1 vues

Transféré par krishna2205

Education

- Quantum Physics Meets Biology
- Entanglement The Greatest Mystery in Physics By Amir D. Aczel (Abee).pdf
- 38529721-Chapter-1
- Stapp_Quantum Mechanical Coherence, Resonance, And Mind
- The universe in a quantum
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee6319.501 06f taught by William Frensley (frensley)
- From Soap Bubbles to String Theory-Yoni Kahn
- Modern Physics 2013
- Winitzki - Randomness and Reality in Quantum Mechanics
- 038117y
- 1994 Quantum Statistics
- Gerry C., Knight P. - Introductory quantum optics (CUP, 2004).pdf
- Switching and Queuing Delay Models 253
- The quantum-to-classical transition: Bohr’s doctrine of classical concepts, emergent classicality, and decoherence
- History of Quantum Mechanics
- MPRA_paper_66983.pdf
- tmpBD2A.tmp
- e195304.pdf
- What Quantum Physics can teach us about the Soul’s Will
- 1367-2630_12_3_033015

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

I'm really interested in quantum physics and would like to learn more. However, I don't know where to start and in what order I should learn things. So,

ideally I'm looking for some sort of roadmap of what to learn. What physics topics do I need to know to start learning about quantum mechanics? (In

addition to the mathematical topics mentioned at What is the math knowledge necessary for starting Quantum Mechanics?)

My current knowledge is mostly popular science stuff, like tv shows on Discovery Science and National Geographic Channel. So I have a basic

understanding of some basic principals. There's also a recent lecture from Brian Cox that I have watched which gave a bit more in-depth information.

quantum-mechanics education

Community ♦ Simon Verbeke

1 334 2 6 12

Questions on Physics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for

improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Hi Simon - the problem with this question is that it's way too open-ended. But I'll close it as a duplicate of an earlier question we have about learning physics so that you have somewhere to

look for resources. I'm not sure whether that earlier question should even be open, but that will have to be decided separately. – David Z ♦ Jan 8 '12 at 2:43

I was hoping there would have been some sort of generally accepted roadmap in the sense of 'first you need to learn x to be able to understand y, after which you can learn z.' But apparently

there isn't such a thing? The other question has some interesting resources though :) – Simon Verbeke Jan 8 '12 at 2:50

Oh, OK, I see what you're asking now. Physics education generally does follow a standard progression (in part) and it should be fine to ask about that. Hopefully you won't mind if I try to

clarify that that's what you're looking for, though. If any of the edits I'm about to make are inaccurate, feel free to improve them. – David Z ♦ Jan 8 '12 at 3:25

I threw in a link to another question that includes mathematical prerequisites to learning QM. – David Z ♦ Jan 8 '12 at 3:30

@DavidZaslavsky Thank you very much for reopening the question. – Simon Verbeke Jan 8 '12 at 15:23

9 Answers

I would suggest that you don't do any preliminary reading, and just learn QM directly. There is not

much to it, the requisite background is very primitive linear algebra, and Dirac's book "The Principles

of Quantum Mechanics" and Feynman's "Lectures on Physics Vol III" can be read with Wikipedia help

without any prerequisites.

The classical mechanics you need to know is not very sophisticated either--- you just need to know

Newton's laws, and how they come from a Lagrangian or Hamiltonian, which is covered in standard

sources. You don't need so much deep stuff, although knowing Poisson brackets is handy for seeing the

vestigial quantumness in the classical mechanics structure.

I would suggest reading the following Wikipedia pages for a historical perspective, which helps a lot

with historical literature:

Adiabatic invariant

Correspondence principle

Matrix mechanics

This is wrongly left out of most books, and this is a shame. There is no unified presentation of the

historical material except on Wikipedia, and this is why these pages are up there. Once you get the

historical stuff (it's not a lot), Dirac gives a conceptually self-contained introduction to the

mathematics, the notation, and the physics, while Feynman is path-integral friendly, so you can go on

to read Feynman and Hibbs, or Mandelstam and Yourgrau without any delay.

It is usually a waste of time to try to go through prerequisites, as these are usually boring and most of

the material doesn't end up getting used. For QM, you need to come in knowing what a matrix is, and

what an eigenvalue is, which is probably best learned from Dirac.

