Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6

Your wireless solution guide

with Newark element14

1. Simplifying the IoT through highly integrated wireless solutions

2. Choosing a protocol

3. Know your area

4. Typical applications and solutions

5. Connecting to the world

6. Conclusion
Simplifying the IoT through highly integrated wireless solutions
Wireless connectivity is ubiquitous; an invisible technology that has changed the networking
infrastructure and is now enabling the IoT. The implementation of wireless data communications is
achieved on many levels and in its simplest form can exist purely as a link between two devices
communicating over a short range, without the need for any kind of protocol. Increasingly, of
course, applications require a more sophisticated solution that supports some form of networking
between multiple devices and, here, the landscape is very different; one dominated by standards.

The proliferation of wireless communications is largely thanks to the openness of the RF spectrum.
The vast majority of standard-based and proprietary protocols operate in the license-free part of the
spectrum which, while open to anyone, still comes with strict restrictions in terms of operating
power. Because of this, implementing a wireless connection is easiest to achieve using either
technology designed to comply with an industry standard, or proprietary technology that has
already been approved for use by the appropriate governing bodies.

Increasingly it is the ability to create networks of devices that is propelling the popularity of industry
standards, but in broad strokes the different technologies available can be categorised by range and
bandwidth; both of which influence the operating power which is becoming an increasingly
important design parameter.

Choosing a protocol
There are many protocols used in the licence-free ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) and SRD
(Short Range Device) frequency bands, both Sub-1 GHz and 2.4GHz. Some standards-based
protocols such as Zigbee operate in both bands but for historic reasons proprietary protocols are
more likely to operate in the Sub-1 GHz band. Semiconductor providers like Texas Instruments
offer a wide range of solutions for wireless connectivity, from transducers to fully integrated
wireless microcontrollers (MCUs); the SimpleLink MCU Platform now supports over ten wired
and wireless protocols, ensuring there is a solution to fit every application.

For example, the CC13xx range of wireless MCUs includes the CC1310 device which integrates an
ARM Cortex-M3 and a sensor controller with the Sub-1 GHz radio, capable of a range of 20km even
when powered by a coin cell battery. This device is ideal for applications including wireless alarm
systems, where the protocol used would either be proprietary or based on the TI 15.4-Stack, a
standards-based star networking protocol released by TI. This is one in a family of wireless MCUs
and transceivers offered by Texas Instruments.

The SimpleLink MCU Platform incudes devices based on TI’s own MSP430 16-bit core designed to
operate as a host, to network processors and wireless MCUs that integrate RF transceiver(s)
alongside the core offering Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and Sub-1 GHz connectivity in a single chip solution.

Know your area
Although the concept of range still exists as the maximum distance between two devices over
which a reliable wireless connection can be sustained, the advent of mesh networking has rendered
its relevance somewhat moot. A network of many devices connected using a short range wireless
standard can theoretically span an area many times greater than the range of one point-to-point
connection. The latest version of Bluetooth, Bluetooth 5, now supports mesh networking and so, in
principle, has the ability to create a single network of devices with unlimited range. However,
Bluetooth has its foundations in Personal Area Networking; short-range communications between
small devices with relatively low bandwidth demands.

Historically, range has been used to define the type of networking addressed by a group of
technologies, such as Body Area Networking (BAN), Personal Area Networking (PAN) and Wide Area
Networking (WAN). With increased support for mesh networking across many standards these
terms are arguably less relevant and with the introduction of integrated solutions that require fewer
system resources there is large crossover between the application areas each has addressed in the

While there may be no ‘wrong’ choice when selecting a wireless technology, there are still excellent
reasons for choosing a particular standard for a specific application area. Range may be less crucial
but bandwidth is still a major consideration, primarily because the amount of data sent/received still
has a direct impact on both the power required and the complexity involved. Fortunately there is a
growing number of highly integrated solutions that successfully address both of these design

The IoT will see many devices with low bandwidth requirements, such as smart sensors, home
appliances and entertainment systems, industrial control and monitoring, as well as emerging
applications within the home, office and car. Here, Zigbee and its variants (including Light Link and
RF4CE) provide a good mix of networking features, power demands and security, at data rates of
around 250kbit/s. For applications with higher bandwidth requirements, Bluetooth becomes more
relevant, offering up to 5Mbit/s. As bandwidth requirements or network complexity increase further,
Wi-Fi steps in, supporting direct connection to the internet with bandwidths as high as 100Mbit/s.

A further consideration is the frequency of operation and the choice here will be based on a
combination of range, bandwidth and operating power. Many standards are capable of operating in
both the Sub-1 GHz and the more common (and crowded) 2.4GHz range; often a Sub-1 GHz
solution offers greater range but at the cost of bandwidth. Co-existence and resilience to a crowded
spectrum may also be a design consideration, with some standards offering greater benefits in this
area than others. The SimpleLink MCU Platform has solutions that address all of these use-cases,
including dual-band devices like the CC1350 which integrates RF transceivers for Sub-1 GHz and
Bluetooth connections in a single device (see below for more details of this family of devices).

Typical applications and solutions
In many cases the application will indicate which wireless technology to use. For example, a system
which includes a number of sensors distributed around a building, each of which is in direct contact
with a central controller (or Gateway), might be best implemented using a Sub-1 GHz technology
based on a star network; transmissions in the Sub-1 GHz range are less susceptible to attenuation
by obstructions such as walls, while a star network avoids the processing overhead associated with
a mesh network and would therefore allow the sensors to operate longer from a single battery.

With the right integrated solution, the low power nature of a Sub-1 GHz application of this type
would allow a smart sensor to operate for as much as 20 years from a single coin cell battery. For
example, the CC1310F32RGZT, part of the SimpleLink Platform, integrates three processing cores;
an ARM Cortex-M3 for application code, an ARM Cortex-M0 dedicated to the radio protocol being
used, and an ultra-low power 16-bit core that functions as an autonomous sensor controller.

As the IoT develops it has become apparent that a hardware platform as capable as the SimpleLink
family can be extended to address more application areas. To achieve this, Texas Instruments
developed a sub-range of SimpleLink devices that offer support for multiple wireless
standards and interfaces running concurrently. The CC1350F128RGZT builds on the features of
the CC1310 to support both Sub-1 GHz and 2.4GHz radio protocols and interfaces. This means it
can be used in a Sub-1 GHz star network for ultra-low power operation, while supporting
over-the-air updates using a Bluetooth connection to a smart phone or home gateway, for example.

Connecting to the world

Of course, a major part of creating an application that forms part of the IoT involves connecting it to
the internet and in many applications the wireless protocol that most easily achieves this is Wi-Fi. A
Wi-Fi connection provides global access to the functionality and data of an application, however the
complexity of the protocol reflects this and is consequently more challenging to implement than,
say, protocols intended for private networks.

As the value of data collected through distributed Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) increases,
manufacturers are looking for reliable yet simple ways to create WSNs and start collecting that data.
In this application area, Sub 1 GHz wireless connectivity can excel in both range and power, and to
assist in the development of exactly this kind of application TI has developed the TIDEP0084
reference design. It provides TI’s IEEE 802.15.4 based star network stack pre-integrated into the
SimpleLink CC13x0 SDK and TI’s Linux SDK targeting
Sitara processors.

The CC3120, part of Texas Instruments’ SimpleLink Wi-Fi family, has been designed to make adding
Wi-Fi to an application as easy as possible. It is a self-contained network processor with a fully
integrated web server and includes the TCP/IP stack needed to connect to the internet. This level of
integration takes most of the processing burden off of a host processor, which can subsequently be
a relatively simple microcontroller. Alternatively, the CC3220 provides even greater integration by
including an ARM Cortex-M4 core dedicated to running application code. This allows a complete
internet-ready device to be developed with a single-chip solution. Texas Instruments also takes into
consideration security concerns seen in the growing IoT space. This latest generation of Wireless
Microcontroller provides multilevel security features that enable developers to protect their products
against hostile takeover, as well as IP and data theft.

The latest revision of the specification sees Bluetooth 5 now supporting mesh networking, as well
as an increased bit rate of up to 5Mbit/s. With the same low power credentials it means Bluetooth
can now be used in a wider range of applications that need a more direct internet connection, with
the added benefit of greater range through the use of mesh networking. One of the first parts to
support Bluetooth 5 is the CC2640R2FRGZT wireless MCU from TI. It is part of the company’s
CC2540 SimpleLink Bluetooth low energy wireless MCUs with support for USB. Table 1 details all of
TI’s wireless MCUs that cover Sub-1GHz, proprietary 2.4GHz, Bluetooth, ZigBee, 6LowPAN and

The internet is enabled through the Internet Protocol, or IP; one of the latest wireless standards to
provide IP functionality is 6LowPAN, as defined by the Internet Engineering Task Force. With full
support for IPv6 on all nodes in a network It is perhaps the most future-proof of all wireless
technologies, as it can operate in either the Sub-1GHz or 2.4GHz frequency bands and on a number
of physical layers. One popular implementation of 6LowPAN is using the IEEE 802.15.4 physical
layer (as used by ZigBee). Many of Texas Instruments’ SimpleLink devices support the IEEE
802.15.4 physical interface and so can be used to implement both ZigBee and 6LowPAN networks.

The IoT will be dominated by low power wireless technologies. In addition to those already
mentioned, engineers are anticipating the wide scale availability of solutions targeting one of the
latest protocols in this exciting and rapidly evolving application space; Thread. Unlike most other
wireless technologies, Thread has been developed with just one objective; to provide a way to
connect and control devices in the home.
This mesh networking technology has also been designed to promote interoperability, by using
open standards based on 6LowPAN; essentially it can be realised through a software ‘upgrade’ to
an existing 802.15.4 platform.
In order to better support Thread, in 2018 TI will be launching its own Thread SDK (Software
Development Kit), which will initially target a new wireless MCU; the CC26x2. For a sneak preview,
visit www.ti.com/tool/simplelink-cc26x2-sdk. The SDK will include support for the Thread 1.1
networking protocol, based on an open source version of the stack, called openthread.

Harnessing the capabilities of wireless connectivity has never been easier, thanks to highly
integrated single-chip solutions and the availability of royalty-free software (including protocol
stacks). The range of devices available covering all of the major standardised wireless protocols is
now significantly accelerating the development of IoT applications.

Family Example Description Protocols Throughput Evaluation Board /
Development Kit

Ultra Low-Power Multi-Standard

dual-band wireless Sub-1GHz, Bluetooth 4Mbit/s
MCU Low Energy

Ultra Low-Power LAUNCHXL-

CC1310 CC1310F64RGZT Sub-1GHz wireless Sub-1GHz 4Mbit/s

Multi-standard 6LowPAN, Bluetooth LE, LAUNCHXL-

CC2650 CC2650F128RGZT 2.4GHz wireless 5Mbit/s
RF4CE, ZigBee CC2650

CC430F CC430F5137IRGZT 16-bit ultra Sub-1GHz 0.5Mbit/s

low-power MCU

CC1110 - 8051-based wireless CC1110-

CC1110F32RHHR Sub-1GHz 0.6Mbit/s
CC1111 MCU CC1111DK

CC2640 Bluetooth wireless Bluetooth 5, Proprietary LAUNCHXL-

CC2640R2FRGZT 5Mbit/s
MCU 2.4GHz CC2640R2

CC2540 CC2540F256RHAR Single-chip Bluetooth Bluetooth Low Energy 1Mbit/s CC2540DK


CC2511 CC2511F32RSP 8051-based 2.4GHz Proprietary 2.4GHz CC2511EMK

wireless MCU

CC2545 CC2545RGZR Value Line wireless Proprietary 2.4GHz CC2545EMK

SoC for 2.4GHz

CC2543 CC2543RHBR Value Line wireless

Proprietary 2.4GHz 2Mbit/s
SoC for 2.4GHz

CC2510 8051-based wireless CC2510-

CC2510F32RHHT Proprietary 2.4GHz 0.5Mbit/s
MCU for 2.4GHz CC2511DK

SoC solution for

CC2533 CC2533F32RHAT 2.4GHz IEEE RF4CE, ZigBee 0.25Mbit/s CC2533DK-
802.15.4 RF4CE-BA

SoC solution for IEEE CC2531EMK

CC2531 CC2531F256RHAT RF4CE, ZigBee 0.25Mbit/s

Certified Wi-Fi
16Mbit/s (UDP), BOOSTXL-
CC3120MOD CC3120MODRNMM Network Processor Wi-Fi
OBR 13Mbit/s (TCP) CC3120MOD

Certified Wireless
16Mbit/s (UDP), LAUNCHCC3220
CC3220MOD CC3220MODSF12M Microcontroller Wi-Fi
13Mbit/s (TCP) MODASF
OB Module

Single-Chip IoT
CC3220 CC3220RM2ARGKT wireless Wi-Fi 16Mbit/s (UDP), CC3220SF-
Microcontroller (SoC) 13Mbit/S (TCP) LAUNCHXL

Ultra low-power
wireless MCU for
CC2630 CC2630F128RGZT 2.4GHz IEEE ZigBee 0.25Mbit/s

SoC for 2.4GHz IEEE CC2538-

CC2538 CC2538SF53RTQT ZigBee 0.25Mbit/s
802.15.4 CC2592EMK

Wireless SoC for
CC2530 CC2530F256RHAR RF4CE, ZigBee 0.25Mbit/s CC2530DK