x petitioner as President is over and only if legally
warranted. He then filed GR No. 146738 for Quo
Estrada vs Disierto Warranto, he prayed for judgment confirming Facts: him to be the lawful and incumbent President of the Republic of the Philippines temporarily Joseph Estrada was the President elect of the unable to discharge the duties of his office, and Republic in 1998. In 2001, he was impeached by declaring Arroyo to have taken her oath as and the congress alleging on the allegations that he to be holding the Office of the President, only in received multi million pesos benefits of jueteng an acting capacity pursuant to the provisions of money from Governor Chavit Singson of Ilocos the Constitution. In their defense, Arroyo claims Norte. During the impeachment proceeding, on a that the issue is a political question as Arroyo vote of 11-10, the senator -judges voted against ascended the presidency through people power; the opening of an envelope which allegedly that she has already taken her oath as the 14th contain evidence that Estrada has account in President of the Republic; that she has billions under the name Jose Velarde. The exercised the powers of the presidency and that private and public prosecutors walked out in she has been recognized by foreign protest of the ruling. The day after, thousand governments. They submit that these realities on had assembled in EDSA shrine , in what was ground constitute the political thicket which the known as EDA 2, calling for Pres. Estrada's Court cannot enter. Two cases were resignation. The next day, Estrada informed consolidated raising the issue as to Executive Secretary Angara that he agreed in a snap election where he would not be a Issue: candidate. It did not diffuse the growing crisis. In Whether petitioner Estrada is a President on the afternoon, the Chief of AFP and Secretary of leave while respondent Arroyo is an Acting National Defense, and a little later the PNP Chief President. Ping Lacson, went to EDSA Shrine announcing that they are withdrawing their support to Pres. Whether or not the Estrada is only temporarily Estrada. At 12: 00 noon the next day, Chief unable to act as President. Justice Davide administered the oath of Arroyo as President of the Philippines. Thus, Pres. Ruling: Estrada issued a statement that he is vacating The case involves justiciable question as the the presidency for the sake of peace and in principal issues for resolution require the proper order to begin the healing process of nation. A interpretation of certain provisions in the 1987 letter was likewise sent to congress stating that Constitution, notably section 1 of Article II, and under Section 11, Article VII of the Constitution, section 8 of Article VII, and the allocation of " I am hereby transmitting this declaration that I governmental powers under section 11 of Article am unable to exercise the powers and duties of VII. my office. By operation of law and the Constitution, the Vice-President shall be the As to first issue on whether Estrada Acting President . Both houses of Congress resigned, the Court held that, to be considered albeit receipt of the letter issued resolution resign there must be an intent to resign and the stating support to Arroyo as President intent must be coupled by acts of relinquishment. The validity of a resignation is The Court then issued a resolution confirming not governed by any formal requirement as to the authority of CJ Davide to administer the oath form. It can be oral. It can be written. It can be of Pre. Arroyo. Thereafter, several cases express. It can be implied. As long as the previously filed against Estrada in the Office of resignation is clear, it must be given legal effect. the Ombudsman were set in motion. He then Using the totality test,by the totality of prior, filed in the SC an action to enjoin the contemporaneous and posterior facts and Ombudsman from conducting any further circumstantial evidence bearing a material proceedings in any other criminal complaint that relevance on the issue, the court held that may be filed in his office, until after the term of President resign. The second round of negotiation cements the reading that the petitioner has resigned. It will be a. The proposal for a snap election for noted that during this second round of president in May where he would not be negotiation, the resignation of the petitioner was a candidate is an indicium that petitioner again treated as a given fact. The only unsettled had intended to give up the presidency points at that time were the measures to be even at that time undertaken by the parties during and after the b. When asked by his adviser to consider transition period. According to Secretary Angara, the option of dignified exit or resignation, the draft agreement which was premised on the significantly, the petitioner expressed no resignation of the petitioner was further refined. objection to the suggestion for a graceful It was then signed by their side and he was and dignified exit but said he would ready to fax it to General Reyes and Senator never leave the country. This is proof Pimentel to await the signature of the United that petitioner had reconciled himself to Opposition. However, the signing by the party of the reality that he had to resign and also the respondent Arroyo was aborted by her oath- relveled that he was told that he would taking have five days to a week in the palace. His mind was already concerned with In sum, it was held that the resignation of the the five-day grace period he could stay petitioner cannot be doubted. It was confirmed in the palace. It was a matter of time. by his leaving Malacaang. In the press release c. Upon request by Former Pres Ramos, containing his final statement, (1) he there was no defiance to the request on acknowledged the oath-taking of the respondent the part of Estrada. Secretary Angara as President of the Republic albeit with the readily agreed. Note that at this stage, reservation about its legality; (2) he emphasized the problem was already about a he was leaving the Palace, the seat of the peaceful and orderly transfer of power. presidency, for the sake of peace and in order to The resignation of the petitioner was begin the healing process of our nation. He did implied. not say he was leaving the Palace due to any kind of inability and that he was going to re- The negotiation was limited to three (3) points: assume the presidency as soon as the disability (1) the transition period of five days after the disappears; (3) he expressed his gratitude to the petitioner’s resignation; (2) the guarantee of the people for the opportunity to serve them. Without safety of the petitioner and his family, and (3) the doubt, he was referring to the past opportunity agreement to open the second envelope to given him to serve the people as President; (4) vindicate the name of the petitioner. The he assured that he will not shirk from any future resignation of petitioner was not a disputed challenge that may come ahead in the same point. The petitioner cannot feign ignorance of service of our country. Petitioners reference is to this fact a future challenge after occupying the office of d. The President says. Pagod na pagod na the president which he has given up; and (5) he ako. Ayoko na masyado nang masakit. called on his supporters to join him in the Pagod na ako sa red tape, bureaucracy, promotion of a constructive national spirit of intriga. (I am very tired. I dont want any reconciliation and solidarity. Certainly, the more of this its too painful. Im tired of national spirit of reconciliation and solidarity the red tape, the bureaucracy, the could not be attained if he did not give up the intrigue.) gain, this is high grade presidency. The press release was his evidence that the petitioner has valedictory, his final act of farewell. His resigned. The intent to resign is clear presidency is now in the past tense. when he said x x x Ayoko na masyado nang masakit. Ayoko na are words of resignation. On the second issue of whether Estrada is only temporarily unable to act as President
Upon receipt of the letter, the HoR and Senate
issued a resolution expressing support for the presidency of Glorai Macapagal Arroyo although the constitution provides that the congress shall convene to decide on such inability both houses of Congress have recognized respondent Arroyo as the President. Implicitly clear in that recognition is the premise that the inability of petitioner Estrada is no longer temporary. Congress has clearly rejected petitioner’s claim of inability. In such case, the question is political in nature and addressed solely to Congress by constitutional fiat even if the petitioner can prove that he did not resign, still, he cannot successfully claim that he is a President on leave on the ground that he is merely unable to govern temporarily. That claim has been laid to rest by Congress and the decision that respondent Arroyo is the de jure President made by a co-equal branch of government cannot be reviewed by this Court.