This site uses cookies to deliver our services and to show you relevant ads and job listings. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our

answered Oct 21 '12 at 1:48

Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy, and our Terms of Service. Your use of Stack Overflow’s Products and Services, including the Stack Overflow Network, is subject to these

Ron Maimon

policies and terms. 1

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/19262/whats-the-standard-roadmap-to-learning-quantum-physics 1/4

9/10/2018 education - What's the standard "roadmap" to learning quantum physics? - Physics Stack Exchange

Thank you for taking the time to post this answer and I hope, if you live in America, that you have a Happy Thanksgiving. If

not, just have a nice day. – Simply Beautiful Art Nov 24 '16 at 23:27

I'm sorry to tell you that anything you learn on TV about quantum mechanics is useless. Not many

people in the world understand quantum mechanics and many of thouse who claim to, are either naive

or liers. I don't understand quantum mechanics, but I could calculate you things, even explain a model

of the hydrogen atom. Quantum mechanics is not "just" understanding, it's about BREAKING all your

concepts, it will destroy every notion you have up to this moment. With this said, I recomend you this

college-like path:

Algebra and analysis: vectorial spaces, integrals, diferential equations are BASIC, so go deep into

them, specially vectorial spaces so you can "upgrade" to tensors from there.

While learning the basics of algebra and analysis you should learn about newtonian mechanics and

maxwell electromagnetics (in that order).

Once you have donde it, learn everything about newtonian mechanics again using the lagrange and

hamilton formulation. In that moment you will be able to mix maxwell electromagnetics and

newtonian physics.

If you really want to go deep you should make some digging in the special relativity, but that is

somehow optional... (not if you want real understanding).

Now start with old quantum mechanics books, not very similar to modern physics, but absolutly

necesary if you want to understand WHY did we go the way we went.

In this point you actually know something about QM and you are ready to learn the Dirac

principles and finally destroy every concept about reality you had before starting this path.

This could be a 2-4 years project, but it is possible. I would recomend you go to lessons (in my country

you can go without paying, but they won't give you the certificate). Good luck.

Note: after ALL THAT, you will get a lot of profit by reading the EPR paradox, Bohr & Heisenbrerg

opinion about quantum mechanics, and of course the Bell article about entangled particles. Don't get

mixed up by von Neumann's principles, in my humble opinion I think he was way too mathematician to

understand the deep of bohr and heisenberg thinking. And by the way, if you ever don't understand

something, you are doing it right.

Gerard

191 1 1

I think the usual way as they take it at a university is pretty much the time efficient way to go. The math

and *at least* Classical Mechanics will be necessary.

Nobel Laureate Gerard 't Hooft at one put together a selection of introductions in a roadmap style

click

The navigation system on that site doesn't work for me anymore. But the important part, the links on

the right hand side, work.

Calmarius Nikolaj-K

3,597 3 24 59 3,053 3 25 69

Very interesting indeed :) Looks like a good roadmap. – Simon Verbeke Jan 8 '12 at 18:02

I don't think there is a standard roadmap because it depends very much on what you're trying to

achieve. I first learned QM when doing a Chemistry degree, and that was heavily focussed on the

Schrodinger equation and time independant solutions. My friends doing Physics took a more abstract

and mathematical approach.

From your question I'd guess you're looking for something like a tradition popular science book but

more rigorous. The trouble is that QM doesn't lend itself to this approach. It isn't like general relativity,

where you can imagine rubber sheets and get a reasonable idea of what is going on. There isn't any

simple mental image of QM you can work with. The only good way to learn it is to get stuck into the

mathematics.

You

This sitemight want totohave

uses cookies a look

deliver at Susskind's

our services and to lectures

show youfor non-physicists.

relevant ads and job See

listings. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2h1E3YJMKfA

, , and our . Yourfor the

use of first

Stacklecture andProducts

Overflow’s search YouTube for the

and Services, including the Stack Overflow Network, is subject to these

others. I thought

policies and terms. they were rather slow moving and only had the patience to watch a couple of lectures,

but they seemed to me to give a reasonably simple but rigorous introduction to QM.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/19262/whats-the-standard-roadmap-to-learning-quantum-physics 2/4

9/10/2018 education - What's the standard "roadmap" to learning quantum physics? - Physics Stack Exchange

John Rennie

263k 41 512 761

The rubber sheet doesn't work for GR, and for QM, there are some nice visualizations, like Pauling's orbital pictures. –

Ron Maimon Oct 21 '12 at 1:38

Like Rennie said there is no standard roadmap for learning quantum mechanics. Even though there is

no standard way of learning QM I'll show you one of the possible ways of doing so. I'll assume you have

the basic highschool math tools: You will need a basig calculus course, one good book for that is:

Calculus,Stewart a general and simple but a good approach. Take a look at the MIT calculus courses (I

and multivariable calculus); Then you will need at least one general linear algebra book: Linear algebra

from Hoffman would be my choice but Kunze is also very good. Then you should have a notion on

probabilities and statistics. For that I would suggest John E.Freund Statistics a first course as an

introduction and then you should pick up one more heavy probabilities and statistics book you like. the

one I mentioned won't be enough in my opinion. You will need to know a book about differential

equations "elements of ordinary differential equations and boundary value problems" will do just fine

even though it is a bit introductory a more complex book after that one would be good. Then to finish

your mathmatical preparation you will need to know Fourier analysis for that I suggest for a basic

approach a book not exactly about Fourier analysis but a book that has a very good approach (in my

opinion) Signals and Systems, Oppenimer.

If you study and Understand all the topics above you will be able to learn QM with no problem. A good

with a somehow historical introduction to QM is Modern Physics from Krane but this one is just a

transposition from classical to QM not really a QM book. As a QM book quantum mechanics, Claude

Cohen-Tannoudji is a good book.

There are two things I must say: 1st a knowledge of the mathmatical tools isn't enough you will need to

know Newtonian Mechanics and Electromagnetism along with an introduction to relativity AT LEAST.

2nd if you do want to learn QM be aware that it will shape the way you see the world for it will show you

how little we know about it. It will show you how complex the laws governing our universe are.

Good luck.

Jose Moreira

21 1

Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics by J. Von Neumman.

An Introduction to Quantum Theory by Keith Hannabus.

Now because of your interest ( according to your profile ) on computer science, you may want to read

something about quantum computing. For example "An Introduction to quantum computing" by

Phillip Kaye, Raymond Laflamme and Michele Mosca.Or the following arxiv.org material :

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9809016

http://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0261

Serifo Blade

317 2 8

Most of the other answers are discussing the mathematical "prerequisites," but let's try to describe a

standard roadmap. Most (American) universities (that I have experience with!) have a sequence for

physics and brave engineering undergraduates that begins with three courses in sequence, the only

math you need generally being a firm grounding in high school calculus:

Newtonian mechanics

Electricity and magnetism (not quite at the level of Maxwell's equations)

This siteModern Physics

uses cookies (Includes

to deliver special and

our services relativity

to showand

youthe basicsads

relevant of and

QM)job listings. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our

, , and our . Your use of Stack Overflow’s Products and Services, including the Stack Overflow Network, is subject to these

At that level, basically after a year of very relaxed training, you'll know enough about quantum

policies and terms.

mechanics to be dismissive of QM claims that pop up on the Discovery channel! If you want to be an

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/19262/whats-the-standard-roadmap-to-learning-quantum-physics 3/4

9/10/2018 education - What's the standard "roadmap" to learning quantum physics? - Physics Stack Exchange

expert, then certainly much more work is required, but I'm a firm believer that you can learn a lot about

a topic without knowing everything...

Which leads nicely into mathematical "prerequisites," and I use scare quotes because I think its easy for

a beginner to get overwhelmed by the idea that they basically need a degree in mathematics before they

can understand physics. Every single one of the topics that Jose Moreira mentioned in his answer

will help you understand QM more deeply (and be remiss not to recommend Strang's book for linear

algebra!) but you'll learn the bits you need as you go. One of the best quantum mechanics books for

undergrads -- totally accesible for someone who has completed the three courses above -- with self-

contained introductions to the mathematical tools and a refreshingly "shut up and calculate" approach

is D.J.Griffiths' Introduction to Quantum Mechanics.

wsc

4,207 21 29

If you want to do research in theoretical physics, you have to be very strong in math (abstract math).

Otherwise, if your goal is to understand what's going on in quantum physics, field theory etc, then you

will not need any math beyond Boas' mathematical methods.

