Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Simple
Cost effective
Reliabel
Transparent
Market
Sales Arguments
PV Heater vs. Thermal
Technology
Logistics
Services
1,00
0,90
0,80
0,70
0,60
€/kWh
0,50
0,40
Grid Parity
0,30
0,20
0,10
0,00
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
1,00
0,90
0,80
0,70
0,60
€/kWh
0,50
0,40
0,30
0,20
Oil Parity mit PV Heater
0,10
0,00
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020
Stromgestehungskosten PV @ 1000kWh/kWp Bezugspreis Strom Haushalt Bezugspreis Heizöl Haushalt Stromgestehungskosten PV Heater @ 1000kWh/kWp
AE PV Heater:
Simple
Cost effective
Reliabel
Transparent
Source: Sarasin forecast of the global solar heat market. Newly installed collector capacity in the GWth p.a., Oct. 2008
Market
Sales Arguments
PV Heater vs. Thermal
Technology
Logistics
Services
Flexible design:
Orientation of the modules to the south, east
or west; detached house, facade, garage,
etc. (partial shading) thanks to 3 MPP
trackers and module parallel operation
(moduleMPPT)
Aesthetic solution:
Appealing flat design with homogeneous
modules and full surface coverage instead
of individual collectors
No bureaucracy:
Rooftop installation is not mandatory,
because there is not compensation from the
German Renewable Energy Act (EEG) and
no coordination with the energy supply
company for a grid connection
Wiring
Low losses, easy and flexible routing of
cable
DC wiring: Standard PV cable with 2.5
- 6 mm² cross-section
Market
Sales Arguments
PV Heater vs. Thermal
Technology
Logistics
Services
WW WW
Invest. Module 2.5 kWp // VCollector 7.22m² + Frame + Line/Tubes 2,250 2,000 €
Installation 500 1,000 €
Heating element + Controller 890 €
Accumulator for HU 800 €
German Federal Office of Economics and Export Control
(BAFA) subsidy (WW+HU) 630 €
Investment costs, net 3,640 3,170 €
Investment costs, gross 4,332 3,772 €
Continuous Maintenance/Resetting per year - 10 - 50 €
Pump group auxiliary supply per year - 40 €
20 year balance - 200 - 1,800 €
TCO (20 year Total Cost of Ownership) 4,532 5,572 €
Energy costs WW €/kWh over 20 years 0.11 0.14 €/kWh
Market
Sales Arguments
PV Heater vs. Thermal
Technology
Logistics
Services
Parallel connection of 2-4 modules per MPPT (3 units); observe reverse current
capability
For typical applications, the losses Verluste nach Querschnitt und Leitungslänge
through 4-6mm² cross-sections -EU Einstrahlungsgewichtung-
Examples 5,00%
PV: 2.2%*2000kWh
Verlustleistung
= 45 kWh/year 4,00%
Thermal: 0.2W/K m = > 0.2*(70-
20K)*20m=200W *1500hours of 3,00%
sunlight
= 300 kWh/year 2,00%
1,00%
0,00%
20m 40m 60m
4mm² 6mm²
Front side
1: Connections for 3 photovoltaic strings
2: Display element
3: Power-ON switch on device bottom side
Rear panel
1: Ethernet connection
2: Screw-in heating element
3: Ventilation openings with drill marks
4: Supply openings
DC output to the
heating resistor
DC input
pole-reversal
protection diode Mounting flange
DC input cap
DC input throttle
Switch for
ON/OFF
DC solar cable:
MPP regulation
with safety limitation for excess temperature
DC max. 50 V
MPPT1+Udc1+Output1
MPPT2+Udc2+Output2
MPPT3+Udc3+Output3
Voltage Sensor1a+1b
Sensor1
supply Controller Relay
PE
Controller
Internal DC
voltage
supply X16 Relay
PE
Ethernet
system does not under cut the outlet temperature of 18.0 x 1 0.2
the utility water heater by more than five degrees 22.0 x 1 0.31
pufferspeicher.eu
http://europe.refusol.com/fileadmin/user_upload/pdf/products/Technisches_Datenblatt_PV_Heater_EN.pdf
Market
Sales Arguments
PV Heater vs. Thermal
Technology
Logistics
Services
1550g
0034480
2350g
1,56 m
1550g
400R1K5
0,85 m
2350g
Costs
OEM variant base costs € 5000
parts lists, type plate, production introduction, standard packaging with own
print, monochromatic flat rate
OEM film € 900 (two-color)
OEM cover with own logo € 3800
RAL color, logo as pad print, monochromatic
(<10,000 units p.a. plus € 2.50 per unit cost)
OEM packaging, possible heating element integration, TBD
Market
Sales Arguments
PV Heater vs. Thermal
Technology
Logistics
Services
Brochures / flyers
Product brochures
End customer brochures
Product data sheets
Roll-ups
Dummy units
EFFICIENCY
More efficient than solar thermal systems
Lower total installation expense
Very high degree of unit efficiency >99% max.
High partial-load efficiency and utilization of diffused radiation
No auxiliary power requirement
SAFETY
Highest safety with single-fault safe design of the electronic circuit (overloading of
the accumulator eliminated)
Non-hazardous, safe-for-contact voltage level (fire department call)
FLEXIBILITY
Flexibility in the installation location - does not have to be installed on the roof like
with the German Renewable Energy Act (EEG)
Highest flexibility in use with 3 MPP trackers
Thin, elastic cable instead of thick pipelines
No partial shade problems due to parallel connection of the models
Retrofitting in existing systems is both possible and beneficial
SATISFACTION
Hot water even in the event of a (grid) power failure, thanks to grid-independence
Outstanding, detailed monitoring capabilities via REFUlog and REFUlog app
Simple
Cost effective
Reliabel
Transparent