Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
1
LIST OF TABLES
2
LIST OF CHARTS
3
1. Introduction
2. Need of the
study
3. Scope of the
study
4. Objectives of
the study
5. Limitations of
the study
4
INTRODUCTION
The term Emotional Intelligence is only a few years old. It was coined
by Daniel Goleman, who wrote the pioneering book on the subject. He
actually co-authored it with his wife, Tara, triggered by sitting through
many frustrating business meetings with her, particularly of boards they
both sat on.
He was only too aware that for some reason they weren't working well.
But it was his wife who was able to tune in to the emotional currents
beneath the surface of those meetings and identify the ones that
diverted the group's focus and energy, keeping them from getting their
business done. So how do we define Emotional Intelligence? Here's one
attempt, by Robert Cooper and Ayman Sawaf, in their excellent book
called Executive EQ (here that EQ stands for Emotional Quotient, Just
like IQ stands for Intelligence Quotient).
5
do powerful people have in common? Most of them are men! As people
become more powerful, those around them increasingly tell them what
they want to hear. The powerful think they're in touch. They imagine
their EQ is high. But it is not.
In this rat race if I win, I do so at your expense. There ain't room for the
two of us on the winner's podium. Little wonder that the environment
encourages us to work ever-longer hours, fly ever more miles to attend
ever more meetings. And then of course we expect to swap tales of our
heroic exploits over a few beers. No emotions here either. Just hard
guys doing hard things. Hard guys like Arnie 'the Governator' of
California, who described some of his opponents as 'girlie men' when
they failed to confront a tough political issue to his satisfaction. This
aversion to emotions in not just implicit. Managers have easily spelt out
why emotions are bad. They interfere with efficiency, reasoning and
judgement; are time wasting; and hold people back from taking the
necessary hard decisions. Rightly, in this sense, they say that emotions
get in the way of organisational effectiveness. Women – and men –
please note. But the challenges, the stresses and strains, are great in this
21st century of ours. Wall Street and its equivalents around the world
demand permanent growth of profits; and so corporate leaders keep
upping the ante on their people. Revenues must increase even as costs
continue to be squeezed.
6
NEED FOR THE STUDY
Working women are no longer a rarity and are now accepted
as an integral part of the working force. Organizations have
experienced a steady increase in the number of women
employees and this pattern is bound to continue in the future
as well.
7
SCOPE OF THE STUDY
8
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
9
LIMITATIONS OF THE
STUDY
10
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The purpose of research methodology is to describe research procedure.
It comprises defining and redefining problems, formulating hypothesis
or suggested solution. Collecting, organizing and evaluating data,
making deduction and reaching conclusions and at last carefully testing
the conclusions to determine whether they fit the formulating
hypothesis.
RESEARCH DESIGN:
DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH:
Descriptive research includes surveys and fact-findings inquiries
of different ways. The major purpose of descriptive research is
description of state of affairs, as it exists at present. The main
characteristics of this method are that the researcher has no control over
the variables, he can only report that has happened. The methods of
research are survey methods of all kinds, including comparitive and co-
relational methods. The researcher has adopted descriptive method.
11
SAMPLING METHOD:
SAMPLE SIZE:
The sample size consists of 50 women.
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
12
The Five Components of Emotional Intelligence of women
• Self-Awareness
People with a healthy sense of self-awareness are "comfortable
in their own skin." They understand their strengths, weaknesses,
emotions, and impact on others. One of the most telling signs of
self-awareness is how well a person responds to constructive
criticism.
• Self-Regulation
Not only do the emotionally intelligent understand their
emotions, but also they can demonstrate maturity and restraint
when revealing them. They do not squelch their feelings, instead
expressing them in a manner that shows a high level of judgment
and control.
• Motivation
Managers generally are ambitious. However, emotionally
intelligent leaders are motivated by a strong inner drive, not
simply money or titles. They are resilient and optimistic in the
disappointments. It takes a lot to break their spirit or thwart their
confidence.
• Empathy
Managers with empathy are not necessarily easy on their staffs.
They do, however, possess the compassion and understanding of
human nature that enables them to connect emotionally with
others. Empathy allows them to provide stellar customer service
and respond genuinely to an employee’s frustration or concern.
• People Skills
Emotionally intelligent managers are widely respected by their
bosses, peers, and employees. They like people and are savvy
enough to know what makes them tick. Their ability to quickly
build rapport and trust with those on whom they depend seems
almost second nature.
