Abloom Mezzanine DEA 15.05.2017 PDF

Lane #23, House-B-160, Ground Floor, New
DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212,

Mobile: +8801718612966,
E-mail: quddus_ce@yahoo.com
DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT (DEA)

OF
EXISTING MEZZANINE FLOOR STEEL STRUCTURE OF BUILDING-01
AT 37, SOUTH SASTAPUR, UPAZILA ROAD, FATULLAH,
NARAYANGONJ-1420, BANGLADESH
(+23.638196N, +90.492288E)
NAME OF THE CLIENT:

ABLOOM DESIGN LTD.
Date of submission (Revised) : 25-07-2017
Name & Address of The Submitting Engineer:

Engr. Abdul Quddus
B.Sc. Engg(Civil, BUET),
DMINB/CE-0231
MIEB-21384
DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION

Road-#23, H-#337, Ground Floor
Mohakhali New DOHS
Dhaka-1206
Mobile: +8801718612966,
TABLE OF CONTENT
Sl No Description
1.0 As-Built drawing
2.0 Load Applied on structure
3.0 Evidential Image of connections
4.0 Typical calculation considering gravity load
5.0 Proposed structural framing system
6.0 Software used for analyzing the structure
7.0 Input Data
7.1 Static Load case
7.2 Load combinations
8.0 Base Reaction
9.0 Design Report
10.0 Column adequacy check
11.0 Beam adequacy Check
12.0 Joint adequacy check
13.0 Conclusion & Recommendation
Signature Of the Engineer
Appendix
Mobile: +8801718612966,
2.0 Load Applied on structure
Dead load: Self weight
Load Load: 40psf
Wind Load:
The calculation of wind load confirms the sub-clause 2.4, Chapter 2, Part-6 of BNBC.
The following equation has been used to calculate sustained wind pressure of the
structure.
Pz=CgCpCcCiCzVb2 [BNBC, 2.4.6.2,2.4.6.3 Page-6-33,6-34]

Wind load was applied in two orthogonal directions X and Y.
The following parameters are considered
1. Design wind speed =195 km/hr

2. Exposure Type =A
3. Importance factor, I = 1.0
Earth quake Load:
As per specifications of BNBC, Part-6, Chapter-2, section-2.5.51, Equivalent Static

Force Method can be applied to calculate the earth quake force of this structure.
Design Base Shear, V=ZICW/R (Ref. Sec2.5.6.1, Chapter-2, Part-6, BNBC)
Where,
1.0 Seismic Zone coefficient factor, Z=0.15 for Zone-02
(Ref.Table6.2.22 Sec2.5.6.1, Chap.-2, Part-6, BNBC)
2.0 Importance factor, I = 1.0
(Ref. Table 6.2.23 Sec2.5.6.1,Chap.-2,Part-6, BNBC)
3.0 Numerical Co-efficient, C=0.034 (for steel structure)
4.0 Response Modification factor, R=6 (Ordinary moment resisting frame)
Earth quake load was applied in two orthogonal directions X & Y.

Mobile: +8801718612966,
3.0 Evidential Image of connections
Type of connection: Member has been connected by welding.

Connection Details of mezzanine floor
01 02
03 04
05 06
4.0 Typical calculation considering gravity load:

Mobile: +8801718612966,
Member size =200x100x6.5mm (I)

Capacity of column against compressive strength= 140kip
Capacity of column against buckling =42kip
Moment carrying capacity =30k-ft
Member size =200x50x5.5mm (Channel)
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Capacity of column against compressive strength= 42kip

Capacity of column against buckling =15kip
Moment carrying capacity =7k-ft
Load Calculation:
Self weight of slab=4.0/12*150=50psf
Additional load due to framing=10psf (Approximate)
Total dead load=60psf
Assume live load=A
Hence total factored load=1.4*60+1.7*A=84+1.7A
Check Channel section:
Due to moment:
WL2/8=7
W=7*8/62
So, W=1.55klf=1550plf
Or,( ((84+1.7A)*20.6)/6)*1.3=1550
Or, A=155psf
Check I-Section: (Beam-01)
Due to moment:
WL2/8=30
W=30*8/16.672
So, W=0.86klf=860plf
Or,( ((84+1.7A)*70)/16.67)*1.3=860
Or, A=43psf
40 psf load can be applied
Column Check:
Maximum effective area of a single column=62.5 sqft
Maximum Gravity Load on Each column is (84+1.7*38)*62.5=9.5kIP
This is less than the capacity of column
So maximum 38 psf live load can be applied on mezzanine floor.
Check edge supporting system:

I-Joist rest on an angle at edge which are connected with wall by 3-12mm dia bar
Maximum shear force at edge, V
Load on beam=(84+1.7*38)* maximum effective area/span length
=(149*78/15.33)=760plf
So sear force at edge=760*15.33/2=5.83kip
Shear resist by 3-12mm dia rod=0.3*40*3*0.175=6.30kip ; Hence ok
Present framing system is able to carry gravity load only but is unable to carry lateral load
earthquake & wind. So a few nos. of column & beam at specific locations is proposed to
resist lateral load.
6.0 Software used for analyze the structure:
ETABS 3D analysis is performed to check the structural adequacy.

Mobile: +8801718612966,
7.0 INPUT DATA
7.1 Static Load Case

Load Case Type
DEAD DEAD
LIVE LIVE
WINDX WIND
WINDY WIND
EQX QUQKE
EQY QUAKE
7.2 Load Combinations:

Combo Type Case Factor CaseType
WSD ADD DEAD 1 Static

WSD LIVE 1 Static
ACC1 ADD DEAD 1.2 Static
ACC1 LIVE 1.6 Static
ACC2 WINDX 1.3 Static
ACC3 WINDX -1.3 Static
ACC4 WINDY 1.3 Static
ACC5 WINDY -1.3 Static
ACC6 QUAKEX 1.5 Static
ACC7 QUAKEX -1.5 Static
ACC8 QUAKEY 1.5 Static
ACC9 QUAKEY -1.5 Static
Mobile: +8801718612966,
8. 0 FOUNDATION ADEQUACY CHECK:
SOIL CAPACITY CALCULATION:

From soil test report, Bearing capacity of soil at 5’-0” level (Table-4)
Avg. allowable bearing capacity, Qall=(1.18+0.46+0.28+0.46+1.00)/5=0.676tsf (FOS=2.5)
Bearing capacity compliance (Existing condition)
Allowable Bearing Capacity of soil , qa=0.676tsf (FOS=2.5)

Service Area of
Current
Load footing
Point Footing ID. Remarks
(DL+LL)
sqft FOS
Kip
440 WSD 11.39 9 2.68 ADEQUATE
441 WSD 10.93 9 2.79 ADEQUATE
444 WSD 10.93 9 2.79 ADEQUATE
424 WSD 10.7 9 2.85 ADEQUATE
435 WSD 10.25 9 2.97 ADEQUATE
422 WSD 9.42 9 3.23 ADEQUATE
442 WSD 8.97 9 3.4 ADEQUATE
436 WSD 8.93 9 3.41 ADEQUATE
Mobile: +8801718612966,
445 WSD 8.85 9 3.44 ADEQUATE

483 WSD 8.13 9 3.75 ADEQUATE
418 WSD 7.95 9 3.83 ADEQUATE
426 WSD 7.89 9 3.86 ADEQUATE
446 WSD 7.61 9 4 ADEQUATE
447 WSD 7.22 9 4.22 ADEQUATE
428 WSD 6.98 9 4.36 ADEQUATE
419 WSD 6.82 9 4.47 ADEQUATE
434 WSD 6.25 9 4.87 ADEQUATE
438 WSD 5.43 9 5.61 ADEQUATE
420 WSD 5.35 9 5.69 ADEQUATE
437 WSD 5.28 9 5.77 ADEQUATE
448 WSD 4.66 9 6.53 ADEQUATE
433 WSD 3.67 9 8.29 ADEQUATE
443 WSD 3.63 9 8.39 ADEQUATE
432 WSD 3.53 9 8.62 ADEQUATE
429 WSD 2.69 9 11.31 ADEQUATE
425 WSD 2.43 9 12.52 ADEQUATE
431 WSD 1.76 9 17.29 ADEQUATE
423 WSD 1.28 9 23.77 ADEQUATE
430 WSD 0.8 9 38.03 ADEQUATE
Bearing capacity compliance (After Beam retrofitting)
Allowable Bearing Capacity of soil , qa=0.676tsf (FOS=2.5)

Area of
Service Load Current
footing
Point Footing ID. Remarks
(DL+LL) Kip sqft FOS
441 F1 10.95 9 2.78 ADEQUATE

444 F1 10.93 9 2.79 ADEQUATE
422 F1 9.39 9 3.24 ADEQUATE
426 F1 9.36 9 3.25 ADEQUATE
442 F1 8.97 9 3.4 ADEQUATE
436 F1 8.88 9 3.43 ADEQUATE
445 F1 8.85 9 3.44 ADEQUATE
421 F1 8.46 9 3.6 ADEQUATE
483 F1 8.14 9 3.74 ADEQUATE
446 F1 7.61 9 4 ADEQUATE
447 F1 7.21 9 4.22 ADEQUATE
440 F1 7.19 9 4.24 ADEQUATE
Mobile: +8801718612966,
418 F1 7.04 9 4.33 ADEQUATE

428 F1 6.98 9 4.36 ADEQUATE
419 F1 6.71 9 4.54 ADEQUATE
427 F1 6.7 9 4.55 ADEQUATE
435 F1 6.65 9 4.58 ADEQUATE
547 F1 6.33 9 4.81 ADEQUATE
434 F1 6.25 9 4.87 ADEQUATE
448 F1 5.67 9 5.37 ADEQUATE
438 F1 5.43 9 5.61 ADEQUATE
420 F1 5.35 9 5.69 ADEQUATE
439 F1 5.3 9 5.74 ADEQUATE
437 F1 5.28 9 5.77 ADEQUATE
476 F1 5.12 9 5.95 ADEQUATE
424 F1 4.45 9 6.84 ADEQUATE
425 F1 4.07 9 7.48 ADEQUATE
433 F1 3.67 9 8.29 ADEQUATE
443 F1 3.63 9 8.39 ADEQUATE
432 F1 3.53 9 8.62 ADEQUATE
429 F1 2.69 9 11.31 ADEQUATE
431 F1 1.76 9 17.29 ADEQUATE
423 F1 1.28 9 23.77 ADEQUATE
430 F1 0.8 9 38.03 ADEQUATE
Comments: All footings are adequate.

Mobile: +8801718612966,
9.0 ETABS Output Data:
ETABS v9.7.4 File:MEZZANINE FLOOR 15.05.2017 Units:Kip-in May 14, 2017 15:20 PAGE 1
PROJECT INFORMATION
Company Name = DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION

Client Name = ABLOOM SWEATERS LTD
Project Name = MEZZANINE FLOOR
S T O R Y D A T A
STORY SIMILAR TO HEIGHT ELEVATION
STORY2 None 84.000 84.000

BASE None 0.000
S T A T I C L O A D C A S E S
STATIC CASE AUTO LAT SELF WT NOTIONAL NOTIONAL

CASE TYPE LOAD MULTIPLIER FACTOR DIRECTION
DEAD DEAD N/A 1.0000

LIVE LIVE N/A 0.0000
WINDX WIND UBC94 0.0000
WINDY WIND UBC94 0.0000
QUAKEX QUAKE UBC94 0.0000
QUAKEY QUAKE UBC94 0.0000
A U T O W I N D U B C 9 4
Case: WINDX
AUTO WIND INPUT DATA
Exposure From: Rigid diaphragm extents

Direction Angle = 0 degrees
Windward Cq = 1.0303
Leeward Cq = 0.00000000001
Top Story: STORY2

