In search of legitimacy

The fundamentals of self sovereignty. The lore/law governments hope you’ll never discover

An essay by John Ake

2005

The Fundamentals of Jurisdiction

ONLY LIVING-SOULS CAN

GENERATE THE ENERGY
REQUIRED TO CREATE
AND PRODUCE ANYTHING

HOWEVER

In 2005 I spent seven (7) months on a public speaking tour of New Zealand
addressing the subject of Personal Sovereignty/Self Immunity – What is it?

There was much interest and as a result I’ve decided to post this essay in
response to some of the questions that were raised.

Disclaimer
This essay is for education and entertainment purposes only. It is not meant to be
authoritative. I am not a practising or licenced lawyer or attorney in the sense of the
corporate courts; and, therefore nothing in this document should be read, inferred,
taken, interpreted, represented, viewed, considered or construed as legal advice.

1
About the author

My story begins in Aotearoa (New Zealand) through my late father Rakei James
Akeake; a direct descendant of the indigenous inhabitants of the land or
tangata whenua - the tribal claimants of the offshore volcanic island of Tuhua
otherwise referred to as Mayor Island. so named by the early English explorer
Captain Cook.

Tuhua [Mayor Island]

3154 acres

35 km north of
Tauranga off the NZ
Coastline

2
My late father was a high ranking Maori elder of chiefly status and his inherited
tribal lands would eventually become the basis of my calling.

Launched on an unknown pathway regarding sovereign-rights, jurisdiction and

law/lore, the process of discovery would soon reveal some fascinating truths.

We were never overcome by inter-tribal or European conquest, nor did we

explicitly surrender or formally cede our natural inheritance.

Neither did we give up our basic sovereign rights as indigenous heirs and
successors to continue to determine our own destiny. Our ancestors, buried in
the land, memorialise our claim, much like civilised society today reveres
cemeteries and monuments through which derives a sense of belonging.

Little by little, the traditional claims of indigenous inhabitants would be

manipulated and weakened.

Land-banking, achieved through shady surveys. Recording and mapping

technologies, used as tools to claim and settle upon vast areas and finally by
re-naming significant landmarks in order to obscure or even obliterate existing
signs of previous occupation.

With the passage of time, this strategy was to make it increasingly difficult for
indigenous claimants to maintain legitimate rights of unbroken occupancy.

The seemingly innocent process of land clearance, building construction or the

planting of a crop, had the same effect as ‘staking a claim’ because if there was
no immediate challenge or intervention then history would view it as consent by
default. Put simply, squatters rights.

The moral of the story being that any claims, right or wrong, would be
legitimised unless a continual challenge was proven to have been maintained.

In the past few hundred years indigenous peoples especially will relate to this
experience, and have further been frustrated by the ongoing process of
assimilation, superior technologies and more importantly, hard cash or paper
money – fiat currency. The indigenous experience particularly now serves to
highlight why today all people have come to better understand the loss of
‘allodial land title’ and the attendant inalienable sovereign rights.

Today the notion of land ownership is an illusion. We are the victims of a

corrupt education system.

In short, most people’s idea of ownership is according to some government

rule or regulation. It’s a temporary right of use and to state the obvious, does
not last forever.

In most common-law jurisdictions [Australia, NZ, Canada, USA, UK etc] modern

day land-title only describes the relationship to a man-made authority in the
form of a landlord. In short, you as the individual do not have the final say.

3
The highest authority, in today’s modern democracies, is a corporation known
as the crown, and subsequently it can separate you from your land and
property by the interpretation of its regulations, through war, litigation such as
a damages claims, property settlement, bankruptcy, even confiscation

Initially it harks back to medieval feudal land rules but ultimately back to the
author of life itself.

The Crown

When people hear The Crown, they automatically think of the King and Queen.
When they hear London or The City, they instantly think of the capital of
England in which the monarch officially resides since London's expansion
absorbed the City of Westminster.

The City is in fact a privately owned Corporation - or sovereign state -

occupying 677 acres in the heart of the 610 square mile "Greater London" area.
The population of the City is 5,000 whereas Greater London has 8 million.

The Crown is a committee of 12-14 men who rule this independent sovereign
state known as London or The City. The City is not a part of England and is
not subject to the Sovereign nor under rule of Parliament. It is an independent
state, like Kowloon City in Hong Kong, which belonged to Communist China. It's
the Vatican of the commercial world.

The City is ruled by a Lord Mayor elected for one year. When the Queen visits
The City she's met by the Lord Mayor at Temple Bar, the symbolic gate of The
City. She bows to him and asks permission to enter his private, sovereign
State. He grants permission to enter by handing her the sword of State. During
such State visits, the Lord Mayor with his robes and chain, his entourage in
medieval costume, outshines the Royal party, which can dress-up no further
than service uniforms. The Lord Mayor leads the Queen into The City of which
he is the monarch and she is his subject.

The Rothschild-controlled Bank of England, Lloyd's underwriters, The London

Stock Exchange, leading international trading concerns, as well as the
headquarters of the newspaper and publishing world are located here. The
small clique who rule The City dictate to the British Parliament, Prime Minister
and Cabinet.

Until the middle of the seventeenth century, the British Monarch was truly
sovereign. Britain was prosperous. Indeed, for 280 years there was no inflation.
The average man worked for only 150 days of the year, and lived well. (In
Australia today, its said that we work for about 150-days to pay our taxes, and
the rest of the year for the usury on our houses). Conditions went down-hill
ever since the privately-owned Bank of England was established to finance the
profligate ways of William III.

Two separate empires operated under the guise of the British Empire. The all
white colonies of South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada

4
(representing 13% of the people made-up the British Empire) were under the
Sovereign and under British law.

The other colonies like India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Cyprus, the colonies in
Central Africa, Singapore, Hong Kong and Gibraltar comprised the hidden
empire that belonged to The Crown of The City of London

These were not under British rule. Parliament had no authority over them. They
were private enterprise, owned and ruled by The Crown of The City of London
whose representatives had the power of life or death over the people and there
was no appeal to British law - not even for a British citizen.

As the Crown also controlled the British Government, there was no problem
getting the British taxpayer to pay for naval and military forces to maintain the
Crown's supremacy. Any revolts were met with terrible retribution by the British
navy at no cost to the Crown who reaped fantastic profits. This was not British
commerce or British wealth, and the average Briton became poorer. It was "The
Crown's" commerce, and "The Crown's" wealth.

The international bankers of The City of London today control the available
resources of the western world at any moment. The Crown of The City of London
still owns and controls it’s former colonies, financially and materially, only today
the United Nations uses American military forces supplemented by the forces of
other nations and paid for by the taxpayers of member nations -- The empire of
the City, by E. C. Knuth. Today they control the politics and economies of South
Africa, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and . . . the USA.
There are three (3) Crowns operating in today’s world. The English Protestant
Crown, the Roman Catholic Papal Crown of the Vatican; and, the Khazar
Crown of Yiddish speaking European people, known as The City of London

The world famous family, the Rothschilds, established and privately control the
Bank of England, which in turn spawned and controls most of the central banks
in the industrialised world; UK, Europe & America, most notably the Federal
Reserve Bank of America. Between them they control -- a cartel -- the world’s
monetary system.

The shareholders of the Federal Reserve Bank of America are :-

Rothschild Banks of London and Berlin

Lazard Brothers Bank of Paris, Israel

Moses Sieff Banks Of Italy

Warburg Bank of Hamburg and Amsterdam

Ex - Lehman Brothers Bank of New York

Kuhn Loeb Bank Of New York

Chase Manhattan Bank Of New York

Goldman Sachs Bank Of New York

5
Sovereignty – what is it?

Feudal paradigm .. entity created by a government or a state.

Sovereign paradigm .. entity created by biological people.

Words can change their meanings over time, so I'll start by saying that I use
the term sovereignty as it is generally understood - both in terms of national
sovereignty and individual sovereignty.

In essence it means - self determination or self government.

When a nation talks about sovereignty, it means its right to determine what
goes on inside its borders. Its right to exist as a self-determining, self-
governing geographic area.

When an individual talks about sovereignty, he means his right to determine

what goes on in his own life.

To understand what is meant by sovereignty, let's go back a little, and see

how it arises.

In the world as it now stands, all land is the sovereign territory of one
nation or another, except the arctic regions which are controlled by
international treaty. The oceans of the world, apart from territorial waters,
are also covered by various treaties.

If you wanted to have your own sovereign piece of real estate – you’re out
of luck. People may have thought it would be great if we could just buy an
island - and run it according to our own ideas.

This thinking misunderstands sovereignty.

Sure, you might purchase an island - there are many around the world for
sale. However, when you part with the cash, you are not buying
sovereignty, that still resides with the country whose jurisdiction extends
over the island.

You’d soon find out who was sovereign if you tried to eliminate income tax
on your newly acquired island.

If you really wanted to claim your own sovereign territory, you'd need to
keep a watchful eye out for the emergence of a complete new land - say an
undersea volcano erupting into a new land mass.

Now, such a new land mass (provided it was outside existing territorial
waters) would indeed be unclaimed land and this is where we get to the nub
of what sovereignty really is.

6
Suppose such a new island appears, in the middle of an ocean somewhere,
and you rush by helicopter and land on it. All you would need to do is put up
your flag - and you would have claimed sovereignty over it.

Unfortunately, you may not be alone. While you are rushing all by yourself
to your newly discovered island, it is highly likely that some nearby nation is
likewise sending a landing party - claiming some special case as to why it
should be theirs.

When push comes to shove, they may decide to remove you by force of
arms and the ensuing potential conflict of interest encapsulates the entire
history of the world - the battle for territory.

So you can certainly claim sovereignty over a new piece of land but you’ll
also need to be able to defend this new found sovereignty.

In these enlightened times one may expect that might is not always right,
and that some international court may arbitrate the issue.

It still doesn't change the basic fact that sovereignty must first be claimed -
then defended.

If sovereignty didn't need defending, then no country would be in need of

armed forces.

Sovereignty is therefore at the mercy of any party that chooses to dispute

it.

Tax havens for example exist for this very reason, as a means of defence.

It's a way of protecting sovereignty. It's not enough to simply stand up and
declare it - because those who oppose you may not play the game by your
rules and use force to deprive you of it.

comprises

To assume you have rights under some constitution, statute or other

historical agreement is to assume that sovereignty is handed out by the
state.

CONSTITUTION = CONSENT TO COMMERCIAL CONTRACT

Man’s sovereign-rights are antecedent to the state. We were here first.

You are not granted sovereignty by virtue of being born in any particular
country, you are sovereign because of your status as a flesh and blood
living-soul and breathing-man -- the breath of life, derives from the laws
of the universe – cause & effect.

7
You are already sovereign - but a prisoner of a larger, more powerful
influence; cultivated ignorance.

Such a mistake could cost you dearly. Even though you may perceive that
some statute law may "save" you - you mustn’t ignore the fact that the
state can simply rewrite its statutory laws and constitutions to better suit it’s
circumstances.

No, your sovereignty does not depend on the state. Your sovereignty was in
place (antecedent) long before the formation of the state. You have it in
the state's absence. Your task is to learn how to defend it cleverly.

Of course, in the present world, there is no free nation. No place where it is

easy to fully assert your sovereignty.

Governments want you to have a good job in the same way that a burglar
wants you to have a house full of valuables. A nice fat cash cow.

However, by learning how to better protect your assets not based on the
laws of your nation state, but based on your capacity to outwit it and out-
manoeuvre it.

One option is to play off one nation state against another by using various
international strategies such as offshore asset protection and thereby use
the laws of one country to play off against the laws of another.

As awareness of true human sovereignty spreads and disillusionment with

the nation state grows, there will arise more and more means of increasing
one's practical freedom.

How do we measure value?

There was a practitioner who had an exceptional gift for fixing health problems.
After serving the people for thirty years she happily retired.

Several years later an ex-patient who was experiencing health problems,

contacted the practitioner asking for help because her current doctors and other
health professionals were unable to provide a suitable remedy.

The practitioner reluctantly took up the challenge. She spent a very short time
with the patient and arrived at a diagnosis. “Ahh”, she said. “Here is the
problem”, and with an ink marker drew a cross on Mary’s chest which took five
seconds and then gave her a healing potion.

Within days Mary’s health had been fully restored.

The practitioner duly sent an account for $2,000.00.

After a month or so, a letter arrived from Mary’s accountant querying what
appeared to be an excessive bill. The practitioner responded :

One Ink Mark …………………………………………………………. $ 1.00

Knowing Where To Put The Ink Mark ………………………… $1,999.00

8
 If you think the cost of education is too high, then consider the

cost of ignorance.

Law / Lore

Man’s statute laws are continually being changed and manipulated to suit the
circumstance.

If man is the creator of true law then how do we explain life, and the law that
causes it, namely the-breath-of-life. What causes the sun to rise, the wind to
blow; gravity, combustion, mechanics and why does a mother hen gather her
chicks.

The foolishness of this argument is self evident. True law cannot be changed or
manipulated by man.

Statutes are not true law. They are the rules and regulations legislated by a
parliament [the State] and in a constant state of change.

Origin of Statutes - (Colorable Law)

1. God created Man

2. Man created Government

3. Government created Corporations

Man was not created by the state -- governments or parliaments -- and it follows
that the created can never be greater than its creator.

Since when does the servant tell the master what to do? That’s treason.

Man-made statute or decree was how Caesar ruled Rome; and, today is still
being masqueraded as true law.

9
People today have been lured spider-like into a web of
artificial-legal-entities created by governments through
paper (fiat) currency, credit and corrupt education
systems.

Money and commerce are the yardstick of the modern

lifestyle.

Even the churches have fallen under this bewitching

spell.

No longer do the churches stand as independent moral

guardians as they once used to.

Today there is no separation of powers between church

and state and governments increasingly are dismissive
of human life issues such as abortion, euthanasia,
eugenics, resuscitation, assisted suicide, genocide,
ethnic cleansing, cloning, embryonic stem-cell
manipulation, water pollution, soil degradation and
deforestation.

10
 The following charted chronology is a visual ready reference.

2 Parallel
Jurisdictions

Sovereign law Statute

law
Private
Public

Laws of the Universe Man’s law

Science Parliamentary Statutes

Status Status
Voluntary servitude Enforced servitude

Created by Created by
Breath-of-life Registration

Rights Privileges
Life, Liberty & Property Rewards and Penalties

Birth Berth
Relating to people Registration of vessels

Common law Admiralty law

of people of maritime vessels

Living-soul Corporation-sole
Upper and lower case letters ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS
John Doe JOHN DOE

Fruits of labour Income

produced by man’s energy Commercial transactions

11
 Non-taxable Taxable
Living-soul Corporate-sole

We have been deceived into surrendering our natural-rights in exchange for

state contracted privileges.

The state (crown) is able to exploit your productive power then proceed to milk
you of the results; and, claim ownership (sovereignty) over all before it.

Prosperity comes from sources outside of a job, such as investments or

business. Not many people get rich on their salary, unless they are corporate
officers who loot shareholder funds.

We have been made subservient to a man-made system of rewards and

penalties in order to gain power and control over our creative energy and all
that we’re capable of producing.

The product of our manual labour; the sweat of our collective brows, part of
which was intended for our creator, as thanks-giving and the ethic on which
charity is based, has been siphoned off by Caesar [modern-day-government] in
a brilliant deception of statutory smoke and mirrors.

In the beginning

As people started to live together in societies, there was nothing to prevent

individuals from infringing upon the rights and freedoms of each other.

Once that happened, there were only two choices; either, protect ourselves or
elect a group of individuals to protect our rights for us. We chose the latter and
man-made [government] was born.

A government’s strategy

In order to implement slave-like control of its citizens, governments had to

invent a system that would not directly violate people’s natural-rights; but, at
the same time allow them to control and own everything created and produced
by man [natural energy source.]

The technique was to create a secondary “corporate” entity [artificial-legal-

entity] that mimicked the existence of the original flesh and blood living-soul so
well, it was for the most part invisible; and could only be readily identified in
the written form. In the spoken form there is no discernible difference.
For every living-soul the government through semantics and its Birth
Registries secretly created a mirror-like identity called a corporation-sole.

12
John Doe and JOHN DOE may sound the same but you can see the difference
in the written form. When a noun is written in all-capital-letters, the Rules of
English Grammar says it’s either fictitious [without substance] or it’s a company
name [corporation].

Consequently, the government as creator of a corporation can now demand

anything it wants from [their] corporation, simply by manipulating the statute
[Corporations Law].

One of the ways governments captured our natural rights and freedoms has
been the creation of artificial-legal-entities.

Through their statutes, they have created companies and corporations [dead-
corporate-entities] through the clever manipulation of language by the re-
definition of certain words.

One of the most powerful, magical, and difficult to detect tools and weapons
used against mankind by aggressors and exploiters, is language.

The basic tool for the manipulation of truth is the manipulation of words,
semantics.

If one can control the meaning of words, one can control the people
who use those words.

For example the word person and persons has been re-defined in the
Interpretation clauses of their statutes as a corporation

How many people would interpret the word person to mean a corporation.

The government want you to assume this ordinary meaning of the word person
so as to deceive you into reading and interpreting their statute in their favour.

You might like to refer to “Sir William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the

Law’s of England”.

Sir William was a pre-eminent juror in his time and an acknowledged expert in
English law.

He confirmed in his expert capacity that there are two (2) persons recognised
in statute law. Natural person and artificial person

However, one still needs to approach this thinking with caution as natural-
person is often taken to mean human-being and the dictionary defines human-
being as a half-monster.

Therefore in statutory or legal matters we should be very careful when using

the term person, natural or artificial; you are better off using man or flesh and
blood living-soul.

13
This nicely avoids any mis-interpretation or mis-understanding.

The first step of the process

When mothers give birth to babies they volunteer, through the medical and
hospital staff, all the associated information which is then recorded on to a
government information database.

This act of recording is the basis of a Registry Births, Deaths & Marriages
Registry

At some later point, mother or child will then apply to the government for a
Certified Extract, that we have come to know as a birth certificate.

Governments through the prism of their central banks use this registry
information to create government Bonds [negotiable instruments] against
which credit is advanced by the international funding community and repaid in
the form of income tax by the artificially-created-legal-entity known under
statute law as a taxpayer. The entire monetary system is built like a house of
cards on this commercial sleight-of-hand.

Member governments have established Reserve Banks that act as central banks
whose policies are influenced by global financial institutions such as the World
Bank and the International Monetary Fund.

These in turn filter into the BIS [Bank for International Settlements], being the
world’s premier central banking institution.

The law of commercial contract

We’ve totally succumbed to a system of commercial statutes, regulations,

codes, ordinances and quasi laws that unrelentingly renders us ripe for the
plundering.

In failing to properly recognise and arrest the onslaught of this insatiable

juggernaut, we have perpetuated a curse that will continue on down the
generations to haunt our heirs and successors.

When taxation that starts at 12% can be arbitrarily lifted to 30% then 60%,
80% and onwards, it soon becomes apparent that 100% is possible; and, in so
doing reveals the full possibilities.

14
Only living-souls can generate the energy required to create and produce
anything; but, this man-made system of artificial-legal-entities has provided a
means of swindling flesh and blood people out of their rightful entitlements.

It is at this point that the biblical law available to living-souls, flesh and
blood, breathing people almost miraculously disappears before our very eyes
to be replaced by man-made statutes that govern the behaviour and activities
of person(s) that are defined as corporations.

Most people will go their entire lives without ever discovering this clever
deception.

At first this is a little difficult to grasp but with a bit of perseverance you will
come to appreciate the thinking behind such carefully crafted words.

Once the government creates their artificial entity that simulates you
i.e. appears to be the same as you from your point of view, but is actually a
contrivance of government statutes and regulations -- then they’ve got you.

When you fill out paperwork, application forms and attach your signature, then
you have unwittingly entered into a contract.

This makes you subservient to all a governments rules and regulations through
assumpsit -- latin for assumed -- contract because you are now bound by
Terms and Conditions through your act of applying for or making application for

The government tricks you, John Doe into volunteering as an agent for or
officer of their artificially-created corporatised entity, JOHN DOE.

Hence John Doe living-soul, mistakenly believes that he is JOHN DOE

corporation-sole; and, in the confusion forfeits his natural-rights.

In being a party to such an agreement or contract, albeit unwittingly; you, as a

living-soul, flesh and blood, breathing-man are deemed to have voluntarily
surrendered your inalienable rights in exchange for honouring government
statute(s).

NOW TAKE A LOOK AT YOUR

• Driver’s Licence
• Vehicle Registration
• Passport
• Birth Certificate
• Bank Account
• Credit Card
• Tax Assessment
• Property Deeds
• Commercial contracts

15
 • Memberships

They are in the ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS name of the artificial-legal-entity;

and, you have been encouraged to believe there is no difference.

Applying for a Tax File Number or lodging an Income Tax Return invokes a
contractual agreement that although may extend privileges, usually you neglect
to acquaint yourself with all the penalties that apply which more often than not,
are well camouflaged by the tangle of rules and regulations.

Now give some thought to the following

Have you ever for School Enrolment

applied
for a Birth Certificate
Have you ever for a Driver’s Licence
applied for a Census Form
Have you ever for a Passport
applied for a Tax File Number
Have you ever for a Welfare Benefit
applied for a Bank Account
Have you ever for a Credit Card
applied for a Mortgage
Have you ever
applied to become Subject of
Have you ever a Citizen of
applied to become Resident of
Have you ever a Member of
applied to become Voter
Have you ever a Elector
applied to become
Have you ever a Trust
applied to become Company
a Land Title Teed
Have you ever to become Property Title
applied a Motor Vehicle
Have you ever
applied to register
Have you ever a
applied to register
Have you ever a
applied to register
Have you ever a
applied to register
Have you ever a
applied to register
a
Have you ever
applied

16
 Have you ever
applied
Have you ever
applied
Have you ever
applied
Have you ever
applied

All the above-mentioned have one thing in common the act of applying for but
more precisely a contractual agreement whereby you voluntarily and willingly
request by the submission of an Application Form and are now contractually
bound to all sorts of fines, taxes, duties, tariffs, customs, excise, registration,
permit and licence fees.

We have voluntarily agreed, albeit unwittingly, to be the government’s natural

energy source in return for privileges and penalties, rather than exercising your
God-given inalienable rights which have fallen from sight in the mistaken belief
that only the state can provide for our interests and wellbeing.

Winston Churchill said that “Men occasionally stumble on the truth, but
most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing had
happened.”

Government departments operate as corporations

Since 1 January 1991, every company in Australia has been issued with a nine-
digit ACN. The ACN is issued by ASIC [The Australian Securities and Investment
Commission] by way of the Corporations Act 2001 and is a unique identifier.
No two companies have the same ACN.

Companies registered under the Corporations Act 2001 and business entities
carrying on an enterprise in Australia are issued with an ABN

The ABN [Australian Business Number] is a single identifier for use in business
dealings with and issued by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO).

Your ABN is based on your ACN but it has 2 additional leading digits and
becomes an 11 digit number.

Refer to these websites

17
http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic_pub.nsf/byheadline/Australian+Company+Nu
mbers?opendocument#aust_business_no

http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic_pub.nsf/byheadline/Australian+Business+Nu
mber?opendocument

Australian Company Number Name of Corporation

ACN - 056108402 NSW POLICE

ACN - 051038843 N.S.W. POLICE DEPARTMENT
ACN - 062005850 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE
ACN - 054595649 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE
ACN - 056466963 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE
ACN - 056104940 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE
ACN - 057000521 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE
ACN - 065230122 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE
ACN - 074297233 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE
ACN - 074402494 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE
ACN - 054595096 N.S.W. POLICE SERVICE

Supreme Court of NSW - ABN 77 057 165 ACN 057 165 500
500

Local Court of NSW - ABN 68 199 215 ACN 199 215 208
208

NSW State Debt - ABN 77 766 744 ACN 766 744 918
Recovery Office 918

Modern day courts

A criminal matter is a dispute between the state or community and an

individual, as set out in the Crimes Act.

A civil matter is a dispute between individuals or companies, that usually ends

in a financial remedy of damages for injury or loss suffered.

Civil disputes in Australia are heard by local and district courts; and, are limited
by the amount of money involved.

Modern day courts operate in any one of the following jurisdictions.

1. Law [Common Law]

Damages claims between people only. Always requires there be an injured party.
Criminal conviction applies

2. Civil [Equity]
Compelled performance as per contract.
No criminal conviction

18
 3. Criminal
The state is always the plaintiff.
Criminal conviction applies

Judges will sometimes use the term “statutory jurisdiction” to try and confuse
lay people that have chosen to defend themselves without engaging a lawyer.

Statutory jurisdiction is the application of the Uniform Commercial Code

[UCC] which governs the rules of commerce and contract and is superior to
state and federal constitutions.

Hidden away within its articles currently UCC 1.308 is a common law remedy
thus allowing an accused party to call for the injured party to be brought before
the court for cross examination.

Common law - Requires there to be an injured party

The common law that has developed over time has but one purpose; to protect
our fundamental rights and freedoms of – life, liberty and property.
Common law derives its force and authority from the customs and traditions of
the people and cannot be radically altered as that is the nature of tradition; to
maintain it as is, without too much change.

Common laws were originally developed from these customs when there were
no written laws.

However, throughout history statute law has been corrupted and used in ways
it was never intended to be used.

Statute laws have been created to control and enslave people for the sole
benefit of those in power.

In 1677, the Statute of Frauds was enacted in England primarily for the purpose
of putting a stop to the abusive use of assumptive contract. That statute required
all, except very minor contracts, to be in writing, signed, sealed, witnessed and
proof of delivery.

Under common law, in the protection of rights, the conversion of free-born

sovereigns into a legal entity called a person, and thus a taxpayer, outlaws
that free-born sovereign in violation of article 39 of the Magna Carta 1215.

