A Prposed Community Hub

A Proposed Community Hub
in Barangay Guadalupe
_________________________________________
An Undergraduate Thesis
Presented to the School of Architecture, Fine Arts and Design
of the University of San Carlos
_________________________________________
In Partial Fulfillment
of the Requirements for the Degree
Bachelor of Science in Architecture
________________________________________
By
Hong, Marie Angelie Uy
March 2018
[A Proposed Community Hub in Barangay Guadalupe]

APPROVAL SHEET
The thesis entitled, A Proposed Community Hub in Barangay Guadalupe, prepared and submitted
by Marie Angelie Uy Hong, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree BACHELOR
OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE, has been reviewed by the Thesis Panel and is recommended
for acceptance and approval.
__________________________________
Ar. Anne Marie Yap Cuizon, UAP
Adviser
__________________________________ __________________________________
Ar. Raymundo C. Dinglasa, UAP Ar. Joseph Michael P. Espina, MURP
Panelist Panelist
__________________________________ __________________________________
Ar. Omar Maxwell P. Espina, MURP Ar. Neil Andrew U. Menjares, MS
Panelist Panelist
__________________________________ __________________________________
Ar. Anne G. Nacorda, MArch Ar. Margret D. Rosario, MTE
Panelist Panel Chair
Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of BACHELOR
OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE, with a grade of .
__________________________________
Ar. Margret D. Rosario, MTE
Chair, Department of Architecture
__________________________________
Ar. Joseph Michael P. Espina, MURP
Dean, School of Architecture, Fine Arts and Design

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to formally express my sincere appreciation to my mentors who have guided me throughout
the journey of building my thesis. First and foremost, I want to thank my closest family and relatives for the
countless support and understanding. My friends and classmates for the encouragement and support. My
coordinators, Ar. Anne Nacorda and Ar. Yumi Espina for the for the consultations, especially Ar. Nacorda for the
referrals and the countless advices 24/7. To my advisor, Ar. Anne Marie Cuizon for the guidance and strong
suggestions. To the research associates, Ms. Josephine Avila and Ms. Josefa Chan form the Office of Population
Studies in University of San Carlos for guidance and fieldwork operations for my surveys. To the Barangay
Guadalupe employees, especially Mam Belen and Mam Ethel, for being accommodating and, helpful in gathering
participants all over Guadalupe. The support and kindness of all these people made the journey worthwhile, and
for that I am very grateful.
3

ABSTRACT
As our city progresses, it brings new challenges and the urgent need to address the different aspects in
our lives. The purpose of this study is to create an Architectural platform that aims to improve each individual’s
growth beyond their own comfort.
Barangay Guadalupe is a highly residential and diverse community with a majority of families claiming
the population. The beginning of growth influences the future, and to nurture these growths will elevate the society
into a positive growth. The purpose of this study is to identify the community in Barangay Guadalupe; to better
understand how they think, and what they want and need in their community that will influence my architectural
solutions. And I strongly believe that a Community Hub can be a good starting platform for the diversified
community.
4

Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 9
RATIONALE OF THE STUDY 9-10
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 11
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY 12-13
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 14
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK 15
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 16
DEFINITION OF TERMS 17
ORGANIZATION OF STUDY 18
CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 19
SOCIAL COHESION 20-21
INTERACTIVE LEARNING FOR THE YOUTH 22-23
GENIUS LOCI, THE SPIRIT OF PLACE 24-25
COMMUNITIES AND PUBLIC SPACE 26-28
GOALS FOR A GOOD ENVIRONMENT 29
YWCA BUILDING SITE 31
COMMUNITY FACILITIES ARCHITECTURE 32-35
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 36
RESEARCH FRAMEWORK 37
RESEARCH ENVIRONMENT 38
RESEARCH RESPONDENTS 38
5

RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS 38
RESEARCH PROCEDURES 39
CHAPTER 4: DATA PRESENTATION 40
CLIENT 42
USERS 47
SURVEYS AND INTERVIEWS 48-58
BUILDING CODES & REQUIREMENTS 59-68
PLAN AND DESIGN STANDARDS 69-79
SITE SELECTION 80-95
SITE 96-97
SITE ANALYSIS 98-101
LIST OF SPACES 102
SPACE RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAMS 103-106
CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 108
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 107-111
CONCLUSION 112
RECOMMENDATIONS 112
CHAPTER 6: SOLUTIONS 113-158
REFERENCES 159-161
APPENDIXES 162-174
CV 175
6

Chapter 1: Introduction
7

1 Rationale of the Study
Introduction
The increasing economic prosperity of Cebu City lay the groundwork for improving the lives of its’
citizens. Consequently, this brings new challenges and an urgent need for new and improved social and
environmental policies (OECD, 2011). With a rising middle class due to a newly prosperous economy, patterns
of consumption begin to change; demand for quality services increase, and disconnect between the middle and
politically elite class concerns grows (OECD, 2011). Building on the presence of social capital, social cohesion
involves the internalization of social ethics and constitutes the level of realized inclination among citizens to
engage in virtuous behavior for the common good. This theory elaboration asserts that social cohesion is defined
largely by the autonomy of the individual to do good across group dynamics and organizational boundaries. The
degree to which they act in a way that is beneficent to society as a whole is the degree to which we could say
they have been "cohered" to that society.
From Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, the community have the basic needs thus needing to move to
psychological and self-fulfillment needs. But with the lack of support facilities to actualize these, the two remain
stagnant. The society must fight against exclusivity and work towards inclusivity, helping one another to fulfill
their needs. We need a platform to begin with and people to share that promise, and that is when we better
ourselves in a positive impact, is when we work in teams to help the marginalize by giving them opportunities to
build their hierarchy of needs.
8

This platform must be strategic, placed in each segment and in the Philippine context, Barangay. The
project aims to develop a Barangay that is diversified in terms of economic status, age, gender, race, and
religion. The place shall have a high residential population with families being the main focus in order for this
project to be actualized.
Vision
The community center should be a place where diversity is welcomed, from young to old, and of different
backgrounds can all participate in different activities and experiences. These activities should focus on the health
and well-being, and hobbies that help with cognitive, social, and physical development. Culture, Cebu’s culture
is in a mix with a Filipino, South-East Asian, Spanish, Chinese, American influences and with Japanese, &
Korean coming into tow, embracing diversity in our culture is a unique quality we can offer. Stories, everyone
has a story to tell, different layers from different experiences uncovered will bridge different backgrounds. Family,
strong family ties are emphasized in the Philippine context, and families find ways to form bonds through
experiences. Experience, it links the different groups and blurs each boundary.
The hub will bring different people together from different academic layers, age brackets and
socioeconomic status will create a better perspective of what they have for one another, thus making it a
diversified community. In order to put the different people together, this project will involve different activities and
informal spaces that would welcome each diverse group to reduce social differences.
9

1.2 Statement of the Problem
Coming up with the project, important questions arise that need to be responded through research and
backing. Questions like, What is a Community Hub? How to design a Community Hub? What programs
would be appropriate for this typology? Who are the target users? By providing the needed research and
answers, I can describe the standards of a Community Hub fit for Cebu City.
1. How to design a community specific to the community and its’ context?
1.1 What are the government programs for the community?
1.2 What is the community’s expectation for a community space?
1.3 What are the activities and priorities of the community?
2. What are the factors to consider for a site fitting for the project?
2.1 What are the qualified core programs?
2.2 How will they be zoned?
2.3 How will the project adapt to the present and future demands?
10

Objective
The objective is to find what opportunities lay ahead for the community hub that will make a great impact
on the local community, and to set a standard of a quality public space. To study the communities’ needs that
are often forgotten in a fast-paced environment and to come up with architectural solutions. And to explore
specific strategies that would attract the local community. The purpose is to design a facility in relation to the
present trends and context, and flexible enough to adapt to the change of the needs for the future population.
These values follow after the main concept of the Community Hub which is to bring diversity and inclusivity into
the community. From the study, comes with several objective breakdowns:
1. To conduct interviews and surveys, and get a quality feedback from the community.
1.1 The study shall cover interviews with the Government employees that are in charge of
community programs, and those with an active role in the community
1.2 The study shall include surveys that will get the thoughts from the community on what they
envision for a quality public space.
1.3 To gather to the public’s interests and activities from the survey.
2. To identify the core qualities from Urban Design.
2.1 To analyze the data and determine a strategy to determine the appropriate spaces and
programs.
2.2 To zone the spaces according to the priorities.
2.3 To include a flexible, communal space that can cater to small or large crowds.
1.3 Significance of the Study
The study aims to educate the community of diverse groups the importance of social cohesiveness,
activity, health and fitness, and education for various skillsets and knowledge. The study is to inform developers
and investors the need for more community-oriented spaces. In doing all this there are a few set goals which
can be beneficial for the local economy:
11

Architectural Significance:
1. The Community Hub shall be introduced as a new building typology as a community space in Cebu.
2. The study aims to uplift a new standard for a quality public space in Cebu City.
3. The study aims update the architecture in a modern day context, appealing to the millennial and
centennial youths.
4. The study shall introduce architectural features that will engage with the millennial and centennial youths.
Urban Design Significance:
1. Health Benefits: The community center can offer many programs that help benefit both the body and
the mind. Reduced stress for people who engage in more positive activities.
2. Family Oriented: Family ties are improved by spending leisure time with each other. This effect even
works with parent-child relationships. The sports facility management team usually has unique ways to
help families participate together to increase family ties.
3. Youth Care: Programs such as after-school childcare and summer programs that can also help further
physical and mental growth of the youth. Proper facility planning can keep youth off the street while
helping them prepare for their futures and giving them a safe place to play.
4. Social Engagement: Recreation builds stronger individuals and families by reducing negative, self-
destructive acts. Recreation has the ability to break down cultural, class and identity barriers, improving
the quality of life for the community.
5. Cultural Diversity: Cultural differences can sometimes cause some problems in community relations
and in workplaces. Participating in group activities can help to increase cohesion in both the community
and the workplace by letting them experience one another’s perspective.
6. Public Safety: The center shall be a safe place to engage in various activities, and can help raise
awareness through lectures and interactive activities with first aid, CPR, and etc, supported by the
government programs.
7. Skills development: Learning different practical skills such as livelihood training can leave a positive
impact such as to promote creativity, practicality and can even be income generating, which is beneficial
to a family.
12

8. Promote local skills and businesses: The center shall be known as a hub that bring the talented
individuals in one area and promote the local works and products for people all over to recognize.
9. Tourism: Community Centers have activities and events that can bring people from different places.
Interesting architectural designs for community centers can attract tourists. This increase of people can
help bring more revenue and the local business and residences can gain more attention from buyers
and customers.
1.4 Scope and Limitations of the Study
The scope of the study shall cover the investigation of a Proposed Community Hub for Barangay Guadalupe.
This shall consist of urban planning standards for public spaces, public engagements, and community-
integrated studies. The study will be limited to the following scope and assumptions:
1. The project shall include Feasibility Studies, Architectural Programs, Landscape Design for the park,
and Architectural Drawings & renderings, and shall not include complex structural design analysis.
2. The project shall only cover the main architectural planning and design of the Proposed Community
Hub, and other special support facilities such the design of the sewage treatment facility and the
solid waste disposal area shall not be included
13

1.4 Theoretical Framework
Image from Project for Public Spaces
In this time and age, each age
group is influenced by the different
experiences they underwent e.g. post
war, boom of technology, stock
market crash, digital phones,
and global warming. From the
Philippine voter’s census, the researcher
has acquired the number of
population per age group in Cebu
City. These can determine the shifts and patterns in each age.
14

1.5 Conceptual Framework
The study was derived from the Theoretical Framework, the project revolves around the Proposed
Community Hub with the key components which is family, friends and the community. Each of these constituents
are defined by the different age group which are the Baby Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Centennials that
went through different shifts in time that affects their priorities. From the survey, the community defined 5
important components which is to grow, be healthy, food and entertainment, socialize, and to relax, with these
will guide the community into a better and more efficient lifestyle.
15

1.7 Definition of Terms
• Placemaking- it is a multi-faceted approach to planning, design and the management of public spaces.
It capitalizes on a local community’s assets and potential, with the intention of creating public spaces
to promote the communities’ health, wellbeing, and happiness.
• Cognitive development - the construction of thought processes, including remembering, problem
solving, and decision-making, from childhood through adolescence to adulthood
• Community Hub – a locale that provide facilities to foster greater community cooperation and mental
and health awareness.
• Nonverbal communication - defined as communication without words, includes apparent behaviors such
as facial expression, eye contact, and tone of voice, as well as less obvious messages such as posture
and spatial distance between two or more people (Knapp & Hall, 2010)
• Social Capital - the resources that result from people cooperating together toward common ends
• Social Cohesion - is defined as a cohesive society that works toward the well being of all its members,
fights exclusion and marginalization, creates a sense of belonging, promotes trust, offers its members
the opportunity of upward mobility (rising from a lower to a higher social class or status)
• Social inclusion -process of improving the terms for individuals and groups to take part in society. It
aims to empower poor and marginalized people to take advantage of rising global opportunities
• Social mobility - the ability of individuals or groups to move upward or downward in status based on
wealth, occupation, education, or other social variables
• Socioeconomic status - an economic and sociological combined total measure of a person's work
experience and of an individual's or family's economic and social position in relation to others, based
on income, education, and occupation
• Taking place – is understood in a quantitative, “functional” sense, with implications such as spacial
distribution and dimensioning. (Norgberg-Schulz, 1991)
• Self-administered questionnaire – refers to a questionnaire that has been designed specifically to be
answered by a respondent without the intervention of the researcher (e.g. interviewer) collecting the
data.
16

1.8 Organization of the Study
Chapter 1: Introduction
This chapter outlines the purpose of the study, which is A Proposed Community Hub. This shall include
the benefits it will provide in a community. This includes the Rationale of the Study, Statement of the Problem,
Significance of Study, Scope and Limitations of the Study, and the Frameworks of the study.
Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature
This chapter talks deeper about the study about social cohesion, planning, and a sense of space. It
also shows the existing architecture that made a positive impact in the community it was focused on. The idea
will be supported by research and scholarly information that support the theories.
Chapter 3: Research Methodology
This chapter talks about the organization of the research and the methods for obtaining the contextual
information.
Chapter 4: Data Presentation and Analysis
This chapter will feature a feasibility study of the Community Hub that shall include client’s profile, user
profile, data from correspondents, site analysis, values-based programming and program of spaces.
Chapter 5: Summary of Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations
This chapter will summarize the findings in coming up with the necessary spaces through Architectural
Plans and execution of the overall concept.
17

Chapter 2: Review of Related Literature
18

2 Review of Related Literature
2.1 Social Cohesion
With a proper social cohesion within the barangay on a societal level can be derived from the quality of
the social cohesion in a more specific area in the city of Cebu. Social Cohesion works toward the well being of
all its members and creates a sense of belonging. It is structured by Social Inclusion, Social Capital, and Social
Mobility as shown in the image below. Social inclusion is the process of improving the terms for individuals and
groups to take part in society. Social Capital is the resource that result from people cooperating together toward
common ends. Social Mobility is the ability of individuals or groups to move upward or downward in status based
on wealth, occupation, education, or other social variables. Each of them creating a clear structure to progress
(OECD, 2011)
Forrest and Kearns (2001) identified a society with a lack of social cohesion as “one with displayed
social disorder and conflict, disparate moral values, extreme social inequality, low levels of social interaction
between and within communities and low levels of place attachment (Forrest & Kearns, 2001)”. Most of the
research carried out on social cohesion reflects the driving force of political agenda because the tendency has
been to focus on deprived or poor neighborhoods (Forrest & Kearns, 2001). This has been criticized by some
scholars, because the assessments are usually ‘symptom based’ rather than aimed at developing a “useful
heuristic device for structuring community studies (Forrest & Kearns, 2001)”.
The first dimension is that of common values and a civic culture. In this dimension, social cohesion is
19

shaped through the common values the members of a society share that helps them to identify common aims
and objectives. It will enable them to share a common set of moral principles and codes of behavior that is the
basis for how they conduct their relation with one another (Kearns & Forrest, 2000)
The second dimension, that of social order and social control, refers to the absence of conflict within a
society. The existing order and system do not have to deal with challenges. Social cohesion is a byproduct,
shaped by routines, demands and reciprocities of everyday life.
The third dimension, that of social solidarity and reductions in wealth disparities, refers to social
cohesion as a harmonious development of society and its constituent groups toward common economic, social
and environmental standards (Kearns & Forrest, 2000). Social cohesion implies here that opportunities for
income generating activities are extended, poverty will be reduced, income gaps will become smaller and
unemployment will fall (Kearns & Forrest, 2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighborhood. It is all
about equality as is reflected in the main elements: redistribution of service, equal access to services and
welfare benefits.
The fourth dimension is that of Social Networks and Social Capital. A social cohesive society in this
dimension is viewed as a society that contains a high amount of Social Interaction, Civic Engagement and co-
operative problem solving. Together, these three will result in a society that contains strong social networks and
the creation of social capital of which the neighborhood can profit.
The last and fifth dimension, that of place attachment and identity, implies that strong attachment to
a place and by intertwining of people’s identities with places will lead to social cohesion. The attachment and
intertwining will have a positive effect on common values, norms and a willingness to participate in a community
or neighborhood (Kearns & Forrest, 2000).
20

2.2 Interactive Learning for the Youth
The youth use public spaces more often than the rest, because this is the period to explore with the
luxury of free-time. However, young adults ages 12 to 25 are often not included in the process of ‘Placemaking’
and end up loitering in other places, or places without a positive environment. With nothing to do after school,
they often hide in their homes or hangout the mall, thus making them stagnant. By including youth-friendly
spaces, the youth will feel belongingness and importance in the community.
The community environment can help achieve a positive and healthy lifestyle as well as contribute to
enhancing capabilities and helping in positive mental development. The strategy focusses on the theory that that
a community focused hub, has the potential for positive change for the cognitive development for its users. But
how do I prove that? Research show that Finland is one of the leading countries in the world for quality education
because they give the learners for time for many free-play outdoor breaks and trainings for languages, arts,
crafts, music, physical education, and ethics. These children also have the freedom to laugh or move. The
Finnish school teachers reject the straight-jacketed discipline which allow the children to have the atmosphere
for innovation and learning. Because these children are taught to work together, they together with the guidance
of the teachers offer positive feedback and constructive suggestion that help build better characters (Doyle,
2016).
Age could be important is several ways; specifically, in the role of neural, motor, cognitive, or social
developmental levels accompanying age. Age differences in the types of group physical activities in which
children engage thus may affect the impact of group physical activities on cognition. The coordination required
for a group activity such as basketball, more likely to be engaged in by older children than younger ones, may
encourage a more strategic approach (e.g., planning) than a simpler game, such as tag, which is enjoyed by
younger children. For example, some aspects, such as the ability to inhibit a prepotent response may develop
mainly during the preschool years whereas other aspects, such as planning and working memory, may continue
to develop through the grade-school years. In this case an exercise intervention may improve inhibition in
preschoolers but not in school-age children. With respect to the importance of motor level, a particular exercise
intervention may primarily challenge the motor coordination of a young child but challenge the planning skills of
an older child who is more advanced motor development. Cognitive level matters when, for example, there is a
21

mismatch between what a child is ready to learn and what learning experiences are provided. Coordination
training, for instance, may need to fit with the child’s level of cognitive “readiness” (i.e., within or slightly above
his or her present cognitive level) in order to teach planning skills. (Tomporowski, Davis, Miller, Naglieri 2008)
Children (6 to 12 years old) develop the ability to think in concrete ways), such as how to combine
(addition), separate (subtract or divide), order (alphabetize and sort), and transform objects and actions. They
are called concrete because they are performed in the presence of the objects and events being thought about
(Stanford, 2011).
Adolescence (between 12 and 18 years of age) marks the beginning development of more complex
thinking processes including abstract thinking, the ability to reason from known principles (form own new ideas
or questions), the ability to consider many points of view according to varying criteria (compare or debate ideas
or opinions), and the ability to think about the process of thinking. During adolescence, the developing teenager
acquires the ability to think systematically about all logical relationships within a problem. The transition from
concrete thinking to formal logical operations occurs over time. Each adolescent progresses at varying rates in
developing his or her ability to think in more complex ways (Stanford, 2011).
22

2.3 Genius Loci, the Spirit of Place
The concept of genius loci talks about the sense of place, that people experience beyond the physical realms.
The energy, the atmosphere, the surrounding, -- they intertwine to create an experience beyond the sensory
properties of places and can feel the attachment to the spirit of place. The spirit of place has been recognized
as the concrete reality man has to face in his daily life. The Architect is to create meaningful places, whereby
helps man to dwell (Norgberg-Schulz, 1991). The spirit of place often persists in spite of profound changes e.g.
social, cultural and technological change (Dubos, 1972, Relph, 1976). From a commercial perspective, it can
be the branding or image of a place. Cities like Paris, Tokyo, and New York portray a clear image of what they
are, from how it looks to how it feels to the sounds of everyday life (Carmona, Heath, Oc, Tiesdell 2003).
Norberg-Schulz talks about the concepts of “image”, “space”, “character” and “genius loci” to illustrate peoples’
experience in the physical environment to achieve the atmosphere and sense-related experiences of genius loci.
In this study context, ‘genius loci’ is divided into:
• tangible landscape, which involves traditional cultural patterns and components  
• intangible landscape, which includes the values of spirit and sense of place, beliefs and spiritual system
and traditional environmental knowledge.  
The Genius Loci is also a ‘phenomenology’ which is the conscious information that makes its way to the
world (Pepper, 1984). Thus, while the meanings of places are rooted in their physical setting and activities, they
are not a property of them, but of 'human intentions and experiences' (Relph, 1976). Hence, what 'the
environment' represents is a form our own subjective construction of it. The phenomenology has been mainly
concerned with ontology, psychology, ethics and some extent aesthetics which have been given very little
attention to the phenomenology of the daily environment. Therefore, a phenomenology in architecture is needed
(Norgberg-Schulz, 1991).
23

Diagram adapted from Relph, 1976
Human interaction is the key player in the 'physical setting', 'activities', and 'meanings' that constitute
the three basic elements activity, form and place (Relph, 1976). The Form is the place setting that puts a persona
to a place through scale and proportions of a building, and the surrounding landmarks. The first basic element
is Image; it is the key sensory element that invites people to a certain area. People asses a place visually, and
the information helps process whether the place is right for them or not. Next is the role of the Activity which
creates diversity and inclusiveness through different events and culture. The diagram illustrates how urban design
actions can contribute to and enhance the sense of place.
24

2.4 Communities and Public Space
Community is in a general sense public, the three interrelated strands of thinking as written in the book Public
Spaces, Urban Spaces:
First, communities are seen as providing identity and character, creating or enhancing a sense of place. It
can create a deeper meaning with the place’s sociocultural character as defined in the Genius Loci. Second,
communities provide a relatively pragmatic way of planning urban areas (with or without associated social
objectives). This is often associated with mixed-use of balanced area, which bring together more activities in a
certain place. Third, communities can be seen as a means of creating areas of greater social interaction which
supports social cohesiveness.
In order for a public space to be feasible, it must offer what people want, -- an attractive and safe
environment. The Project for Public Space (1999) identified four key attributes of successful places: comfort and
image; access and linkage; uses and activity; and sociability.
Comfort and image is in relation to the visualization, it is the first determinant that can attract or repel
people towards a certain space. ‘Safety’ is the first and most important intangible quality, it must be open and
welcoming but not to open that safety is compromised, it is determined by the crime statistics of an area.
‘Charm, historical background, 'attractiveness and the spirit of the place’ are the following qualities are looked
after safety. People generally go towards a place that they are comfortable with or a place that is inclusive and
welcoming, this includes ‘availability’ of public comfort such as greenness, walkways, seats and cleanliness.
Such measurement of the tangibles is the sanitation rating, building condition and environmental data.
Access and Linkage is in relation to way finding, these are the information systems that guide the users
through a physical environment to enhance their experience of a space. This is important in a complex built
environment for an urban center where people need visual cues such as ‘readability’ which are the signs and
symbols to guide them to their destinations. This contributes to a sense of well-being, safety and security that
brings us back to comfort and image. ‘Walkability, reliability and continuity’ are the physical paths that constitute
to safety and ‘convenience’ of mobility in a place. ‘Proximity, connectedness and accessibility’ follow.
25

Uses and Activity is in relation to space and the contents of space. This is where people associate the
‘uniqueness, and quality’ of place it terms of what it has to offer such as the association with ‘fun, activities,
celebration, and usefulness’. The tangibles are the property values, rent, and local business ownership.
Principles to keep in mind from Projects for Public Spaces (PPS):
• People of different ages are using the spaces throughout the day (retired people and people with young
children can use a space during the weekday when others are working or studying)
• The more activities that people have the opportunity to participate in, the better.
Sociability is in relation to the human realm. This is how the people make a space, while the the
‘welcoming feel, co-operation, pride and friendliness’ are the human values that invite ‘diversity, and
interactivity.’
Diagram by John Montgomery (1998) in enhancing the potential sense of place
“The key to a successful public realm should be 'as complex as possible'. Urban areas and cities must
provide spaces for social and cultural exchanges that strengthens.” (Montgomery, 1998). This includes;
26

• The extent of variety in primary land uses, including residential
• The proportion of locally owned or independent businesses, particularly shops
• Patterns of opening hours, and the existence of evening and night-time activity
• The presence, size and specialisms of street markets
• Availability of cinemas, theatres, wine bars, pubs, restaurants and other cultural/meeting places,
offering service of different kinds, prices and quality;
• Availability of spaces, including gardens, squares and corners for activities such as cultural animation
programs
• Patterns of mixed land use enabling self improvement and small-scale investment in property
• Availability of differing unit sizes and costs of property; 
• The degree of innovation and confidence in new architecture, providing a variety of building types, styles
and designs 
• The presence of an active street life and street frontages.
27

2.5 Goals for a Good Urban Environment
(Towards an Urban Design Manifesto, Jacobs and Appleyard 1987)
From the paper written by Jacobs and Appleyard, they suggested that a good urban environment shall
consist of 7 goals:
1. Livability
A city or a community must be a place where everyone can live in relative comfort with the basic
needs and proper facilities. There shall be clean air, trees, open spaces, scaled buildings, low noise
pollution, cleanliness and physical safety which are characteristics that can be designed into the physical
fabric in the city. They emphasize on reasonable characteristics though not excessive that is beyond the
need.
2. Identity and Control
There should be a given identity in a community that will give the people a sense of
belongingness individually and collectively. It should be a community where people have the freedom to
express themselves to create a dialogue between others giving them a sense of identity. Culture is an
essence to the identity of a community, being able to present the local talents and goods can give a
definitive image.
3. Access to Opportunity, Imagine and Joy
A city should have an extension where people can break from their traditional molds, extend
their experience, meet new people, learn other viewpoints and enjoy to counter the seriousness of
everyday life. Positive exchanges are more likely to happen when there is a diversified experience.
4. Authenticity and meaning
People should be able to understand their city, its basic layout, public functions and institutions,
and the opportunities it offers. The urban environment should reveal its significant meaning by engaging
and if necessary, provoke for people are indifferent to the norms and are overwhelmed by complexity.
This may mean encouraging locally based industries and handicrafts, locally grown foods, natural
materials, self-help projects, not only to save energy but to undermine its source.
28

5. Community and Public Life
A community should encourage participation of their citizens in public meeting places that are
accessible to all and must be controlled publicly. To encourage public participation, it is important for
way-finding, interaction, the exchange of goods and ideas to have a healthy public circulation. A city
should be more than just a warring collection of interest groups, classes and neighborhoods; it should
breed a commitment to a larger whole.
6. Urban Self-Reliance
Increasingly cities must be more environmentally aware by becoming more self-sustaining.
7. An Environment for all
A good environment must be accessible to all as every citizen is entitled to some minimal level
of environmental livability, identity, control and opportunity. Good urban design must be for
both the poor and rich. It is where power is evenly distributed among the social groups.
The good urban environment is one that balances these goals, allowing individual and group identity
while maintaining public concern, encouraging pleasure while maintaining public safety and responsibility.
Design considerations:
• Smaller buildings and parcels shall have more entrances on the public spaces with more windows and
openings that would attract diversity.
• A community must have a reasonable proximity for the activities, whether it is living, working, shopping,
spiritual, and recreational activities. The perfect examples are the mix-used communities that respond
to the values of openness and diversity.
• Buildings should be arranged in such a way as to define public space, rather than sit in space. It should
be engaging and welcoming to the public.
29

2.6 YWCA Building Site
(Book: Time-saver Standards for Building types)
The geographical location for the center is determined by the community needs for the services offered.
The architect listed the following factors that should be taken into account when designing for the community.
• Proximity to public transportation and availability of parking facilities – The architect suggested
that accessibility is one of the biggest strategic factors. Since the building should attract all
kinds of people, making it accessible to buses and in the Philippine context, the Jeepneys,
participants can easily access the place. If the lot is not large enough to accommodate parking,
the architect suggested that parking lots within the vicinity would be adequate.
• Size of the site – The site should be large enough to accommodate the building and its’ spaces
including spaces for future expansions, parking area and outdoor activity spaces.
• Visibility – Way finding must be easy as the site should be easily to seen with the help of
adequate road frontage and identifying signage
• The ideal facility has the expression of adaptability and usefulness for different types of
activities, meaning that it should not only serve a single use or for specific occasions
• The building should be a friendly place with a good atmosphere to attract different kinds of
participants
• Awareness of the liveliness within the building to attract curious people to investigate
30

2.7 Community Facilities Architecture
2.7.1 KU.BE
The Danish Firm Adept in partner with the Dutch Firm MVRDV were tasked to design a community center
in Frederiksberg, Denmark funded by the Frederiksberg community. KU.BE is a new urban typology with its mix
of a community center, exhibition and performance, park and playground, and health center. The House of
Culture and Movement aims to engage the population of Frederiksberg into health and fitness, social culture,
and youth culture.
Exterior Perspective of KU.BE by MVRDV and Adept
The center is a dynamic meeting point for people of all ages, diversifying the range of activities. Health,
culture, leisure and education smoothly blend together to create an architectural experience that will become a
new central destination in Frederiksberg. (Adept, 2016)
Interior inside the main building Perspective of running track
31

KU.BE provides spaces inductive for teamwork, creativity, creation, innovation, dialogue and
participatory interdisciplinary projects, thus diversifying its’ experience. They feature a play facility such as a large
rock-climbing wall and mazes that target the enjoyment of children.
Images from Adept and MVRDV. Image on the left is a section view and the image on the right is the concept diagram
Their programs hold permanent activities like their sports facilities, yoga classes, tai chi classes, ballet
for children and etc. The center is used by different user groups that work together or separately depending on
the activity.
Events held at KU.BE. Image from KU.BE
They hold various events and activities to keep the center interesting throughout the year. Their programs
include events, movement, debate, festivals, film, lectures, concerts, shows, games, education, and workshops.
Summer programs invite the public to the center.
32

4.7.2 San Vicente Community Center
Rendered perspective of San Vicente Community Center by PLAN: B arquitectos
This Community Center, spearheaded by PLAN: B arquitectos partnered up with the Government of
Antioquia and the community to plan a central meeting point. The community comprises of 70% farmers,
distributed in eighty municipalities. It aims to educate the people of various regions.
Built center by PLAN: B arquitectos
San Vicente Ferrer, Colombia is a municipality that sits atop a mountainous region. Its little center
consists of an “organic” urban structure laid out on an irregular and steep topography, works to complement
nature
33

4.7.3 Paludan Bogcafe
Paludan Bogcafe (Bookcafe) is a Danish
library fused together with a café. It started as a
combined bookstore and publisher that provided
the University students with books at good prices. It
offers a cozy environment for book lovers by being
surrounded by thousands of books which is a
conducive environment for studying, being creative
and enjoying coffee. It hosts a variety of events
such as live music (jazz and blues), poetry Image by Paludan Bogcafe
readings, and an exhibition for local art. The bookcafe is one of the most sought out places for locales and
tourists to visit.
4.7.4 Paper Island
Paper Island, located at the heart of
Copenhagen’s Harbor is filled with colorful food
trucks from different parts of the world. Each
food truck offers a unique theme that shows the
different culture that is all housed in an old
newspaper factory. It has a maximum capacity
of 400 people and 184 people for an open
section for private parties. The place gives a sense Image from Copenhagen Street Food
of variety and excitement for both locals and tourists because of the authenticity from the Maritime setting. This
is also a place for create souls that offers activities and events such as Latin dance night, bingos, and live
concerts.
34

Chapter 3: Research Methodology
35

3 Research Framework
The model for my entire thesis process can be divided into four parts. A analytical framework, qualitative
research, analysis from findings and the design development phase.
The first phase of this research is answered in the analytical framework in the vision section. It shows
the purpose of the study and what I envision. The second phase will focus on how the community center
functions. The data for this question will be collected through the qualitative data collection method interviews.
The questions in this interview will be about social cohesion, facilities, and usual activities. These results will be
categorized and analyzed to come up with the design solutions. The final phase shall be the design development
where I can come up with Architectural Solutions.
36

3.1 Research Environment
The areas of the research covered will be in Cebu City. This
includes scholarly references provided by USC-Talamban LRC,
Cebu City hall, Guadalupe Barangay Hall and other government
agencies. The survey and Focus Group Discussion shall be
administered with the guidance of the Office of the Population.
The collaborative environment shall include the local
communities in Cebu City, Barangay Hall in Guadalupe , Guadalupe
Elementary School, and Duterte Memorial National High school.
3.2 Research Respondents
Barangay Guadalupe in Cebu City is zoned as a residential sector, as shown in the 1996 zoning map.
In 2016, there are 70,074 number of residents in Barangay Guadalupe alone. With a recorded 28,543 inhabitants
in the Banawa area and 41,531 in the Guadalupe area. The objective is to target different age groups and groups
with different socioeconomic backgrounds of Cebu City, to understand their different activities and patterns.
3.3 Research Instruments
The purpose of this project is to determine the spaces according to the needs and wants specific to the
local community of Barangay Guadalupe. The project shall undergo a series of test surveys and a final survey
conducted first through an online web survey, Google forms, a self-administered survey and interviews. Given a
limited time constraint, the final survey shall be strategic in distribution to the different socioeconomic groups
that shall focus on 3 major topics:
1) Positive qualities of the local community
2) Needs of the diverse local community
3) Ideal characteristics of a public space
37

3.4 Research Procedures
3.4.1 Gathering of Data
The undergo a series of test surveys and a final survey conducted first through an online web survey,
then self-administered surveys. The first survey was a trial online web survey, Google forms, which had 23
respondents from all-over Cebu City. This survey proved to be ineffective because some of the respondents do
not use g-mail and the survey must be specific to Guadalupe residents. The second survey was a self-
administered survey that tested the 42 respondents from Cebu City, which proved to be more effective because
the questions brought their own point of view on their take of their community. The final survey was in
collaboration with Ms. Joshephine L. Avila, Research Associate from the Office of Population Studies in University
of San Carlos and Mrs. Josefa Chan, a colleague of Ms. Josephine who specializes in FGD (Focus Group
Discussions). Under the consultation of Ms. Avila, she recommended the procedure of the survey and the
improvement of the questions. Mrs. Chan aided with the administration of the Focus Group Discussion which
involves 5 different focus groups that involves 8-10 representatives, 1 researcher and 1 administrator. The first
and second focus group shall be the students and faculty from Guadalupe Elementary School, the third and
fourth shall be the students and faculty from the Duterte Memorial National High school in Guadalupe. The fifth
shall be the Barangay Guadalupe LGU representatives because of their knowledge of the local community.
3.4.2 Treatment of Data
The data gathered shall undergo a series of analysis through tables and charts that will determine the
majority’s answer. The translated data shall be used to determine the spaces for the Proposed Community Hub
specific to Barangay Guadalupe.
38

Chapter 4: Data Presentation and

Analysis
39

4 Data Presentation
This chapter outlines the client and population catchments for the Proposed Community Hub for
Barangay Guadalupe. The data shall provide a profile of the community within the catchment. The profile shall
include an analysis of population and demographic data to identify the characteristics that shall indicate the the
types of needs of the community to be considered in the planning and design.
The Guadalupe Community Hub strategy conducts a study of a community facility that will conform to
the community’s needs and wants. Furthermore, the identification of the existing community based facilities and
to analyze their condition, whether they are in relation to the present trends and context. From these studies, the
researcher can formulate a strategy for the design solution.
4.1 Client’s Profile
This is under the assumption that the Barangay Guadalupe LGU will be partnering with the Arcenas Development
Corporations for the commission of the Community Hub located in Banawa, Barangay Guadalupe.
Barangay Guadalupe
Mission: “To be efficient & effective in addressing the
needs and wants of the general public.”
Vision: “To efficiently deliver the public goods and services
to the public in general and most particularly to its’ barangay
constituents.”
Barangay Guadalupe has the largest Barangay Hall in Cebu City and is awarded as the best governed
Barangay back in 2016. They aim to “address the needs and wants” of community which includes public welfare.
The Barangay Captain, Hon. Michael M. Gacasan is currently advocating for the development of the youth
through sports and cultural development.
40

Arcenas Development Corporations
Arcenas Development Corporations is a company that builds and develops real-estate
properties. Their main development is the whole Arcenas Estate master planed to be a
mixed-used community such as subdivisions, a commercial district and an I.T. Zone.
4.2 Catchment and Population
The Guadalupe Barangay Profile has been used to determine the population of the Proposed Community
Hub in Barangay Guadalupe.
4.2.1 Catchment
The catchment population is within Barangay Guadalupe in
Cebu City which has a total of 374 hectares of land bounded by
Barangay Kalunasan and Sapangdaku from the North, Barangay
Calamba from the South, Barangay Capitol Site on the West and
Barangay Labangon on the East.
4.2.2 Community Hub catchment population
Recorded in the year 2016 by Barangay Guadalupe, there are approximately 70,074 number of residents
in Barangay Guadalupe alone. With a recorded 28,543 inhabitants in the Banawa area and 41,531 in the
Guadalupe area. The Economic Status for the people under the category of the working force is 80% employment
rate and 20% are unemployed.
41

4.2.3 Community Hub catchment population of families and households
In 2016, Barangay Guadalupe is characterized with high proportions of families with children and low
proportions of lone person households.
DESCRIPTION AREA POPULATION

Guadalupe 30,790
Families
Banawa 28,543
TOTAL NO. OF FAMILIES 59,333
Guadalupe 7,697
Households
Banawa 4,593
TOTAL NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS 12,290
AREA GENDER POPULATION

Male 20,063
Guadalupe
Female 21,468
Male 14,215
Banawa
Female 14,328
TOTAL (Guadalupe Community Catchment) 70,074
42

4.2.4 Existing Public Facilities in Guadalupe
The existing community facility in Barangay Guadalupe is within
the Barangay Hall which is the largest barangay hall in Cebu
City. They include activities and programs set by the government
and private organizations for the benefit of the local community.
However, the venue for these events are inconsistent, being
from different government facilities that do not fit the type of
program (public schools for medical missions, gym for meetings, and etc.) and houses of volunteers.
ADITIONAL PUBLIC FACILITIES AREA

Guadalupe Wet Market 340 sqm
Barangay Guadalupe Gymnasium 1,200 sqm
Guadalupe Health Center 200 sqm
Banawa Health Center 64 sqm
4.3 Community Characteristics
The study analyzed the 2016 Census of Population and Households data conducted by Barangay
Guadalupe to understand the characteristics of the catchment area. This was selected as the preferred data
source for the study of the characteristics of Barangay Guadalupe.
4.3.1 Dwelling Type
The types of residences in Barangay Guadalupe are Condominium complexes, Townhouses,
Subdivisions, informal housing.
43

4.3.2 Education
Barangay Guadalupe has a high proportion of primary and secondary school students and a lower
proportion of colleges. This includes Guadalupe Elementary School, Banawa Elementary School, Ramon Duterte
Memorial National High School, Royal Oaks International School, and 30 other learning centers, tutorials and
preschools.
4.3.3 Employment
Barangay Guadalupe recorded a number of 80% employed for the people under the working age bracket
and 20% unemployment rate.
4.3.4 Livelihood and Income
DESCRIPTION SUBCATEGORY
Agriculture
Source of Livelihood Industrial
Retail
Mango
Ornamental plants
Farming
Principal income source
Handicrafts
Lantern Making
Small scale business
44

4.4 Barangay Hall Development Plan
The information gathered is formulated by both the government and the community. The community
were given the opportunity to vote for activities related to the Gender and Development Plan (GAD) as set
regulated by the national government. These activities are in response to the needs and wants of the community
e.g. livelihood training is a platform to save and earn money. The following are in accordance in their respective
categories:
DESCRIPTION SUBCATEGORY
Social Rights Protection Women’s Advocacy Seminar
Organization of Women's group
Organization of Children's group
Socio-Economic
Organization of Men's group
Organization of PWD
Livelihood training on food processing
Livelihood training on cookery
Livelihood training on cosmetology
Livelihood training on flower making
Right to Livelihood
Livelihood training on rug making
Livelihood training on candle making
Livelihood training on soap making
Livelihood training on composting
Food Security and Productive Resources Training on Organic Vegetable Gardening
Community clean-up drive
Operation Tuli
Medical Assistance for Senior Citizens
Right to Health
Sportsfest
Dengue awareness orientation
Nutrition Month
Trainings and Seminars Responsible Parenthood
Fiesta December 12: Feast of our Lady Guadalupe
45

4.5 Users
Public participation is the key component to my research; with the aid of online and physical surveys as
tools for this part of the research. The research included interviews and surveys within the local communities in
Cebu City and residents in Barangay Guadalupe. Public participation is the key component to my research.
The primary users shall be the youth with a focus to develop their social experience that extends towards
their families and the community in engagement. The secondary users shall be the extended community from
nearby the areas interested to experience the place. The support users shall be that staff that shall administer
the building. This includes the Management team, Accounting team, Marketing and Advertising team, the Events
team, Activities team, Security Team, Janitorial Team, and the Maintenance and technical team. The number of
staff is flexible depending on the demand for a larger team or smaller team
46

4.5.1 Surveys and Interviews
The research comprises of 3 different surveys, with the first 2 being the developing survey that produced the final
survey. The surveys that were conducted started with interviews with a group of higher socio-economic status
respondents from a digital platform, the second was a study that required a direct approach to various people
all over Cebu, and the final survey became more specific to the community of Barangay Guadalupe.
Survey 1
With 23 responses from the online survey through Google Forms; the respondents were Facebook friends of
different age brackets. They were first informed about the functions and purpose of a Community Center in
communities abroad. The questionnaire starts with the basic information, then asks about their Barangay and
the third asks about the activities.
How do spend your typical What do you think is missing

days off or weekends? in the community?
Workout 1 Workshops 2
Productivity 1 Seminars 2
Crafting 1 Activities 4
Mall 4 Medical facilities 1
Movies 3 Grocery 2
Spend time with family 4 Parks and public spaces 10
Spend time with friends 3 Study area 2
Family lunch/dinner 6 Events 2
Gaming 1 Wider roads 1
Stay at home/rest 3 Leisure facilities 1
47

Socials 1
Go to Church 1
Study out 1
Watch tv 2
Play with pets 1
Conclusion:
The results show that the community is generally family and friends oriented, seeking for a better environment
such as a park and safe public spaces to enjoy together. And majority of the respondents voted that reading,
and fitness and health are one the most important factors for their lifestyles. At the end of the survey, the online
respondents agreed that a Community Hub would be useful for the community.
However, the result deemed to be ineffective because it limits only a specific group of people on a digital platform
that had no personal interaction.
48

Survey 2
For my second survey, the questions were modified to less “yes or no questions” and more questions that
involved the respondents take of their community. There were 40 respondents of higher socioeconomic status
from all over Cebu City that took part of this self-administered survey. The self-administered survey was taken
place in various public locations such as cafes, food courts, offices, and tutorial classes.
1. Majority of the respondents aren’t contented with the public spaces, seeing the need for improvements.
CONTENTED WITH PUBLIC SPACE?

don’t know
5%
yes
39%
no
56%
2. Majority of the respondents agreed that there are interesting events in Cebu, however they do not appeal
to them and they aren’t informed. These events should be appealing to families as well.
INTERSTING EVENTS IN CEBU

not informed
no 3%
don't know 2%
8%
yes
87%
49

3. There were numerous answers, and the 57% engage in relaxing activities such as the creative arts, read,
and watch movies, and 43% engage in active lifestyles. These activities are are fused for the youth, and
either or for the adults.
HOBBIES CHART
badminton
creative arts 12%
17%
basketball
14%
exercise
17%
watch movies read

14% 26%
4. Majority of the respondents want a center that caters to Hobbies, Health, Academics and Interaction
between the community.
SELF-IMPROVEMENT WITH THE

COMMUNITY CENTER
none / no
answer Social Skills and
2% Interaction
Livelihood
15%
training
13% Hands-on skills
(crafting and
building)
Health 10%
19%
Hobbies
26%
Academics
15%
50

5. Lastly, are the suggestions for a better Community space as contributed by the respondents from all-
over Cebu City.
AGE GENDER OCCUPATION BARANGAY What do you want for your community’s public space?
11 F student not sure food shops
11 F student Pooc art center and security
11 M student Talamban parks & gyms
11 M student Lahug safe places, badminton & basketball court
12 F student Mambaling sports center, public spaces & parks
12 F student Cambaro parks & gyms
12 F student Vel-Pal I outreach programs, & tree planting programs
12 F student Banilad park
12 M student Banilad wifi, sports varieties, outreach activities & programs
13 M student kalunasan beneficial to everyone
17 F student Cambaro a lot of food places
17 F student don’t know food places
17 M student Guadalupe art or theater community club
17 M student Agus park with trees & exercise machines
18 F student Tisa Food places
18 F student Buhisan hang-out places for food, entertainment & parks
18 F student Mambaling have bits of everything to make it interesting
18 M student Mambaling food stalls
20 M student Consolacion make it suitable for young & old people so a lot can participate
20 M student Ramos voluntary cleaning & activities
21 F student Banawa seminars on health & community improvement, & livelihood training
21 F student Guadalupe open spaces & events space
21 F student Lapu-Lapu board game place or coffee shop
21 F student Busay an iconic form to attract people with enough resting places
21 M student Capitol better information dissemination on events
35 F Dice Kong Kasambagan must leave a long-term impact on the society
37 M self-employed Calamba healthy lifestyle
39 F Business-woman Apas programs that promote education & health for the youth
41 F Employee Talisay livelihood programs
44 F teacher Labangon more health, hobbies & academic programs
46 M business-man Kasambagan open spaced parks and eateries
49 F PAL employee Lapu-lapu basic supplies, services, sports & leisure, food places, public spaces
51 M Lawyer Lapu-lapu Health & wellness service, public market, chapel
58 F Business-woman Guadalupe activityi, function rooms, co-working spaces,& outdoor areas
75 F Retired Kamputhaw livelihood training so people can earn a living too
51

Conclusion:
Based from the respondents, they highly suggest a flexible space that caters to all the age brackets through
food & entertainment, public parks, and various programs and activities. Sports and wellness, access to basic
supplies, and community spaces are sought out among the youth. The information presented influenced the
space planning approach.
Interviews and Survey 3
The third survey was under the guidance of Ms. Josephine
Avila, Research Associate from the Office of Population Studies in
University of San Carlos and Mrs. Josefa Chan, a colleague of Ms.
Josephine who aided me with my research in Barangay Guadalupe.
The picture on the right is with Mrs. Chan, meeting about
what type of research and survey to conduct in Guadalupe.
Image of Mrs. Chan and the researcher
Interviews
During the survey in Barangay Guadalupe, the Barangay
employees emphasized on the helpful residential community with
the youth having a positive role in the community. Although there are
some youth without the financial support, they envision a more
proactive role with access to work and skills opportunities to create
a better future for them.
Image of the surveys conducted in the Barangay Hall
The major contributors from the Barangay Hall survey is
from Ms. Isabelita Cang and her daughter, Ms.Ethel both Guadalupe
Barangay Hall employees, who are strong advocates with helping
the community through livelihood training, gathered more
respondents from the fire volunteer department, and the families
around Guadalupe.
52

Guadalupe Barangay Captain, Hon. Michael M. Gacasan is
an advocate of the Youth through Sports. During the interview, he
stressed the need for leading the youth in a positive atmosphere.
Thus, he and the Barangay Tanods keep night watch to ensure a
safe neighborhood and to keep the youth off the streets.
Image of the Barangay Captain and the researcher
Mam Rose, in charge of the community activities, mentioned that
there is currently a large allotment of budget for livelihood training among
the Barangay and on September 27, 2017 dozens of families lined up to
be part of this program. The trainings happen in the barangay hall lobby
and the activities always have a different venue ranging from one home to
another.
Image of the Barangay Hall Lobby
Conclusion:
Going around the barangay hall, the people showed strong community bonds by helping one another.
Some of these people do not see their work as a job, but an opportunity to help the people of the barangay. The
“bayanihan” among the people, with evident passion to see everyone thrive truly makes this a community. The
opportunity for external communities to realize through a platform or architecture will show the passion in each
of these individuals.
53

Final Survey
At the third revision, the update includes a Bisaya version to cater to the different people. The self-
administered survey consists of 3 main topics, Community, Activities and Ideal Community Center. To make the
survey more effective, small information were included with the researches ready to answer and explain the
different topics.
1. Majority of the respondents mentioned that there is a strong community support and peace within the
community. They enjoy the beautiful mountainous terrains, the spring from the mountain and the fresh
air that the mountain offers.
2. The respondents enjoy going to malls, mountains, and springs. They enjoy the convenience of goods
close by, congregating with the community and nature areas.
3. Majority of the respondents voted yes to being contented with their public spaces mostly because they
are happy with the happy community that is put into the different spaces. And the rest that voted no,
because people lack sanitation awareness.
Are you contented with the public spaces?

no idea
6%
no
33%
yes
61%
4. For the weekends, the respondents enjoy spending quality time with family and friends, outdoor
activities, and contributing to the community by helping other people.
54

5. The respondents enjoy a mix of indoor and outdoor activities.
HOBBIES & INTERESTS

badminton
9%
bake &
cook
11%
puzzles
11% basketball
23%
creative arts
11%
exercise volleyball
12% 14%
movies, tv, net

9%
6. The government allotted a budget for public programs for everyone to enjoy. The survey asked if these
people were aware of this right and if they want to participate.
Are you aware of government programs?

Participation in these programs
no not
19% interested
no answer 20%
33%
want to
yes attend
81% 47%
55

7. The community’s suggestion for a good public space for their Barangay.
AGE G OCCUPATION SITIO 9. Suggestions for your community’s public space

12 F student Guadalupe unity and cooperation
13 F student Guadalupe open to everyone, nice venue for eating
14 M Student Guadalupe parks and playgrounds
16 F Student Guadalupe budget for the center
17 M Student Guadalupe budget for the center
19 F Student Banawa
19 M Kitchen staff Guadalupe
20 F none Guadalupe place to keep healthy through activities
20 M Student Guadalupe gather the community for unity and safety
20 M Student Guadalupe a place to make the seniors happy
20 M Fire volunteer Banawa A center that supports different socioeconomics
21 M Fire volunteer Guadalupe internet place
22 M Fire volunteer Guadalupe basketball court
22 M Fire volunteer Banawa clinic center
23 F online English tutor Guadalupe generating jobs for people that are unemployed
23 M Student Guadalupe hospital
23 M Student Guadalupe a center for youth educational seminars
24 F Fire volunteer Guadalupe important skills to the youth for better futures
26 F Staff Guadalupe parks for the youth and elderly w/ food stands
26 M Fire volunteer Banawa sports club
29 F DSWD Employee Banawa should have business aspects & fitness gym
31 F HR assist Banawa accessible to all
34 F none Englis health center for seniors
35 M customer service Guadalupe facilities for events, activities. Food, clinics
39 F Secretary Banawa place to start small businesses
39 M Banker Guadalupe center for events & services to aid community
41 M BPSO Englis livelihood training center
41 F Law desk officer Banawa livelihood training center
43 M Habal2 Driver Guadalupe park
48 F GSO Clerk Guadalupe Parks and playground for the youth
52 M Habal2 Driver Banawa a center to create opportunities for the youth
53 M Driver Banawa sports center
58 M Fire volunteer Guadalupe sports center
61 F Embroiderer Banawa function rooms for activities
67 F Barangay worker Englis center that helps the livelihood of the people
70 F Labandera Banawa small work opportunities for the youth
56

8. The respondents voted for what they would want for their community center.
SELF-IMPROVEMENT WITH THE COMMUNITY CENTER

Social Skills and
Interaction
creativity 14%
7%
business Hands-on skills

12% (crafting and
building)
13%
Livelihood
training
Hobbies
17%
10%
Health Academics
17% 10%
9. Majority of the respondents agree that putting up a community center will help the community.
Do you think a Community center will improve

the community?
not sure
6%
yes
94%
Conclusion:
Majority of the respondents are already contented with their community, however they are more concerned with
the practicality such as their health, livelihood training too produce income, and awareness for people about
the garbage issues. The awareness can be solved through interactive seminars that will aim for a more
sustainable lifestyle such as producing simple goods at home, and education on recycling.
57


4.6 Related Building Codes
(National Building Code, Plumbing and Electrical and Fire Code of the Philippines)
The building typology of the Proposed Community Hub is under Type 3b: Educational, Social, and Institutional
concert halls.
Minimum Setback:
20 meter road right of way, front is 6 meters, side is 3 meters, rear is 3 meters
The vacant space left by the setback may be used for open space with separation from any permanent public
open space with free flow and ventilation. Uncovered driveways, access roads and parking spaces shall be open
and uninstructive.
4.6.1 National Building Code of the Philippines
Light and Ventilation
The purpose for this requirement is to guide the designers to provide each and every building adequate lighting
and proper ventilation.
1. Ceiling Heights- Habitable spaces with artificial ventilation shall have a floor to ceiling height not less
than 2.4 meters, while habitable spaces with natural ventilation shall be not less than 2.7 meters. The
minimum ceiling height for a multi-storey building shall be 2.7 meters for the first storey, 2.4 meters
for the second storey, and the succeeding storeys have unobstructed typical headroom clearance of
not less than 2.1 meters above the finished floor line. The minimum for a Mezzanine floor shall be 1.80
meter clear ceiling height.
2. Window Openings- The total free area of openings shall be equal to at least 10% of the floor area of
the room that shall open to an unobstructed court, yard, alley, etc.

Sanitation
All buildings shall be provided with adequate and potable water supply, plumbing, installation, suitable waste
disposal, storm drainage, and health protection to users.
1. Wastewater Disposal System- Sanitary Sewage from the building shall be discharged directly into the
nearest street sanitary sewer of the existing city sanitary sewage system.
2. Storm Drainage System- Rainwater drainage shall not be mixed with the sanitary sewer system.
3. Pest and Vermin Control- Garbage bins shall be provided with protection against entry for pests and
vermins. And dining rooms for public use without artificial ventilation shall be screened.
Parking and Loading Space Requirement
For every 50 sqm GFA of the building shall be equal to 1 parking slot and an additional PWD parking slot for
every 50 slots up to 150 parking slots and additional slot for every 100 slots thereafter. The chart below are the
additional minimum parking dimension requirements.
PARKING SLOT DIMENSIONS
Average automobile 2.50 m. x 5.00 m.
Bus 3.60 m. x 12.00 m.
Jeepney / Shuttle Loading and Unloading 3.00 m. x 9.00 m.
Bicycle 0.65 m. x 2.40 m. (inclined)
59

4.6.2 Fire Code of the Philippines
Stairways
Width stairways with an occupant load of 50 or less may have a width of 0.9 meters, and those with an occupant
load of 50 or more must have a width of not less than 1.1 meters. Handrails should not reduce the required with
by more than 100 millimeters.
1. Rise and Run- The rise of every step in a stairway shall not exceed 200mm and the run shall not be less
than 250mm. A maximum variation of 5mm in the height of risers and the width of treads is acceptable.
Every tread less than 25 cm shall have nosing. Slanted nosings are preferable compared to
projected nosings and open stringers because people in crutches may get caught.
2. Landings- Width of landings shall have the same dimension with the stairways. Landings when provided
shall not be reduced by more than 100mm by a door when fully open. Headroom Clearance for every
required stairway must not be less than 2.0 meters.
60

Ramps
Ramps should have a minimum clear width of 1.2 meters and a maximum gradient of 1:12 with lengths not more
than 6.0 meters, in cases where ramps having a 1:12 gradient exceeds 6.0 meters, landings should be provided
with length not less than 1.5 meters. The top and bottom of ramps should be provided with a level area of not
less than 1.8 meters in length. Ramps should be equipped with handrails.
Exits
Building should provide exits of kinds, numbers, location and capacity appropriate to the building with regard to
the character to the occupancy, the number of occupants, the fire protection available and the height and type
of construction of the building, to give all occupants convenient facilities for escape.
The exits should be free and unobstructed egress at all times. It should always be remained open and no locks
for quick escapes during emergencies.
Exits should also be visible and must be properly marked to prevent confusion from other egresses, and the
route of exits must be arranged and marked leading to the place of safety outside the structure. All egresses
must be well lit for easy recognition.
1. Egress Capacity and Occupant Load- The occupant load for any storey is more than 500 but not
more than 1000 shall have a minimum of 3 egress and in excess shall be not less than 4.
2. Required Width- The total width of exits in meters shall not be less than the total occupant load
served by 165. The width of exits shall be divided approximately equally among the separate exits.
61

3. Arrangement of Exits- These exits shall be located ½ of the length of the maximum diagonal
dimension of the building and shall be linear to avoid disruption.
4. Travel Distance- The travel distance to an exit from any point in a building not protected by
automatic fire suppression systems shall not exceed 46.0 meters. If protected, it should not exceed
61.0 meters in any building.
5. Access to Exits- Exit access should be arranged to be clearly recognizable and shall not be close
to an area of high hazard. Exits access shall not be through a bathroom, bedroom or other room
subject to locking except where the exit will serve only the bathroom, or other rooms subject to
locking.
6. Discharge from Exits- All exits shall terminate directly to a public yard, court, open space or other
portions of exit discharge.
7. Headroom-The means of egress shall be designed to provide an adequate headroom of not less
than 2.3 meters.
8. Changes in Elevation- Any changes in elevation for any means of egress shall be linked by stairs or
ramps conforming to the requirements.
62

Fire Escape Stairs
Fire escape stairs shall not constitute more than 50% of the required exit capacity, and must have an uninstructive
safe path of travel to the ground.
There are two types which are the return platform types with superimposed runs and the straight run type with
platforms continuing in the same direction. Either of these may be parallel to or at a right angle to the building.
These may be attached or independent to the building.
63

4.6.3 BP 344 Accessibility Law
Minimum requirements for accessibility for the disabled persons
Inside Buildings
1. Entrances- The entrance of any building must be accessible from the place of arrival to the interior
lobby. Ramps should be provided at entrances where level of the site arrival grade is not of the same
level as of the entrances.
2. Doors- A minimum of 0.9 meters in width is required
for all doors. A 1.5 meters clear level space should
be provided before and extending beyond the door,
however, if the door open unto a corridor, it may have
a clear level space the same as that of the corridor
which is a minimum of 1.2 meters in width. Out
swinging doors should be provided at the storage
rooms, closets and accessible restroom stalls.
Doorknobs with a height of 0.9 meters for the floor
level is preferred, while vertical pull handles are to be
centered as 1.06 meters in height above floor level.
64

3. Corridors- Corridors shall have a minimum clear width of 1.2 meters and should not be obstructed by
waiting areas and other facilities or spaces. Recesses or turnabout spaces should be provided for the
wheelchairs to turn around or to enable another wheelchair to pass by, the minimum area of 1.5 by 1.5
meters with a maximum spacing at every 12 meters is required. Just like in walkways, the corridors must
be of constant level and have a slip-resistant surface
4. Washroom and Toilet- PWD washrooms and toilet
must be wheelchair accessible. Water closet stalls
must have a minimum area of 1.7 by 1.8 meters
and must be equipped with grab bars. A turning
space outside but adjacent to the water closet stall
shall have a minimum area of 1.5 by 1.5 meters.
There should be one water closet for disabled in
every floor level for every 20 water closets. Two water
closets for disabled if required where the number of water closets exceeds 20.
Outside and around Buildings
1. Dropped Curbs- Curb as defined, is a raised rim of concrete, stone or metal which forms the edge of
street, sidewalk, planted area, etc.
Dropped curbs are to be applied in walkways where change in level is to be done and should be ramped towards
adjoining curbs with a gradient not more than 1:12. Dropped curbs must be sloped towards the road with the
maximum gradient of 1:20 to prevent water from collecting at the walkway.
2. Walkways and Passage Ways- The minimum width of walkways should be 1:20 meters, if not, it must
have a gradient of not more than 1:20 or 5% and should have a cross gradient of 1:100 or 1%. If
possible walkways should be straightforward with right angle turns to guide the blind. In cases where
there is a lengthy walkway, a space for rest stop or turning wheeled chair should be provided. These
spaces should have a minimum dimension of 1:50 meters spaced in a maximum distance of 12 meters.
65

3. Handrails- Handrails should be installed at both sides of ramps and at the outer edges of dropped curbs
and must have heights of both 0.9 and 0.7 above steps or ramps.
4. Signages- Signages, both directional and informational, should be located at points conveniently seen
even by persons on wheelchair and those visual impairment. International symbols for access should be
used to designate routes and facilities that are
accessible and a maximum height of 1.6 meters.
Requirements mentioned above can also be applied
to spaces inside building structures.
5. Parking Areas- Parking for handicaps should be
1 slot for every 50 slots up to 150 parking slots
and additional slot for every 100 slots thereafter.
They must be located nearest to the possible
accessible entrances of the facility. The PWD
parking slots should have a minimum width of
3.70 meters. A 1.20 m. walkway such as
pavement markings should also be provided.
Outdoor parking spaces shall be located not more than 50 m from the nearest accessible building
entrance. Indoor parking spaces shall be located right next to accessible elevators, or as close to
possible exits.
66

4.6.4 Plumbing Code
Plumbing Fixtures Requirement for Public Building
Water Closet WC
Gender (fixture per person) Urinals Lavatory
1 WC:1-100 1:1-100
2 WC:101-200 2:101-200
MALE 3 WC:201-400 3 :201-400
(add 1 fixture for each 4: 401-600 1:1-200 pax
additional 500 male) (add 1 fixture for each 2: 201-400 pax
additional 300 male) 3 :401-750 pax
1 WC:1-200 (add 1 fixture for each

2 WC:201-400 additional 500 people)
FEMALE 3 WC:401-750
(add 1 fixture for each
-
additional 550 female)
EMPLOYEES
1 WC:1-15
2 WC:16-35 1:10-50
MALE 3 WC:36-55 (Add 1 fixture for each
(add 1 fixture for each additional male)
1 per 10 or less people
additional 40 people)
FEMALE
Table ... Plumbing Fixture Requirement
67

4.7 Plan and Design Standards
4.7.1 Planning, Furniture Standards
TALE: Social and Cultural Zone
List of Spaces:
1. Drop-off area- it should be at least 3.60 m wide for the allowance of a PWD to be dropped-off. It shall
incorporate an aisle of 1.20 m wide to allow for maneuvering. The length should accommodate at least
2 cars. There shall be appropriate curb ramps to facilitate circulation for the paved surfaces. When there
is no curb to mark a separation between pedestrian and vehicles, bollards or tactile marking strips at
60 mm wide must be set up to guide sightless pedestrians. A canopy with seating facilities is
recommended for the passenger loading zones.
2. Lobby
3. Information Center
4. Indoor Events Pavilion
68

Management Zone
The office operation must have a synchronized operation, with an efficient and flexible layout that can size
according to the number of team members. The planning must adapt to the different working environments such
as a controlled environment for the more serious operations and a creative environment to maximize the create
flow for the team.
1. Management Offices- the management
offices operate in a controlled environment
that relies on efficiency. Therefore, it shall
be planned in such a way that there are less
disturbances and more efficient way to pass
out information.
a. Management Head Office
b. Management Team
c. Accounting Office
Image from concept diagram
2. Marketing Offices- the marketing offices require a more flexible and creative environment because the
team comes up with ideas and productions that keep the center interesting.
a. Marketing head
b. Marketing team
c. Advertising Team
d. Activities Director
e. Events Coordinator
3. Conference Room
4. Security Office
5. CCTV room
6. Pantry and Lounge
69

LIFE: Wellness and Activity Zone
1. Clinic
1. Adjacent to the examination
table, a clear floor space of
1.20 x 0.80 m minimum shall
be done for slide transfers.
2. An adjustable examination
table suitable for the different
types of people.
3. A space that allows the staff
to assist the person.
4. A sizeable floor space that
will allow free movements.
5. Access route that connects
to the public
6. A minimum of 0.90 m wide
door with a 90-degree door
opening.
7. Maneuvering clearances.
70

2. Fitness Center - A fitness center is typically separated by the different zones as indicated by the
Inclusive Fitness Initiative (IFI). These zones are determined by the equipment or the type of exercise.
a. Stretch Area – for the first warm up. It should be located strategically close to the entrance, to
promote the use.
b. Cardiovascular Area
c. Resistance Area- these involve heavy machines used for strength training.
d. Free Weights Area- typically used for body builders, they must be zoned away from busy
areas to avoid injury.
e. Stretch Area- for the last area used for cooling down
f. Small Activities Room- these are for special group exercises that require A/V equipment.
g. Shower and Locker Room
Fitness Center
User Flow
A fitness center is typically separated by the different zones as
indicated by Inclusive Fitness Initiative (IFI). These zones are
determined by the equipment or the type of exercise. The typical user
may use the gym in the following sequence:
71

Stretch Area Equipment
The stretch area is open in plan giving options for the users to use yoga mats, yoga balls and other
accessories may also be used for warming up. Storage should be provided for loose equipment to be stored.
Cardiovascular (CV) Area
Cardio equipment would normally include a number of machines with a different form of exercise. The average
user may spend between 20-30 minutes on each piece of equipment. They are arranged in rows, facing towards
an AV system. Some of the equipment can cause impact vibration, particularly the running machines, so their
position will need special consideration. The equipment may include the following:
• Tread or Running machines
• Upper Body Ergometers
• Cross trainers
• Bicycles
• Step machines
• Rowing machines
Resistance Area
A minimum of 8-10 pieces of resistance equipment may provide an adequate range of exercises for most
users depending on its strategic functions and diversity. These equipment should be zoned by the exercise
type, allowing a strategic circulation.
Provisional Level gym facility, these are the basic equipment for the Resistance Area:
• Leg curl
• Leg Press
• Upper body multi-station and small loose equipment such as low weight dumbbells
72

Free Weights Area
1. Dumbbell weights are typically on open racks grouped in weight ranges, with additional benches and
stands provided for heavier barbell weights.
2. The heavier weights area should be positioned at the back of the fitness gym space where there is less
foot traffic because these weights might cause injury to the non-users.
Shower and Locker Room
The changing rooms shall be 25 - 35% of the number of workstations to avoid underutilization.
Space Requirements
SPACE MACHINE FOOTPRINT RANGE CIRCULATION

Resistance area 2m²/machine 1.75 x machine footprint
Cardio Vascular area 1.5m²/machine 1.75 x machine footprint
2m²/machine
Free weights area 2.5 m²/machine 2 x machine footprint
3.5 m²/machine
Stretch area 2m²/person N/A
2.5 m²/person
Spinning Room 1.0m²/machine 1.25 x machine footprint
1.5m²/machine
1 Circulation includes the area around the machine and the minimum aisle width to access the machine, but does not
include the general circulation of the room.
Equipment space requirements
SPACE STORAGE DETAILS AREA

Fitness gym Equipment spares 20 m²
Machines awaiting repair
Tools & cleaning equipment
Promotional materials
Small valuables e.g. stopwatch

Activities room Audio visual system 2 m² minimum
73

HYPE: Food and Entertainment Zone
Markets and food stalls can bring the community together; it is part of our culture as Cebuanos. And
Guadalupe is thriving with small family-owned karenderias and food stalls. The purpose is to uplift the local
businesses by incorporating a locale. There shall be two types of food markets, the Covered Market which are
covered flexible indoor spaces to accommodate the different stalls and events. The next is the Open Air Market
which are the temporary operating once or twice a week, such as a weekend farmer’s market.
Dimension of a small Market stall
Image from Camden Lock Market
74

ZEN: Learning and Meditation Zone
Bookcafe
Seating Dimensions
Image source from arquiteturanaescale
Yoga Room
This space practices the discipline that focuses on the human being’s physical, psychological and
spiritual needs. The space must have an environment for reflection, introspection, and healing.
The main Yoga room is a free plan that is flexible and adaptable for different uses. The dimensions are
placed after the dimensions of a yoga mat, which is the primary item used. It is suggested that atleast 50 cm
space allowance between each mats to allow free movement for the users.
It is good to have shelves for the users to leave their items such as personal belongings, and shelves for yoga
equipment such as mats, bands, and blocks. In a typical yoga room, there are mirrors on one or more walls.
Image source from goCstudio
75

PARK PLAZA: Outdoor Entertainment Zone
Basketball court dimension
Image source from Merriam-Webster
4.7.1 Design Standards
Color theory
With the Color theory chart, this will serve as a guide to choosing the rights colors that affect the
psychology of the space.
Image source from Dirigo
76

4.8 Site Selection
4.8.1 Site Selection Criteria
This section is the method of site selection based on 6 major criteria that go through the process of a
point system that evaluates the different plots in order to ensure that the final site meets the standards based
from Urban Planning Principles.
Comfort and Image- This is the visual aspect of the the site selection which is first determinant that can attract
or repel the potential users.
1. Welcoming- an open and positive atmosphere that is suitable for families
2. Safety from Human threats- security watch and low crime rates associated to the vicinity
3. Visual Appearance of Site- greenery and views
4. Cleanliness of surrounding vicinity- the vicinity must be well-maintained
Access and Linkage- This is the way finding aspect of the site selection where the site is easily accessible to the
site.
1. Visibility from the main road- the project will be easily distinguished from the traffic
2. Proximity to residences- the closer to the potential users, the better
3. Proximity to city center- it can be accessed to and from the city center
4. Proximity to medical facilities- access for emergencies
5. Traffic and Congestion- the purpose is to decongest from the main traffic
6. Zoning of the adjacent properties- it shall be zoned close the the commercial establishments, as
not to disturb the residential areas.
7. Accessibility of Public Transport- jeepney route
8. Accessible to Pedestrians – walkable distance
Availability of Utilities- This is the convenience aspect of the site selection where the basic needs for a structure
to fully function.
1. Power- access to power lines
77

2. Water- access to MCWD
3. Communication Lines- access to telephones, cellular signals and etc
4. Sewage system- access to sewage lines and drainage systems
5. Roads and Sidewalks- development of proper roads and sidewalks
Weakness- These are the threats that affect the project
1. Away from similar Establishments- away from public gyms and similar facilities
Environmental Factors
1. Topography- soil type and landslide risks
2. Hydrology- flooding and proximity to bodies of water
3. Orientation- sun and wind orientation
Expandability- Adjacent to a plot that can be used for future development when expansion is considered.
4.8.2 Point System
Comfort and Image = 20%
1. Welcoming = 10 points (+)
2. Safety from Human threats = 60 points (+)
3. Visual Appearance of Site = 10 points (+)
4. Cleanliness of surrounding vicinity = 20 points (+)
Access and Linkage = 25%
1. Visibility from the main road = 20 points (+)
2. Proximity to residences = 20 points (+)
3. Proximity to city center = 5 points (+)
78

4. Proximity to medical facilities = 10 points (+)
5. Traffic and Congestion = 15 points (+)
6. Zoning of the adjacent properties = 10 points (+)
7. Accessibility of Public Transport = 10 points (+)
8. Accessible to Pedestrians = 10 points (+)
Availability of Utilities = 15%
1. Power = 20 points (+)
2. Water = 20 points (+)
3. Communication Lines = 20 points (+)
4. Sewage system = 20 points (+)
5. Roads and Sidewalks = 20 points (+)
Weakness = 10%
1. Away from similar Establishments = 100 points (+)
Environmental Factors = 20%
1. Topography = 40 points (+)
2. Hydrology = 40 points (+)
3. Orientation = 20 points (+)
Expandability = 10%
1. Adjacent to available plot = 100 points (+)
79

4.8.3 Site Selection
This section compares the data and analyses the three potential plots based on the criteria above. All
the plots are located within the boundary of Barangay Guadalupe which is a highly residential area.
Site 1 falls under the Guadalupe area, and is close to the Barangay Hall. Site 2 and 3 are located in the Banawa
area.
80

Comfort and Image
Site 1 is in a dense area where the
adjacent lots have a height no taller than
2-storeys.
Site 2 is in an area where the
establishments are wider spread. With
buildings not taller than 2-storeys, the
views all around are visible.
Site 3 is uphill in a more secluded area
where buildings are mid-rise.
81

Access and Linkage
• Proximity to City Center- the city centers can easily be accessed through public transportations
• Proximity to Medical Facilities
82

• Traffic and Congestion
The traffic data generated from google maps shows that the Guadalupe area has a moderate traffic
and the Banawa area has light traffic.
83

• Zoning of the adjacent properties- All the plots are located in the zoned Residential area. Site 1 is
located adjacent to the residences and close to the Barangay Hall. Site 2 is located in Paseo Arcenas
which consists of a mixed residential area and is zoned with the commercial and BPO zones, which
fits the criteria. Site 3 is close to the residential areas and is right across Apple One Banawa Heights.
• Access from public Transport and Pedestrians- Site 1 has more access to public transport that come
from Colon, C. Padilla, Ayala, and SM which are the major points in city and fits the requirements.
Site 2 and 3 have the same route that come from Labangon, Ayala, and Carbon which are meets the
basic requirement.
84

Weakness
1. There is currently one public
sports complex in Barangay
Guadalupe which is right next to
the Barangay Hall. The purpose
of this sports complex is to hold
public events such as mass. The
rest within the 1.5 km radius are
private gyms in private
institutions of Labangon.
2. There is one Public Market in
Barangay Guadalupe which is
located at the confluence
between Guadalupe and Banawa
area.
3. The dominant types of places
to eat in Barangay Guadalupe are
mom and pop karenderias.
85

Environmental Factors
• Geologic Map- The data was collected from the Cebu City GIS center which indicates that the Site 1 is
composed of Quarternary Alluvium, and Site 2 and 3 is composed of the Carcar formation.
• Landforms Map - The data was collected from the Cebu City GIS center which indicates that the
selected plots belong to lowland.
86

• Elevation Map- The data was collected from the Cebu City GIS center which indicates that the
selected plots have an elevation between 0-200 mts.
• Topographic Map - The data was collected from the National Mapping and Resource Information
Authority (NAMRIA) which indicates the slope of the plots. Site 3 has the highest elevation point of 75
mts. above sea level, Site 2 has an elevation point of 40 mts. above sea level, and Site 1 has the
lowest elevation point which is 35 mts. above sea level.
87

• Flood Map- The data was collected from the Mines and Geosciences Bureau of the Philippines (MGB)
which indicates that Site 1 has a low to moderate susceptibility to flooding which poses a risk for the
project. Site 2 and 3 are not susceptible to flooding which fits the standard criteria.
88

Site 1
CATEGORY STRENGTHS WEAKNESS

COMFORT AND IMAGE Small community atmosphere Appears closed off and hidden
Located close to the Barangay Hall Site cannot be seen from main road
ACCESS AND LINKAGE Adjacent to residential area Can disturb the residences
Access by multiple public transportation Area will be too busy
WEAKNESS - Guadalupe Sports Complex

AVAILABILITY OF
UTILITIES Available drainage system Too much trash
EVIRNOMENTAL
FACTORS - Low elevator
EXPANDABILITY Site is 2.5 hectares limited to 2.5 hectares

CATEGORY OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
COMFORT AND IMAGE Welcoming to families Overcrowding
Barangay Hall is the indicator for the Hub Difficult way finding
ACCESS AND LINKAGE Potential users Noise Complaints
Easy access for potential users Traffic and noise from the road
They go to the Sports Complex
WEAKNESS Potential users are close-by instead
AVAILABILITY OF
UTILITIES Rainwater goes to drainage Clogged drainage
EVIRNOMENTAL
FACTORS - Susceptible to flooding
Enough space for parks to be as noise
EXPANDABILITY buffers cannot expand further
89

Site 2
The site is located in Paseo Arcenas which is close to the R.Duterte Street that connects Banawa to
Labangon.
CATEGORY STRENGTHS WEAKNESS

COMFORT AND IMAGE Open and welcoming atmosphere could attract bad people
Visibility from the main road Could be far from the main road
ACCESS AND LINKAGE Zoned in commercial area Can disturb the nearby residences
Access by multiple public transportation Area will be too busy
WEAKNESS Few places to eat close by Lack of interesting tenants
AVAILABILITY OF UTILITIES Lot slopes down to street Trash thrown around
EVIRNOMENTAL FACTORS High elevation -
EXPANDABILITY Site fits the program at 1.2 hectares Expansion is costly

CATEGORY OPPORTUNITIES THREATS
COMFORT AND IMAGE Families and the youth are encouraged No one shows up
Easy access Lack of encouragement to explore

ACCESS AND LINKAGE Target users will be attracted Noise Complaints
Easy access for potential users Traffic and noise from the road
WEAKNESS Project will be the new locale Restaurants to open up close-by
AVAILABILITY OF UTILITIES Easy for drainage Clogged drainage
EVIRNOMENTAL FACTORS Avoid susceptibility to flooding Flooding rises

Sudden claims to expandable
EXPANDABILITY Can expand towards residential land
90

A Prposed Community Hub

Transféré par

Informations du document

Description originale:

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

A Prposed Community Hub

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

A Proposed Community Hub

Presented to the School of Architecture, Fine Arts and Design

of the University of San Carlos

of the Requirements for the Degree

Bachelor of Science in Architecture

for acceptance and approval.

OF SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE, with a grade of .

for that I am very grateful.

growth beyond their own comfort.

RATIONALE OF THE STUDY 9-10

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM 11

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY 12-13

SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 14

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 19

SOCIAL COHESION 20-21

INTERACTIVE LEARNING FOR THE YOUTH 22-23

GENIUS LOCI, THE SPIRIT OF PLACE 24-25

COMMUNITIES AND PUBLIC SPACE 26-28

GOALS FOR A GOOD ENVIRONMENT 29

YWCA BUILDING SITE 31

COMMUNITY FACILITIES ARCHITECTURE 32-35

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 36

CHAPTER 4: DATA PRESENTATION 40

SURVEYS AND INTERVIEWS 48-58

BUILDING CODES & REQUIREMENTS 59-68

PLAN AND DESIGN STANDARDS 69-79

SITE SELECTION 80-95

SITE ANALYSIS 98-101

LIST OF SPACES 102

SPACE RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAMS 103-106

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS 108

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 107-111

CHAPTER 6: SOLUTIONS 113-158

1 Rationale of the Study

they have been "cohered" to that society.

build their hierarchy of needs.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

1. How to design a community specific to the community and its’ context?

1.1 What are the government programs for the community?

1.2 What is the community’s expectation for a community space?

1.3 What are the activities and priorities of the community?

2.1 What are the qualified core programs?

2.2 How will they be zoned?

community programs, and those with an active role in the community

envision for a quality public space.

2. To identify the core qualities from Urban Design.

2.2 To zone the spaces according to the priorities.

1.3 Significance of the Study

can be beneficial for the local economy:

Urban Design Significance:

help families participate together to increase family ties.

the quality of life for the community.

and the workplace by letting them experience one another’s perspective.

1.4 Scope and Limitations of the Study

solid waste disposal area shall not be included

1.4 Theoretical Framework

Image from Project for Public Spaces

In this time and age, each age

group is influenced by the different

experiences they underwent e.g. post

war, boom of technology, stock

market crash, digital phones,

• tangible landscape, which involves traditional cultural patterns and components  

and traditional environmental knowledge.  

• Availability of differing unit sizes and costs of property; 