CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Law 124 (Remedial Law 1)

Prof. Rommel V. Cuison

1st Semester, AY 2018-2019

Course Description: The law governing prosecution, trial, and adjudication of criminal cases,
including procedures relating to arrest, incidental seizures, and searches, custodial interrogation,
preliminary investigation, indictment, trial, and sentencing of offenders, as provided in the Rules
of Court and special laws. (UP College of Law, Catalog, 2007)

Laws and Rules Covered: CONSTITUTION

Rep. Act No. 7438 (1992)
Rep. Act No. 9745 (2009)
Batas Pamb. Blg. 129 (1980), as amended
RULES OF COURT, Rules 110-127
REVISED RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991)
A.M. No. 11-6-10-SC dated 21 February 2012
A.M. No. 15-06-10-SC dated 30 June 2015

Grade Components: Recitation and/or Quizzes - 40%

Written Assignments (including, but not limited to, reflection papers on the
following court visits: preliminary investigation or inquest, arraignment, pre-
trial, trial, promulgation) - 10%
Midterm Exam – 20%
Final Exam with Departmental Exam- 30%

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Substantive Law vs. Remedial Law

1. Bustos v. Lucero, 80 Phil. 640
2. Fabian v. Desierto, 356 Phil. 787 (1998).
3. People v. Lacson, G.R. No. 149453, April 1, 2003

B. Rule-making Power of the Supreme Court

1. Estipona v. Lobrigo, G.R. No. 226679, August 15, 2017
2. Echegaray v. Secretary of Justice, 301 SCRA 96 (1999)
3. Kuizon v. Desierto, G.R. No. 140619, March 9, 2001
4. Neypes v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 141524, September 14, 2005
5. Sumbilla v. Matrix Finance, G.R. No. 197582, June 29, 2015

C. Retroactivity of Rules of Procedure

1. People v. Besmonte, G.R. No. 137278-79, February 17, 2003
2. Subido v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 122641, January 20, 1997
 D. Due Process in General
1. Dy v. People, G.R. No. 189081, August 10, 2016
2. City of Manila v. Laguio, G.R. No. 118127; April 12, 2015

E. Criminal Due Process

1. Alonte v. Savellano, Jr., 287 SCRA 245 (1998)
2. Galman v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 72670, September 12, 1986.
3. People v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 118882, September 26, 1996.
4. Escobar v. People, G.R. No. 205576, November 20, 2017

F. Injunctions against criminal prosecutions

1. Hernandez v. Albano, 19 SCRA 95 (1967)
2. Brocka v. Enrile, 192 SCRA 183 (1990)
3. Defensor-Santiago v. Vasquez, 205 SCRA 162 (1992)

II. JURISDICTION

A. Jurisdiction of criminal courts

1. Batas Pamb. Blg. 129 (1980), as amended, Secs. 20, 32, 35 & 36
2. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Secs. 1.B, 11-23
3. Pres. Decree No. 1606 (1978), as amended, Sec. 4
4. A.M. No. 02-6-07-SB dated 28 August 2002
5. A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC dated 28 February 2002
6. A.M. No. 10-3-10-SC dated 18 October 2011, Rule 10-15
7. A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC dated 13 April 2010, IV, Rules 9-18

B. Jurisdiction over the offense

1. Alfelor, Sr. v. Intia, 70 SCRA 460 (1976)
2. Uy v. CA, 276 SCRA 367 (1997)
3. People v. Lagon, 185 SCRA 442 (1990)
4. De Lima v. Guerrero, G.R. No. 229781, 10 October 2017

C. Jurisdiction over the accused

1. Rivera v. CA, 332 SCRA 416 (2000)

III. POLICE INVESTIGATION

A. CONST., Art. III, Secs. 3, 12 and 17

B. Statutes/Rules
1. Rep. Act No. 7438 (1992)
2. REV. PEN. CODE, Art. 125
3. Rep. Act No. 4200 (1965)
4. Rep. Act No. 9372 (2007)
5. Rep. Act No. 1405 (1955), as amended
6. Rep. Act No. 6426 (1972), as amended
7. Rep. Act No. 9160 (2001), as amended
8. RULES OF COURT, Rule 113, Sec. 14

