Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Name 1
Name 2
Name 3
Name 4
Name 5
[Date]
TYPE: Choose one and erase the rest: PRODUCT, SERVICE, SPACE, or SYSTEM]
Title
Please substitute headings with the titles or leave them the same
Abstract
(250 words maximum)
An Abstract is the entire paper in a condensed form, written for those seeking to learn more. An
abstract summarizes, usually in one paragraph of 250 words or less, the major aspects of the entire
paper in a prescribed sequence that includes: 1) the overall purpose of the study and the research
problem(s) you investigated; 2) the basic design of the study; 3) major findings or trends found as a
result of your analysis; and, 4) a brief summary of your interpretations and conclusions.
The abstract allows you to elaborate upon each major aspect of the paper and helps readers decide
whether they want to read the rest of the paper. Therefore, enough key information [e.g., summary
results, observations, trends, etc.] must be included to make the abstract useful to someone who may
want to examine your work.
How do you know when you have enough information in your abstract? A simple rule-of-thumb is to
step into the shoes of a reviewer evaluating your research, but with only one exception. The reviewer
has only your Abstract, nothing else. Is there enough information presented here? Too many
assumptions? Does it tell the whole story about your study? If the answer is "no" then the abstract
will need to be revised.
You may write the Abstract in the beginning to get a general sense of your argument and plan. It
would be a big mistake, however, if you just left it at that. Before you turn your paper in, re-read and
re-write your Abstract. If I were you, I would be suspicious if you didn’t think it needed
revision. That would mean that you crafted questions for which you already knew the answer…or
you did not ask the right ones.
Include the distilled summaries of Part 1 and 2 of your paper in the Abstract.
Key Words/Tags:
NOTE on TABLE of CONTENTS: Students spend WAY too much time with formatting their
Table of Contents. They shouldn’t. It’s easy to do. If you don’t know how to use Headings for
a Table of Contents, I can teach it, or you can consult a tutorial. Three things to keep in mind.
1. For now, DO NOT change any of the headings and subheadings (below).
2. Never make changes IN the Table of Contents, either.
3. Just replace the text in red.
As you write your paper, make certain to right-click on the body of the Table of Contents.
You will then see this:
If you’re confident everything looks great, you can click update page #s
I suggest, however, that you click “Update entire table.” Then, see what happens. if
things don’t look right, you can make the changes.
If you accidentally change a title, retype it and make certain to use one of the following styles:
For Main Headings: (like Part I-IV), use the style: Heading 1
For Sub Headings (like Focus | Multiple Perspectives), use Heading 2
CONFUSING? Here are some tutorials:
Tutorial One: 13.26
Tutorial Two: 4.23
In Word itself, click Help, then search on Headings, and scroll down to Apply heading
styles and Create a table of contents
NOTICE, for your convenience (and the convenience of the reader, you can click on Return to Table
of Contents (in the footer)
Table of Contents
II-B. Stakeholdership
Think about what you have read (and may continue to read) about stakeholdership and your idea,
design-process and outcomes.
http://www.designkit.org/mindsets
http://www.designkit.org/methods/45
Is it SMART?
To the best of your ability, how might this respond to SMART criteria? There is no expectation
that it will be fully prototyped, tested, and ready for market.
Examine what makes this SMART
Show the prototype
Who, What, Where, When, Why, How?
Sustainable?
Scalable?
Is it Sellable?
Give us a glimpse of a possible prototype
Describe the Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How?
Consider “How Ideas Spread: Diffusion of Innovation Theory”
Part V. Appendices
Appendix V-1: Sources
Make a section for each:
Books (annotated)
People (title…or not)
Disciplines
Observations