KULLIYYAH OF ENGINEERING

FINAL YEAR PROJECT (FYP 2)

REPORT ASSESSMENT RUBRIC
Department: Semester/Year:

Student Name: Matric:

Items Unacceptable Satisfactory Good Outstanding/Excellent Score Mark

Score (0 – <4) (4 – <6) (6 – <8) (8 – 10) (S) (S x W)
Report Content
Poorly written, lack All important
Only some information
important All important information are clearly
are summarized and
Abstract information such as information are organized and
presented. Does not
problem statement, summarized and summarized. Provides a
(W = 10) provide a clear
methodology, presented but not good understanding on
understanding about the
findings and properly organized. what the project is all
project.
conclusion about

Demonstrate poor Demonstrate limited Demonstrate high

Introduction Demonstrate some
understanding on understanding on the understanding on the
understanding on the
the topic. No topic. The problem topic with a valid and
topic. A good problem
(W = 5) problem statement is statement is vaguely concise problem
statement is provided.
defined. defined. statement

The overall purpose The overall purpose for

Objectives The overall purpose The overall purpose for for undertaking the undertaking the
for undertaking the undertaking the project project is stated fully, research or
project is not stated is stated fully, but in an but could have been experiment(s) is stated
(W = 5) fully, and is unclear unclear manner worded more in a clear, concise
concisely/directly manner.
Insufficient Fair amount of
Limited explanations A proper explanations
Literature explanations and explanations and
and elaboration if and elaboration of
Review elaboration of elaboration of
previous works. Only previous works.
previous works – previous works. Some
(W = 5) reporting but no critical Demonstrate good
not related to the critical thinking skill is
thinking skill. critical thinking skill.
project demonstrated.
Fairly addresses and
No clear description cites techniques and Clearly addresses the Clearly addresses the
Methodology of techniques and procedures techniques and techniques and
procedures used. appropriately. procedures used, procedures used,
(W = 15) Disorganized and Explanations are vague, Explanations are fairly Well organized, clear
unclear narrative. sometimes confusing organized and clear. and concise narrative.
but can be understood.
Provides some analysis
Provides limited Provides sufficient
Results and of the data. Presents Provides rich analysis
analysis of the data. analysis of the data.
Discussion some logical of the data. Presents a
Presents an illogical Presents a logical
explanation of findings logical and convincing
(W = 30) explanation of explanation of
but sometimes explanation of findings
findings findings.
confusing.
Demonstrates
Demonstrates some
limited ability to Draws valid
ability to draws Draws insightful
Conclusion draw conclusions conclusions based on
conclusions based on conclusions based on
based on the data. the data. Addresses
the data. Does not the data. Addresses
Does not address some of the questions
(W = 10) address many of the most of the questions
any of the questions raised in the
questions raised in the raised in the objectives.
raised in the objectives.
objectives.
objectives.
 KULLIYYAH OF ENGINEERING

Most are properly

Not properly cited or cited with minor All are properly cited,
Citation No or poor
incomplete, some inconsistency in list of reference are in
reference,
sources are formatting of list. order, Sources are
improperly cited,
(W = 5) questionable for an Sources are appropriate and
questionable sources
academic work. appropriate and reputable
reputable.
Writing skills
Poor grammatical Excellent grammatical
Fair grammatical Uses proper and
structure with many structure used. The
structure with some adequate grammar and
grammatical errors, information is presented
Language grammatical errors. The spelling. The flow of
contain disjointed very well, with strong,
information is presented information is good,
(W = 10) sentences and poor clear and convincing
in a simpler way but provides clear
statement of argument together with
with weak evidence for argument with fair
explanation with no relevant evidence to
support evidence to support
supporting evidence support

Overall

In relation to the In relation to the In relation to the In relation to the

project, the student project, the student , project, the student project, the student
didn’t addressed any the student addressed addressed ONE of the addressed TWO or
of the issues listed ONE of the issues listed issues listed below MORE of the issues
Impact of the below with a simple with a good listed below with a
Project below:
explanation without any explanation and good explanation and
(W=5) a) Society justification justification: justification:
b) Global a) Society a) Society a) Society
c) Environment b) Global b) Global b) Global
c) Environment c) Environment c) Environment

W = 100 Total Mark

Final score percentage (%) = (Total Mark/W)*10

Date: Signature: Examiner: