
2 125 120°C 200 RPM 91
3 100 130°C 200 RPM 78
4 125 130°C 200 RPM 93
5 100 120°C 250 RPM 85
6 125 120°C 250 RPM 93
7 100 130°C 250 RPM 87
8 125 130°C 250 RPM 90
The material that Emil is experimenting comes in a xed quantity. He estimates that there will only be enough
material for about 4 experiments before the material runs out. Then he can switch to a second supplier's
material. The choice of supplier material is expected to a ect the conversion, but no one seems to be able to
tell him how.
Given all of this information, Emil vaguely remembers the terms of blocking, nuisance factors, disturbances,
and covariates.
Select all options below that are correct:
Emil's manager has said that he is not interested in e ect of the raw material, on the reactor's
conversion. The raw material is determined by the supplier of the material.
Since the suppliers of the material are not always consistent, and the company is obligated to use
whatever they receive, Emil should consider the raw material as a nuisance variable.
Therefore, he must use blocking to help negate the e ect of this nuisance variable of the raw
material going into the reactor.
He can block using the sign of the FTS terms to determine if the experiments should be run with
the rst (FTS = −1) or second (FTS = +1) supplier.
Correcto
You may use the R code below gives the half-fraction, complementary half fraction and full factorial
for this system. You will need to uncomment (remove the # symbol) from the lines you would like to
run.
1 # When S=TF is the generator; i.e. use +FTS sign to block.
2 F <- c(-1, +1, -1, +1)
3 T <- c(-1, -1, +1, +1)
4 S <- c(+1, -1, -1, +1) 10/10 points (100 %)
5 questions
Cuestionario, 10 y <- c(85, 91, 78, 90)
6 reactor <- lm(y ~ F*T*S)
7 summary(reactor)
8
9 # Or when S=-TF is the generator; i.e. use the
10 # sign of -FTS to block
11 #F <- c(-1, +1, -1, +1)
12 #T <- c(-1, -1, +1, +1)
13 #S <- c(-1, +1, +1, -1)
14 #y <- c(80, 93, 87, 93)
16 summary(reactor)
17
18 # For comparison: try using the full factorial,
19 # using all 8 experiments:
20 #F <- c(-1, +1, -1, +1, -1, +1, -1, +1)
21 #T <- c(-1, -1, +1, +1, -1, -1, +1, +1)
22 #S <- c(-1, -1, -1, -1, +1, +1, +1, +1)
23 #y <- c(80, 91, 78, 93, 85, 93, 87, 90)
25 summary(reactor)
If Emil only had enough money to conduct 4 experiments and used the generator S = −TF , the
predictive model would be:
^
y = 88.25 + 4.75xF + 1.75xT + 1.75xS
Correcto
Use the code provided in the other options, and verify this.
If Emil only had enough money to conduct 4 experiments and used the generator S = TF , the
predictive model would be:
^
y = 86 + 4.5xF − 2.0xT + 1.5xS
Correcto
Yes, this is the correct option.
The R code below gives the half-fraction, complementary half fraction and full factorial for this system.
You will need to uncomment (remove the # symbol) from the lines you would like to run.
1 # When S=TF is the generator; i.e. use +FTS sign to block.

2 F <- c(-1, +1, -1, +1)
3 T <- c(-1, -1, +1, +1)
4 S <- c(+1, -1, -1, +1)
5 y <- c(85, 91, 78, 90)
7 summary(reactor)
8
9 # Or when S=-TF is the generator; i.e. use the
10 # sign of -FTS to block
11 #F <- c(-1, +1, -1, +1)
12 #T <- c(-1, -1, +1, +1)
13 #S <- c(-1, +1, +1, -1)
14 #y <- c(80, 93, 87, 93)
16 summary(reactor)
17
18 # For comparison: try using the full factorial,
19 # using all 8 experiments:
20 #F <- c(-1, +1, -1, +1, -1, +1, -1, +1)
21 #T <- c(-1, -1, +1, +1, -1, -1, +1, +1)
22 #S <- c(-1, -1, -1, -1, +1, +1, +1, +1)
23 #y <- c(80, 91, 78, 93, 85, 93, 87, 90)
25 summary(reactor)
Emil's manager has said that he is not interested in e ect of the raw material, on the reactor's
conversion. The raw material is determined by the supplier of the material.
Since the suppliers of the material are not always consistent, and the company is obligated to use
whatever they receive, Emil should consider the raw material as a disturbance.
Your advice to Emil would be to randomize, so that you can counteract disturbances.
Just as Emil starts his experiments, he learns that the person that will actually implement the
experiments (called "the operator") will go on vacation in a few days.
The operator going on vacation will do the rst four experiments, while the new, temporary
operator will do the last four experiments.
Emil has already blocked his experiments for the material supplier 1 and 2. But this new issue with
the operator should make Emil concerned that his experiments will be confounded. True (click the
checkbox), or not true?
1/1
 puntos
10.
Hiro, a competitive swimmer, is trying to optimize his training habits with the goal of minimizing his race time in the 400 meter
individual medley. In order to do this he will conduct experiments, using a factorial DOE method, where he will conduct di erent
training sessions, while manipulating several factors that he has identi ed.
Flickr: 47844355@N00
He has considered the following 6 factors:
A = Stretching time: low level was 5 minutes, and high level was 10 minutes.
B = Amount of water drank prior to training: low level was 400ml, and high level was 500ml.
C = Warm up swim distance: low level was 500 meters, and high level was 700 meters.
D = Protein bar eaten prior to practice: low level was not eaten, and high level was eaten.
E = Amount of sleep the night before: low level was 8 hours, and high level was 9 hours.
F = Type of swimming suit: low level was only swimming trunks, and high level was full body swimming suit.
Due to time constraints, Hiro was only able to conduct 8 experiments. Therefore he ran a randomized eight-fraction factorial
experiment: 26−3 = 8 , using the generator: D = AB, E = AC, F = BC . Yielding the following results, reported in a standard
order table:
C= y = Time
A= E=
B= Warm D= F = Type to swim
Stretching Amount
Experiment Water up Protein of 400
Time of sleep
[ml] Distance Bar swimsuit meters
[minutes] [Hours]
[meters] [seconds]
1 5 400 500 Eaten 9 Full suit 325
Not
2 10 400 500 8 Full suit 330
eaten
Not Swim
3 5 500 500 9 326
eaten trunks
Swim
4 10 500 500 Eaten 8 300
trunks
Swim
5 5 400 700 Eaten 8 272
trunks
Not Swim
6 10 400 700 9 265
eaten trunks
Not
7 5 500 700 8 Full suit 300
eaten
8 10 500 700 Eaten 9 Full suit 275
Based on Hiro's experimental setup and results, identify the correct statements below.
The following pareto plot represents the following experiments:

Correcto
Run this code to help you solve the question.
The following subset of factors are signi cant: A, C, F, D
Correcto
The de ning relationship for the design was:

I = ABC = ADE = ABCFE = ABCDE = ABCDEF
The de ning relationship for the design was:

I = ABD = ACE = BCF = DEF = BCDE = ACDF = ABEF
Correcto
The following pareto plot represents the following experiments:

The following subset of factors are signi cant: A, B, D, E, F
  

¡Felicitaciones! ¡Aprobaste!: Module 4 Quiz (4A To 4H)

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

¡Felicitaciones! ¡Aprobaste!: Module 4 Quiz (4A To 4H)

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

1/12/2017 Coursera | Online Courses From Top Universities.

Join for Free | Coursera

 Module 4 quiz [4A to 4H] 10/10 points (100 %)

 ¡Felicitaciones! ¡Aprobaste! Próximo artículo

Select all correct statements below.

Module 4 quiz [4A to 4H] 10/10 points (100 %)

She considered the following factors for her experiment:

The three factor interaction TSC e ect is confounded with factor C .

Experiment D R P y = Taste (1 to 10)

1 15 (−) middle (−) 30 sec (−) 3

2 22 (+) middle (−) 30 sec (−) 9

3 15 (−) low (+) 30 sec (−) 3

4 22 (+) low (+) 30 sec (−) 7

5 15 (−) middle (−) complete (+) 3

6 22 (+) middle (−) complete (+) 10

7 15 (−) low (+) complete (+) 4

8 22 (+) low (+) complete (+) 7

The DP and RP interaction terms were found to be insigni cant (zero).

Now assume that Aditi only had enough time to do 4 experiments.

Using the example above, select all correct responses.

15 (−) middle (−) 30 sec (−) 3

22 (+) middle (−) 30 sec (−) 9

15 (−) low (+) complete (+) 4

22 (+) low (+) complete (+) 7

The predictive model that she would get would be:

Module 4 quiz [4A to 4H] 10/10 points (100 %)

15 (−) middle (−) complete (+) 3

22 (+) middle (−) 30 sec (−) 9

15 (−) low (+) 30 sec (−) 3

22 (+) low (+) complete (+) 7

The predictive model that she would get would be:

T = Oven temperature: low level = 350°C, and high level = 375°C

1 15(−) 350(−) 30(−)

2 25(+) 350(−) 30(−)

3 15(−) 375(+) 30(−)

4 25(+) 375(+) 30(−)

5 15(−) 350(−) 40(+)

6 25(+) 350(−) 40(+)

7 15(−) 375(+) 40(+)

8 25(+) 375(+) 40(+)

Experiment D T N Time the experiment was run

1 15(−) 350(−) 30(−) 07:05

2 25(+) 350(−) 30(−) 09:02

3 15(−) 375(+) 30(−) 15:04

4 25(+) 375(+) 30(−) 17:10

5 15(−) 350(−) 40(+) 11:00

6 25(+) 350(−) 40(+) 13:05

7 15(−) 375(+) 40(+) 19:20

8 25(+) 375(+) 40(+) 22:05

Experiment D T N Time the experiment was run

1 15(−) 350(−) 30(−) 07:05

2 25(+) 350(−) 30(−) 09:02

3 15(−) 375(+) 30(−) 11:00

4 25(+) 375(+) 30(−) 13:05

5 15(−) 350(−) 40(+) 15:04

6 25(+) 350(−) 40(+) 17:10

7 15(−) 375(+) 40(+) 19:20

8 25(+) 375(+) 40(+) 22:05

Experiment D T N Time the experiment was run

3 15(−) 375(+) 30(−) 19:20

4 25(+) 375(+) 30(−) 22:05

5 15(−) 350(−) 40(+) 15:04

6 25(+) 350(−) 40(+) 17:10