ETP Soil Test Report

CLIENT:
COTTON GROUP.
REPORT ON:
SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED ETP
EXTENSION AT HABIR BARI, AMTOLI, BHALUKA, MYMENSINGH.
AUGUST - 2018.
METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS

CHA-37/1, SHADHINATA SORANI, NORTH BADDA,
DHAKA-1212.
MOBILE-01726-341115, 01733149349.
MGE
CONTENTS
REPORT ON SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION------------------------------------------------PAGE NO-01
INTRODUCTION------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-01
PURPOSE----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-01
INVESTIGATION PROGRAM---------------------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-02.
METHODOLOGY------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-03
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION----------------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-04
CALCULATION OF SOIL MECHANICS PARAMETERS------------------------------ PAGE NO-05
DETERMINATION OF PILE BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL FOR FOOTING---- PAGE NO-06
DETERMINATION OF PILE LOAD CAPACITY (A SINGLE PILE)------------------ PAGE NO-07
CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION-------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-08
ILLUSTRATIONS
CORRELATION CHART : TABLE NO - 01 & 02.

ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY (qa) OF SOIL
FOR FOOTING IN TSF &
: TABLE
07 NO - 03.
CHART FOR ULTIMATE SKIN FRICTION &
END BEARING CAPACITY OF PILE IN TSF : TABLE NO - 04 & 08.
CHART FOR RCC CAST-IN-SITU PILE
CAPACITY AT DIFFERENT LEVEL & DIFFERENT DIAMETER :ANNEX NO – 01 & 05.
SITE PLAN -A3 SIZE : FIG. NO - 01
BORING LOGS : FIG. NO - 02 TO 06.
TEST RESULTS SHEET : FIG. NO - 07 TO 15.

MGE
REPORT ON:
SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION
INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared and submitted to present the sub soil and geotechnical features of
features of the following project.
NAME OF PROJECT : Const of Proposed ETP Extension
LOCATION : Habir Bari, Amtoli, Bhaluka, Mymensingh.
METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS. CHA-37/1, Shadhinata Sorani, North Badda, Dhaka,

was entrusted with the geotechnical investigation work for the above mentioned site by the
concerned authority.
CLIENT : Cotton Group.
PURPOSE
The purpose of the investigation was to obtain information relating to foundation condition
and natural construction materials commensurate with the magnitude and type of structure
involved within the project. The soil investigation both in the field an laboratory were
carried out in detail to evaluate the mechanical, physical and getechnical properties of safe
and economic foundation for the proposed structures to be constructed with investigation site
The report contains the works program, methodology of field and laboratory investigation
works, discussions on physical and engineering properties of sub-soil formation
encountered during investigation, evaluation of laboratory test data, analysis of bearing
capacities, foundation recommendation and graphs representing the field and
laboratory test results.
The test results, analysis, duscussions and recommendations which are presented in this
report is valid only for the locations where the actual investigation have been carried out.

INVESTIGATION PROGRAM MGE
The sub-soil and geotechnical investigation program for the project is detailed below
A. Field Investigation
Number of Boring : 05 Nos Depth (m) : 30.30m
SPT Execution : 100 Nos Interval : 1.50 m
Disturbed Sample : 100 Nos Undisturbed samples : 05 Nos
Compaction Test : Nil G.W.L : 05 Nos
Other Tests : Nil Mackintosh : Nil
B. Laboratory Investigation
Grain Size : 13 Nos Atterberg Limits : 05 Nos
Sp. Gravity : 05 Nos Moisture Content : 05 Nos
Unconfined : 05 Nos Consolidation : Nil
Direct Shear : 05 Nos Triaxial Shear : Nil
Density : 05 Nos Others : Nil

METRO GEOTECHNICL ENGINEERS MGE
DHAKA-1212.
MOBILE-01726-341115-01733-149349.
METHODOLOGY
The methodology of conducting field and laboratory investigation and evaluations
bearing capacities of shallow and deep foundations is discussed below ;
FIELD INVESTIGATION
Execution of Borings
The field boring were conducted using 100 mm dia casing. The method consists in first
driving a casing through which a hollow drill rod with a sharp chisel or chopping bit at
the lower end is inserted. Water is forced under pressure through the drill rod which is
alternatively raised and dropped, and also rotated. The soil cuttings are forced up to the
droped and also rotated. The soil cuttings are forced up to the ground in the drilled rod
and casing. Before taking SPT and collection of disturbed and undisturbed soil samples,
the bore hole is cleaned with repeated circulation of mud slurry.
Standard Penetration Tests(SPT)

The standard Penetration Tests (SPT) were performed in all the bore holes. The tests
were executed by using a thick walled split sampler of 35 mm inner dia and 50.8 mm
outer dia and 63.5 kg hammer falling freely from a constant height of 75 cm. The SPT
value (N-value) were taken as the ; summation of blows required in 2nd and 3rd 15 cm of
penetration of sampler. The SPT values (N-values) are shown on the bore hole logs
against the respective interval of tests.
The Standard Penetration Tests provide a fair knowledge on the density and consistency
of the soil layer encountered and in addition yield disturbed/ semi-disturbed soil samples
from within the split spoon sampler used during the tests.
Disturbed Sample Collection

The disturbed samples were collected with the help of split spoon sampler used during
Standard Penetration Tests. The collected samples were classified in-situ and were
preserved in water tight polythene bags with proper identification marks for onward
transmission to the laboratory for further analysis.
The disturbed samples were also used to reconstruct depthwise stratification of bore holes
depending on its classifications.
METRO GEOTECHNICL ENGINEERS
MGE
DHAKA-1212.
MOBILE-01726-341115-01733-149349.
Undisturbed Sample Collection
The undisturbed samples were collected whenever feasible from the cohesive layers with
the help of thin walled Shelby tubes 76 mm dia thin walled Shelby tubes are penetrated
into the undisturbed soil formation at the bottom of the borehole by applying rapid but
continuous force. The samples recovered within the Shelby tubes were wax sealed at both
ends and transmitted to the laboratory with proper identification marks.
Recording of Ground Water Table

The ground water table was recorded in each of the boreholes by rope/rod sounding after
24 hours of completion of the drilling and sampling operation.
Other Field Tests

Any other field tests, which were conducted at site was done as per AASHTO/ASTM
standard.
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
Different types of laboratory tests were performed in the laboratory to evaluate the
physical and engineering properties of the sub-soil formation to facilitate determination
of soil bearing capacities and to recommend foundation type and magnitude.
Grain Size Analysis , Atterberg Limit and Sp. Gravity Tests were performed to ascertain
the detail composition of the soil and to evaluate the physical parameters of the
formation. These tests also help in classifying the soils properly for geological and
geotechnical interpretation.
Unconfined Compression, density and Shear tests were done to evaluate the shear
characteristics of the soils, which directly helps in bearing capacity calculation.
Consolidation tests provide data on consolidation behaviour of the sub-soil formation.
The laboratory tests were performed as per AASHTO/ASTM Standard

MGE
DHAKA-1212.
MOBILE-01726-341115-01733-149349.
CORRELATIONS
A. The following definitions are used in this report to describe the soil
compositions :
Trace : 1% to 10% Sandy : >36% to 60% Sand
Little : >10% to 20% Clayey : >36% to 60% Clay
Some : >20% to 36% Silty : >36% to 60% Clay
B. Correlation among values (N) with Different Engineering properties of

cohesion less (Sandy) soil :
N Value Compactness or Angle of Relative Moist Unit Allowable

Consistency Internal Density weight, pcf Soil pressure
Friction(0) ton/sft
0 to 4 Very loose 250 to 320 0% to 15% 70 to 100 0.00 to 0.40

>4 to 10 loose 270 to 350 >15% to 35% 95 to 125 0.40 to 0.70
0 0
>10 to 30 Medium 30 to 40 >35% to 65% 110 to 130 0.70 to 2.60
>30 to 50 Dense 350 to 450 >65% to 85% 110 to 140 2.60 to 4.60
Over 50 Very Dense > 450 >85% to >130 >4.60
100%
The above tabulated values are applicable for dry or moist cohesion less soil. For silty
sands, the Bearing Capacity values must be reduced by study or Grain Size Analysis
and applying judgment.
C. Correlation among values (N) with Different Engineering properties of

cohesive (clayey) soil:
N Value Compactness Consistency Unconfined Allowable bearing capacity
or Index(%) Compressive (qa), tone/sft
Consistency Strength(qu), Square Continuous
ton/sft Footing Footing
1.2 x qu 0.90 x qu
0-2 Very soft 0 - 25 0.00 - 0.62 0.00 -0.30 0.00 -0.23
>2-4 Soft > 25 - 50 > 0.62 - 0.60 > 0.30 - 0.72 > 0.23 - 0.46
>4-8 Medium stiff > 50 - 75 > 0.60 - 1.00 > 0.72 – 1.20 > 0.54 - 0.90
> 8 - 16 Stiff > 75 - 100 > 1.00 - 2.00 > 1.20 - 2.40 > 0.90 - 1.80
> 16 - 32 Very stiff > 100 > 2.00 - 4.00 > 2.40 - 4.80 > 1.80 - 3.60
> 32 Hard > 100 > 4.00 > 4.80 >3.60
In the above table , the shearing of strength of cohesive soil is equal to half of
unconfined compressive strength the value of angle shearing resistance (0) in equal
zero. METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS
MGE
DHAKA-1212.
MOBILE-01726-341115-01733-149349.
DETERMINATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL FOR

FOOTING.
The SPT is widely used to obtain the allowable bearing capacity values in the following
general equation for sandy soil( for 25 mm settlement)
qa = N/F1 Kd BF4
qa = N/F2 ( B+ F3/ B)2 Kd BF4
qa = -------------------allowable bearing capacity, ksf

Where,
N = --------------------SPT Value
B = -------------------width of footing
D = --------------------depth of footing
Kd = 1+ 0.33 D/B 1.33
F1 = 2.5 (F factors )
F2 = 4 "
F3 = 1 "
F4 = 4 "
Terzaghi has expressed the bearing capacity values in the following general equation
(Terzaghi, 1942; Meterhof, 1951)
qult = 1.3 c Nc + D Nq + 0.6 BN
Where, qult = ----------------- ultimate bearing capacity, psf

c = ----------------- cohesion of soil, psf
 = -------------------- moist unit weight of soil pcf
D = ------------------- depth of foundation
B = ------------------- width of footing
Nc, Nq, N = ------------ bearing capacity factors