13
Data
Analysis
and
Interpret
ation
14
Table 4.1
S.N NO. OF
O PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 15-30 years 9 15
2 30-45 years 18 45
3 45-60 years 12 24.6
4 60- 75 years 11 15.4
TOTAL 50 100
15
CHART 4.1
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
50
40
30
20
10
0
AGE GROUP
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
16
Table 4.2
NO. OF
S.NO PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Below Rs.30000 7 15
Between Rs.30000-
2 Rs50000 21 43
Between Rs.50000-
3 Rs.150000 17 37
4 Above Rs.150000 5 10
TOTAL 50 100
17
CHART 4.2
50
NO. OF
43
40 37
30
20 15
10
10
0
18
Table 4.3
NO. OF
S.NO PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 10 + 2 5 2
2 Diploma 10 20
3 UG 20 40
4 PG 15 38
TOTAL 50 100
19
CHART 4.3
PERCENTAGE
2%
20%
38%
10 +2
Diploma
UG
PG
40%
20
Table 4.4
NO. OF
S.NO PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Good 10 24
2 Excellent 20 34
3 Poor 15 22
4 Very poor 5 20
TOTAL 50 100
21
CHART 4.4
40
34
35
30
24
25 22
20
20 P ERC ENTAGE
15
10
5
0
22
Table 4.5
NO. OF
S.NO PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Good 10 24
2 Excellent 20 34
3 Poor 15 22
4 Very poor 5 20
TOTAL 50 100
23
CHART 4.5
R E L A T IO N W IT H S U P E R V IS O R
34
40
24 22 20
20
0
PERCENT AG E
Good E x c e lle n t
Poor V e ry p o o r
24
Table 4.6
NO. OF
S.NO PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Regularly 18 36
2 Often 17 34
3 Rarely 10 20
4 Almost never 5 10
TOTAL 50 100
25
CHART 4.6
36 34
40
30 20
20 10
10
0
PERCENT AG E
R e g u la r ly
O f te n R a r e lyA lm o s t n e v e r
26
Table 4.7
NO. OF
S.NO PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Regularly 18 36
2 Often 17 34
3 Rarely 10 20
4 Almost never 5 10
TOTAL 50 100
27
CHART 4.7
10%
20% 36%
34%
R e g u la r ly
O ft e n R a r e lyA lm o s t n e v e r
28
Table 4.8
NO. OF
S.NO PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Regularly 5 10
2 Often 9 18
3 Rarely 26 52
4 Almost never 10 20
TOTAL 50 100
29
CHART 4.8
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
R e g u la r ly O fte n R a re ly A lm o s t n e v e r
P E R C E N T A G E1 0 18 52 20
30
Table 4.9
NO. OF
S.NO PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Strongly Agree 10 20
2 Agree 15 30
3 Disagree 20 40
4 Strongly Disagree 5 10
TOTAL 50 100
31
CHART 4.9
50
40
30
20
10
0
S t r o n g l yA g r e e D i s a g r eSe t r o n g l y
P E R C E N T A G2 0E 30 40 10
32
Table 4.10
NO. OF
S.NO PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Regularly 11 22
2 Often 14 28
3 Rarely 17 34
4 Almost never 8 16
TOTAL 50 100
33
CHART 4.10
A lm o s t n e v e r 16
R a r e ly 34
O fte n 28
R e g u la r ly 22
PERCENTAGE
34
Table 4.11
NO. OF
S.NO PARTICULARS RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
1 Very true 12 24
2 Mostly true 13 26
3 Mostly not true 18 36
4 Not true at all 7 14
TOTAL 105 100
35
CHART 4.11
100
N o t tr u e a t a ll
80
M o s t ly n o t t r u
60
M o s t ly tr u e
40 V e r y tr u e
20
0
PERCENT AG E
36
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
1. The study show that a maximum of 45% of respondents fall under
SUGGESTION and
RECOMMENDATIONS
37
1. Label your feelings, rather than labeling people or
situations.
38
CONCLUSION
39
I am a first year M.A. HRM student undertaking a survey of
"EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE OF WORKING WOMEN" in
"CHENNAI". This exercise is a part of the project towards fulfilling the
requirement of M.A. HRM course. I could be obliged if you provide me
with some of your time to answer a few questions, which will be
strictly confidential purely used for academic purpose.
QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Name :
2. Age :
a) 15-30 years c) 45-60 years
b) 30-45 years d) 60- 75 years
3. Income:
a) Below Rs.30000
b) Between Rs.30000- Rs50000
c) Between Rs.50000- Rs.150000
d) Above Rs.150000
40
c) Rarely d) Almost never
10. It is better to remain cold and neutral until you really get to know a
person
a) strongly agree b) Agree
c) disagree d) strongly disagree
11. I worry about things that other people don't even think about.
a) Regularly b) Often
c) Rarely d) Almost never
12. I am not satisfied with my work unless someone else praises it.
a) Very true b) Mostly true
c) Mostly not true d) Not true at all
41
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Dan Goleman
Jeanne Segal
PRACTICAL GUIDE
Authorstream.com
Slideshare.net
42