Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 13

PENTOBARBITAL CUARTO FRIO VS PETOBARBITAL CUARTO CALIENTE

Two Way Repeated Measures ANOVA (Two Factor Repetition) viernes, septiembre 07, 2018, 01:20:56
a.m.

Data source: Data 1 in Notebook1

Balanced Design

Dependent Variable: Temperatura

Normality Test (Shapiro-Wilk): Failed (P < 0.050)

Equal Variance Test (Brown-Forsythe): Passed (P = 0.974)

Source of Variation DF SS MS F P
Equipo 5 72.773 14.555
Perturbacion 1 465.125 465.125 43.704 0.001
Perturbacion x Equipo 5 53.213 10.643
Tiempo 5 107.946 21.589 5.877 0.001
Tiempo x Equipo 25 91.842 3.674
Perturbacion x Tiempo 5 99.523 19.905 4.727 0.004
Residual 25 105.268 4.211
Total 71 995.691 14.024

Main effects cannot be properly interpreted if significant interaction is determined. This is because the size of
a factor's effect depends upon the level of the other factor.

The effect of different levels of Perturbacion depends on what level of Tiempo is present. There is a
statistically significant interaction between Perturbacion and Tiempo. (P = 0.004)

Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Perturbacion : 0.999


Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Tiempo : 0.948
Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Perturbacion x Tiempo : 0.866

Least square means for Perturbacion :


Group Mean
PBCF 32.919
PBCC 38.003
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.544

Least square means for Tiempo :


Group Mean
0.000 38.033
10.000 35.850
20.000 34.567
30.000 34.750
40.000 34.742
50.000 34.825
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.553

Least square means for Perturbacion x Tiempo :


Group Mean
PBCF x 0.000 37.617
PBCF x 10.000 33.600
PBCF x 20.000 30.817
PBCF x 30.000 30.933
PBCF x 40.000 31.683
PBCF x 50.000 32.867
PBCC x 0.000 38.450
PBCC x 10.000 38.100
PBCC x 20.000 38.317
PBCC x 30.000 38.567
PBCC x 40.000 37.800
PBCC x 50.000 36.783
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.838

All Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures (Bonferroni t-test):

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
PBCC vs. PBCF 5.083 6.611 0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
0.000 vs. 20.000 3.467 4.430 0.002 Yes
0.000 vs. 40.000 3.292 4.207 0.004 Yes
0.000 vs. 30.000 3.283 4.196 0.004 Yes
0.000 vs. 50.000 3.208 4.100 0.006 Yes
0.000 vs. 10.000 2.183 2.790 0.149 No
10.000 vs. 20.000 1.283 1.640 1.000 No
10.000 vs. 40.000 1.108 1.416 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 30.000 1.100 1.406 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 50.000 1.025 1.310 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 20.000 0.258 0.330 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 40.000 0.0833 0.106 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 30.000 0.0750 0.0958 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 20.000 0.183 0.234 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 40.000 0.00833 0.0106 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 20.000 0.175 0.224 1.000 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo within PBCF


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
0.000 vs. 20.000 6.800 5.932 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 30.000 6.683 5.830 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 40.000 5.933 5.176 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 50.000 4.750 4.144 0.002 Yes
0.000 vs. 10.000 4.017 3.504 0.015 Yes
10.000 vs. 20.000 2.783 2.428 0.283 No
10.000 vs. 30.000 2.667 2.326 0.362 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 40.000 1.917 1.672 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 50.000 0.733 0.640 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 20.000 2.050 1.788 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 30.000 1.933 1.687 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 40.000 1.183 1.032 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 20.000 0.867 0.756 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 30.000 0.750 0.654 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 20.000 0.117 0.102 1.000 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo within PBCC


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
30.000 vs. 50.000 1.783 1.556 1.000 No
30.000 vs. 40.000 0.767 0.669 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 10.000 0.467 0.407 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 20.000 0.250 0.218 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 0.000 0.117 0.102 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 50.000 1.667 1.454 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 40.000 0.650 0.567 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 10.000 0.350 0.305 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 20.000 0.133 0.116 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 50.000 1.533 1.338 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 40.000 0.517 0.451 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 10.000 0.217 0.189 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 50.000 1.317 1.149 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 40.000 0.300 0.262 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 50.000 1.017 0.887 1.000 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 0


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
PBCC vs. PBCF 0.833 0.628 0.536 No

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 10


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
PBCC vs. PBCF 4.500 3.391 0.002 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 20


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
PBCC vs. PBCF 7.500 5.652 <0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 30


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
PBCC vs. PBCF 7.633 5.752 <0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 40


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
PBCC vs. PBCF 6.117 4.609 <0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 50


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
PBCC vs. PBCF 3.917 2.952 0.007 Yes

A result of "Do Not Test" occurs for a comparison when no significant difference is found between two
means that enclose that comparison. For example, if you had four means sorted in order, and found no
difference between means 4 vs. 2, then you would not test 4 vs. 3 and 3 vs. 2, but still test 4 vs. 1 and 3 vs. 1
(4 vs. 3 and 3 vs. 2 are enclosed by 4 vs. 2: 4 3 2 1). Note that not testing the enclosed means is a procedural
rule, and a result of Do Not Test should be treated as if there is no significant difference between the means,
even though one may appear to exist.

SOLUCION SALINA CUARTO FRIO VS SOLUCION SALINA CUARTO CALIENTE


Two Way Repeated Measures ANOVA (Two Factor Repetition) viernes, septiembre 07, 2018, 01:54:55
a.m.

Data source: Data 1 in Notebook1

Balanced Design

Dependent Variable: Temperatura

Normality Test (Shapiro-Wilk): Passed (P = 0.129)

Equal Variance Test (Brown-Forsythe): Passed (P = 0.598)

Source of Variation DF SS MS F P
Equipo 5 3.116 0.623
Perturbacion 1 40.051 40.051 40.651 0.001
Perturbacion x Equipo 5 4.926 0.985
Tiempo 5 2.325 0.465 0.660 0.657
Tiempo x Equipo 25 17.623 0.705
Perturbacion x Tiempo 5 23.498 4.700 8.047 <0.001
Residual 25 14.600 0.584
Total 71 106.139 1.495

Main effects cannot be properly interpreted if significant interaction is determined. This is because the size of
a factor's effect depends upon the level of the other factor.

The effect of different levels of Perturbacion depends on what level of Tiempo is present. There is a
statistically significant interaction between Perturbacion and Tiempo. (P = <0.001)

Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Perturbacion : 0.998


Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Tiempo : 0.0500
Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Perturbacion x Tiempo : 0.993

Least square means for Perturbacion :


Group Mean
SSCF 37.733
SSCC 39.225
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.165

Least square means for Tiempo :


Group Mean
0.000 38.633
10.000 38.433
20.000 38.342
30.000 38.200
40.000 38.525
50.000 38.742
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.242

Least square means for Perturbacion x Tiempo :


Group Mean
SSCF x 0.000 38.517
SSCF x 10.000 37.800
SSCF x 20.000 37.167
SSCF x 30.000 36.583
SSCF x 40.000 37.583
SSCF x 50.000 38.750
SSCC x 0.000 38.750
SSCC x 10.000 39.067
SSCC x 20.000 39.517
SSCC x 30.000 39.817
SSCC x 40.000 39.467
SSCC x 50.000 38.733
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.312

All Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures (Bonferroni t-test):

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. SSCF 1.492 6.376 0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
50.000 vs. 30.000 0.542 1.580 1.000 No
50.000 vs. 20.000 0.400 1.167 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 10.000 0.308 0.900 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 40.000 0.217 0.632 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 0.000 0.108 0.316 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 30.000 0.433 1.264 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 20.000 0.292 0.851 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 10.000 0.200 0.583 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 40.000 0.108 0.316 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 30.000 0.325 0.948 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 20.000 0.183 0.535 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 10.000 0.0917 0.267 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 30.000 0.233 0.681 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 20.000 0.0917 0.267 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 30.000 0.142 0.413 1.000 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo within SSCF


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
50.000 vs. 30.000 2.167 4.675 <0.001 Yes
50.000 vs. 20.000 1.583 3.416 0.019 Yes
50.000 vs. 40.000 1.167 2.517 0.227 No
50.000 vs. 10.000 0.950 2.050 0.686 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 0.000 0.233 0.503 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 30.000 1.933 4.171 0.002 Yes
0.000 vs. 20.000 1.350 2.913 0.080 No
0.000 vs. 40.000 0.933 2.014 0.742 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 10.000 0.717 1.546 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 30.000 1.217 2.625 0.172 No
10.000 vs. 20.000 0.633 1.366 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 40.000 0.217 0.467 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 30.000 1.000 2.158 0.538 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 20.000 0.417 0.899 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 30.000 0.583 1.259 1.000 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo within SSCC


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
30.000 vs. 50.000 1.083 2.337 0.353 No
30.000 vs. 0.000 1.067 2.301 0.384 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 10.000 0.750 1.618 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 40.000 0.350 0.755 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 20.000 0.300 0.647 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 50.000 0.783 1.690 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 0.000 0.767 1.654 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 10.000 0.450 0.971 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 40.000 0.0500 0.108 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 50.000 0.733 1.582 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 0.000 0.717 1.546 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 10.000 0.400 0.863 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 50.000 0.333 0.719 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 0.000 0.317 0.683 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 50.000 0.0167 0.0360 1.000 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 0


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. SSCF 0.233 0.501 0.620 No

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 10


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. SSCF 1.267 2.719 0.011 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 20


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. SSCF 2.350 5.045 <0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 30


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. SSCF 3.233 6.942 <0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 40


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. SSCF 1.883 4.043 <0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 50


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCF vs. SSCC 0.0167 0.0358 0.972 No

A result of "Do Not Test" occurs for a comparison when no significant difference is found between two
means that enclose that comparison. For example, if you had four means sorted in order, and found no
difference between means 4 vs. 2, then you would not test 4 vs. 3 and 3 vs. 2, but still test 4 vs. 1 and 3 vs. 1
(4 vs. 3 and 3 vs. 2 are enclosed by 4 vs. 2: 4 3 2 1). Note that not testing the enclosed means is a procedural
rule, and a result of Do Not Test should be treated as if there is no significant difference between the means,
even though one may appear to exist.

PENTOBARBITOL CC VS SOLUCION SALINA CC


Two Way Repeated Measures ANOVA (Two Factor Repetition) viernes, septiembre 07, 2018, 02:12:22
a.m.

Data source: Data 1 in Notebook1

Balanced Design

Dependent Variable: Temperatura

Normality Test (Shapiro-Wilk): Passed (P = 0.275)

Equal Variance Test (Brown-Forsythe): Passed (P = 0.069)

Source of Variation DF SS MS F P
Equipo 5 3.595 0.719
Perturbacion 1 28.125 28.125 41.038 0.001
Perturbacion x Equipo 5 3.427 0.685
Tiempo 5 14.005 2.801 9.606 <0.001
Tiempo x Equipo 25 7.290 0.292
Perturbacion x Tiempo 5 4.080 0.816 3.281 0.021
Residual 25 6.218 0.249
Total 71 66.740 0.940

Main effects cannot be properly interpreted if significant interaction is determined. This is because the size of
a factor's effect depends upon the level of the other factor.

The effect of different levels of Perturbacion depends on what level of Tiempo is present. There is a
statistically significant interaction between Perturbacion and Tiempo. (P = 0.021)

Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Perturbacion : 0.998


Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Tiempo : 0.999
Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Perturbacion x Tiempo : 0.635

Least square means for Perturbacion :


Group Mean
PBCC 37.975
SSCC 39.225
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.138

Least square means for Tiempo :


Group Mean
0.000 38.517
10.000 38.583
20.000 38.917
30.000 39.192
40.000 38.633
50.000 37.758
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.156

Least square means for Perturbacion x Tiempo :


Group Mean
PBCC x 0.000 38.283
PBCC x 10.000 38.100
PBCC x 20.000 38.317
PBCC x 30.000 38.567
PBCC x 40.000 37.800
PBCC x 50.000 36.783
SSCC x 0.000 38.750
SSCC x 10.000 39.067
SSCC x 20.000 39.517
SSCC x 30.000 39.817
SSCC x 40.000 39.467
SSCC x 50.000 38.733
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.204

All Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures (Bonferroni t-test):

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. PBCC 1.250 6.406 0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
30.000 vs. 50.000 1.433 6.502 <0.001 Yes
30.000 vs. 0.000 0.675 3.062 0.078 No
30.000 vs. 10.000 0.608 2.759 0.160 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 40.000 0.558 2.533 0.270 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 20.000 0.275 1.247 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 50.000 1.158 5.254 <0.001 Yes
20.000 vs. 0.000 0.400 1.814 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 10.000 0.333 1.512 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 40.000 0.283 1.285 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 50.000 0.875 3.969 0.008 Yes
40.000 vs. 0.000 0.117 0.529 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 10.000 0.0500 0.227 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 50.000 0.825 3.742 0.014 Yes
10.000 vs. 0.000 0.0667 0.302 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 50.000 0.758 3.440 0.031 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo within PBCC


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
30.000 vs. 50.000 1.783 5.943 <0.001 Yes
30.000 vs. 40.000 0.767 2.555 0.206 No
30.000 vs. 10.000 0.467 1.555 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 0.000 0.283 0.944 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 20.000 0.250 0.833 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 50.000 1.533 5.110 <0.001 Yes
20.000 vs. 40.000 0.517 1.722 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 10.000 0.217 0.722 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 0.000 0.0333 0.111 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 50.000 1.500 4.998 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 40.000 0.483 1.611 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 10.000 0.183 0.611 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 50.000 1.317 4.388 <0.001 Yes
10.000 vs. 40.000 0.300 1.000 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 50.000 1.017 3.388 0.021 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo within SSCC


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
30.000 vs. 50.000 1.083 3.610 0.011 Yes
30.000 vs. 0.000 1.067 3.554 0.013 Yes
30.000 vs. 10.000 0.750 2.499 0.237 No
30.000 vs. 40.000 0.350 1.166 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 20.000 0.300 1.000 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 50.000 0.783 2.610 0.179 No
20.000 vs. 0.000 0.767 2.555 0.206 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 10.000 0.450 1.500 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 40.000 0.0500 0.167 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 50.000 0.733 2.444 0.272 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 0.000 0.717 2.388 0.312 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 10.000 0.400 1.333 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 50.000 0.333 1.111 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 0.000 0.317 1.055 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 50.000 0.0167 0.0555 1.000 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 0


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. PBCC 0.467 1.426 0.167 No

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 10


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. PBCC 0.967 2.953 0.007 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 20


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. PBCC 1.200 3.666 0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 30


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. PBCC 1.250 3.818 <0.001 Yes
Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 40
Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. PBCC 1.667 5.091 <0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 50


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCC vs. PBCC 1.950 5.957 <0.001 Yes

A result of "Do Not Test" occurs for a comparison when no significant difference is found between two
means that enclose that comparison. For example, if you had four means sorted in order, and found no
difference between means 4 vs. 2, then you would not test 4 vs. 3 and 3 vs. 2, but still test 4 vs. 1 and 3 vs. 1
(4 vs. 3 and 3 vs. 2 are enclosed by 4 vs. 2: 4 3 2 1). Note that not testing the enclosed means is a procedural
rule, and a result of Do Not Test should be treated as if there is no significant difference between the means,
even though one may appear to exist.

PENTOBARBITOL CF VS SOLUCION SALINA CF

Two Way Repeated Measures ANOVA (Two Factor Repetition) viernes, septiembre 07, 2018, 02:37:32
a.m.

Data source: Data 1 in Notebook1

Balanced Design

Dependent Variable: Temperatura

Normality Test (Shapiro-Wilk): Failed (P < 0.050)

Equal Variance Test (Brown-Forsythe): Passed (P = 0.937)

Source of Variation DF SS MS F P
Equipo 5 68.003 13.601
Perturbacion 1 354.223 354.223 24.213 0.004
Perturbacion x Equipo 5 73.147 14.629
Tiempo 5 150.773 30.155 7.461 <0.001
Tiempo x Equipo 25 101.038 4.042
Perturbacion x Tiempo 5 61.737 12.347 2.559 0.053
Residual 25 120.647 4.826
Total 71 929.569 13.093

The difference in the mean values among the different levels of Perturbacion is greater than would be
expected by chance after allowing for effects of differences in Tiempo. There is a statistically significant
difference (P = 0.004). To isolate which group(s) differ from the others use a multiple comparison procedure.
The difference in the mean values among the different levels of Tiempo is greater than would be expected by
chance after allowing for effects of differences in Perturbacion. There is a statistically significant difference
(P = <0.001). To isolate which group(s) differ from the others use a multiple comparison procedure.

