Title:
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________
Qualities & Exemplary
Criteria (10)
Introduction The research problem isvery apparent to the
reader and hassufficient conceptual backstop.
Theoretical & The ideas are arranged logically to support the
Conceptual purpose. They flow smoothly from one to
Framework another and are clearly linked to each other.
Line of reasoning is clear all thru out.
Methodology Research design is clearly explained; sampling
of participants is adequately described; source/s
of research instruments recognized, scoring,
validation & reliability testing was conducted.
Data Analysis Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate
and information that shows a thoughtful, in-depth
Interpretation analysis and interpretation of data. Reader
gains important insights.
Conclusion The paper makes succinct and precise
conclusions based on the findings & literature
review. Conclusion indicates reflection on
personal position and current understandings.
Recommendations The paper presents legitimately clear
recommendations based on the major findings &
conclusions
Use of Compelling research from professionally
References legitimate sources is given. Attribution is clear
and fairly represented.
Overall The presentation is persuasive. Overall
Presentation presentation catches & sustains the audiences’
interest throughout.
Xavier University
Corrales St., Cagayan de Oro City 9000
School of Business Management
Research Paper Rubrics
Good
(8)
The research problem issomewhat apparent
to the reader with literature support.
The ideas are arranged logically to support the
purpose. They are usually clearly linked to
each other. Line of reasoning is clear in most
part.
Research design is somewhat explained;
sampling of participants are described;
source/s of research instruments recognized,
scoring, validation & reliability testing was
conducted.
Information displays evidence of a basic
analysis and interpretation of data. Reader
gains some insights.
The paper makes some precise conclusions
based on the findings & literature review.
Conclusion indicates some reflection on
personal position and current understandings.
The paper presents legitimate
recommendations based on the some major
findings & conclusions
Professionally legitimate sources are generally
present and attribution is, for the most part,
clear and fairly represented.
The presentation is generally engaging. In
general, it is focused but does not sustain the
audiences’ attention.
Total
Evaluated by:
Acceptable
(6)
The research problem is somewhat apparent
but does not reveal any connection with
existing literature.
In general, the ideas are not arranged
logically, although occasionally ideas fail to
make sense together. Line of reasoning is
fairly clear.
Research design is somewhat explained;
sampling of participants are not described
fully; source/s of research instruments
recognized, scoring, no evidence of
validation & reliability testing.
Information displays evidence of a basic
analysis and interpretation of data at times.
Reader gains few insights.
The paper provides a conclusion vaguely
supported by findings &research review. The
conclusion does not connect the personal
position with current understandings.
The paper presents somewhat legitimate
recommendations barely based on the major
findings & conclusions
Although attributions are occasionally given,
many statements seem unsubstantiated.
The reader is confused about source of
information and ideas.
The presentation is dull and un-engaging.
Though the presentation has some
interesting parts, the audiences find it difficult
to maintain interest at times.
_____________________________________
Name & Signature
Unacceptable Score
(3)
The research problem is not clear to
the reader.
The ideas are not logically organized.
Frequently, ideas fail to make sense
together. Line of reasoning not clear.
Research design is not clear;
sampling of participants not described;
source/s of research instruments not
recognized, scoring, validation &
reliability testing not explained
Analysis is vague or not evident.
Reader is confused or may be
misinformed.
There is little to no evidence of
synthesis of the information.
The paper presents recommendations
that are not based on the major
findings & conclusions
References are seldom cited to
support statements.
The presentation is dull and un-
engaging. The audiences find it
difficult to maintain interest..