RUBRICA ECOLOGÍA

EXPOSICION ORAL FECHA ULTIMA REVISIÓN:

30/07/2018
CASO DE ESTUDIO: ECOLOGÍA GLOBAL

TOTAL
CATEGORY SCORING CRITERIA SCORE
POINTS
Were the main ideas presented in a logical, orderly and clear manner? 2
Did the presentation fill the time allotted (15 minutes for exposition, 5 minutes for
2
discussion)?
Organization
Were the overheads/handouts appropriate and helpful to the audience? 2
Was the material selected for presentation appropriate to the topic?
(10 points)
It includes as a reference at least one primary source (scientific article) and one 2
science communication article (newspaper, popcast, etc).
Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references. 2
Introduction:
 Defines background and importance of research.
 States objective, and is able to identify relevant questions. 5
 Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for
the target audience.
Body:
 Presenter has a scientifically valid argument.
 Addresses audience at an appropriate level (rigorous, but generally
understandable to a scientifically-minded group). 15
Content and Scientific Merit
 Offers evidence of proof/disproof.
 Describes methodology.
(45 points)  The talk is logical.
Conclusion:
 Summarizes major points of talk.
15
 Summarizes potential weaknesses (if any) in findings.
 Provides you with a “take-home” message.
Was enough essential information given to allow the audience to effectively evaluate
the topic? 5

Did the presenter have a clear understanding of the material presented? 5

Were the main issues in this area clearly identified? 5
Were both theoretical positions (Frameworks: Principles of ecology for
biotechnological engineering or Biotechnology for ecology ) and empirical evidence 5
presented?
Were the strengths and weaknesses of these theories, and the methods used to
5
gather this evidence adequately explained?
CRITICL THINKING
Did the presenter make recommendations for further work in this area? 5
(45 POINTS) Did the main conclusions of the presentation follow from the material presented? 5
Were competing explanations or theories and principles of ecology considered and
5
dealt with properly?
Were the questions proposed by the team in the discussion section relevant to the
5
case of the study?
Did the team answer the questions from the audience properly? 5
5
TOTAL SCORE 100