Well Being in India: disparity and surprises

across districts

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

© COPYRIGHT, Tata Strategic Management Group, 2010. All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be circulated,
quoted, or reproduced for distribution. The contents of this document are the intellectual property of Tata Strategic Management
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
June
STRATEGIC 15, 2010GROUP
MANAGEMENT
Group. These may not be used without prior written permission of Tata Strategic Management Group. 0
0
Quality of Life – Definition by Prof. Joseph Stiglitz

Quality of Life:

“It is a broader concept than economic production and living

standards which includes the full range of factors that influences what we
value in living, reaching beyond its material side.”

- Prof. Joseph Stiglitz, Commission on Measurement

of Economic & Social Progress - 2009

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 1
1
Quality of Life & Well Being : Indian context

Well being, in the Indian context needs to consider a range of

indicators representing material and social factors

Essential to look at a smaller geographical unit say, a district, instead

of a typical state

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 2
2
 Using NSSO household surveys data (63rd round on consumer
expenditure), a scoring methodology was used to compute the well
being index for each district in India

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 3
3
8 different categories carefully selected to form the index on the basis of their
ability to explain the well being of households

Category Description
Type of home (pucca / kaccha), primary source of energy for lighting, electricity units
Home amenities consumed, expense on domestic servant /cook and LPG, ownership of air conditioner /
cooler
Primary source of energy for cooking & ownership of appliances/white goods like stove,
Kitchen facilities pressure cooker & refrigerator

Literacy rate & expense on education

Education
Expense on washing soap/soda, other washing requisites ,women and men toiletries &
Hygiene ownership of white goods like washing machine & water purifier

Expense on entertainment & ownership of radio, television, VCR/VCP/DVD player, tape

Entertainment recorder, CD player and personal computer

Expense on landline telephone and mobile & ownership of telephone instrument and
Communication mobile handset

Expense on conveyance & ownership of personal transport vehicles like bicycle, motor
Transportation cycle, scooter, motor car and jeep

Institutional and Non-institutional medical expense

Healthcare

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 4
4
Methodology

Consumer Expenditure, National Crime

Census, 2001
NSSO, 06-07 Record Bureau, 06-07

Score Households

Score and Rank Districts

Plot Index on India map

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 5
5
 District-wise view of Well Being Index

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey data for 63rd round (2006-07); Census 2001 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 6
• Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available 6
 Well Being Index reveals wide diversity and disparity across districts, often
within the same state
District-wise Well Being Index

• Marked difference between

Eastern & Central India
• Best districts are in Punjab,
Haryana & Delhi
• Huge variation across districts
even in the same state

Best 5
District State
Central Delhi Delhi
New Delhi Delhi
North Delhi Delhi
Mumbai Maharashtra
Mumbai Suburban Maharashtra
• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group
• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey data for 63rd round (2006-07); Census 2001 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 7
• Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available 7
 While the WBI captures all major material parameters, it
does not include a very important reality of Indian society –
the well being, status and treatment of women

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 8
8
Using Gender Ratio (Census, 2001) and data on Crime against women
(National Crime Bureau – 2006, 2007), a scoring methodology was used
to compute the Female Security Index for each district in India

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 9
9
 3 categories selected to form the index on the basis of their ability to explain
the status and treatment of women in India

• Gender ratio
• Incidences of Rape*
• Dowry deaths*

* Incidences per female population of district STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 10
10
 District-wise view of Female Security Index

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (2006,2007) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 11
• Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available 11
 A female security index (FSI) has been created using gender ratio and crime
against women
District-wise Female Security Index

• Clear divide between North India

& South India, East India
• Worst rating in Punjab, MP, West
UP, Haryana & Delhi
• Uttaranchal & Eastern UP better
• Peninsular India well placed
• Huge disparity in Rajasthan
Best 5
District State
Sivaganga Tamil Nadu
Hamirpur Himachal Pradesh
Thanjavur Tamil Nadu
Karur Tamil Nadu
Virudhunagar Tamil Nadu
• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group
• Data Source: Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (2006,2007) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 12
• Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available 12
 Female Security Index – Category Map : Gender Ratio

• Bangalore Urban in Karnataka is the

only district in Karnataka which is
below “Average”
• Kargil, J&K; Mon, Nagaland &
Wardha, Maharashtra are “Worst” in
Gender Ratio but have lowest Rapes
and Dowry Deaths
• Khordha is the only district in Orissa
which is below “Average”
Best 5
District State
Almora Uttaranchal
Ratnagiri Maharastra
Udupi Karnataka
Diu Daman & Diu
Highest Ratio – Best score
Rudraprayag Uttaranchal
• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group
• Data Source: Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (2006,2007) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 13
• Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available 13
 Female Security Index – Category Map : Rape Cases

• Quilon, Kerala is “Best” in FSI but

“Bad” in terms of Rape Incidences
• Nalbari district is the only district in
Assam which is above “Average”
• South Goa below “Average” whereas
North Goa is above “Average”
• All districts in MP, Tripura, Sikkim &
Mizoram are below “Average”

Best 5
District State
Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi Uttar Pradesh
Tuensang Nagaland
Deoria Uttar Pradesh
Navsari Gujarat
Least incidences – Best score
Mokokchung Nagaland
• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group
• Data Source: Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (2006,2007) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 14
• Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available 14
 Female Security Index – Category Map : Dowry Deaths

• Some of the districts in Arunachal

Pradesh, Assam, Chhattisgarh, Delhi,
HP, J&K, Mizoram & Sikkim which are
“Worst” in FSI have lowest Dowry
Deaths
• Gopalganj & Siwan, Bihar are “Best” in
FSI but have highest Dowry Deaths
• Panchkula is the only district in
Haryana which is above “Average”

Best 5
District State
Wardha Maharashtra
Malappuram Kerala
Kannur Kerala
Ernakulam Kerala
Least incidences – Best score
Surendranagar Gujarat
• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group
• Data Source: Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (2006,2007) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 15
• Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available 15
 A comparison of well being index and female security index reveals some
interesting and contra intuitive findings
District-wise Well Being Index District-wise Female Security Index

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey, Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (06-07) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 16
• Data on certain districts (uncoloured) in Jammu & Kashmir not available 16
Comparison of WBI and FSI maps

• Some of the most well off parts of India (Punjab, Delhi, Haryana and Western UP) as

indicated in Well Being Index have the worst rating in terms of Female Security Index

• Some of the ‘Bad’ or ‘Worst’ districts in WBI like Orissa, Eastern UP, West Bengal,

Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh and Bihar score well in the FSI

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 17
17
Conclusions

• Vivid diversity and disparity across districts

• There is no correlation between the Well Being Index and Female Security Index

• Insights on district should be the foundation for action planning and effective

performance

• Useful for all players, for eg.:

policy maker wishing to improve ‘well being’ in rural India

NGO aiming to improve gender equality

business house planning to increase the penetration of its goods or services

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 18
18
Annexure
 About National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO)

• NSSO is part of the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation of Government of

India

• The NSSO, since its inception, has been conducting multi-subject integrated sample surveys in
the form of successive rounds on countrywide basis relating to social, economic, demographic,
industrial and agricultural statistics

• NSSO conducts surveys on multiple subjects with Consumer Expenditure being one of the
primary category along with Employment & Migration, Household Wealth & Finance, Education
among others.

• NSSO is synonymous with reliable estimates on various aspects of economic and social life in
India based on large scale sample surveys

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC
Source: NSSO MANAGEMENT GROUP
website 20
20
 Number of districts in each WBI and FSI category

WBI Group
FSI Group Worst Bad Average Good Best
Worst 19 20 21 21 37
Bad 29 26 21 18 22
Average 39 20 24 17 20
Good 20 28 26 31 11
Best 11 24 25 30 29

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey, Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (06-07) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 21
21
 State-wise number of districts in WBI category

WBI Category Distribution across States WBI Category Distribution across States
State Worst Bad Average Good Best Total State Worst Bad Average Good Best Total
Andaman & Nicober 1 1 2 Lakshadweep 1 1
Andhra Pradesh 5 8 8 2 23 Madhya Pradesh 9 15 13 5 3 45
Arunachal Pradesh 4 3 3 3 13 Maharastra 1 3 12 9 10 35
Assam 5 6 7 4 1 23 Manipur 1 1 2 3 2 9
Bihar 30 5 2 37 Meghalaya 3 3 1 7
Chandigarh 1 1 Mizoram 1 5 2 8
Chhattisgarh 8 5 3 16 Nagaland 3 5 8
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1 1 Orissa 23 5 2 30
Daman & Diu 2 2 Pondicherry 1 3 4
Delhi 9 9 Punjab 2 15 17
Goa 2 2 Rajasthan 4 12 10 5 1 32
Gujarat 3 1 5 11 5 25 Sikkim 1 1 2 4
Haryana 2 4 13 19 Tamil Nadu 2 9 13 6 30
Himachal Pradesh 5 7 12 Tripura 3 1 4
Jammu & Kashmir 2 5 3 14 Uttar Pradesh 13 24 14 14 5 70
Jharkhand 7 7 2 2 18 Uttaranchal 3 3 5 2 13
Karnataka 3 8 9 4 3 27 West Bengal 3 8 3 3 1 18
Kerala 3 11 14

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey, Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (06-07) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 22
22
 State-wise number of districts in FSI category

FSI Category Distribution across States FSI Category Distribution across States
State Worst Bad Average Good Best Total State Worst Bad Average Good Best Total
Andaman & Nicober 1 1 2 Lakshadweep 1 1
Andhra Pradesh 1 2 9 11 23 Madhya Pradesh 26 11 6 2 45
Arunachal Pradesh 7 1 4 1 13 Maharastra 4 10 15 6 35
Assam 5 16 1 1 23 Manipur 1 2 6 9
Bihar 4 18 12 1 2 37 Meghalaya 3 3 1 7
Chandigarh 1 1 Mizoram 3 5 8
Chhattisgarh 1 1 7 6 1 16 Nagaland 1 2 4 1 8
Dadra & Nagar Haveli 1 1 Orissa 1 3 16 9 1 30
Daman & Diu 1 1 2 Pondicherry 1 3 4
Delhi 9 9 Punjab 4 7 6 17
Goa 1 1 2 Rajasthan 9 5 8 7 3 32
Gujarat 1 17 7 25 Sikkim 3 1 4
Haryana 15 3 1 19 Tamil Nadu 6 24 30
Himachal Pradesh 2 3 1 4 2 12 Tripura 1 3 4
Jammu & Kashmir 3 4 5 2 14 Uttar Pradesh 20 18 12 7 13 70
Jharkhand 4 4 9 1 18 Uttaranchal 1 1 3 3 5 13
Karnataka 2 8 17 27 West Bengal 5 8 5 18
Kerala 2 12 14

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey, Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (06-07) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 23
23
 Best 20 and Worst 20 Districts – WBI

Best 20 districts in terms of WBI Worst 20 districts in terms of WBI

Sr. No. District Corresponding State Sr. No. District Corresponding State
1 Central Delhi 1 Rayagada Orissa
2 New Delhi Delhi 2 Kandhamal Orissa
3 North Delhi 3 Banka Bihar
4 Mumbai Maharashtra 4 Nuapada Orissa
5 Mumbai Suburban Maharashtra 5 Sheohar Bihar
6 Dimapur Nagaland 6 Kawardha Chhattisgarh
7 Pune Maharashtra 7 Baudh Orissa
8 Chandigarh Chandigarh 8 East Kameng Arunachal Pradesh
9 Bangalore Urban Karnataka 9 Balangir Orissa
10 Chennai Tamil Nadu 10 Koraput Orissa
11 Kolkata West Bengal 11 Cachar Assam
12 Pattanamtitta Kerala 12 Nalanda Bihar
13 Aizwal Mizoram 13 Kaimur (Bhabua) Bihar
14 South Goa Goa 14 Khagaria Bihar
15 Fatehgarh Sahib Punjab 15 Koppal Karnataka
16 Patiala Punjab 16 Lohardaga Jharkhand
17 Ahmedabad Gujarat 17 Dumka Jharkhand
18 North Goa Goa 18 The Dangs Gujarat
19 Jalandhar Punjab 19 Bargarh Orissa
20 South Delhi 20 Araria Bihar

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey data for 63rd round (2006-07); Census 2001 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 24
• Sr. No. 1 in Worst 20 table is the ‘Worst’ 24
 WBI & FSI: Best and Worst 5 in Bihar

WBI
WBI
Bihar - Best 5 Bihar - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Patna 298 Banka 587
Aurangabad 346 Sheohar 585
Munger 414 Nalanda 578
Lakhisarai 431 Kaimur (Bhabua) 577
Rohtas 462 Khagaria 576

FSI
FSI
Bihar - Best 5 Bihar - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Siwan 77 Banka 542
Gopalganj 107 Purnia 532
Madhubani 220 Katihar 527
Nawada 266 Kishanganj 485
Saran 267 Patna 471

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey, Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (06-07) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 25
25
 WBI & FSI: Best and Worst 5 in Madhya Pradesh

WBI
WBI
Madhya Pradesh - Best 5 Madhya Pradesh - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Indore 52 Dhar 567
Ujjain 102 Damoh 566
Bhopal 114 Sheopur 555
Gwalior 130 Mandla 547
Jabalpur 145 Tikamgarh 530

FSI
FSI
Madhya Pradesh - Best 5 Madhya Pradesh - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Jhabua 173 Gwalior 590
Balaghat 212 Shivpuri 587
Dindori 257 Vidisha 579
Neemuch 297 Bhind 578
Mandla 302 Datia 576

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey, Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (06-07) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 26
26
 WBI & FSI: Best and Worst 5 in Maharashtra

WBI
WBI
Maharashtra - Best 5 Maharashtra - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Mumbai 4 Gondiya 477
Mumbai Suburban 5 Nandurbar 456
Pune 7 Buldana 426
Thane 29 Washim 420
Ratnagiri 58 Jalna 353

FSI
FSI
Maharashtra - Best 5 Maharashtra - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Ratnagiri 14 Thane 440
Sindhudurg 26 Mumbai 416
Satara 83 Mumbai Suburban 404
Raigarh 90 Latur 393
Nandurbar 98 Aurangabad 348

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey, Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (06-07) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 27
27
 WBI & FSI: Best and Worst 5 in Orissa

WBI
WBI
Orissa - Best 5 Orissa - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Khordha 259 Rayagada 589
Sambalpur 352 Kandhamal 588
Kendujhar 418 Nuapada 586
Sundargarh 423 Baudh 583
Cuttack 425 Balangir 581

FSI
FSI
Orissa - Best 5 Orissa - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Gajapati 72 Khordha 512
Ganjam 130 Anugul 407
Baudh 139 Cuttack 378
Nuapada 145 Nayagarh 363
Rayagada 160 Baleshwar 352

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey, Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (06-07) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 28
28
 WBI & FSI: Best and Worst 5 in Rajasthan

WBI
WBI
Rajasthan - Best 5 Rajasthan - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Kota 63 Baran 542
Jaipur 122 Jalor 501
Jhunjhunun 141 Jhalawar 496
Jodhpur 162 Rajsamand 476
Udaipur 216 Dhaulpur 470

FSI
FSI
Rajasthan - Best 5 Rajasthan - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Rajsamand 23 Dhaulpur 574
Dungarpur 36 Karauli 557
Jalor 116 Bharatpur 547
Pali 156 Ganganagar 530
Churu 180 Alwar 523

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey, Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (06-07) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 29
29
 WBI & FSI: Best and Worst 5 in Tamil Nadu

WBI
WBI
Tamil Nadu - Best 5 Tamil Nadu - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Chennai 10 Pudukkottai 416
Coimbatore 61 Ariyalur 379
Thiruvallur 72 Tiruvanamala 329
Kancheepuram 83 Perambalur 315
Nilgiri 88 Viluppuram 314

FSI
FSI
Tamil Nadu - Best 5 Tamil Nadu - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Sivaganga 1 Perambalur 233
Thanjavur 3 Salem 205
Karur 4 Chennai 163
Virudhunagar 5 Ariyalur 142
Kaniyakumari 8 Dharmapuri 128

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey, Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (06-07) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 30
30
 WBI & FSI: Best and Worst 5 in Uttar Pradesh

WBI
WBI
Uttar Pradesh - Best 5 Uttar Pradesh - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Gautam Buddha Nagar 41 Chitrakoot 543
Lucknow 67 Shrawasti 541
Ghaziabad 70 Banda 532
Hathras 93 Kaushambi 528
Kanpur Nagar 119 Bara Banki 526

FSIFSI
Uttar Pradesh - Best 5 Uttar Pradesh - Worst 5
District Group India Rank District Group India Rank
Azamgarh 15 Kanpur Dehat 552
Deoria 25 Shahjahanpur 548
Mau 47 Firozabad 545
Sant Kabir Nagar 57 Mainpuri 543
Ghazipur 59 Aligarh 540

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Household Consumption Expenditure, NSSO Survey, Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (06-07) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 31
31
 Best 20 and Worst 20 Districts – FSI

