0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
29 vues1 page
A judgment is a court's final determination of the rights of the parties involved in a case, based on the issues currently before it. A void judgment is considered non-existent in the eyes of the law and may be ignored or challenged at any time either directly through its own proceedings or indirectly in other cases where the judgment is asserted. The Rules of Court allow void judgments to be annulled through actions specified in Rules 47 and 65 due to lack of jurisdiction or fraud. A void judgment has no legal authority or effect since a court without proper jurisdiction has no power to render any judgment at all.
A judgment is a court's final determination of the rights of the parties involved in a case, based on the issues currently before it. A void judgment is considered non-existent in the eyes of the law and may be ignored or challenged at any time either directly through its own proceedings or indirectly in other cases where the judgment is asserted. The Rules of Court allow void judgments to be annulled through actions specified in Rules 47 and 65 due to lack of jurisdiction or fraud. A void judgment has no legal authority or effect since a court without proper jurisdiction has no power to render any judgment at all.
A judgment is a court's final determination of the rights of the parties involved in a case, based on the issues currently before it. A void judgment is considered non-existent in the eyes of the law and may be ignored or challenged at any time either directly through its own proceedings or indirectly in other cases where the judgment is asserted. The Rules of Court allow void judgments to be annulled through actions specified in Rules 47 and 65 due to lack of jurisdiction or fraud. A void judgment has no legal authority or effect since a court without proper jurisdiction has no power to render any judgment at all.
A judgment is the final consideration and determination
by a court of the rights of the parties as those rights which
presently exist, upon matters submitted in an action or proceeding. (Gotamco v. Chan Seng, 46 Phil. 542 [1924])
[A void judgment] is, in contemplation of law non-
existent and may be wholly disregarded. Such judgment may be assailed any time, either directly or collaterally, by means of a separate action or by resisting such judgment in any action or proceeding whenever it is invoked. It is not necessary to take any step to vacate or avoid a void judgment; it may simply be ignored. (Vide Ancheta v. Ancheta, 424 SCRA 725, 735 [2004]; Ramos v. CA, 180 SCRA 635, 649 [1989]) (Emphasis supplied.)
The Revised Rules of Court lay out these "separate
actions" in the form of Rules 47 (Annulment of Judgments or Final Orders and Resolutions) where, inter alia, the judgment is assailed as void for want of jurisdiction or for being obtained by extrinsic fraud; and 65 (Certiorari), anchoring such an action on grave abuse of discretion.
At any rate, “[a] void judgment for want of jurisdiction
is no judgment at all. All acts performed pursuant to it and all claims emanating from it have no legal effect.” (Tiu v. First Plywood Corporation, 629 Phil. 120, 133 [2010]) (Emphasis supplied.)