McGarnagle ahmed

487 9 20 31 2

It is possible to learn Quantum Mechanics before taking Classical Mechanics. That is what I did. But

you do have to know what a vector space, basis, change of basis, linear transformation, and matrix are.

Then read Dirac. You can learn the Hamiltonian point of view from Dirac. So I would say that the

prerequisites are: Irving Adler, The New Mathematics, and Isaac Asimov, The Realm of Algebra.

joseph f. johnson

5,328 19 37

This site uses cookies to deliver our services and to show you relevant ads and job listings. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our

, , and our . Your use of Stack Overflow’s Products and Services, including the Stack Overflow Network, is subject to these

policies and terms.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/19262/whats-the-standard-roadmap-to-learning-quantum-physics 4/4

- Quantum Physics Meets BiologyTransféré parDavid Silvera
- Entanglement The Greatest Mystery in Physics By Amir D. Aczel (Abee).pdfTransféré parhadzimusic
- 38529721-Chapter-1Transféré parSarmad Sabih Al.obaidi
- Stapp_Quantum Mechanical Coherence, Resonance, And MindTransféré parPetru Dumitraşcu Art
- The universe in a quantumTransféré parVasil Penchev
- UT Dallas Syllabus for ee6319.501 06f taught by William Frensley (frensley)Transféré parUT Dallas Provost's Technology Group
- From Soap Bubbles to String Theory-Yoni KahnTransféré parqbexch
- Modern Physics 2013Transféré parKat
- Winitzki - Randomness and Reality in Quantum MechanicsTransféré parwinitzki
- 038117yTransféré parAgung Prastowo
- 1994 Quantum StatisticsTransféré parFxHartanto
- Gerry C., Knight P. - Introductory quantum optics (CUP, 2004).pdfTransféré parRosario Maria Larios Osuna
- Switching and Queuing Delay Models 253Transféré parrohit
- The quantum-to-classical transition: Bohr’s doctrine of classical concepts, emergent classicality, and decoherenceTransféré parclaudio_cagioni
- History of Quantum MechanicsTransféré parCarrie Mae Silva Arcon
- MPRA_paper_66983.pdfTransféré parJose Luis Pereyra Diaz
- tmpBD2A.tmpTransféré parFrontiers
- e195304.pdfTransféré parAzhar Mahmood
- What Quantum Physics can teach us about the Soul’s WillTransféré parLaura Kenney
- 1367-2630_12_3_033015Transféré parManuel Valera
- epjconf_icfp2012_00039Transféré parPaul Dirac
- mortonquiparlericeTransféré parapi-325674437
- 101Transféré parJean-nette Barlisan
- Katie Walter- Quantum Simulations Tell the Atomic-Level StoryTransféré parLomewcx
- PhysicsTransféré parshah_aditk
- Quantization Rules for Bound States of the Schr¨odinger EquationTransféré parahsbon
- 2003_Multiscale modelling of nanomechanics and micromechanics- a review.pdfTransféré parYongliang Liu
- 4. Wave Function and ProbabilitiesTransféré parAbhishek Verma
- B%20Tech%20Engg%20Phys%20Course%20Structure%20FINAL%20APRIL%202015.pdfTransféré parankur
- Vladimir S. Lerner - Arising Information Regularities in an Observer (ArXiv, July 2013, 2nd)Transféré parTommaso Cimino

- Vorträge, Interviews, Artikel _ Himalaya-Yoga-TraditionTransféré parkrishna2205
- Paul of Alexandria - The Hellenistic Astrology WebsiteTransféré parkrishna2205
- Over 50 Hermetic and Mystical Texts in PDF Format!Transféré parkrishna2205
- New Larousse Encyclopedia of Mythology _ Solar Deity _ Greek MythologyTransféré parkrishna2205
- Why Not Space_ _ Do the MathTransféré parkrishna2205
- Why Not Space_ _ Do the MathTransféré parkrishna2205
- The 21-Day Headstand Challenge! - Total Yoga is a Yoga School Pivoted on Fitness & Mindfulness!Transféré parkrishna2205
- The Strange Tale of Newton's PapersTransféré parkrishna2205
- Uberman Sleep - Polyphasic SocietyTransféré parkrishna2205
- Ozone Science & Nikola Tesla_ Ozone History & Nikola TeslaTransféré parkrishna2205
- Ralph Juergens' Article_ the Electric SunTransféré parkrishna2205
- Sarvangasana - i Cannot Breathe Anymore - AYP Public ForumTransféré parkrishna2205
- Aspects Astrology Affliction Unaspected Declination ParallelsTransféré parkrishna2205
- Why Not Space_ _ Do the MathTransféré parkrishna2205
- QUANTAVOLUTION & CATASTROPHE in 15 Volumes + CONCORDANCES (in HTML, Acrobat & Plain-text)Transféré parkrishna2205
- MC in Leo Conjunct Regulus W_ Sun in 10th_ - Astrologers' CommunityTransféré parkrishna2205
- How Do I Remove Dust or Dust Mites From Old Books_ - QuoraTransféré parkrishna2205
- FermatTransféré parkrishna2205
- Is Depletion of Antioxidants Responsible for the Ozone Sauna Induced Rash and is the Rash a Sign of the Body Being Burned by Oxygen__ _ the Power of OzoneTransféré parkrishna2205
- H.P. Blavatsky - Theosophical Writings of H.P. Blavatsky @ Theosophy TrustTransféré parkrishna2205
- Constructible Number -- From Wolfram MathWorldTransféré parkrishna2205
- introductionTransféré parFrank William
- Napoleon Hill Sex Transmutation Pt 1Transféré parkrishna2205
- Lemuria_ the Lost Continent of the Pacific by Wishar Cervé and James WardTransféré parkrishna2205
- Charles Carter. QuotesTransféré parkrishna2205
- International Association for the Preservation of Spiritualist and Occult Periodicals_ CatalogTransféré parkrishna2205
- Astronomy - Why Did the Ancients Fail to Discover That the Earth Orbits the Sun_ - Physics Stack ExchangeTransféré parkrishna2205
- DescartesOntologicalTransféré parAniruddha Rao A
- Best Positions to Reduce Shortness of Breath _ Lung InstituteTransféré parkrishna2205

- 1605.01898v2Transféré parbase1
- Instantons and their applications [’t Hooft and η’ail] — Tanedo.pdfTransféré parAlex Shpilkin
- Montalk - Dimensional Shift - The Physics of 2012 - Fringe ScienceTransféré parKamal Hasan
- Mtech Cs Pcb 2015Transféré parNilanjan Sarkar
- Handout ApproxTransféré parMarcelo Machado
- g482 mod 5 2 5 4 energy levels in atomsTransféré parapi-236179294
- IR SpectroscopyTransféré parAshutosh Pandey
- Menas Kafatos Quantum Processes, Space-Time Representation and Brain Dynamics 0304137Transféré parforizsl
- Unit 4 Band Theory of SolidsTransféré parAshema Aggarwal
- Tutorial 1Transféré parAmelia Umang
- Ni Hms 476724Transféré parRAJAT GARG
- How Mind Interacts With Brain Through Electric Spin EffectsTransféré parQuantumDream, Inc.
- BronsteinTransféré parNgô Lưu Duy Thái
- Aqa Phya1 w Qp Jun11Transféré parshubhangikarmakar
- HuckelTransféré parMarvin Shady
- lec1(1)Transféré parSaid
- كتب قسم الفيزياء باللغة الانكليزيةTransféré parSultan Ali
- bput_mtech_vlsi_2010Transféré parSushanta Sahu
- KaluzaKlein_theory.pdfTransféré parPanos BRINIAS
- Electronic Structure & Covalent Bonding (2GMT)Transféré parGMT_cez
- PHYS2912 - Unit OutlineTransféré parEdmond Abdou
- nanoMOS25Transféré parHammid A. Almokhtar
- Discrete Variable RepresentationTransféré parJustin Brock
- Molecular Thermodynamics - Richard E. DickersonTransféré parbohrdom
- Quantum Cryptography EditedTransféré parCody Mosblech
- Variation of Fermi Level in Intrinsic and Extrinsic SemiconductorsTransféré paragnirailways
- HW Assignment 4Transféré parmeatykiwi
- Review of PhysicalTransféré parDini Lestari
- Dual NotesTransféré parnav3128
- Michael Galperin, Abraham Nitzan and Mark A. Ratner- Inelastic effects in molecular junction transport: scattering and self-consistent calculations for the Seebeck coefficientTransféré parDfmso0