MGE
DHAKA-1212.
MOBILE-01726-341115-01733-149349.
DETERMINATION OF PILE CAPACITY ( A SINGLE PILE )
The load applied to a single pile is carried jointly by the soil beneath the tip of the pile and by
soil around the shaft and the maximum load that the pile can support the pile capacity
Q = Ap*Eb + [ (fs * Π D*L)
Where Q = ------------------- pile capacity

Eb = ------------------- end bearing capacity
Fs = ------------------- shaft resistance ( skin friction )
Ap = ------------------- area of pile point
D = ------------------- diameter of pile
L = ------------------- length of pile
End bearing :
Eb = 0.6 x N tsf < 45.0tsf (for granular soil )*

= 9 c ( for cohesive soil )
Where
c = ------------------- cohesion of soil beneath pile point ( or Su )
N = ------------------- standard penetration test value
Skin friction :
Qs = α c (for cohesive soil )

= N/6 in ton/m2 (for granular soil )*
Where
α = ------------------- adhesion factor
c = ------------------- standard penetration test value
( Ref. Drilled Shafts, Manual, Student Workbook, Volume-1, National highway

Institute, US Department of Transportation. Page: 501-502)
Ref, The theory and practice of Foundation Design, N. N. Som & S. C. Das. Page: 217.

MGE
Table No. 1.
Correlation between standard penetration resistance and

different soil parameters for cohesion less soil.
Compactness very loose loose medium dense very dense
Relative density 0% to 15% 15% to 35% 35% to 65% 35% to 85% 85% to 100%
SPT N 0 to 4 4 to 10 10 - 30 30 to 50 >50
Angle of internal friction o 28 28 to 30 30 to 36 36 to 41
Unit weight. (moist) pcf <100 95 to 125 110 to 130 110 to 140 >130
Submerged unit weight pcf <60 55 to 65 60 to 70 65 to 85 >75
Table No. 2.
Correlation between standard penetration resistance and
different soil parameters for cohesive soil.
Consistency very soft soft medium stiff very stiff
Unconfined comp. test in pcf 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 2.00 - 4.00
SPT N 0 to 2 2 to 4 4 to 8 8 to 16 16 to 32
Unit weight. (Saturated) in pcf 100 100 - 120 110 - 130 120 - 140 130 +
(Ref. FOUNDATION DESIGN Wayne C. Teng. Page 12 & 15)

MGE
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATION
From the field and confirmatory laboratory test results, it can be concluded as follows:
The sub -soil formation encountered at the proposed site is mostly homogeneous. The
sequence of lithological composition as well as con sistency of the soil at different depths has
been depicted in the respective bore logs BH-01 through BH-05.
We enclosed the allowable bearing capacity of soil & Chart for unit ultimate skin friction
& unit End bearing Capacity of pile in this report in Table No -03 to 08. Considering the
magnitude of the structure, the structural designer may put his justice to select the suitable
type and depth of foundation.
Since the precise recommendation for total load comes to the foundation is needed , So the
Structural Design Engineer has to take the final decision from this report.
NOTE- Different
Length & Dia of Pile Bearing Capacity Calculation Is Presented In
Annex No – 01 & 05.

Table No. 03 MGE
ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY (qa) OF SOIL FOR FOOTING IN TSF
CLIENT Cotton Group.

PROJECT Const of Proposed ETP Extension
LOCATION Habir Bari, Amtoli, Bhaluka, Mymensingh.
ALLOW ABLE BEARING CAPACITY IN TSF

Boring no Depth in Ft
C/N Nc Y' qa
t/cuf
1.50 0.063 5.7 0.0256 0.208
1 3.00 0.312 5.7 0.0288 0.877
4.50 0.312 5.7 0.0288 0.931
1.50 0.063 5.7 0.0256 0.208

2 3.00 0.125 5.7 0.0264 0.415
4.50 0.312 5.7 0.0288 0.931
1.50 0.063 5.7 0.0256 0.208

3 3.00 0.125 5.7 0.0264 0.415
4.50 0.312 5.7 0.0288 0.931
1.50 0.063 5.7 0.0264 0.208

4 3.00 0.125 5.7 0.0264 0.415
4.50 0.312 5.7 0.0288 0.931
1.50 0.063 5.7 0.0256 0.208

5 3.00 0.125 5.7 0.0264 0.415
4.50 0.187 5.7 0.0272 0.622
FACTOR OF SAFETY=3.0
Ref. Foundation Design- Wayne C. Teng page-58 TABLE NO-03.

Ref. Foundation Analysis & Desigh - Josph E. Bowls Fifth Edition Page - 263.264.

CHART FOR ULTIMATE SKIN FRICTION MGE
& END BEARING CAPACITY OF PILE IN TSF

BH-01.
Ultimate Ultimate End

Depth in Shearing
SPT Value Sample type Alpha factor skin fricton Bearing (Eb) in
meter strength in tsf
in tsf tsf
1.5 1 C 0.063 1.00 0.063 0.60
3.0 5 C 0.313 0.94 0.294 3.00
4.5 5 C 0.313 0.94 0.294 3.00
6.0 8 C 0.500 0.80 0.400 4.80
7.5 18 S - - 0.279 10.80
9.0 27 S - - 0.418 16.20
10.5 38 S - - 0.589 22.80
12.0 44 S - - 0.682 26.40
13.5 43 S - - 0.666 25.80
15.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
16.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
18.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
19.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
21.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
22.5 24 C 1.500 0.50 0.750 14.40
24.0 23 C 1.438 0.50 0.719 13.80
25.5 24 C 1.500 0.50 0.750 14.40
27.0 26 C 1.625 0.50 0.813 15.60
28.5 18 C 1.125 0.50 0.563 10.80
30.0 20 C 1.250 0.50 0.625 12.00
TABLE NO-04.


BH-02.

Depth in Shearing
in tsf tsf
1.5 1 C 0.063 1.00 0.063 0.60
3.0 2 C 0.125 1.00 0.125 1.20
4.5 5 C 0.313 0.94 0.294 3.00
6.0 6 C 0.375 0.90 0.338 3.60
7.5 15 S - - 0.232 9.00
9.0 19 S - - 0.294 11.40
10.5 29 S - - 0.449 17.40
12.0 43 S - - 0.666 25.80
13.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
15.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
16.5 36 S - - 0.558 21.60
18.0 45 S - - 0.697 27.00
19.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
21.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
22.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
24.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
25.5 34 C 2.125 0.50 1.063 20.40
27.0 38 C 2.375 0.50 1.188 22.80
28.5 30 C 1.875 0.50 0.938 18.00
30.0 38 C 2.375 0.50 1.188 22.80
TABLE NO-05.


BH-03.

Depth in Shearing
in tsf tsf
1.5 1 C 0.063 1.00 0.063 0.60
3.0 2 C 0.125 1.00 0.125 1.20
4.5 5 C 0.313 0.94 0.294 3.00
6.0 10 C 0.625 0.65 0.406 6.00
7.5 25 S - - 0.387 15.00
9.0 28 S - - 0.434 16.80
10.5 34 S - - 0.527 20.40
12.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
13.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
15.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
16.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
18.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
19.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
21.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
22.5 48 S - - 0.743 28.80
24.0 14 C 0.875 0.50 0.438 8.40
25.5 17 C 1.063 0.50 0.531 10.20
27.0 22 C 1.375 0.50 0.688 13.20
28.5 14 C 0.875 0.50 0.438 8.40
30.0 21 C 1.313 0.50 0.656 12.60
TABLE NO-06.


BH-04.

Depth in Shearing
in tsf tsf
1.5 1 C 0.063 1.00 0.063 0.60
3.0 2 C 0.125 1.00 0.125 1.20
4.5 5 C 0.313 0.94 0.294 3.00
6.0 8 C 0.500 0.80 0.400 4.80
7.5 6 S - - 0.093 3.60
9.0 20 S - - 0.310 12.00
10.5 18 S - - 0.279 10.80
12.0 26 S - - 0.403 15.60
13.5 44 S - - 0.682 26.40
15.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
16.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
18.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
19.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
21.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
22.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
24.0 42 S - - 0.651 25.20
25.5 33 C 2.063 0.50 1.031 19.80
27.0 34 C 2.125 0.50 1.063 20.40
28.5 38 C 2.375 0.50 1.188 22.80
30.0 40 C 2.500 0.50 1.250 24.00
TABLE NO-07.


BH-05.

Depth in Shearing
in tsf tsf
1.5 1 C 0.063 1.00 0.063 0.60
3.0 2 C 0.125 1.00 0.125 1.20
4.5 3 C 0.188 0.90 0.169 1.80
6.0 6 C 0.375 0.94 0.353 3.60
7.5 14 C 0.875 0.50 0.438 8.40
9.0 21 S - - 0.325 12.60
10.5 29 S - - 0.449 17.40
12.0 38 S - - 0.589 22.80
13.5 40 S - - 0.620 24.00
15.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
16.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
18.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
19.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
21.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
22.5 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
24.0 50 S - - 0.774 30.00
25.5 39 S - - 0.604 23.40
27.0 34 C 2.125 0.50 1.063 20.40
28.5 37 C 2.313 0.50 1.156 22.20
30.0 34 C 2.125 0.50 1.063 20.40
TABLE NO-08.

MGE
CHART FOR RCC CAST-IN-SITU PILE CAPACITY AT DIFFERENT LEVEL & DIFFERENT DIAMETER.

BH-01
Allowable Pile Capacity in Ton Average (F. S. =2.5)

Depth in
(m) 16 inches dia 18 inches dia 20 inches dia 24 inches dia
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8
3.0 4.1 4.8 5.6 7.4
4.5 6.5 7.6 8.7 11.0
6.0 10.8 12.5 14.3 18.2
7.5 16.5 19.3 22.5 29.2
9.0 22.9 27.0 31.5 41.2
10.5 31.5 37.1 43.3 56.7
12.0 39.1 46.0 53.4 69.7
13.5 44.2 51.7 59.8 77.2
15.0 53.0 61.9 71.4 92.0
16.5 59.3 69.0 79.4 101.6
18.0 65.7 76.2 87.3 111.1
19.5 72.1 83.4 95.3 120.7
21.0 84.9 97.9 111.4 140.0
22.5 82.4 93.8 105.5 129.7
24.0 87.9 100.1 112.4 137.8
25.5 94.4 107.5 120.6 147.9
27.0 101.8 115.8 130.0 159.4
28.5 103.7 117.7 131.6 160.3
30.0 97.7 110.1 122.2 146.8
ANNEX NO – 01.

MGE

BH-02

Depth in
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8
3.0 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.1
4.5 5.1 6.0 6.9 8.9
6.0 8.2 9.5 10.9 13.9
7.5 13.2 15.5 18.0 23.5
9.0 16.9 19.9 23.1 30.2
10.5 24.0 28.3 33.0 43.3
12.0 34.2 40.4 47.2 62.0
13.5 42.9 50.5 58.8 76.9
15.0 49.3 57.7 66.8 86.5
16.5 53.3 62.1 71.3 91.3
18.0 61.4 71.3 81.9 104.6
19.5 67.7 78.5 89.9 114.2
21.0 74.1 85.7 97.9 123.8
22.5 80.5 92.9 105.8 133.4
24.0 93.3 107.4 121.9 152.7
25.5 96.7 110.5 124.5 153.7
27.0 107.8 123.2 138.8 171.4
28.5 112.8 128.5 144.3 177.0
30.0 102.8 115.8 128.6 154.4
ANNEX NO – 02.

MGE

BH-03
Depth in

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8
3.0 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.1
4.5 5.1 6.0 6.9 8.9
6.0 10.1 11.9 13.7 17.7
7.5 18.4 21.8 25.6 33.8
9.0 22.9 27.1 31.6 41.4
10.5 29.3 34.5 40.2 52.5
12.0 41.0 48.4 56.5 74.1
13.5 47.4 55.6 64.5 83.7
15.0 53.8 62.8 72.4 93.2
16.5 60.2 70.0 80.4 102.8
18.0 66.5 77.2 88.4 112.4
19.5 72.9 84.3 96.3 122.0
21.0 78.3 90.4 103.0 129.6
22.5 90.7 104.3 118.4 148.2
24.0 82.9 94.0 105.1 128.0
25.5 88.2 100.2 112.1 136.8
27.0 95.6 108.7 121.8 149.1
28.5 96.5 109.3 122.2 148.4
30.0 91.8 103.4 114.8 137.9
ANNEX NO – 03.

MGE

BH-04
Depth in Allowable Pile Capacity in Ton Average (F. S. =2.5)

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8
3.0 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.1
4.5 5.1 6.0 6.9 8.9
6.0 9.4 11.0 12.6 16.1
7.5 11.5 13.3 15.0 18.8
9.0 18.8 22.0 25.6 33.2
10.5 20.4 23.8 27.4 35.1
12.0 26.4 30.9 35.7 46.1
13.5 38.1 44.8 52.1 68.1
15.0 46.4 54.5 63.3 82.2
16.5 52.8 61.7 71.2 91.8
18.0 59.2 68.9 79.2 101.4
19.5 65.6 76.1 87.2 110.9
21.0 71.9 83.2 95.1 120.5
22.5 74.6 85.9 97.6 122.5
24.0 85.4 98.1 111.2 138.7
25.5 90.8 103.8 117.1 144.7
27.0 99.9 114.1 128.5 158.6
28.5 111.0 126.8 142.8 176.3
30.0 98.3 110.7 123.0 147.6
ANNEX NO – 04.

MGE

BH-05.
Depth in

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.5 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.8
3.0 1.7 2.0 2.3 3.1
4.5 3.6 4.2 4.8 6.1
6.0 7.4 8.6 9.8 12.6
7.5 13.7 16.0 18.5 24.0
9.0 18.7 22.0 25.5 33.3
10.5 25.1 29.5 34.3 44.9
12.0 32.9 38.8 45.1 58.9
13.5 38.7 45.4 52.5 68.1
15.0 48.4 56.8 65.7 85.2
16.5 54.8 63.9 73.7 94.8
18.0 61.2 71.1 81.7 104.3
19.5 67.5 78.3 89.6 113.9
21.0 73.9 85.5 97.6 123.5
22.5 80.3 92.7 105.6 133.1
24.0 81.6 93.6 106.1 132.2
25.5 91.6 104.9 118.6 147.3
27.0 98.6 112.6 126.9 156.7
28.5 109.2 124.6 140.4 173.2
30.0 115.5 129.0 151.0 185.3
ANNEX NO – 05.

DHAKA-1212.
MOBILE-01726-341115-01733-149349. PROJECT Const of Proposed ETP Extension
BH -2
BH -4 BH -3
BH -1
BH -5.
BORING POINT
METRO GEOTECHNICL ENGINEERS S & M ENGINEER FIGURE NO : 1

METRO GEOTECHNICL ENGINEERS CLIENT Cotton Group.
DHAKA-1212. PROJECT Const of Proposed ETP Extension
MOBILE-01726-341115-01733-149349.
METHOD OF BORING : WASH BORING DATE OF STARTING : 28-07-2018

Bore Hole N0 : 1 DIAMETER OF BORING : 100mm DATE OF COMPLETION : 28-07-2018
Bore Depth : 30.30m INCLINATION : VERTICAL GROUND WATER LEVEL: 3.00m below
SAMPLE
S.P.T. VALUES
DEPTH
BORE
TYPE
SOIL
DESCRIPTION OF
IN m.
LOG
S.P.T
D/M
STRATA ENCOUNTERED. NO. OF BLOWS /0.30m
10 20 30 40 50
2.00m
Grey very soft silt with some clay.

