Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Search for...
This topic contains 5 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by
(https://www.methodspace.com/members/DaveCollingridge201/) Dave Collingridge
(https://www.methodspace.com/members/DaveCollingridge201/) 4 years, 5 months ago
(https://www.methodspace.com/forums/topic/how-to-quantify-likert-scale-type-data/#post-
1111).
(https://www.methodspace.com/members/KassaTeshagerAlemu/)
(https://www.methodspace.com/members/DaveCollingridge201/)
(https://www.methodspace.com/members/StephenGorard/)
What you seem to be proposing has several problems. First, the responses you have
are ordinal classifications not scores. Second, averaging across items (even if they
were scores) is an error. If the items correlate highly (+/-1.0 or near) then it shows
you have asked the same question repeatedly (wasting respondent time). If they
correlate little (+/-0.7 or lower, meaning that over half of the variance is unique to
each item), then adding them would be like adding a height to a maths test score. If
the error in each item is random, the only reason really for asking the question
several times, then repeating the question must reduce the accuracy of the average
responses.
(https://www.methodspace.com/members/AlexanderEssienTimothy/)
Alex
9th April 2014 at 5:14 am #1108 (https://www.methodspace.com/forums/topic/how-to-
quantify-likert-scale-type-data/#post-1108)
(https://www.methodspace.com/members/ProfDrSubhadraIyengarPhD/)
Prof.Dr.Subhadra Iyengar,PhD
(https://www.methodspace.com/members/ProfDrSubhadraIyengarPhD/)
Member
Hello Kassa
You are using the most standradised tool, or a scale, likert scale. Your data should be
highly acurate. then why do you again want to requantify. For each sample take the
total score aggeregate and divided by n, that is how you get mean score.
As per the rule of thumb, in this scale , the 5 point, ranging from most to least agree.
SA,A,UN,D,SD. Positive 5,4 3,2,1 and negative statements reverse1,2,3,4,5. So now
when youb have total the scores of all the item you get exact score.(remebr
positive+negative gets nullified). Then you take the mean.
This is the standard method in quantitaive research, which scholars here do.
Prof.Dr.Subhadra Iyengar,PhD
HOD,Research department,PSG,Coimbatore,TamilNadu,India
(https://www.methodspace.com/members/KassaTeshagerAlemu/)
thank you very much for your inputs. I have managed to do it accordingly.
Author
Posts
Welcome to Methodspace
Home of the research methods community
Log In
Username:
Password:
Remember Me
I'm a human.
I'm a human.
Log In
Recent Posts
Active Groups
Upcoming Events
Resources
Classes
(http://journals.sagepub.com/r/bigdata?
utm_source=methodspace.com&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=bigdata_201808)
(https://www.methodspace.com/category/focus-series/)
(http://us.sagepub.com)
(http://us.sagepub.com)
(http://us.sagepub.com)
(http://us.sagepub.com)