Best 20 districts in terms of FSI Worst 20 districts in terms of FSI

Sr. No. District Corresponding State Sr. No. District Corresponding State
1 Sivaganga Tamil Nadu 1 Central Delhi
2 Hamirpur Himachal Pradesh 2 Upper Siang Arunachal Pradesh
3 Thanjavur Tamil Nadu 3 Panipat Haryana
4 Karur Tamil Nadu 4 Gwalior Madhya Pradesh
5 Virudhunagar Tamil Nadu 5 South West Delhi
6 Alleppey Kerala 6 North East Delhi
7 Dakshin Kannad Karnataka 7 Shivpuri Madhya Pradesh
8 Kanniyakumari Tamil Nadu 8 Kinnaur Himachal Pradesh
9 Udupi Karnataka 9 East Delhi
10 Nilgiri Tamil Nadu 10 Rohtak Haryana
11 Vizianagaram Andhra Pradesh 11 Chandigarh Chandigarh
12 Toothukudi Tamil Nadu 12 South Delhi
13 Ratnagiri Maharashtra 13 Gurgaon Haryana
14 Malappuram Kerala 14 North West Delhi
15 Azamgarh Uttar Pradesh 15 Vidisha Madhya Pradesh
16 Dahod Gujarat 16 Bhind Madhya Pradesh
17 Champawat Uttaranchal 17 North Delhi
18 Imphal East Manipur 18 Datia Madhya Pradesh
19 Tiruvanamala Tamil Nadu 19 Raisen Madhya Pradesh
20 Nagapattinam Tamil Nadu 20 Dhaulpur Rajasthan

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (2006,2007) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 32
• Sr. No. 1 in Worst 20 table is the ‘Worst’ 32
 Best 20 and Worst 20 Districts – Gender Ratio

Best 20 districts in terms of Gender Ratio Worst 20 districts in terms of Gender Ratio
Sr. No. District Corresponding State Sr. No. District Corresponding State
1 Almora Uttaranchal 1 Daman Daman & Diu
2 Ratnagiri Maharastra 2 North (Mongam) Sikkim
3 Udupi Karnataka 3 West Kameng Arunachal Pradesh
4 Diu Daman & Diu 4 Chandigarh Chandigarh
5 Rudraprayag Uttaranchal 5 Mumbai Maharastra
6 Garhwal Uttaranchal 6 Tawang Arunachal Pradesh
7 Bageshwar Uttaranchal 7 South West Delhi
8 Hamirpur Himachal Pradesh 8 New Delhi Delhi
9 Pattanamtitta Kerala 9 South Delhi
10 Trichur Kerala 10 Lahul and Spiti Himachal Pradesh
11 Kannur Kerala 11 Dadra and Nagar Haveli Dadra & Nagar Haveli
12 Sindhudurg Maharastra 12 North West Delhi
13 Alleppey Kerala 13 Jaisalmer Rajasthan
14 Quilon Kerala 14 Morena Madhya Pradesh
15 Malappuram Kerala 15 Mumbai Suburban Maharastra
16 Palghat Kerala 16 Ladakh (Leh) Jammu & Kashmir
17 Trivandrum Kerala 17 Panchkula Haryana
18 Kozhikode Kerala 18 Ludhiana Punjab
19 Toothukudi Tamil Nadu 19 North Delhi
20 Tehri Garhwal Uttaranchal 20 Dhaulpur Rajasthan

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (2006,2007) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 33
• Sr. No. 1 in Worst 20 table is the ‘Worst’ 33
 Best 20 and Worst 20 Districts – Rape Cases

Best 20 districts in terms of Rape Cases Worst 20 districts in terms of Rape Cases
Sr. No. District Corresponding State Sr. No. District Corresponding State
1 Sant Ravidas Nagar Bhadohi Uttar Pradesh 1 Kolasib Mizoram
2 Tuensang Nagaland 2 Central Delhi
3 Deoria Uttar Pradesh 3 Dhemaji Assam
4 Navsari Gujarat 4 Upper Siang Arunachal Pradesh
5 Mokokchung Nagaland 5 Champhai Mizoram
6 Siddharth Nagar Uttar Pradesh 6 Serchhip Mizoram
7 Dahod Gujarat 7 Betul Madhya Pradesh
8 Gadag Karnataka 8 Aizwal Mizoram
9 Dharmapuri Tamil Nadu 9 Koriya Chhattisgarh
10 Chandauli Uttar Pradesh 10 Guna Madhya Pradesh
11 Porbandar Gujarat 11 East Siang Arunachal Pradesh
12 Thanjavur Tamil Nadu 12 Jashpur Chhattisgarh
13 Ghazipur Uttar Pradesh 13 Dhuburi Assam
14 Azamgarh Uttar Pradesh 14 Vidisha Madhya Pradesh
15 Thiruvallur Tamil Nadu 15 Marigaon Assam
16 Kushinagar Uttar Pradesh 16 Lakhimpur Assam
17 Senapati Manipur 17 Kinnaur Himachal Pradesh
18 Valsad Gujarat 18 Rajgarh Madhya Pradesh
19 Mahesana Gujarat 19 Jaintia Hills Meghalaya
20 Sivaganga Tamil Nadu 20 Lohardaga Jharkhand

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (2006,2007) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 34
• Sr. No. 1 in Worst 20 table is the ‘Worst’ 34
 Best 20 and Worst 20 Districts – Dowry Deaths

Best 20 districts in terms of Dowry Deaths Worst 20 districts in terms of Dowry Deaths
Sr. No. District Corresponding State Sr. No. District Corresponding State
1 Wardha Maharastra 1 Gaya Bihar
2 Malappuram Kerala 2 Central Delhi
3 Kannur Kerala 3 Latur Maharastra
4 Ernakulam Kerala 4 Rohtak Haryana
5 Surendranagar Gujarat 5 Kanpur Dehat Uttar Pradesh
6 Uttar Kannand Karnataka 6 Kendrapara Orissa
7 Ahmadnagar Maharastra 7 Damoh Madhya Pradesh
8 Gandhinagar Gujarat 8 Mainpuri Uttar Pradesh
9 Trichur Kerala 9 Vaishali Bihar
10 Golaghat Assam 10 Rudraprayag Uttaranchal
11 Banas Kantha Gujarat 11 Bhind Madhya Pradesh
12 Dantewada Chhattisgarh 12 Gurgaon Haryana
13 Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 13 Nalanda Bihar
14 Ahmedabad Gujarat 14 Auraiya Uttar Pradesh
15 Shimla Himachal Pradesh 15 Jalaun Uttar Pradesh
16 Kottayam Kerala 16 Firozabad Uttar Pradesh
17 Ratnagiri Maharastra 17 Etawah Uttar Pradesh
18 Junagadh Gujarat 18 Bhadrak Orissa
19 Idukki Kerala 19 Muzaffarpur Bihar
20 Dhemaji Assam 20 Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh

• Analysis based on DisProTM, Tata Strategic Management Group

• Data Source: Census, 2001, National Crime Record Bureau (2006,2007) STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 35
• Sr. No. 1 in Worst 20 table is the ‘Worst’ 35
About the authors

• Raju Bhinge is the Chief Executive of Tata Strategic Management Group. He has wide experience dealing
with corporate level strategic issues and has consulted with numerous organizations on key strategic issues
like growth, divestments and review of business portfolio. He has a keen interest in Economy & Policy issues
and has also been involved in negotiating joint ventures and setting them up. He continues to serve on the
board of several companies across sectors as diverse as technology, auto components and retail.

• Harsha Kapoor is Practice Head – Analytics Solutions at Tata Strategic Management Group. He has more
than 16 years of experience in Analytics, consulting, productivity improvement and optimization in various
industry sectors like Banking, Insurance, Manufacturing, Telecom etc. He has led numerous assignments
with clients in India, USA, UK and Europe.

Research Team:
• Sachin Somaiya is Project Leader – Analytics Solutions at Tata Strategic Management Group’s Analytics
Solutions practice. He has worked extensively in the domain of analytics and optimization for Financial
Services and Consumer Goods.
• Rituparna Dasgupta is a ‘Specialist’ – Predictive Analytics at Tata Strategic Management Group’s Analytics
Solutions practice. She has significant experience in predictive modelling, scoring, segmentation and
optimization.

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 36
36
 HARSHA KAPOOR

PRACTICE HEAD

Analytics Solutions

Phone: +91 22 66376709

End of Document Mobile: +91 98191 90444
Fax: +91 22 66376600
e-mail: harsha.kapoor@tsmg.com

TATA STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

18th Floor, Nirmal
Nariman Point
Mumbai 400021
India
URL: www.tsmg.com

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP

STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT GROUP 37
37
India based
….with global reach & experience

© COPYRIGHT, Tata Strategic Management Group, 2010. All Rights Reserved. No part of this document may be circulated, quoted, or
reproduced for distribution. The contents of this document are the intellectual property of Tata Strategic Management Group. These may not
be used without prior written permission of Tata Strategic Management Group.