Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 12

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/275658664

Direct Displacement Based Design (Based on Priestley and Kowalsky)


versus Force Based Design for wall structures

Conference Paper · April 2015


DOI: 10.15224/978-1-63248-042-2-94

CITATIONS READS

0 239

2 authors:

Arton Dautaj Naser Kabashi


University of Prishtina faculty of civil engineering and architecture,Kosovo
17 PUBLICATIONS   1 CITATION    62 PUBLICATIONS   11 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Proposed Model to Analyse Infilled Frames View project

Compare the Deformations on Concrete and Reinforcement Steel in Conventional and SCC Concrete Beams View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Arton Dautaj on 13 May 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Arton D.Dautaj
Naser Kabashi

Direct Displacement Based Design (Based on Priestley and Kowalsky) versus Force Based Design for
wall structures .

Base shear force


Displacement change

Force change

Displacement on the roof

The relationship between displacement and damage

1
OBJECTIVES

 APPLICATION OF DDBD METHOD FOR WALL STRUCTURES


 COMPARASION WITH FORCE BASED DESIGN

2
• DDBD
 Based on the application of the so-called “Substitute-Structures”
 Structure characterized with effective secant stiffness on max
displacement d (depending on performance or limit state) and total
effective damping d.
2 y
y   5%
lw
y  h 
y  he2 1  e 
l w  3hn 
  d  y

 1   0.5 
 d  5  95 
  

0.5
  5 
Te  TD d   
 D ,5  10 

2
4 2 me  D ,5  10 
VB  K e   d     
TD2 d  5   

3
DDBD

FORCE DISTRIBUITED

 Base Shear force should be


distributed on the wall proportionally
to the square of the length of walls
and after the analysis can be done
separately for each wall.

l wj2
Vwi  m
VB
2
l
j 1
wj

4
DDBD FBD
1. Choose a max. displacement 1. Determine the stiffness of
based on the performance structure based on reduced
requirements cross section of elements and
2. Find the equivalent viscous estimate fundamental elastic
damping period of vibration.
3. Choose displacement design 2. Estimate the behavior factor q
spectrum for different levels of based on: ductility class, type of
damping and find effective period resisting system and regularity
for maximum allowed 3. Choose the design spectrum
displacement and determine acceleration
4. Determine the base shear force design spectrum Sd
5. Using the proper method for 4. Determine the base shear force
structural analysis and determine 5. Checking displacements
design demands

5
EXAMPLE
Second Case First Case

First case Second case


DBD FBD DBD FBD
Period 1.72 0.368
Period 2.92 1.156
Ductility 9.4 4
Ductility 4.6 4
Damping % 18.22 5 Damping % 21 5

Base shear force kN 3534.06 3639.8 Base shear force kN 2978 3707.9
Moments in M1
(kN*m) 23192.4 19562.5 Moments in M1 (kN*m) 10481 14217.18
Moments in M2
(kN*m) 4026.39 1609.42 Moments in M2 (kN*m) 1819.7 1244.29

6
Conclusion

The DDBD is preferred for the following reasons

7
1.Constant Stiffness (FBD) versus Stiffness proportional to
strength (DBD)
DDBD is more direct then FBD, since it is based on the yield curvature which
depends only from the height of cross section and yield strain. While FBD
depends on the stiffness treated as a constant which actually varies greatly in
the process of improving the preliminary design

Design assumption(FBD)-CONSTANT STIFFNESS Yield Curvature independent to strength (DBD)-

8
2. DDBD makes adequate assessment of ductility demand

DDBD FBD

   9.4    4.6   4.0   4.0

9
3. The distribution of forces in the walls

DDBD FBD

y  h  l wj2 J1
 yi  hi2 1  i  Vwi  m
VB Vw1  m
VB
l w  3hn 2
 l
j 1
wj J i
i 1
Ji -is moment of inertia
10
THANK YOU FOR YOUR
ATTENTION

11

View publication stats

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi