Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
"
Author(s): Wayne Booth
Source: Modern Philology, Vol. 48, No. 3 (Feb., 1951), pp. 172-183
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/435387
Accessed: 23-04-2018 05:28 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
http://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to Modern Philology
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
DID STERNE COMPLETE TRISTRAM SHANDY?
WAYNE BOOTH
he never revises,
UNTIL recently, nearly everyone has that he has no control
assumed that Tristram Shandy is that whatever pops into his
over his pen,
a careless, haphazard book, head with
goes into his book; and the book
little or no deliberate structure. Sterne's reads, from page to page, as if his state-
contemporaries established the tradition ments about it were certainly true. Di-
by praising or blaming the book in terms gression upon digression, afterthoughts,
of its oddity and the eccentricity of delays,
its apologies-if, with all this, the
author. Goldsmith, for example, said that reader is bombarded with claims that all is
the book "had no other merit upon earth chaos, he can hardly believe otherwise.
than nine hundred and ninety-five breaks, Perhaps even more responsible for the
seventy-two ha ha's, three good things, traditional criticism of the work is the his-
and a garter," and, speaking indirectly tory of of its composition and publication,
Sterne himself, whom he clearly confused coupled with Sterne's statements about
with Tristram, he said: "in one page the his writing methods and future intentions.
author [makes] . . . them [the readers]It awas published in five parts over a period
low bow, and in the next [pulls] ... them of more than seven years. Some of the
by the nose; he must talk in riddles, and later volumes contain materials that
then send them to bed to dream of the Sterne could not have known when he be-
solution."' gan to write, and thus could not have
In the nineteenth century, even those planned to put into his book. What is
critics who liked Sterne's works perpetu- more, the narrator repeatedly tells us that
ated the standard opinion about the book he intends to go on publishing two vol-
as a whole; as Bagehot said, Tristram umes a year until death overtakes him, or
Shandy is "a book without plan or order,""for the next forty years," and Sterne re-
whose greatest defect is "the fantastic dis- peated this claim in letters and conversa-
order of the form."2 And even today it is tions outside the work. Yet his fifth in-
fairly common to read fresh statements of stalment consisted of only one volume,
the old judgment.3 There are, of course, the ninth, and within a few months after
many seemingly valid reasons for this be- its publication Sterne died. If, as he said,
lief that Sterne produced a "salmagundi of he really saw the possibility of eighty
odds and ends recklessly compounded."4volumes or more and if he wrote every-
Tristram Shandy, the narrator, says thatthing into his book that came to mind, it
1 The citizen of the world, Letter LIII (Public ledger, would be foolish to claim that the result
June 30, 1760).
is anything other than a hodge-podge.
2 Walter Bagehot, Literary studies (4th ed.; Lon-
don, 1891), II, 104. Some recent critics have discovered,
3 Arthur Calder-Marshall, "Laurence Sterne," however, that Sterne planned at least
The English novelists (London, 1936), p. 90: "Tristram
Shandy is technically a hotch-potch, without even large parts of the book with more care
the unity of mood in Burton's Anatomy of Melan- than his public attitude would suggest.
choly."
4 Ernest A. Baker, The history of the English novel,
Perhaps the best summary of this tend-
IV (London, 1930), 244. ency to discover method in Sterne's mad-
[MODERN PHILOLOGY, February, 1951] 172
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
DID STERNE COMPLETE "TRISTRAM SHANDY"? 173
tionably
ness is that of James Aiken Work, inlogical
his sequence--by association--of
edition of Tristram Shandy: ideas in Tristram Shandy.5
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
174 WAYNE BOOTH
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
DID STERNE COMPLETE "TRISTRAM SHANDY"? 175
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
176 WAYNE BOOTH
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
DID STERNE COMPLETE "TRISTRAM SHANDY"? 177
half volumes, with perhaps the strongest Actually, it does not take very careful
praise for Sterne's structural gifts ever reading to discover that, as Work dimly
made: "Up to this point Tristram Shandy suggests in the passage quoted above,
is as thoughtfully constructed and as uni- there are only two main story-threads in
fied as Tom Jones." Then the man with Tristram Shandy: the story of the young
Tristram, before and after birth, and the
the structural gifts of a Fielding is made
story of Uncle Toby. More important,
to change his fundamental design to satis-
fy a few prudes: they run simultaneously; there is no real
shift of direction to match the announced
The probable cause for the alteration in
shift in the sixth volume. The details of
Sterne's design was the clamor against the
Uncle
double entendre and downright indecencies of Toby's campaigns and amours have
the second installment. Possibly he also
been promised again and again, beginning
in Volume I, and the misfortunes of Tris-
realized that Walter's hypotheses were growing
slightly stale. Still the compromise he made
tram's youth pervade the remainder of
was minor. He shifted his subject to the more
the book (to say nothing of the fact which
poignant humor of Uncle Toby's activities,Putney does notice-that Tristram, the
but the consistency of Tristram's character as
adult narrator, persists as one of the cen-
narrator and consequently the tone and com-
tral interests fully as much after the
edy were scrupulously maintained.1'
"shift" as before).
The assumption that the book is lessThe first volume has not been long un-
bawdy after Volume VI than before,deral- way before we are introduced to Un-
though a somewhat amusing one in thecle Toby's campaigns, which ostensibly
light of the sustained bawdry of the court-
do not begin until Volume VI. But even
ships of Corporal Trim and Uncle Toby, before his Hobby-Horse, which is his cam-
does not concern us primarily here. paigning,
But is presented to us, we are given
the assumption that the shift Tristram
a passage on his modesty:
announces in chapter xx of this volumeMy uncle TOBY SHANDY, Madam, was a
was not planned from the very beginning
gentleman, who.., .possessed.., .a most ex-
of Sterne's writing is of primary concern,
treme and unparallel'd modesty of nature;-
particularly since it comes in a passage the
tho' I correct the word nature, for this reason,
main point of which is to declare Sterne's
that I may not prejudge a point which must
structural artistry. Our attitude toward
shortly come to a hearing, and that is, Whether
this modesty of his was natural or acquir'd.
the book as a whole and toward the prob-
lem of its completion depends on what -
weWhichever way my uncle Toby came by
it, 'twas nevertheless modesty in the truest
think is happening when Tristram an-
sense of it.
nounces that he is dropping his story and
taking up the story of his Uncle Toby.He got it, Madam, by a blow.., .from a
And if Sterne is really as skilful a crafts- stone, broke off by a ball from the parapet of
a horn-work at the siege of Namur, which
man as Putney says, one is certainly justi-
struck full upon my uncle Toby's groin.--
1f Rufus D. S. Putney, "Laurence Sterne, apostle
of laughter," The age of Johnson: Essays presented to
Which way could that affect it? The story of
C. B. Tinker (New Haven, 1949), p. 163. that, Madam, is long and interesting;- but
16 Ibid., pp. 164-65. it would be running my history all upon heaps
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
178 WAYNE BOOTH
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
DID STERNE COMPLETE "TRISTRAM SHANDY"? 179
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
180 WAYNE BOOTH
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
DID STERNE COMPLETE "TRISTRAM SHANDY"? 181
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
182 WAYNE BOOTH
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms
DID STERNE COMPLETE "TRISTRAM SHANDY"? 183
dismissed
sel") of Volume IV. One must thinkas a valiant, but rather unim-
pressive,
Sterne very clumsy indeed to suppose last-minute effort at tying up the
that
he intended to continue beyond loose
hisends.
an-But as we have seen, he has all
nounced choicest morsel, after allbeen
along this
"hastening towards" this part,
buildup through eight volumes and he has it
toward been liberally dropping clues
and after the final explicit pronouncement plan all along the way.
to his whole
that this morsel and no other is what he If, in the light of these converging
has "all the time" been hastening to tell.probabilities, one can accept at least
If this pronouncement were an isolatedtentatively not only the fact that Sterne
one, we might perhaps question its impor- was through with his book when he sent
tance. He might indeed have a dozen Volume IX to the printer sometime late in
"choicest morsels." We might even say, if December, 1766, but also that the book
we had no other evidence, that all these he had completed represented the com-
echoes of earlier phrases and situations pletion of a plan, however rough, which
merely indicate that Sterne, tired of writ-was present in his mind from the begin-
ing, decided to quit and pillaged his earlier ning, then the book as a whole begins to
work in order to make some semblance of come into focus. Questions about the form
a concluding gesture. Even the fact that of this "formless work," questions which
one finds more "fulfilments" of earlier have until now been ignored and which I
facetious promises (a chapter on the right have scarcely touched on here, can now
end of a woman, a chapter on pishes, etc.) for the first time receive adequate con-
in Volume IX than in Volumes V, VI, sideration.
VII, and VIII together might be similarly HAVERFORD COLLEGE
This content downloaded from 143.107.252.58 on Mon, 23 Apr 2018 05:28:41 UTC
All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms