Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Jessica Pennington
CUR/528
Siddeeqah Johnson
2
The goal of this needs assessment is to determine through data measurement if the
proposed safety training project would benefit both the new and existing employees at Evans
Building Concepts in that they would be more aware of workplace hazards, more inclined to
communicate hazards, and more capable of mitigating risk through correctly using fall protection
on the jobsite. The needs assessment is necessary to measure and assess existing employees’
knowledge of safety procedures and to determine if they have received sufficient training from
overall in reducing the risk of injury. The plan seeks to identify current knowledge, stakeholder
perceptions, and future training goals aligned with the standards set by the Occupational Safety
Bradshaw (1972) conceptualized four types of need as normative, felt, expressed, and
regulations). Felt needs are stated by employees based upon their comfort levels with workplace
safety procedures. Expressed needs are established through supply and demand—safety needs
increase with the increase in workplace incidents. And comparative needs can be identified by
Normative Needs
Statistics (BLA), falls are the leading cause of death in construction—In fact, in 2015, there were
350 fatal falls to a lower level out of 937 construction fatalities. OSHA believes that proper
training is the key to mitigating risk and creating a safer working environment. Safety
3
professionals and members of the OSHA organization have developed a guide to Fall Protection
in Construction, which requires that employers provide fall protection training programs to all
workers who might be exposed to fall hazards. OSHA also requires that employers verify
worker training by preparing a written account of all trainings, including dates of training and
names of those who received instruction. By providing a standard for fall protection training,
this exhibits proof that company-specific planning should be implemented to develop a training
session for new and existing employees of Evans Building Concepts that identifies guidelines
Felt Needs
Felt needs come from the front line of action in the industry: all general construction
laborers, foreman, supervisors, and managers play a key role in expediting and communicating
safety practices. Felt needs, for this proposal, will be measured qualitatively through an interview
with a controlled group of employees who attend weekly meetings in-office on Tuesdays. The
group will consist of the owner of the company, the project manager, two supervisors, and two
construction laborers. The interview will take place confidentially in the office manager’s
holding area; the interviewee will be aware that the results will not directly be shared with the
owner and that their responses will remain anonymous. By providing qualitative responses, the
select group will have the opportunity to express any concerns that they have experienced or felt
in the workplace from the lack of training that the company currently provides.
The results of this assessment will demonstrate any needs that are experienced on the
front lines of operation and may be overlooked by management who is not in direct contact with
the new employees who are being trained. Because the new employees are provided with only
training material, the interviewees will determine whether this approach to safety training is
4
sufficient in communicating hazards or if they have been in situations where they were required
to administer impromptu training in fall protection. The responses from the interview will be
transcribed by the office manager, printed, and placed into the proposal binder to be given to the
owner in conjunction with all resources and materials that illustrate the training need.
Expressed Needs
Expressed needs should be measured quantitatively, as the demand for safety training
increases with the increase in workplace incidents and worker’s compensation claims.
According to the National Council on Compensation Insurance, the magnitude of the injury is
inversely related to the seriousness of the injury and results in a high level of indirect costs that
can ultimately create financial destruction in a small business. The chart below demonstrates the
Some of the indirect costs associated with workplace injury are as follows:
Any wages paid to injured workers for absences not covered by workers' compensation;
The wage costs related to time lost through work stoppage associated with the worker injury;
Administrative time spent by supervisors, safety personnel, and clerical workers post-injury;
Clean-up, repair, and replacement costs of damaged material, machinery, and property;
$0 - $2,999 4.5
Comparative Needs
The need for training can also be determined by comparing the safety training programs
in place with competitors in the construction industry. This approach would create comparative
data to measure our company injury statistics and would determine if the training provided by
the competitor proved to reduce the occurrence of injury. Although an interview with a
competing project manager would provide the necessary information, it may not be the best
approach to situation. Because the company operates within a niche market of construction
around a specific region, there are vendors and fellow construction companies that Evans
Building Concepts is in close contact with frequently on the job site. By requesting that the
vendors (they, too, are stakeholders) participate in an anonymous survey, there is a potential to
learn about how the company’s safety policy is perceived from an outside source. In addition to
being objective, vendors may be more likely to provide honest feedback, knowing that the results
6
will shape the way that their partners operate in the field—and thus, keeping them safer.
The survey consists of three basic questions relating to the company’s implementation of
fall protection on the jobsite. Although the questions are formatted to illicit a YES, NO, or
UNDECIDED response, there are adequate blanks for the vendors to include relevant
information that they deem necessary. The survey will conclude with space for the participant to
leave contact information if they wish to discuss their responses with the owner. The owner of
the company, or the primary stakeholder, will be receiving the resulting data and will consider
the outside observers as he makes a final decision on this training proposal. The next steps for
the training will be determined by the urgency of the concerns communicated by the felt needs of
Post-Training Assessment
As important is developing measures to analyze the need for safety training to create the
needs proposal, post-training assessments also play a crucial role in determining whether training
is necessary to meet the needs of the company. The safety training for all existing employees, as
well as new employees joining the company, would encompass a three-day initiative as part of
the onboarding process. The necessary training materials (OSHA fall protection guides) would
be issued on the date of hire for new employees and would provide all the necessary information
to succeed in fall protection and hazard communication training. The instructional process
would conclude with an authentic assessment facilitated by a company supervisor. The decision
to allow the supervisors to conduct the authentic assessment serves a multi-faceted purpose for
the company—both to ensure that the new employees can follow directions and maintain a safe
work environment and to ensure that the supervisors are capable of informing, evaluating, and
measuring effectiveness in the field. Because the instructor will not be present on the jobsites, it
7
is the responsibility of the supervisors to perform daily assessments of their crews to ensure that
work is being completed regarding meeting job timelines, as well as safety guidelines. Because
the construction industry can prevent significant and life-endangering hazards, safety must be the
Budget
The needs assessment budget reflects the size of the company and the OSHA
requirements for workplace safety. Because Evans Building Concepts has a relatively small
employee base, the parameters of this research and the development of assessment tools have
spanned outward to include a target population of all stakeholders: from the employees to the
vendors associated with the building process. They will be assessed differently to reflect what
contributions they provide and how their experiences will shape the future of company safety
training. While all resources utilized in the needs assessment development are available through
the OSHA website at no charge, a few costs associated with preparing this needs assessment and
conducting the needs assessment are displayed in the chart below (prepared for training class of
ITEM COST
Safety Resources – OSHA $0
Planning and Research Hours $60
- $15/hr
Supervisor Assessment Hours $60
- $15/hr (1/employee)
Vendor Surveys – Issued $0
Electronically
Paid Interview Time – 10 $15
minutes/employee ($15/hr)
Office supplies – notebooks, $45
pens, printing costs
Fall Protection Equipment – $0
Company Owned
8
Total $180
Concluding Thoughts
The needs assessment proposed is intended to research, measure, and interpret a variety
of company needs from a variety of different sources and stakeholders in the company. Because
the training would capitalize on the resources readily available by the company, this low-cost
training initiative could prove to save the company financially by mitigating risks that could lead
to a worker’s compensation claim and save the employees from being involved in hazardous
situations. This plan seeks to identify current knowledge, stakeholder perceptions, and future
training goals aligned with the standards set by the Occupational Safety and Health
the vendors that the employees encounter daily, and offering a post-training authentic
assessment, the needs of the company, employees, and board of safety professionals can be
Sources
Bradshaw, J. (1972). The concept of social need. Problems and Progress. Oxford University
Press.Oxford,UK.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2018). Background of the Cost Estimates.