1 1.50m D-1
5 3.00m D-2
4.50m
3.40m
Brownish grey medium silt with some 3.85m
clay.
5 4.50m D-3
8 6.00m D-4
3.00m
18 7.50m D-5
Brownish grey medium dense sand with
some silt.
9.00m D-6
27
38 10.5m D-7
44 12.0m D-8
13.5m D-9
43
12.00m
Light Brown dense sand with some/little silt.

50 15.0m D-10
50 16.5m D-11
50 18.0m D-12
50 19.5m D-13
50 21.0m D-14
24 22.5m D-15
23 24.0m D-16
8.80m
Brownish grey very stiff silt with some clay.

24 25.5m D-17
26 27.0m D-18
18 28.5m D-19
26 30.0m D-20
NOTE: TYPE OF SAMPLE CHECKED BY:
UNDIST SAMPLE......................... FIGURE NO :2
DIST SAMPLE.............................. DATE:
MOBILE-01726-341115-01733-149349.

SAMPLE
S.P.T. VALUES
DEPTH
BORE
TYPE
SOIL
DESCRIPTION OF
IN m.
LOG
S.P.T
D/M
10 20 30 40 50
3.50m

1 1.50m D-1
2 3.00m D-2
3.40m
3.85m
3.50m
5 4.50m D-3
Brownish grey medium silt with
some clay.
6 6.00m D-4
15 7.50m D-5
4.00m

9.00m D-6
some silt. 19
29 10.5m D-7
43 12.0m D-8
13.5m D-9
50
50 15.0m D-10
13.50m
Light Brown dense sand with some/little silt. 36 16.5m D-11
45 18.0m D-12
50 19.5m D-13
50 21.0m D-14
50 22.5m D-15
50 24.0m D-16
34 25.5m D-17
5.80m
Brownish grey hard silt with some clay. 38 27.0m D-18
30 28.5m D-19
38 30.0m D-20
DIST SAMPLE.............................. DATE:
MOBILE-01726-341115-01733-149349.

SAMPLE
S.P.T. VALUES
DEPTH
BORE
TYPE
SOIL
DESCRIPTION OF
IN m.
LOG
S.P.T
D/M
10 20 30 40 50
4.00m
Grey very soft silt with some clay. 1 1.50m D-1
2 3.00m D-2
3.40m
3.85m
2.50m
5 4.50m D-3
Brownish grey medium to stiff silt with
some clay.
10 6.00m D-4
3.00m
25 7.50m D-5
some silt.
9.00m D-6
28
34 10.5m D-7
50 12.0m D-8
13.5m D-9
50
13.50m
Light brown dense sand with some/little silt.

50 15.0m D-10
50 16.5m D-11
50 18.0m D-12
50 19.5m D-13
50 21.0m D-14
48 22.5m D-15
14 24.0m D-16
17 25.5m D-17
7.30m
Brownish grey very stiff silt with some clay.

22 27.0m D-18
14 28.5m D-19
21 30.0m D-20
DIST SAMPLE.............................. DATE:
MOBILE-01726-341115-01733-149349.

SAMPLE
S.P.T. VALUES
DEPTH
BORE
TYPE
SOIL
DESCRIPTION OF
IN m.
LOG
S.P.T
D/M
10 20 30 40 50
3.50m

1 1.50m D-1
2 3.00m D-2
3.40m
3.85m
5 4.50m D-3
4.50m
Brownish grey medium silt with some clay.

8 6.00m D-4
6 7.50m D-5
9.00m D-6
20
4.50m

some silt.
18 10.5m D-7
26 12.0m D-8
13.5m D-9
44
50 15.0m D-10
50 16.5m D-11
11.80m
Light brown dense sand with some/little silt.

50 18.0m D-12
50 19.5m D-13
50 21.0m D-14
50 22.5m D-15
42 24.0m D-16
33 25.5m D-17
5.80m
Brownish grey hard silt with some clay. 34 27.0m D-18
38 28.5m D-19
40 30.0m D-20
DIST SAMPLE.............................. DATE:
MOBILE-01726-341115-01733-149349.

SAMPLE
S.P.T. VALUES
DEPTH
BORE
TYPE
SOIL
DESCRIPTION OF
IN m.
LOG
S.P.T
D/M
10 20 30 40 50
1
5.00m
1.50m D-1
Grey very soft to soft silt with some clay.
2 3.00m D-2
3.40m
3.85m
3 4.50m D-3
6 6.00m D-4
4.50m
Brownish grey medium to very stiff silt with

some clay.
D-5
14 7.50m
D-6
21 9.00m
29 10.5m D-7
4.50m
Brownish grey medium dense to dense

sand with some/little silt.
38 12.0m D-8
13.5m D-9
40
50 15.0m D-10
50 16.5m D-11
12.00m
50 18.0m D-12
Light Brown dense sand with some/little silt.
50 19.5m D-13
50 21.0m D-14
50 22.5m D-15
45 24.0m D-16
39 25.5m D-17
4.30m
34 27.0m D-18
Brownish grey hard silt with some clay.
37 28.5m D-19
34 30.0m D-20
DIST SAMPLE.............................. DATE:
METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS CLIENT Cotton Group.
CHA-37/1, SHADHINATA SORANI, NORTH BADDA, PROJECT Const of Proposed ETP Extension
DHAKA-1212. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS
MOBILE-01726-341115, 01733149349. LOCATION Habir Bari, Amtoli, Bhaluka, Mymensingh.
SAND SILT CLAY SAND SILT CLAY

C M F C M F C C M F C M F C
2.0 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.006 2.0 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.006
1.00 0
1.00 0
TR
TR
90 10
90 10
LI
LI
80 20
80 20
SO
SO
70 30
70 30
35
35
60 60
and
and
50 50
50 50
and
and
40 40
PERCENT FINER BY WEIGHT

35

35
30 30
30 30
SO
SO
20 20
20 20
LI
LI
10 10
10 10
TR
TR
0 0
0
10 4.0 100 200 0
SEIVE SIZES 10 4.0 100 200
SEIVE SIZES
TR-TRACE 0-10 % LI= LITTLE 11-20 % SO=SOME 21-35 % AN=ADD 35-50 %
SYMPOL BORE SYMPLE DEPTH.M GRAYEL CLAY UNIFIED

SAND SILT CLASSIFICATION SP.GR L.L P.L P.L CLASS
% % % %
BH - 1 D-2 3.00 0 73 27 Silt some clay – 43 27 16
BH - 1 D-7 10.50 76 24 0 Sand some silt – – – NP
BH - 1 D - 13 19.50 93 08 0 Sand trace silt – – – NP
BH - 2 D - 15 22.50 86 14 0 Sand little silt – – – NP
X X X
-
-
-
FIGURE NO : 06 APPROVAL.
CHA-37/1, SHADHINATA SORANI, NORTH BADDA, PROJECT Const of Proposed ETP Extension
DHAKA-1212. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS

2.0 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.006 2.0 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.006
1.00 0
1.00 0
TR
TR
90 10
90 10
LI
LI
80 20
80 20
SO
SO
70 30
70 30
35
35
60 60
and
and
50 50
50 50
and
and
40 40

35

35
30 30
30 30
SO
SO
20 20
20 20
LI
LI
10 10
10 10
TR
TR
0 0
0
10 4.0 100 200 0
SEIVE SIZES 10 4.0 100 200
SEIVE SIZES

% % % %
BH - 3 D-6 9.00 70 30 0 Sand some silt – – – NP
X X X
-
-
-
DHAKA-1212. GRAIN SIZE ANALYSIS PROJECT Const of Proposed ETP Extension
MOBILE-01726-341115, 01733149349.

2.0 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.006 2.0 1.0 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.06 0.02 0.01 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.006
1.00 0
1.00 0
TR
TR
90 10
90 10
LI
LI
80 20
80 20
SO
SO
70 30
70 30
35
35
60 60
and
and
50 50
50 50
and
and
40 40

35

35
30 30
30 30
SO
SO
20 20
20 20
LI
LI
10 10
10 10
TR
TR
0 0
0
10 4.0 100 200 0
SEIVE SIZES 10 4.0 100 200
SEIVE SIZES

% % % %
BH - 5 D - 10 15.00 81 19 0 Sand some silt – – – NP
X X X
-
-
-
DHAKA-1212.
MOBILE-01726-341115, 01733149349.
UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST
0.80 0.60
X X X
STRESS IN KG/Cm2
X
X
X
X
X
X
0.40 0.30
X
X
X
X
X
X
0 .5 1.0 1.5 0 .5 1.0 1.5

STRAIN %
SYMBOL B.H. NO. SAMPLE DEPTH IN M. q/u kg/cm 2 % STRAIN WET T/M 3 DRY T/M 3 % MOISTURE
1 U-1 3.40 - 3.85 0.625 10.001 1.812 1.405 28.951
X 2 U-1 3.40 - 3.85 0.437 11.512 1.728 1.320 30.842

FIGURE NO : 08
DHAKA-1212.
0.60 0.60
X X
X X
STRESS IN KG/Cm2
X
X
X
X
X
0.30 0.30
X
X
X
X
X
X
0 .5 1.0 1.5 0 .5 1.0 1.5

STRAIN %
3 U-1 3.40 - 3.85 0.375 12.321 1.701 1.295 31.254
X 4 U-1 3.40 - 3.85 0.468 11.985 1.729 1.326 30.355

FIGURE NO : 09
DHAKA-1212.
0.60
STRESS IN KG/Cm2
0.30
0 .5 1.0 1.5
STRAIN %
5 U-1 3.40 - 3.85 0.312 12.551 1.715 1.303 31.542

FIGURE NO : 12
CHA-37/1, SHADHINATA SORANI, NORTH BADDA, DIRECT SHEAR TEST PROJECT Const of Proposed ETP Extension
DHAKA-1212.
Boring No-01 Sample No= DS -06 Depth = 09.00m Boring No-02 Sample No= DS -08 Depth = 12.00m
0
1.25 38 1.25 380
0
35 350
1.00 1.00
0 0
30 30
0.75 0.75
0 0
25 25
0 0
20 20
0.50 0.50
Shear stress kg/cm2

Shear stress kg/cm2
0 0
15 15
0 0
10 10
0.25 0.25
0 0
0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0
0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00
Normal stress kg/cm2 Normal stress kg/cm2
Angle of internal friction = 30 Angle of internal friction = 34

Cohesion C = 0 kg/cm2 Cohesion C= 0 kg/cm 2
METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS FIGURE NO : 10

APPROVAL :
CHA-37/1, SHADHINATA SORANI, NORTH BADDA, DIRECT SHEAR TEST PROJECT Const of Proposed ETP Extension
DHAKA-1212.
Boring No-03 Sample No= DS -14 Depth = 21.00m Boring No-04 Sample No= DS -10 Depth = 15.00m
0
1.25 38 1.25 380
0
35 350
1.00 1.00
0 0
30 30
0.75 0.75
0 0
25 25
0 0
20 20
0.50 0.50
Shear stress kg/cm2

Shear stress kg/cm2
0 0
15 15
0 0
10 10
0.25 0.25
0 0
0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0
0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00
Angle of internal friction = 37 Angle of internal friction = 35


APPROVAL :
CHA-37/1, SHADHINATA SORANI, NORTH BADDA, DIRECT SHEAR TEST
DHAKA-1212.
MOBILE-01726-341115, 01733149349.
Boring No-05 Sample No= DS -16 Depth = 24.00m Boring No- Sample No= Depth =
0
1.25 38 1.25 380
0
35 350
1.00 1.00
0 0
30 30
0.75 0.75
0 0
25 25
0 0
20 20
0.50 0.50
Shear stress kg/cm2

Shear stress kg/cm2
0 0
15 15
0 0
10 10
0.25 0.25
0 0
0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0
0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00
Angle of internal friction = 37 Angle of internal friction =


APPROVAL :

ETP Soil Test Report

Transféré par

Informations du document

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

ETP Soil Test Report

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

CLIENT:

METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS

REPORT ON SUB-SOIL INVESTIGATION------------------------------------------------PAGE NO-01

INTRODUCTION------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-01

PURPOSE----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-01

INVESTIGATION PROGRAM---------------------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-02.

METHODOLOGY------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-03

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION----------------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-04

CALCULATION OF SOIL MECHANICS PARAMETERS------------------------------ PAGE NO-05

DETERMINATION OF PILE BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL FOR FOOTING---- PAGE NO-06

DETERMINATION OF PILE LOAD CAPACITY (A SINGLE PILE)------------------ PAGE NO-07

CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION-------------------------------------------------- PAGE NO-08

CORRELATION CHART : TABLE NO - 01 & 02.

METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS

NAME OF PROJECT : Const of Proposed ETP Extension

LOCATION : Habir Bari, Amtoli, Bhaluka, Mymensingh.

METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS. CHA-37/1, Shadhinata Sorani, North Badda, Dhaka,

CLIENT : Cotton Group.

METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS

Number of Boring : 05 Nos Depth (m) : 30.30m

SPT Execution : 100 Nos Interval : 1.50 m

Disturbed Sample : 100 Nos Undisturbed samples : 05 Nos

Compaction Test : Nil G.W.L : 05 Nos

Other Tests : Nil Mackintosh : Nil

Grain Size : 13 Nos Atterberg Limits : 05 Nos

Sp. Gravity : 05 Nos Moisture Content : 05 Nos

Unconfined : 05 Nos Consolidation : Nil

Direct Shear : 05 Nos Triaxial Shear : Nil

Density : 05 Nos Others : Nil

METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS

Standard Penetration Tests(SPT)

Disturbed Sample Collection

Undisturbed Sample Collection

Recording of Ground Water Table

Other Field Tests

Consolidation tests provide data on consolidation behaviour of the sub-soil formation.

The laboratory tests were performed as per AASHTO/ASTM Standard

B. Correlation among values (N) with Different Engineering properties of

N Value Compactness or Angle of Relative Moist Unit Allowable

0 to 4 Very loose 250 to 320 0% to 15% 70 to 100 0.00 to 0.40

C. Correlation among values (N) with Different Engineering properties of

DETERMINATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF SOIL FOR

qa = -------------------allowable bearing capacity, ksf

qult = 1.3 c Nc + D Nq + 0.6 BN

Where, qult = ----------------- ultimate bearing capacity, psf

METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS

DETERMINATION OF PILE CAPACITY ( A SINGLE PILE )

Q = Ap*Eb + [ (fs * Π D*L)

Where Q = ------------------- pile capacity

Eb = 0.6 x N tsf < 45.0tsf (for granular soil )*

Qs = α c (for cohesive soil )

( Ref. Drilled Shafts, Manual, Student Workbook, Volume-1, National highway

METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS

Correlation between standard penetration resistance and

Compactness very loose loose medium dense very dense

Angle of internal friction o 28 28 to 30 30 to 36 36 to 41

Submerged unit weight pcf <60 55 to 65 60 to 70 65 to 85 >75

Consistency very soft soft medium stiff very stiff

(Ref. FOUNDATION DESIGN Wayne C. Teng. Page 12 & 15)

METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS

METRO GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS

ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY (qa) OF SOIL FOR FOOTING IN TSF

CLIENT Cotton Group.

ALLOW ABLE BEARING CAPACITY IN TSF

Q = ApEb + [ (fs Π D*L)