Bottom Story: BASE
No parapet is included
Basic Wind Speed, V = 121 mph

Exposure Type = B
Importance Factor, Iw = 1
AUTO WIND EXPOSURE WIDTH INFORMATION (Exposure widths are from diaphragm extents)
STORY DIAPHRAGM WIDTH X Y
STORY2 D1 396.840 561.720 198.420
AUTO WIND CALCULATION FORMULAS
P = wind pressure = SUM(Ce Cq qs Iw) -- Method 1
Ce, the combined height, exposure and gust factor coefficient, is from UBC94 Table 16-G
qs is the wind stagnation pressure at the standard height of 33 feet

qs = 0.00256 V^2 >= 10 psf
AUTO WIND CALCULATION RESULTS

Mobile: +8801718612966,
qs = 37.4810 psf
AUTO WIND STORY FORCES
STORY FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
STORY2 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 -549.862
A U T O W I N D U B C 9 4
Case: WINDY
AUTO WIND INPUT DATA
Exposure From: Rigid diaphragm extents

Direction Angle = 0 degrees
Windward Cq = 1.4323
Leeward Cq = 0.000000000001
Top Story: STORY2

Bottom Story: BASE
No parapet is included
Basic Wind Speed, V = 121 mph

Exposure Type = B
Importance Factor, Iw = 1
AUTO WIND EXPOSURE WIDTH INFORMATION (Exposure widths are from diaphragm extents)
STORY DIAPHRAGM WIDTH X Y
STORY2 D1 396.840 561.720 198.420
AUTO WIND CALCULATION FORMULAS
P = wind pressure = SUM(Ce Cq qs Iw) -- Method 1
Ce, the combined height, exposure and gust factor coefficient, is from UBC94 Table 16-G
qs is the wind stagnation pressure at the standard height of 33 feet

qs = 0.00256 V^2 >= 10 psf
AUTO WIND CALCULATION RESULTS
qs = 37.4810 psf
AUTO WIND STORY FORCES
STORY2 3.85 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 -764.406
A U T O S E I S M I C U B C 9 4
Case: QUAKEX
AUTO SEISMIC INPUT DATA
Direction: X
Typical Eccentricity = 5%
Eccentricity Overrides: No
Period Calculation: Program Calculated

Ct = 0.034 (in feet units)
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Top Story: STORY2

Bottom Story: BASE
Rw = 6
Z = 0.15
S = 1.5
I = 1
hn = 84.000 (Building Height)
AUTO SEISMIC CALCULATION FORMULAS
Ta = Ct (hn^(3/4))
If Z >= 0.35 (Zone 4) then: If Tetabs <= 1.30 Ta then T = Tetabs, else T = Ta
If Z < 0.35 (Zone 1, 2 or 3) then: If Tetabs <= 1.40 Ta then T = Tetabs, else T = Ta
V = Z I C W / Rw
C = (1.25 S) / (T^(2/3))
C <= 2.75
C >= 0.075 Rw, that is, C >= 0.4500
If T <= 0.7 sec, then Ft = 0

If T > 0.7 sec, then Ft = 0.07 T V <= 0.25 V
AUTO SEISMIC CALCULATION RESULTS
Ta = 0.1463 sec
T Used = 0.2048 sec
C Used = 2.7500
W Used = 244.98
V Used = 0.0688W = 16.84
Ft Used = 0.00
AUTO SEISMIC STORY FORCES
STORY2 16.84 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 -3053.196
A U T O S E I S M I C U B C 9 4
Case: QUAKEY
AUTO SEISMIC INPUT DATA
Direction: Y
Typical Eccentricity = 5%
Eccentricity Overrides: No
Period Calculation: Program Calculated

Ct = 0.034 (in feet units)
Top Story: STORY2

Bottom Story: BASE
Rw = 6
Z = 0.15
S = 1.5
I = 1
hn = 84.000 (Building Height)
AUTO SEISMIC CALCULATION FORMULAS
Ta = Ct (hn^(3/4))
If Z >= 0.35 (Zone 4) then: If Tetabs <= 1.30 Ta then T = Tetabs, else T = Ta
If Z < 0.35 (Zone 1, 2 or 3) then: If Tetabs <= 1.40 Ta then T = Tetabs, else T = Ta
Mobile: +8801718612966,
V = Z I C W / Rw
C = (1.25 S) / (T^(2/3))
C <= 2.75
C >= 0.075 Rw, that is, C >= 0.4500
If T <= 0.7 sec, then Ft = 0

If T > 0.7 sec, then Ft = 0.07 T V <= 0.25 V
AUTO SEISMIC CALCULATION RESULTS
Ta = 0.1463 sec
T Used = 0.2048 sec
C Used = 2.7500
W Used = 244.98
V Used = 0.0688W = 16.84
Ft Used = 0.00
AUTO SEISMIC STORY FORCES
STORY2 0.00 16.84 0.00 0.000 0.000 9502.117
M A S S S O U R C E D A T A
MASS LATERAL LUMP MASS

FROM MASS ONLY AT STORIES
Loads No No
M A S S S O U R C E L O A D S
LOAD MULTIPLIER
DEAD 1.0000
D I A P H R A G M M A S S D A T A
STORY DIAPHRAGM MASS-X MASS-Y MMI X-M Y-M
STORY2 D1 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 559.577 140.975
A S S E M B L E D P O I N T M A S S E S
STORY UX UY UZ RX RY RZ
STORY2 6.345E-01 6.345E-01 6.345E-01 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00

BASE 4.210E-03 4.210E-03 4.210E-03 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
Totals 6.387E-01 6.387E-01 6.387E-01 0.000E+00 0.000E+00 0.000E+00
C E N T E R S O F C U M U L A T I V E M A S S & C E N T E R S O F R I G I D I T
Y
STORY DIAPHRAGM /----------CENTER OF MASS----------//--CENTER OF RIGIDITY--/

LEVEL NAME MASS ORDINATE-X ORDINATE-Y ORDINATE-X ORDINATE-Y
STORY2 D1 0.000E+00 0.000 0.000 583.714 166.964
MODAL INFORMATION
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Modal Analysis not done.
TOTAL REACTIVE FORCES (RECOVERED LOADS) AT ORIGIN
LOAD FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
DEAD 1.326E-13 8.315E-14 2.469E+02 4.493E+04 -1.393E+05 1.801E-11

LIVE 4.930E-14 3.252E-14 9.324E+01 1.698E+04 -5.280E+04 8.191E-12
WINDX -2.771E+00 5.102E-13 2.416E-19 -4.286E-11 -2.328E+02 5.499E+02
WINDY -3.852E+00 7.093E-13 -1.536E-20 -5.958E-11 -3.236E+02 7.644E+02
QUAKEX -1.684E+01 -6.021E-13 -2.817E-17 5.057E-11 -1.415E+03 3.053E+03
QUAKEY -8.021E-13 -1.684E+01 -9.114E-18 1.415E+03 -6.741E-11 -9.502E+03
S T O R Y F O R C E S
STORY LOAD P VX VY T MX
MY
STORY2 WINDX 2.229E-04 -9.113E-04 4.373E-05 2.220E-01 5.895E-03 -

2.459E-02
STORY2 WINDY 3.099E-04 -1.267E-03 6.079E-05 3.086E-01 8.195E-03 -
3.418E-02
STORY2 QUAKEX 8.492E-05 -1.022E-02 1.177E-04 1.706E+00 -1.400E-01 -
5.211E-01
STORY2 QUAKEY 4.285E-05 -1.469E-04 -1.039E-02 -3.486E+00 6.325E-01 -
2.183E-01
STORY DRIFTS
STORY DIRECTION LOAD MAX DRIFT
STORY2 X WINDX 1/498694

STORY2 X WINDY 1/358727
STORY2 X QUAKEX 1/313227
STORY2 Y QUAKEY 1/173440
DISPLACEMENTS AT DIAPHRAGM CENTER OF MASS
STORY DIAPHRAGM LOAD UX UY RZ
STORY2 D1 WINDX 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000

BASE D1 WINDX 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000
STORY2 D1 WINDY 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000
BASE D1 WINDY 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000
STORY2 D1 QUAKEX 0.0002 0.0000 0.00000
BASE D1 QUAKEX 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000
STORY2 D1 QUAKEY 0.0000 0.0002 0.00000
BASE D1 QUAKEY 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000
STORY MAXIMUM AND AVERAGE LATERAL DISPLACEMENTS
STORY LOAD DIR MAXIMUM AVERAGE RATIO
STORY2 WINDX X 0.0002 0.0001 1.999

STORY2 WINDY X 0.0002 0.0001 1.999
STORY2 QUAKEX X 0.0003 0.0001 1.807
STORY2 QUAKEY Y 0.0005 0.0002 1.941
Mobile: +8801718612966,
10.0 Column adequacy check:
Tensile strength of steel=36ksi
Column adequacy check(Existing condition)
Story ColLine SecID PMMCombo PMMRatio

STORY2 C4 I-SECTION ACC1(C) 0.486
STORY2 C23 I2-SECTION ACC1(C) 0.705
STORY2 C50 I2-SECTION ACC1(C) 0.871
Mobile: +8801718612966,

STORY2 C63 PIPE ACC1(C) 0.016
Column adequacy check(After proposing steel column)
Steel Columns - Stress Check Output - AISC-LRFD93

GB C1 I-SECTION ACC1(C) 0.607
Mobile: +8801718612966,
Steel Columns - Stress Check Output - AISC-LRFD93

GB C33 P1 ACC1(T) 0.023
Comments: For structural members adequacy several new steel columns has
been proposed.
Mobile: +8801718612966,
11 Beam adequacy check:
Beam adequacy check:(Existing condition)

Steel Beams - Stress Check Output - AISC-LRFD93
Story BayID SecID PMMCombo PMMRatio
GB B425 I-SECTION ACC1(T) 0.777
GB B426 C-SECTION ACC9(T) 0
GB B427 C-SECTION ACC9(T) 0.002
GB B433 ANGLE ACC1(T) 0.344
Mobile: +8801718612966,

Mobile: +8801718612966,

Comments: For structural members adequacy several new steel floor beams has
been proposed.
A single floor beam is inadequate. Inadequate members are proposed to
strengthen.
Beam adequacy check:(After retrofitting condition)

GB B426 C-SECTION ACC9(T) 0
Mobile: +8801718612966,

GB B479 RMB ACC1(T) 0.737
Mobile: +8801718612966,

GB B499 ANGLE ACC1(C) 0.106
Mobile: +8801718612966,
12.0 Joint check:

Table: joint shear
Point Load FX FY
2 ENVELOP MAX 2.05 0.87

2 ENVELOP MIN -1.92 -1.00
24 ENVELOP MIN -1.90 -1.22
25 ENVELOP MIN -1.59 -1.49
26 ENVELOP MIN -0.68 -0.29
27 ENVELOP MIN -0.64 -0.40
29 ENVELOP MIN -0.94 -0.35
30 ENVELOP MIN -1.15 -1.11
32 ENVELOP MIN -0.96 -0.41
33 ENVELOP MIN -0.50 -0.37
45 ENVELOP MIN -1.65 -4.04
46 ENVELOP MIN -1.46 -2.24
53 ENVELOP MIN -1.40 -1.65
58 ENVELOP MIN -0.98 -1.34
59 ENVELOP MIN -0.39 -0.56
61 ENVELOP MIN -1.62 -1.58
Mobile: +8801718612966,
63 ENVELOP MIN -0.65 -1.03

65 ENVELOP MIN -0.07 -0.15
66 ENVELOP MIN -0.17 -0.22
76 ENVELOP MIN -0.88 -0.84
77 ENVELOP MIN -0.79 -0.72
78 ENVELOP MIN -0.50 -0.79
79 ENVELOP MIN -0.99 -1.71
236 ENVELOP MIN -1.09 -1.12
672 ENVELOP MIN -0.42 -0.22
685 ENVELOP MIN -1.28 -1.65
Joint Check (Beam column):

Maximum shear, Fx=2.38kip
Thickness of welding, s=3/16in
Allowable shear in weld, Fv=0.3*40=12Kip
Assume length of weld=L
Then,
L*s*Fv=Fx
L*3/16*12=2.38
L=1.05in
But minimum welding length, L=4s=4*3/16=0.75in
So required welding length, Lr=1.05in
Provided length, Lp=(4+4)=8in; Hence ok
Edge joint (join in brick wall) check:
Maximum vertical shear, Fy=4.45Kip

3-12mm dia bar provided in edge support
So resisting force, Fr=0.3fy*3*As=0.3*40*3*0.175=6.3kip >4.45; Hence ok
Mobile: +8801718612966,
13.0 Conclusion & Recommendation:
The following observation has been found.
1. Present structural system is adequate to carry 40psf live load

2. To ensure structural adequacy due to lateral loading a few nos of column & beam is proposed
in specific locations. A floor beam is inadequate. Inadequate beams are proposed to
strengthen.
3. Foundation system adequate.
Thanking You
Md. Abdul Quddus

B.Sc Engg. (Civil, BUET)
MIEB-21384, DMINB/CE-0231
CEO & Structural Designer
DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION

Abloom Mezzanine DEA 15.05.2017 PDF

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Abloom Mezzanine DEA 15.05.2017 PDF

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Lane #23, House-B-160, Ground Floor, New

DOHS, Mohakhali, Dhaka-1212,

DETAILED ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT (DEA)

NAME OF THE CLIENT:

Date of submission (Revised) : 25-07-2017

Name & Address of The Submitting Engineer:

DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION

2.0 Load Applied on structure

Dead load: Self weight

Load Load: 40psf

Pz=CgCpCcCiCzVb2 [BNBC, 2.4.6.2,2.4.6.3 Page-6-33,6-34]

1. Design wind speed =195 km/hr

Earth quake Load:

As per specifications of BNBC, Part-6, Chapter-2, section-2.5.51, Equivalent Static

Earth quake load was applied in two orthogonal directions X & Y.

3.0 Evidential Image of connections

Type of connection: Member has been connected by welding.

4.0 Typical calculation considering gravity load:

Member size =200x100x6.5mm (I)

Capacity of column against compressive strength= 42kip

Check edge supporting system:

6.0 Software used for analyze the structure:

ETABS 3D analysis is performed to check the structural adequacy.

7.0 INPUT DATA

7.1 Static Load Case

7.2 Load Combinations:

WSD ADD DEAD 1 Static

8. 0 FOUNDATION ADEQUACY CHECK:

SOIL CAPACITY CALCULATION:

Bearing capacity compliance (Existing condition)

Allowable Bearing Capacity of soil , qa=0.676tsf (FOS=2.5)

445 WSD 8.85 9 3.44 ADEQUATE

Bearing capacity compliance (After Beam retrofitting)

Allowable Bearing Capacity of soil , qa=0.676tsf (FOS=2.5)

441 F1 10.95 9 2.78 ADEQUATE

418 F1 7.04 9 4.33 ADEQUATE

Comments: All footings are adequate.

9.0 ETABS Output Data:

Company Name = DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT SOLUTION

STORY SIMILAR TO HEIGHT ELEVATION

STORY2 None 84.000 84.000

STATIC CASE AUTO LAT SELF WT NOTIONAL NOTIONAL

DEAD DEAD N/A 1.0000

AUTO WIND INPUT DATA

Exposure From: Rigid diaphragm extents

Top Story: STORY2

Basic Wind Speed, V = 121 mph

STORY DIAPHRAGM WIDTH X Y

STORY2 D1 396.840 561.720 198.420

AUTO WIND CALCULATION FORMULAS

P = wind pressure = SUM(Ce Cq qs Iw) -- Method 1

qs is the wind stagnation pressure at the standard height of 33 feet

AUTO WIND CALCULATION RESULTS

AUTO WIND STORY FORCES

STORY2 2.77 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 -549.862

AUTO WIND INPUT DATA

Exposure From: Rigid diaphragm extents

Top Story: STORY2

Basic Wind Speed, V = 121 mph

STORY DIAPHRAGM WIDTH X Y

STORY2 D1 396.840 561.720 198.420

AUTO WIND CALCULATION FORMULAS

P = wind pressure = SUM(Ce Cq qs Iw) -- Method 1