Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
THE PHILIPPINES
SENATE
Explanatory Note
LEILA M. DE LIMA
SENATE
SENATE BILL NO. 1677
Approved
1
Section 2. Plea of guilty to a lesser offense. - At
arraignment, the accused, with the consent of the
offended party and the prosecutor, may be allowed by
the trial court to plead guilty to a lesser offense which is
necessarily included in the offense charged. After
arraignment but before trial, the accused may still be
allowed to plead guilty to said lesser offense after
withdrawing his plea of not guilty. No amendment of the
complaint or information is necessary.
2
G.R. No. 99287, June 23, 1992, 210 SCRA 246.
3
G.R. No. 159261, February 21, 2007, 516 SCRA 383,
398.
4
Marcelo, Elizabeth. "Napoles' camp mulls plea bargain
deal, new petition for bail". Philippine Star. May 10, 2017.
Available at
http://www.philstar.com/headlines/2017/05/10/1698609/n
apoles-camp-mulls-plea-bargain-deal-new-petition-bail.
Last accessed July 18, 2017.
5
Valente, Catherine. "Duterte: Napoles a 'minimal player'
in scam". The Manila Times. May 11, 2017. Available at
http://www.manilatimes.net/duterte-napoles-minimal-
player-scam/326572/. Last accessed on July 18, 2017.
From 12 years
to 6 months:
Small time
drug cases
get plea
bargains
But those caught selling and trading over 1
gram of shabu and over 10 grams of marijuana
will not be entitled to plea bargain deals
Lian Buan
@lianbuan
Published 10:09 PM, May 05, 2018
Updated 10:09 PM, May 05, 2018
Facebook
Twitter
Reddit
Email
–– ADVERTISEMENT ––
> The accused and the prosecutor in a criminal case work out a mutually
criminal cases. It shortens the time between charge and disposition and
> It is not allowed under the Dangerous Drugs Act where the imposable
affidavits and other documents which form part of the record of the
d. Amount of damages;
e. Genuineness and due execution of documents;
investigation;
4. Ask parties to agree on the specific trial dates and adhere to the flow chart
determined by the court which shall contain the time frames for the
promulgation of decision and use the time frame for each stage in setting the trial
dates;
by subpoena; and
6. Consider modification of order of trial if the accused admits the charge
Section 1. Short Title. – This Act shall be known and cited as the
"Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002".
ARTICLE I
Definition of terms
ARTICLE II
The penalty of twelve (12) years and one (1) day to twenty (20)
years of imprisonment and a fine ranging from One hundred
thousand pesos (P100,000.00) to Five hundred thousand pesos
(P500,000.00) shall be imposed upon any person, who acts as a
"protector/coddler" of any violator of the provisions under this
Section.
The penalty of twelve (12) years and one (1) day to twenty (20)
years of imprisonment and a fine ranging from One hundred
thousand pesos (P100,000.00) to Five hundred thousand pesos
(P500,000.00) shall be imposed upon any person, who acts as a
"protector/coddler" of any violator of the provisions under this
Section.
The penalty of twelve (12) years and one (1) day to twenty (20)
years of imprisonment and a fine ranging from One hundred
thousand pesos (P100,000.00) to Five hundred thousand pesos
(P500,000.00) shall be imposed upon any person, who acts as a
"protector/coddler" of any violator of the provisions under this
Section.
(4) After the filing of the criminal case, the Court shall,
within seventy-two (72) hours, conduct an ocular inspection
of the confiscated, seized and/or surrendered dangerous
drugs, plant sources of dangerous drugs, and controlled
precursors and essential chemicals, including the
instruments/paraphernalia and/or laboratory equipment,
and through the PDEA shall within twenty-four (24) hours
thereafter proceed with the destruction or burning of the
same, in the presence of the accused or the person/s from
whom such items were confiscated and/or seized, or
his/her representative or counsel, a representative from the
media and the DOJ, civil society groups and any elected
public official. The Board shall draw up the guidelines on
the manner of proper disposition and destruction of such
item/s which shall be borne by the offender: Provided, That
those item/s of lawful commerce, as determined by the
Board, shall be donated, used or recycled for legitimate
purposes: Provided, further, That a representative sample,
duly weighed and recorded is retained;
The penalty provided for the offense under this Act shall be
imposed upon the partner, president, director, manager, trustee,
estate administrator, or officer who knowingly authorizes,
tolerates or consents to the use of a vehicle, vessel, aircraft,
equipment or other facility, as an instrument in the importation,
sale, trading, administration, dispensation, delivery, distribution,
transportation or manufacture of dangerous drugs, or chemical
diversion, if such vehicle, vessel, aircraft, equipment or other
instrument is owned by or under the control or supervision of the
partnership, corporation, association or juridical entity to which
they are affiliated.
Section 31. Additional Penalty if Offender is an Alien. – In
addition to the penalties prescribed in the unlawful act
committed, any alien who violates such provisions of this Act
shall, after service of sentence, be deported immediately without
further proceedings, unless the penalty is death.
ARTICLE III
For this purpose, the DOH shall establish, operate and maintain
drug testing centers in government hospitals, which must be
provided at least with basic technologically advanced equipment
and materials, in order to conduct the laboratory examination
and tests herein provided, and appoint such qualified and duly
trained technical and other personnel as may be necessary for
the effective implementation of this provision.
ARTICLE IV
Participation of the Family, Students, Teachers and School
Authorities in the Enforcement of this Act
ARTICLE V
ARTICLE VI
ARTICLE VII
An order entered under this Section shall expire after one (1)
year or at such earlier time as stated in the order. The Board
may bring a complaint seeking a permanent injunction against
any nuisance described under this Section.
This Article does not restrict the right of any person to proceed
under the Civil Code against any public nuisance.
ARTICLE VIII
However, should the DOH find that during the initial after-care
and follow-up program of eighteen (18) months, the drug
dependent requires further treatment and rehabilitation in the
Center, he/she shall be recommitted to the Center for
confinement. Thereafter, he/she may again be certified for
temporary release and ordered released for another after-care
and follow-up program pursuant to this Section.
If after such hearing and the facts so warrant, the court shall
order the drug dependent to be examined by two (2) physicians
accredited by the Board. If both physicians conclude that the
respondent is not a drug dependent, the court shall order his/her
discharge. If either physician finds him to be a dependent, the
court shall conduct a hearing and consider all relevant evidence
which may be offered. If the court finds him a drug dependent, it
shall issue an order for his/her commitment to a treatment and
rehabilitation center under the supervision of the DOH. In any
event, the order of discharge or order of confinement or
commitment shall be issued not later than fifteen (15) days from
the filing of the appropriate petition.
In the case of minors under fifteen (15) years of age at the time
of the commission of any offense penalized under this Act, Article
192 of Presidential Decree No. 603, otherwise known as the
Child and Youth Welfare Code, as amended by Presidential
Decree No. 1179 shall apply, without prejudice to the application
of the provisions of this Section.
ARTICLE IX
Dangerous Drugs Board and Philippine Drug Enforcement
Agency
The Director of the NBI and the Chief of the PNP shall be the
permanent consultants of the Board, and shall attend all the
meetings of the Board.
Section 79. Meetings of the Board. – The Board shall meet once
a week or as often as necessary at the discretion of the
Chairman or at the call of any four (4) other members. The
presence of nine (9) members shall constitute a quorum.
Section 81. Powers and Duties of the Board. – The Board shall:
Section 84. Powers and Duties of the PDEA. – The PDEA shall:
ARTICLE X
All receipts derived from fines, fees and other income authorized
and imposed in this Act, including ten percent (10%) of all
unclaimed and forfeited sweepstakes and lotto prizes but not
less than twelve million pesos (P12,000,000.00) per year from
the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO), are hereby
constituted as a special account in the general fund for the
implementation of this Act: Provided, That no amount shall be
disbursed to cover the operating expenses of the Board and
other concerned agencies: Provided, further, That at least fifty
percent (50%) of all the funds shall be reserved for assistance to
government-owned and/or operated rehabilitation centers.
ARTICLE XI
Jurisdiction Over Dangerous Drugs Cases
Trial of the case under this Section shall be finished by the court
not later than sixty (60) days from the date of the filing of the
information. Decision on said cases shall be rendered within a
period of fifteen (15) days from the date of submission of the
case for resolution.
The Board after notice and hearing shall consider the following
factors with respect to each substance proposed to be
reclassified, added or removed from control:
The Board shall also take into accord the obligations and
commitments to international treaties, conventions and
agreements to which the Philippines is a signatory.
(e) The Board shall, within five (5) days from the date of its
promulgation submit to Congress a detailed reclassification,
addition, or removal of any drug from the list of dangerous
drugs.
ARTICLE XII
ARTICLE XIII
Final Provisions
Section 102. Effectivity. – This Act shall take effect fifteen (15)
days upon its publication in at least two (2) national newspapers
of general circulation.
Approved,
(Sgd) (Sgd)
(Sgd) (Sgd)
GLORIA
MACAPAGAL-
ARROYO
President of the
Philippines
The Supreme Court has issued a framework on plea bargaining in illegal drugs
cases to enable drug offenders to avail themselves of such arrangement.
In its Plea Bargaining Network made public Friday, the high court clarified that
plea bargaining is not allowed in drug cases where the imposable penalty is life
imprisonment or death.
ADVERTISEMENT
Also, the high court reiterated that plea bargaining is also prohibited under
Section 5 of Republic Act 9165 or the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act.
Section 5 of RA 9165 penalizes sale, trading, administration, dispensation,
delivery, distribution and transportation of all kinds of dangerous drugs.
Based on the new framework, the high court said an accused charged with
violation of Section 11 of RA 9165 for possession of dangerous drugs where
the quantity is less than five grams (in case of shabu, opium, morphine, heroin
and cocaine, and less than 300 grams in case of marijuana) with a penalty of 12
years and one day to 20 years in prison and a fine ranging from P300,000 to
P400,000, he or she can plea bargain to a violation of Section 12 on possession
of equipment, instrument, apparatus, etc. with a penalty of six months and one
day to four years in prison and a fine ranging from P10,000 to P50,000.
“The court is given the discretion to impose a minimum period and a maximum
period to be taken from the range of the penalty provided by law,” the high
court said.
“A straight penalty within the range of six months and 1 day to one year may
likewise be imposed,” the high court added.
The high court added there has to be a drug dependency test in all instances
regardless if the maximum period of the penalty has been served.
“If accused admits drug use, or denies it but is found positive after drug
dependency test, he/she shall undergo treatment rehabilitation for a period of
not less than six month,” the high court said.
It added that the treatment or rehabilitation has to be credited “to his/her
penalty and the period of his/her after-care and follow-up program if penalty is
still unserved. If accused is found negative for drug use/dependency, he/she
will be released on time served, otherwise, he/she will serve his sentence in jail
minus the counseling period at rehabilitation center.”
“However, if accused applies for probation in offenses punishable under RA
9165, other than for illegal drug trafficking or pushing under Section 5 in
relation to Section 24 thereof, then the law on probation shall apply.”
On the other hand, if the accused is charged with possession of shabu, opium,
morphine, heroin and cocaine of more than five grams but not exceeding 10
grams, or with marijuana of 300 grams but not more than 500 grams (Section
11), the accused can enter into a plea bargain to violation of Section 11 (less
than five grams in case of shabu, etc. and less than 300 grams of marijuana) to
lower the penalty from 20 years to life imprisonment and fine ranging from
P400,000 to P500,000, to 12 years and one day to 20 years prison term and
fine ranging from P300,000 to P400,000.
ADVERTISEMENT
If an accused is charged with possession of equipment, apparatus and other
paraphernalia for dangerous drugs under Section 12, he or she can plea bargain
to violation of Section 15 or use of dangerous drugs to lessen the penalty from
six months and one day to four years in prison and fine from P10,000 to
P50,000, to six months treatment and rehabilitation if he or she admits drug use
or is found positive after drug use/dependency test.
For violation of Section 14 for possession of equipment, apparatus and other
paraphernalia for dangerous drugs during parties, social gatherings or meetings,
he or she can plea bargain to violation of Section 15 on use of dangerous drugs
to lower the penalty from a maximum or four months in prison to six months of
treatment and rehabilitation.
The plea bargaining framework was adopted by the SC as an offshoot of its
Aug. 15, 2017 decision that declared unconstitutional Section 23 of RA 9165
for being contrary to the rule-making authority of the High Tribunal under the
Constitution.
Section 23 of RA 9165 provides that any person charged under the
Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002, regardless of the imposable
penalty, should be denied plea bargaining or pleading guilty to a lesser offense.
The high court issued the guideline following its ruling in the case involving
Salvador Estipona versus Legazpi City Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 3
Judge Frank Lobrigo.
In its ruling, the high court declared as unconstitutional the prohibition against
plea bargaining in Republic Act 9165 (Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of
2002).
The framework was released following a meeting between Associate Justice
Diosdado M. Peralta, who wrote the Estipona decision and officers of the
Philippine Judges Association which submitted the draft on the plea bargaining
framework.
The SC directed Court Administrator Jose Midas P. Marquez to issue a circular
to all trial courts in the country for the implementation of the plea bargaining
framework.