Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
The other reason that researchers would choose to use a correlational study rather than an
experiment is that the statistical relationship of interest is thought to be causal, but the
researcher cannot manipulate the independent variable because it is impossible, impractical, or
unethical. For example, Allen Kanner and his colleagues thought that the number of “daily
hassles” (e.g., rude salespeople, heavy traffic) that people experience affects the number of
physical and psychological symptoms they have (Kanner, Coyne, Schaefer, & Lazarus,
1981).Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J. C., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1981). Comparison of two modes
of stress measurement: Daily hassles and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral
Medicine, 4, 1–39. But because they could not manipulate the number of daily hassles their
participants experienced, they had to settle for measuring the number of daily hassles—along
with the number of symptoms—using self-report questionnaires. Although the strong positive
relationship they found between these two variables is consistent with their idea that hassles
cause symptoms, it is also consistent with the idea that symptoms cause hassles or that some
third variable (e.g., neuroticism) causes both.
This is “Correlational Research”, section 7.2 from the book Psychology Research Methods: Core
Skills and Concepts (2012)
https://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/psychology-research-methods-core-skills-and-
concepts/s11-02-correlational-research.html