The effect of different levels of Perturbacion does not depend on what level of Tiempo is present. There is
not a statistically significant interaction between Perturbacion and Tiempo. (P = 0.053)

Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Perturbacion : 0.966


Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Tiempo : 0.988
Power of performed test with alpha = 0.0500: for Perturbacion x Tiempo : 0.454

Least square means for Perturbacion :


Group Mean
PBCF 32.919
SSCF 37.356
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.637

Least square means for Tiempo :


Group Mean
0.000 38.067
10.000 35.700
20.000 33.992
30.000 33.767
40.000 34.633
50.000 34.667
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.580

Least square means for Perturbacion x Tiempo :


Group Mean
PBCF x 0.000 37.617
PBCF x 10.000 33.600
PBCF x 20.000 30.817
PBCF x 30.000 30.933
PBCF x 40.000 31.683
PBCF x 50.000 32.867
SSCF x 0.000 38.517
SSCF x 10.000 37.800
SSCF x 20.000 37.167
SSCF x 30.000 36.600
SSCF x 40.000 37.583
SSCF x 50.000 36.467
Std Err of LS Mean = 0.897

All Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures (Bonferroni t-test):

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCF vs. PBCF 4.436 4.921 0.004 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
0.000 vs. 30.000 4.300 5.239 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 20.000 4.075 4.965 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 40.000 3.433 4.183 0.005 Yes
0.000 vs. 50.000 3.400 4.143 0.005 Yes
0.000 vs. 10.000 2.367 2.884 0.120 No
10.000 vs. 30.000 1.933 2.356 0.400 No
10.000 vs. 20.000 1.708 2.081 0.717 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 40.000 1.067 1.300 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 50.000 1.033 1.259 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 30.000 0.900 1.097 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 20.000 0.675 0.822 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 40.000 0.0333 0.0406 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 30.000 0.867 1.056 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 20.000 0.642 0.782 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 30.000 0.225 0.274 1.000 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo within PBCF


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
0.000 vs. 20.000 6.800 5.594 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 30.000 6.683 5.498 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 40.000 5.933 4.881 <0.001 Yes
0.000 vs. 50.000 4.750 3.907 0.004 Yes
0.000 vs. 10.000 4.017 3.304 0.027 Yes
10.000 vs. 20.000 2.783 2.290 0.395 No
10.000 vs. 30.000 2.667 2.194 0.495 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 40.000 1.917 1.577 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 50.000 0.733 0.603 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 20.000 2.050 1.686 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 30.000 1.933 1.590 1.000 Do Not Test
50.000 vs. 40.000 1.183 0.973 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 20.000 0.867 0.713 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 30.000 0.750 0.617 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 20.000 0.117 0.0960 1.000 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: Tiempo within SSCF


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
0.000 vs. 50.000 2.050 1.686 1.000 No
0.000 vs. 30.000 1.917 1.577 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 20.000 1.350 1.110 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 40.000 0.933 0.768 1.000 Do Not Test
0.000 vs. 10.000 0.717 0.590 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 50.000 1.333 1.097 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 30.000 1.200 0.987 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 20.000 0.633 0.521 1.000 Do Not Test
10.000 vs. 40.000 0.217 0.178 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 50.000 1.117 0.919 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 30.000 0.983 0.809 1.000 Do Not Test
40.000 vs. 20.000 0.417 0.343 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 50.000 0.700 0.576 1.000 Do Not Test
20.000 vs. 30.000 0.567 0.466 1.000 Do Not Test
30.000 vs. 50.000 0.133 0.110 1.000 Do Not Test

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 0


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCF vs. PBCF 0.900 0.613 0.546 No
Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 10
Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCF vs. PBCF 4.200 2.862 0.009 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 20


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCF vs. PBCF 6.350 4.327 <0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 30


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCF vs. PBCF 5.667 3.862 <0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 40


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCF vs. PBCF 5.900 4.021 <0.001 Yes

Comparisons for factor: Perturbacion within 50


Comparison Diff of Means t P P<0.050
SSCF vs. PBCF 3.600 2.453 0.022 Yes

A result of "Do Not Test" occurs for a comparison when no significant difference is found between two
means that enclose that comparison. For example, if you had four means sorted in order, and found no
difference between means 4 vs. 2, then you would not test 4 vs. 3 and 3 vs. 2, but still test 4 vs. 1 and 3 vs. 1
(4 vs. 3 and 3 vs. 2 are enclosed by 4 vs. 2: 4 3 2 1). Note that not testing the enclosed means is a procedural
rule, and a result of Do Not Test should be treated as if there is no significant difference between the means,
even though one may appear to exist.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi