Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
COURT OF APPEALS
Manila
CEBGO INC.,
Petitioner,
COMMENT/OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
1 Emphasis supplied
not see that private respondent brought out the polo shirts
from the stockroom and placed it in her trolley shall stand.
2 Emphasis supplied
3 G.R. No. 178184, January 29, 2014
Here, the mere filing of a formal charge, to our
mind, does not automatically make the dismissal valid.
Evidence submitted to support the charge should be
evaluated to see if the degree of proof is met to
justify respondents’ termination. The affidavit
executed by Montegrico simply contained the
accusations of Abis that respondents committed
pilferage, which allegations remain uncorroborated.
Unsubstantiated suspicions, accusations, and
conclusions of employers do not provide for legal
justification for dismissing employees. The other bits
of evidence were also inadequate to support the charge
of pilferage. The findings made by GASLI’s port captain
and internal auditor and the resulting certification
executed by De la Rama merely showed an
overstatement of fuel consumption as revealed in the
Engineer’s Voyage Reports. The report of Jade Sea Land
Inspection Services only declares the actual usage and
amount of fuel consumed for a particular voyage. There
are no other sufficient evidence to show that
respondents participated in the commission of a serious
misconduct or an offense against their employer.4
4 Emphasis supplied
5
G.R. No. 201483, August 4, 2014
A re-computation (or an original computation, if
no previous computation has been made) is a part of the
law – specifically, Article 279 of the Labor Code and the
established jurisprudence on this provision – that is
read into the decision. By the nature of an illegal
dismissal case, the reliefs continue to add on until full
satisfaction, as expressed under Article 279 of the Labor
Code. The re-computation of the consequences of
illegal dismissal upon execution of the decision does
not constitute an alteration or amendment of the
final decision being implemented. The illegal
dismissal ruling stands; only the computation of
monetary consequences of this dismissal is affected and
this is not a violation of the principle of immutability of
final judgments.6
6 Emphasis supplied
Page
xxx
PRAYER
By:
ILDEBRANDO D. VIERNESTO
Roll No. 39205
PTR No. 7002558; 01/03/18; Manila
IBP No. 1006129; 01/03/18; Manila III
MCLE Compliance No. V-0014252
attybrando@yahoo.com
+639062363340
8
Page
11 Emphasis supplied
COPY FURNISHED:
EXPLANATION
(Pursuant to Sec. 11, Rule 13
of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure)
9
Page