Today we live in a world where we are told that our fundamental rights still
exist, but there are times when we wonder, how is this so?

For example, we can have the full force of the law brought down upon us with a
traffic violation, income tax irregularity, refusing to fill in a census form, etc.

These offences do no harm to the life, liberty or property of others.

19
There are no victims whose rights or freedoms have been violated so we ask;
How can this be?

Trial by Jury

Genuine common law is the product of the sense of fairness, and justice of the
ordinary people and therefore ‘trial by jury’ is the only peaceful means known
to mankind by which supreme power can be retained collectively and
responsibly, lodged in the hands of ALL the people.

When a juror feels that the statute involved in any criminal offence is unfair, or
that it infringes upon the defendant’s natural God-given inalienable or
Constitutional rights, then it is his duty to affirm that the offending statute is
really no law at all and that the violation of it is no crime at all, for no one is
bound to obey an unjust law.

Such a juror must vote ‘not guilty’ regardless of the pressures or abuses that
may be heaped on him by any or all other members of the jury with whom he
may in good conscience disagree.

He is voting on the justice of the law according to his own conscience and
convictions and not someone else’s.

Only as long as juries of ordinary citizens has the final say does government
remain the servant, not the master, of the people.

Invoking sovereign immunity

Fundamental to understanding how to be a true sovereign [living-soul] is

learning how to repel the government’s attempts at attaching this artificiality to
us.

The government being artificial [not a living organism], means that anything it
creates is also artificial.

The government does not have any energy in its own right. It exists only by the
creative energy of we the people.

Living-souls imbued with the breath-of-life, can trace this inheritance back to
an original source; the author of life.

20
This is critical to understanding and invoking sovereign-immunity.

It’s only the artificial or corporate entities that fall within the crown’s [court’s]
jurisdiction not living-souls and flesh and blood people.

Avoiding prosecution

Natural justice or the right of due process allows for any accusation [violation of
law] to be tested [heard] before a properly convened court that will examine
the evidence put before a jury of our peers to decide guilt or innocence.

However when a parliamentary statute has been breached or violated, then

their court is a legislated government body headed by a magistrate or a judge.

Under statute law both plaintiff and defendant are always artificial legal entities
a.k.a. corporations

An example is a traffic matter where the issuing Police officer issues a traffic
ticket. He’s only acting on behalf of or as agent for his employer, the New
South Wales Police, the real Plaintiff in any subsequent court action.

Substitute the word agent for officer and you will see why all Australian Citizens
according to the statutes are defined in statutes as persons [corporations] and
similarly agents acting for, or on behalf of, a corporatised artificial-legal-entity
referred to in the statute as a person.

Challenging the jurisdiction of a court

JURIS - an oath DICTION -verbal

The legal right by which Judges exercise their authority. The power of the
courts to inquire into the facts, apply the law, make decisions, and declare
judgement.

21
We must learn how to successfully challenge the jurisdiction of a statutory court
by rebutting all of the false assumptions they make, otherwise your silence will
be interpreted as voluntarily surrendering jurisdiction.

Be warned though, that turning up in person before a court is routinely

interpreted as the voluntary surrender of jurisdiction.

You are deemed to be joined in the discussion/matter on the basis of your

behaviour, otherwise why would you have bothered to appear.

There is a little known procedure whereby the court does recognise your right
of Special Appearance but only to make a challenge to the court’s
jurisdiction.

Under this circumstance the court accepts that you are not voluntarily
surrendering to its jurisdiction.

However, you may not engage in any other discussion or presentation of

documents or argument regarding the matter before the court, because you are
not yet recognised as being joined in the matter

This forum of Special Appearance can quickly revert to General Appearance

which makes it a difficult procedure to conduct.

You must deny being a dead-artificial-legal-entity

Either by letter or affidavit you need to identify and refute the following.

That there are two (2) similar-sounding entities identified in law:-

(a) Dead, artificial-legal-entity - JOHN DOE

(b) Living breathing, flesh & blood man - John Doe

Remember as well, Mister [Mr], Missus [Mrs] and Madam are tags that attach
artificiality.

If for example a judge or a magistrate addresses you as Mr Doe, just invite

them to call you John “… your honour may call me John;” because it’s a method
of attaching artificiality, hoping you won’t realise it and thus gaining
jurisdiction over you.

Do not respond either physically or verbally. Remain respectfully mute and non-
responsive.

That neatly avoids their attempt at gaining jurisdiction.

22
You must deny having an ‘address’ or being a ‘resident’

An address is artificial. You can not take it with you if you move.

You do not live at an address. You have a location. You live in your skin. You
inhabit a shelter. You sojourn under the stars. You live in the greater universe
continuum.

If you allow the artificial tag of “resident” or “address” to be attached to you,

then the state construes that by default or by your silence, you must be their
artificial creation whereby they then claim jurisdiction.

The correct method of contact or access, without surrendering jurisdiction is:-

General Post

or

Post Restante

(A notation written on a letter indicating that it should be held at the Post Office for collection)

The word post does not refer to any corporate activity to do with artificial-legal-
entities, but the word mail does.

You should also know that postcodes indicate commercial activity only between
corporate entities.

You must deny being a ‘defendant’

Use the term accused.

When a plaintiff issues their paperwork; ‘Court Attendance Notice’ Or ‘Summons’

they routinely refer to you as the defendant.

You should never accept under any circumstances this unassuming tag because
it wrongly presumes, you, the living-soul and sovereign-man has something to
defend and if you remain silent on this then the court interprets your silence as
agreeance thus joining you in the controversy and declaring you to be a self-
confessed party to the matter.

23
You must always rebut this assumption in a carefully worded and filed affidavit
or letter addressed to the Registrar of the Court.

You should never volunteer to plea, because it’s a binding act of

contract.

Guilty or not guilty has yet to be proven/established. Until then it’s innocent.

By insisting on a plea the court [magistrate] is attempting to gain jurisdiction

by enticing you into a contractual agreement; thus gaining jurisdiction over the
living-soul and sovereign-you, most times without your ever realising it.

You need to clearly state, verbally or in writing or both, that you are “innocent”
and that by not offering to plea, the court can not construe that you have
consented to contract or voluntarily surrendered to the court’s jurisdiction.

When you turn up before the court for the first time, the magistrate will always
try and somehow coax or coerce you into entering a plea of guilty or not guilty,
in order to gain jurisdiction.

Sometimes it might be a seemingly innocent question by a Judge such as “Do

you understand the charge(s)?”

Remember another way to ask the same question would reveal its true nature.

“Do you stand under the charges?” Now there is no ambiguity and the reality of
the situation becomes obvious.

If you admit to standing under the charge(s), that’s contractual. You have just
placed yourself under the court’s jurisdiction.

Eventually out of desperation they will even enter a not guilty plea on your
behalf, which is why you need to actively resist, and state it in writing for the
court record that you are innocent and do not consent to contract with the court
by voluntarily entering a plea.

At least this action can’t be misheard, misunderstood, misinterpreted or

ignored.

Your affidavit should clearly state that you, the living-soul and sovereign-man is
innocent thus nicely avoiding any assumed contract through the act of entering
a plea.

Most people do not realise why the police and the courts like you to have a
solicitor, lawyer or licensed legal counsel, who as part of their job description,
are taught to somehow secure of plea [guilty or not guilty].

If you indicate any objection, their role is to persuade or convince you,

otherwise. Sometimes they may even step in and do it on your behalf, making
it look like they’re doing you a favour, all the time hoping you’ll not object.

24
The focus here has nothing to do with innocence or guilt. The act of offering to
plea is the same as offering to contract.

So up to this point, your letter or affidavit is a method of rebutting [denying] the

assumption of jurisdiction because of an assumed contract.

Again, most people will fail to realise that by remaining silent on these
seemingly unimportant matters, it will be taken as your voluntary agreement to
surrender jurisdiction to the court.

Resist using paid legal counsel

Most people are not aware that the engagement of a lawyer or solicitor
automatically gives jurisdiction to the crown [court].

Licensed legal practitioners have taken an oath of office that binds their loyalty
to the crown. They forfeit their professional indemnity [insurances etc] if they
promulgate [practise or spread] sovereign-law.

They are professionally trained in statute-law to re–present on behalf of an

artificial-legal-entity because it is without substance or actuality.

That is, it has no conscience, morals, intelligence, voice, mobility etc.

The presence of a solicitor or lawyer before a court is a silent signal to a

magistrate or judge that the court can safely assume it has jurisdiction because
it is customary practice for legal professionals at some point to obtain their
clients consent as part of their duty of care.

Some go as far as to provide a ‘Consent to Jurisdiction Form’ which they sign on

your behalf, often without bothering to disclose this to you.

Therefore, you have voluntarily consented to the crown’s [court’s] jurisdiction

without realising it.

At this point you have successfully

1. Denied being a “dead-artificial-legal-entity”

2. Denied having an “address” or being a “resident”
3. Denied being a “defendant”
4. Denied agreeing to contract by offering a “plea”
5. Denied “consent to jurisdiction” provided by default through a
lawyer or solicitor acting on your behalf.

25
In order for you just to get to this point you do have to understand a great deal
more about some of the other fundamental processes of the law and how it
works, otherwise if a Magistrate were to question you on some of the contents
of your affidavit, a vague response could bring all your efforts undone.

Sometimes understanding only a little can be very dangerous. It can be just

enough to get you into trouble.

It’s like putting a loaded gun in the hands of child and hoping for the best. You
need to be sure of all the facts and how to successfully articulate them.

Note the following maxims of law;

1. An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce.

2. He who leaves the field of battle, loses by default.

Foreclosure, Repossession, Bankruptcy.

A corrupt education system continually promotes the false notion of ownership

and in fact is a clever means used to exploit the fruits of our labor with imposts
such as fines, taxes, tolls, duties, tariffs, customs, levies, excise, registration,
permit and licence fees.

Today, many believe that once their mortgage has been paid, they own the
land. This is to seriously misunderstand a deceptive legal system that
eventually will fully reveal itself in the form of mandatory confiscations,
heartless evictions, ruthless bankruptcies, stealthy probate and death duties.
Most tenants never come to fully appreciate the feudal 'landlord' and
'tenancy' law, as the invisible over-riding authority being exercised by the
government.

By imagining they actually own a property, having secured papers detailing

title, tenants then proceed to improve such property by sowing crops or
erecting buildings or structures on the land.

Often they borrow more of the crown's fiat currency to do so.

It is important in this charade that they imagine they own the property
otherwise they have little vested interest in its upkeep.

The over extended use of the crowns fiat currency can plunge tenants headlong
into a foreclosure action, whereby the value of their expended time and effort is
then transmitted to the crown via the ultimate legal sleight of hand.

26
This modus operandi is repeated over and over again by the crown and has
become inter-generational.

In allowing a corporation such as the crown to exert sovereignty [Master

status] we have foolishly offered ourselves and our posterity into a life of
voluntary subservience.

Even when we are emotionally and financially broken most of us still fail to
recognise this elephant in the room.

Offshore strategies
Asset protection, personal & financial privacy solutions

Asset protection is the positioning of assets to make them unattractive and

legally unreachable by creditors, but available for financial goals and needs.

Remember, governments use our strawman as an invisible third-party middle-

man to exploit and plunder the fruits of our labor [productivity - cash and
assets].

Likewise we need to act similarly by using alternative entities and identities as a

means of securing ourselves, our property, cash and our assets.

Beware of those that would discourage you from going offshore

• The local banking system is afraid you’ll transfer

funds to foreign banks that offer better services.

• Accountants and money managers are afraid of losing your

business.

• Credit bureaus and database firms that make money

collecting and selling data about you.

• Attorneys and lawyers afraid they will be unable to

27
 confiscate your savings if your money is safely overseas.

Why do law abiding people go offshore?

• to increase personal privacy

• to protect against an invasive bureaucracy
• to protect against frivolous lawsuits
• to protect assets from seizure
• to assist estate planning
• to preserve assets for heirs & successors
• to protect a percentage of your income from income taxes
• to protect a percentage of your profits from capital taxes
• to protect capital gains from capital gains taxes
• to delay any taxation
• to increase investment diversification..

1. Private Companies, Trusts & Foundations

Trusts are based on common law, and are established through a private
contractual document that does not need to be filed with a public entity.

• Fixed non-discretionary Trusts

• Discretionary or revocable Trusts
• Testamentary Trusts
• Owning an offshore company through a Trust
• Offshore Trusts

2. Debit and credit card facilities in a foreign jurisdiction.

Offshore banking is tax free, there are no foreign exchange regulations, and all
account information is confidential.

• Anonymous banking
• Offshore credit cards

3. Easy internet access for monitoring, transfers, purchases &

payments.

• Offshore mail-drops
• Offshore merchants
• Anonymous mobile & sim cards
• Offshore brokerage

28
4. Perpetual Traveller status with multiple passports

• Tax free cars

• Immigration services
• Camouflage passports

The following novelty ID cards which can be useful for many circumstances
depending on not just who you are, but who or what you want to be.

Readily available on the internet for a nominal fee. No questions asked. No

records kept.

Anti-Terrorist Army Sniper

Bail Enforcement Agent Black Belt
Body Guard Security
Concealed Weapons Permit Delta Force
Executive Body Guard Explosives Expert
Identification Card Intelligence Officer
Locksmith Organised Crime Bureau
Ordained Minister Photographer
Pilot Private Detective
Private Investigator Property Pass
Registered Mercenary Scuba Diver
Security Consultant Security Enforcement Officer
Special Agent Special Forces
Special Investigator Special Operations
Special Security Officer Special Weapons Permit
State Identification Tax Exempt
Vietnam Veteran Weapons Specialist

Press agencies and student associations issue ID cards to whomsoever they

like.

Premium Press Cards

A Press Card forgives a multitude of sins. It may get you the best seats, often
for free, at restaurants, sporting and social events, and you will often be traded
up to first class on flights.

Many countries offer special deals for foreign journalists (Germany, for
example, offers half price rail travel to foreign journalists).
At the other end of the scale, a Press Card really could save your life - in war
zones or times of civil unrest, authorities still respect foreign journalists
because they fear negative publicity.

29
Press Card

An Asian PRESS ID is available on the internet as a novelty item and it’s very
convincing.

Travel Agent ID Card

Identify yourself as a travel agent at hotel chains, airlines and car rental offices
for VIP treatment. You can expect upgrades and heavy discounts.

Usually an impressive document which identifies you as a bona fide travel

agent.

(Note this card does not identify you as an agent on the IATAN list. However,
for most purposes, especially outside the USA or at smaller hotels, this card will
do the trick.)

British Hong Kong Drivers Licence

The UK government no longer issues any Hong Kong drivers licences, but not
every one knows that.

The British Hong Kong drivers licence is an impressive card which identifies you
as a resident of British Hong Kong, showing your name, address and date of
birth.

My Philosophy

Engage, entertain, educate, enrich, encourage.

Favourite Quotations

He who fails to assert his rights, has none.

30
The full exercise of inalienable sovereign powers and all the attendant rights are seen in the
deliberations of a jury, not in the statutes of a government, thus acknowledging that the
powers of the people are antecedent to the formation of the state.

See also Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905) American jurisprudence

Definition of Law - All commerce is contract. Contract makes the law.

Conclusion

The ten commandments of Bible renown continues to underpin the law systems of many western
democracries.

Such commandments have stood the test of time.

As well, the Bible is a key that can unlock the mystery of the universe to man; and, the mystery
of man to himself. It is a book of emancipation; and, the emancipation of man can mean the
delivery from sorrow, sickness, poverty, uncertainty, ignorance, limitation and finally from
death itself.

________________________________________________

END

31