2
 C. Cases
1. “Miranda” rights
a. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
b. U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1969)
c. Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324 (1969)
d. U.S. v. Brown, 990 F.2d 397 (1993)
e. People v. Andan, 269 SCRA 95 (1997)
f. People v. Endino, 352 SCRA 307 (2001)
g. People v. Caguioa, 95 SCRA (1980)
h. People v. Maqueda, 242 SCRA 656 (1995)
i. People v. Amestuzo, 361 SCRA 184 (2001)
j. People v. Obrero, 332 SCRA 190 (2000)
k. Jesalva v. People, 640 SCRA 253 (2011)

2. Exclusionary rule/ “Fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine

a. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)
b. People v. Alicando, 251 SCRA 293 (1995)
c. People v. Januario, 267 SCRA 608 (1997)
d. People v. Samontañez, 346 SCRA 837 (2000)
e. People v. Mojello, 425 SCRA 11 (2004)
f. Ho Wai Pang v. People, 659 SCRA 624 (2011)

3. Surveillance/ Recording of communications

a. Gaanan v. IAC, 145 SCRA 112 (1986)
b. Katz v. U. S., 389 U.S. 347 (1967)
c. U.S. v. White, 401 U.S. 745 (1971)
d. U.S. v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983)
e. Spouses Hing v. Choachuy, 699 SCRA 667 (2013)

IV. SEARCH & SEIZURE – Rule 126

A. CONST., Art. III, Secs. 2 and 3

B. Statutes/Rules
1. REV. PEN. CODE, Arts. 129-130
2. TARIFF AND CUSTOMS CODE, Secs. 2201-2212, 2301-2304
3. Rep. Act No. 6235 (1971), Sec. 9

C. Cases
1. Generally
a. Stonehill v. Diokno, 20 SCRA 383 (1967)
b. Burgos v. Chief of Staff, 133 SCRA 800 (1984)
c. People v. Marti, 193 SCRA 57 (1991)
d. People v. Bongcarawan, 384 SCRA 525 (2002)
e. U.S. v. Place, 462 U.S. 696 (1983)

2. Procedure for issuance of a search warrant

a. Pendon v. CA, 191 SCRA 429 (1990)
b. Silva v. Hon. Presiding Judge of RTC Negros Oriental, 203 SCRA
140 (1991)

3
 c. People v. Mamaril, 420 SCRA 662 (2004)
d. Malaloan v. CA, 232 SCRA 249 (1994)
e. Groh v. Ramirez, 540 U.S. 551 (2004)
f. Paper Industries Corp. v. Asuncion, 307 SCRA 687 (1984)
g. People v. Dichoso, 223 SCRA 174 (1993)
h. People v. Salanguit, 356 SCRA 683 (2001)
i. Kho v. Macalintal, 307 SCRA 70 (1999)
j. Worldwide Web Corporation v. People, 713 SCRA 18 (2014)

3. Warrantless searches
a. Moving vehicles
i. Carroll v. U.S., 267 U.S. 132 (1925)
ii. People v. Que, 265 SCRA 721 (1996)
iii. Caballes v. CA, 373 SCRA 221 (2002)
iv. U.S. v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 1977)
v. People v. Mariacos, 621 SCRA 327 (2010)

b. Plain view
i. U.S. v. Gray, 484 F.2d 352 (6th Cir., 1978)
ii. Arizona v. Hicks, 480 U.S. 321 (1987)
iii. Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990)
iv. People v. Musa, 217 SCRA 597 (1993)
v. People v. Doria, 301 SCRA 668 (1999)
vi. Valeroso v. CA, 598 SCRA 41 (2009)
vii. Miclat, Jr. v. People, 656 SCRA 539 (2011)

c. Waiver or consented searches

i. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973)
ii. U.S. v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974)
iii. Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 (1968)

d. Stop and frisk

i. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)
ii. Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366 (1993)
iii. People v. Solayao, 262 SCRA 255 (1996)
iv. People v. Sy Chua, 396 SCRA 657 (2003)
v. Romines v. People, 629 SCRA 370 (2010)
vi. People v. Cogaed, 731 SCRA 427 (2014)

e. Search incidental to a lawful arrest

i. Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969)
ii. New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981)
iii. People v. Chua Ho San, 308 SCRA 432 (1999)
iv. Cadua v. CA, 312 SCRA 703 (1999)
v. Padilla v. CA, 269 SCRA 402 (1997)
vi. People v. Martinez, 637 SCRA 791 (2010)
vii. Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (1998)
viii. People v. Delos Reyes, 656 SCRA 417 (2011)
ix. People v. Dimalanta, 727 SCRA 20 (2014)

f. Exigent and emergency circumstances

4
 i. People v. De Gracia, 233 SCRA 716 (1994)
ii. People v. Ayangao, 427 SCRA 428 (2004)

g. Hot pursuit
i. People v. De Lara, 236 SCRA 291 (1994)

h. Customs searches
i. Boac, et al. v. People of the Philippines, 570 SCRA 533
(2008)
ii. Bureau of Customs, et al. v. Ogario, et al., 329 SCRA 289
(2000)

i. Airport searches
i. People v. Johnson, 348 SCRA 526 (2000)
ii. People v. Canton, 394 SCRA 478 (2002)
iii. U.S. v. Davis, 482 F.2d 893 (9th Cir., 1973)

V. ARREST – Rules 113 and 112, Secs. 5, 6, 7 and 9(b)

A. CONST., Art. III, Secs. 1 and 2

B. Statutes/Rules
1. Rep. Act No. 7438 (1992)
2. Rep. Act No. 9344 (2006), Secs. 20-21
3. Batas Pamb. Blg.129 (1980), Sec. 37, pars. 2 & 3
4. REV. PEN. CODE, Art. 269
5. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE, Sec. 16
6. A.M. No. 02-1-06-SC dated 22 January 2002
7. S.C. Admin. Circ. No. 13 dated 12 October 1985
8. DOJ Circular No. 50 dated 29 October 1990

C. Cases
1. Generally
a. Chance v. State, 202 So.2d 825 (Fla. 1967)
b. Sanchez v. Demetriou, 227 SCRA 627 (1993)

2. Procedure for issuance of a warrant of arrest

a. Allado v. Diokno, 232 SCRA 192 (1994)
b. Pangamdaman v. Casar, 159 SCRA 599 (1988)
c. Gutierrez v. Hernandez, 524 SCRA 1 (2007)
d. AAA v. Carbonell, 524 SCRA 496 (2007)

3. Warrantless arrests
a. In flagrante delicto
i. People v. Montilla, 285 SCRA 703 (1998)
ii. People v. Aminnudin, 163 SCRA 402 (1988)
iii. People v. Molina, 352 SCRA 174 (2001)
iv. Alih v. Castro, 151 SCRA 279 (1987)
v. People v. Alunday, 564 SCRA 135 (2008)
vi. People v. Ng Yik Bun, 639 SCRA 88 (2011)

5
 vii. People v. Araneta, 634 SCRA 475 (2010)

b. When an offense has just been committed

i. Posadas v. Ombudsman, 341 SCRA 380 (2000)
ii. People v. Escordial, 373 SCRA 585 (2002)
iii. People v. Mengote, 210 SCRA 174 (1992)
iv. Pestilos v. Generoso, 739 SCRA 336 (2014)

c. Escapee

VI. PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION – Rule 112

A. Statutes/Rules
1. Batas Pamb. Blg. 129, Sec. 37
2. A.M. No. 05-8-26-SC dated 30 August 2005
3. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE, Sec. 11
4. Rep. Act No. 6770 (1989), as amended
5. Ombudsman Administrative Order No. 07 dated 10 April 1990
6. Rep. Act No. 9344 (2006), Secs. 32-33
7. Distinguish from: DOJ Circular No. 61 dated 21 September 1993
8. DOJ Circular No. 70 dated 3 July 2000
9. DOJ Circular No. 70-A dated 10 July 2000
10. DOJ Circular No. 18 dated 8 March 2017

B. Cases
1. Crespo v. Mogul, 151 SCRA 462 (1987)
2. Roberts v. CA, 254 SCRA 307 (1996)
3. Fuentes v. Sandiganbayan, 495 SCRA 784 (2006)
4. Villaflor v. Vivar, 349 SCRA 194 (2001)
5. Uy v. Sandiganbayan, 354 SCRA 651 (2001)
6. Sales v. Sandiganbayan, 369 SCRA 293 (2001)
7. Hegerty v. CA, 409 SCRA 285 (2003)
8. Ocampo v. Obando, 715 SCRA 673 (2014)
9. Estrada v. Ombudsman, 748 SCRA 2 (2015)

VII. VENUE - Rule 110, Sec. 15

A. CONST., Art. VIII, Sec. 5(4)

B. Statutes
1. Batas Pamb. Blg. 129, Sec. 18
2. Pres. Decree No. 1069 (1977)

C. Cases
1. Lopez v. City Judge, 18 SCRA 616 (1977)
2. People v. Grospe, 157 SCRA 154 (1988)
3. Gamboa et al. v. CA, 68 SCRA 308 (1975)
4. Ibasco v. CA, 261 SCRA 449 (1996)
5. Isip v. People, 525 SCRA 735 (2007)

6
VIII. COMPLAINT AND INFORMATION – Rule 110

A. With whom, by whom, and against whom, filed

1. Statutes/Rules
a. REV. PEN. CODE, Art. 91
b. A.M. No. 00-11-01-SC dated 25 March 2003

2. Cases
a. Del Rosario v. Vda. de Mercado, 29 SCRA 116 (1969)
b. Francisco v. People, 579 SCRA 698 (2009)

B. By whom prosecuted

1. Statutes/Rules
a. A.M. No. 02-2-07-SC dated 10 April 2002
b. REV. PEN. CODE, Arts. 344 and 360, last par.
c. Rep. Act No. 8353 (1997)

2. Cases
a. Bagatua v. Revilla, 104 Phil. 392 (1958)
b. Bernabe v. Bolinas, 18 SCRA 812 (1966)
c. People v. Liggayu, 97 Phil. 865 (1955)
d. Sta. Rosa Mining Co. v. Zabala, 153 SCRA 362 (1987)
e. Crespo v. Mogul, 151 SCRA 462 (1987)
f. Tan v. Gallardo, 73 SCRA 30 (1976)

C. Form and constituent allegations – Relate to Rule 116, Sec. 9

1. Statute/Rule
a. REV. PEN. CODE, Arts. 48 and 294

2. Cases
a. U.S. v. Lim San, 17 Phil. 273 (1910)
b. U.S. v. Starks, 6 F.R.D. 43 (S.D. N.Y. 1946)
c. People v. Teves, 310 SCRA 788 (1999)
d. U.S. v. Chan Toco, 12 Phil. 262 (1908)
e. U.S. v. Dichao, 27 Phil. 421 (1914)
f. U.S. v. Stollings, 128 W.Va. 483, 37 SE 2nd 98 (1946)
g. Gallego v. Sandiganbayan, 115 SCRA 793 (1982)
h. People v. Yap, 22 SCRA 853 (1968)
i. U.S. v. Lahoylahoy, 38 Phil. 330 (1918)
j. People v. Verzosa, 294 SCRA 466 (1998)

D. Amendment - Relate to Rule 120, Sec. 4; Rule 117, Sec. 7; Rule 119, Sec. 19

1. Cases
a. Arevalo v. Nepomuceno, 63 Phil. 627 (1936)
b. People v. Casey, 103 SCRA 21 (1981)

7
 c. Buhat v. CA, 265 SCRA 701 (1996)
d. Fronda-Baggao v. People, 539 SCRA 531 (2007)

IX. THE CIVIL ASPECT – Rule 111

A. Prosecution of civil action – Relate to Rule 110, Sec. 16

1. Statutes/Rules
a. CIVIL CODE, Arts. 29 to 36
b. Supreme Court Circular No. 57-97 dated 16 September 1997
c. OCA Circular No. 70-97 dated 21 October 1997

2. Cases
a. Civil action for civil liability ex delicto
1. U.S. v. Heery, 25 Phil. 600 (1913)
2. Yakult v. CA, 190 SCRA 357 (1990)
3. Rafael Reyes Trucking Corp. v. People, 329 SCRA 600
(2000)
4. Rodriguez v. Ponferrada, 465 SCRA 338 (2005)

b. Prejudicial question
1. Rojas v. People, 57 SCRA 243 (1974)
2. Jimenez v. Averia, 22 SCRA 1380 (1968)
3. Ras v. Rasul, 100 SCRA 125 (1980)
4. People v. Consing, 395 SCRA 366 (2003)
5. Ark Travel Express, Inc. v. Abrogar, 410 SCRA 148 (2003)
6. People v. Delizo, 436 SCRA 615 (2004)

B. Provisional remedies
1. Rule 127
2. Rep. Act No. 9262 (2004), Sec. 22

X. BAIL – Rule 114

A. CONST., Art. III, Sec. 13

B. Statutes/Rules
1. Administrative Circular No. 2-92 dated 20 January 1992
2. A.M. No. 05-8-26-SC dated 30 August 2005
3. Rep. Act No. 6036 (1969)
4. Rep. Act No. 9344 (2006), Secs. 34-36

C. Cases
1. Stack v. Boyle, 342 U.S. 1 (1951)
2. Yap, Jr. v. Court of Appeals, 358 SCRA 564 (2001)
3. Manotoc, Jr. v. CA, 142 SCRA 149 (1986)
4. Esteban v. Alhambra, 437 SCRA 560 (2004)
5. Taborite v. Sollesta, 408 SCRA 602 (2003)
6. Serapio v. Sandiganbayan, 396 SCRA 443 (2003)

8
 7. Chua v. CA, 520 SCRA 729 (2007)
8. Leviste v. CA, 615 SCRA 619 (2010)

XI. ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA – Rule 116

A. Cases
1. U.S. v. Santiago, 35 Phil. 20 (1916)
2. People v. Chua, 366 SCRA 283 (2001)
3. People v. Durango, 329 SCRA 758 (2000)
4. People v. Magat, 332 SCRA 517 (2000)
5. People v. Madraga, 344 SCRA 628 (2000)
6. People v. Bello, 316 SCRA 804 (1999)
7. People v. Baharan, 639 SCRA 157 (2011)

XII. QUASHAL – Rule 117

A. CONST., Art. III, Sec. 21

B. Cases

1. Generally
a. Lopez v. City Judge, 18 SCRA 616 (1966)
b. People v. Nitafan, 302 SCRA 424 (1999)
c. People v. Cadabis, 97 Phil. 829 (1955)
d. People v. dela Rosa, 98 SCRA 190 (1980)

2. Double jeopardy
a. U.S. v. Jenkins, 490 F.2d 868 (1973)
b. U.S. v. Scott, 437 U.S. 82, 98 S.Ct. 2187, 57 L.Ed.2d 65 (1978)
c. Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 33, 109 S.Ct. 285, 102 L.Ed.2d 265
(1988)
d. Cudia v. Court of Appeals, 284 SCRA 173 (1998)
e. People v. Alvarez, 45 Phil. 472 (1923)
f. People v. Relova, 148 SCRA 292 (1987)
g. People v. del Carmen, 88 Phil. 51 (1951)
h. People v. Gloria, 80 SCRA 675 (1977)
i. Esmeña v. Pogoy, 102 SCRA 861 (1981)
j. People v. Adil, 76 SCRA 462 (1977)
k. People v. Velasco, 340 SCRA 207 (2000)
l. People v. Obsania, 23 SCRA 1249 (1968)
m. Green v. U.S., 355 U.S. 184, 78 S.Ct. 221, 2 L.Ed.2d 199 (1957)
n. Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 25 L.Ed.2d 469
(1970)
o. Alonto v. People, 445 SCRA 624 (2004)
p. Castro v. People, 559 SCRA 676 (2008)
q. Cerezo v. People, 650 SCRA 222 (2011)

9
XIII. PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE AND PRE-TRIAL – Rule 118

A. Statutes/Rules
1. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Sec. 14
2. Administrative Circular No. 03-1-09-SC dated 13 July 2004, I. B. Criminal
Cases
3. Rep. Act No. 8493 (1998), Secs. 2-5; Supreme Court Circular No. 38-98-
SC dated 11 August 1998
4. A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC dated 13 July 2004

B. Cases
1. Bayas v. Sandiganbayan, 391 SCRA 415 (2002)
2. People v. Sitao, 387 SCRA 701 (2002)

XIV. TRIAL – Rule 119; Rule 116, Secs. 9 and 11; Rule 115

A. CONST., Art. III, Secs. 12, 14, 16 and 17

B. Statutes/Rules
1. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Secs. 14, 18-20
2. Rep. Act No. 8493 (1998), Secs. 6-14
3. Supreme Court Circular No. 38-98-SC dated 11 August 1998
4. Rep. Act No. 6981 (1991)
5. Pres. Decree No. 749 (1975)
6. Rep. Act No. 4908 (1968)
7. Rep. Act No. 6033 (1969)

C. Cases
1. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)
2. People v. Santocildes, Jr., 321 SCRA 310 (1999)
3. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972)
4. Jones v. Superior Court, 58 Cal.2d 56, 372 P.2d 919 (1982)
5. People v. Mendiola, 82 Phil. 743 (1949)
6. Flores v. Sandiganbayan, 124 SCRA 109 (1983)
7. People v. Feliciano, 367 SCRA 53 (2001)
8. Chua v. Court of Appeals, 261 SCRA 112 (1996)
9. Webb v. De Leon, 247 SCRA 652 (1995)
10. U.S. v. Catimbang, 35 Phil. 367 (1916)
11. Bermudez v. Castillo, 64 Phil. 483 (1937)
12. People v. Mamacol, 81 Phil. 543 (1948)
13. Abriol v. Homeres, 84 Phil. 525 (1949)
14. Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609 (1965)
15. Ty-Dazo v. Sandiganbayan, 374 SCRA 200 (2002)

XV. JUDGMENT - Rule 120

A. CONST., Art. VIII, Sec. 14

B. Statutes/Rules

10
 1. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Sec. 14
2. Pres. Decree No. 968 (1976), as amended
3. Rep. Act. No. 9344 (2006), Sec 38-56
4. Administrative Circular No. 7-A-92 dated 21 June 1993

C. Cases
1. People v. Tamayo, 86 Phil. 209 (1950)
2. People v. Romero, 89 Phil. 672 (1951)
3. Ramos v. Gonong, 72 SCRA 559 (1976)
4. People v. Jalandoni, 131 SCRA 454 (1984)
5. Cea v. Paguio, 397 SCRA 494 (2003)
6. People v. Trestiza, 660 SCRA 407 (2011)

XVI. NEW TRIAL OR RECONSIDERATION - Rule 121

A. Statute/Rule
1. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Sec. 19(c)

B. Cases
1. Jose v. CA, 70 SCRA 257 (1976)
2. People v. Astudillo, 401 SCRA 723 (2003)
3. Suliman v. People, 741 SCRA 477 (2014)

XVII. APPEAL - Rules 122, 124 and 125

A. Statutes/Rules
1. REV. RULE ON SUMMARY PROCEDURE (1991), Sec. 21
2. A.M. No. 00-5-03-SC dated 28 September 2004

B. Cases
1. Quemuel v. CA, 22 SCRA 44 (1968)
2. People v. Gomez, 20 SCRA 293 (1967)
3. People v. Ursua, 60 Phil. 252 (1934)
4. Martinez v. CA, 237 SCRA 575 (1994)
5. People v. Bayotas, 236 SCRA 239 (1994)
6. People v. Esparas, 260 SCRA 539 (1996)
7. Tamayo v. CA, 423 SCRA 175 (2004)
8. Vitto v. CA, 404 SCRA 307 (2003)
9. Villena v. People, 641 SCRA 127 (2011)
10. Yu v. Tatad, 642 SCRA 421 (2011)
11. Geroche v. People, 742 SCRA 514 (2014)

XVIII. POST-CONVICTION REVIEW

A. Cases
1. Abriol v. Homeres, 84 Phil. 525 (1949)
2. Cruz v. Director of Prisons, 17 Phil. 269 (1910)
3. Parulan v. Director of Prisons, 22 SCRA 638 (1968)

11
4. Galman v. Sandiganbayan, 144 SCRA 43 (1986)
5. People v. Labriaga, 250 SCRA 163 (1995)
6. Lejano v. People, 638 SCRA 104 (2010)

12