Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Whatever that was never placed in the bill lading, it will not be admissible as to vary the terms of the

agreement. you cannot use the prior agreement as to vary the terms in the bill of lading. that in the
event of dispute the basis will be the content bill of lading. Except under what circumstances only?
What are the instances of which parol evidence may be admitted as to vary the terms in the bill of
lading? Except other than those of falsity or material error in the drafting of the bill of lading. parol
evidence may only be acceptable if there is falsity in the preparation of the bill of lading or material
error in the bill of lading. Otherwise if there is a bill of lading, in case of dispute, the court will only
examine the content of the bill of lading and no other evidence is admissible. parol evidence is not
acceptable to vary with what is in the contents of the bill of lading. That was the issue there because it
appears that there were other arguments that was raised that was not in the bill of lading which the
parties, in this case in this case, signed. the dispute now will be determined based on what kind of bill of
lading was issued.

What we are trying to discuss here is, what is a bill of lading as a contract. As a contract, article 353
provides it is a legal evidence of the contract between the parties. As a contract, it provides for the
terms and conditions etc. so being a contract, it provides for the law between the parties which are
bound by the terms and conditions of the contract provided that these are not contrary to law, public
morals, etc.

As provided under article 353, as evidence also, the contents shall decide the dispute

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi