Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Aims:
• Examine a few common 2-transistor amplifiers:
-- Differential amplifiers
-- Cascode amplifiers
-- Darlington pairs
-- current mirrors
• Introduce formal methods for exactly analysing multiple stage amplifiers
BJT Comments
Name 1st Stg 2nd Stg
(voltage amp) CE CE High Voltage gain
cascode CE CB High bandwidth
(op-amp) CE CC High Zin low Zout
(current buffer) CB CE Higher Zout than CB/CG
(current buffer) CB CB Second stage to improve on CB/CG
(Not common) CB CC Not common
(Not common) CC CE Instead of CE, offers higher Zin
differential amp CC CB High voltage gain and bandwidth
darlington CC CC High current gain
(a)
(b)
(a) Buffered Widlar mirror
(b) The “gm-compensated” mirror
Rs ROUT1 RO2
RIN2
RIN1 A1 V1 A2 V2 RL
+
Vs -
-
-
VL 1 1 1 1
= A1 A2 , Yx = , x ∈ {in1, in 2, L}
Vs 1 + RsYin1 1 + Rout1Yin 2 1 + Ro 2YL Rx
• For non-unilateral amplifiers:
• The input impedance of each stage depends on the input impedance of the
next stage
• The output impedance of each stage depends on the output impedance of
the preceding stage.
• This problem has a solution but involves the solution of sets of simultaneous
quadratic equations.
L6 Autumn 2009 E2.2 Analogue Electronics Imperial College London – EEE 12
Input - output impedance of a loaded amplifier
• We calculate the input impedance of a voltage amplifier driving a load ZL :
i1 = g11v1 + g12i2 ⎫
⎪ i1 = g11v1 − g12YL v2 ⎫
v2 = g 21v1 + g 22i2 ⎬ ⇒ ⎬⇒
⎪ v = g v − g 22 L 2 ⎭
Y v
i2 = −v2YL ⎭
2 21 1
G22
v1 G11 v2 YL
VS
G21V1
G12i2
We start with the amplifier definition, plus the source-load boundary conditions:
i1 = g11v1 + g12i2
v2 = g 21v1 + g 22i2
v1 = vs − i1Z s
i2 = −v2YL
After some algebra we conclude that:
v2 g 21 g 21
= = , Δ g = g11 g 22 − g 21 g12
vs (1 + g11Z s )(1 + g 22YL ) − g12 g 21Z sYL 1 + g11Z S + g 22YL + Δ g YL Z s
⎡v1 ⎤ ⎡ A1 B1 ⎤ ⎡ v2 ⎤ ⎫
⎢ i ⎥ = ⎢ C D ⎥ ⎢ −i ⎥ ⎪
⎣ 1⎦ ⎣ 1 1⎦ ⎣ 2 ⎦ ⎪ ⎡v1 ⎤ ⎡ A1 B1 ⎤ ⎡ A2 B2 ⎤ ⎡ v3 ⎤ ⎡ v1 ⎤ ⎡ A3 B3 ⎤ ⎡ v3 ⎤
⎬ ⎢ ⎥=⎢
⇒ ⇒ =
⎡ v2 ⎤ ⎡ A2 B2 ⎤ ⎡ v3 ⎤ ⎪ ⎣ i1 ⎦ ⎣C1 D1 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣C2 D2 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ −i3 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ i1 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣C3 D3 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ −i3 ⎥⎦
⎢ −i ⎥ = ⎢C D ⎥ ⎢ −i ⎥ ⎪
⎣ 2⎦ ⎣ 2 2 ⎦ ⎣ 3 ⎦⎭
1 g f 1g f 2 y f 1z f 2 1 g f 1 y f 2 y f 1h f 2
gf = = yf = =
1
−
1 y z
f1 f 2 − g g
f1 f 2
1
−
1 y f 1h f 2 − g f 1 y f 2
g f 1g f 2 y f 1z f 2 g f 1 y f 2 y f 1h f 2
1 z f 1g f 2hf 1z f 2 1 h f 1h f 2 z f 1 y f 2
zf = = hf = =
1
−
1 hf 1z f 2 − z f 1g f 2 1
−
1 z f 1 y f 2 − h f 1h f 2
z f 1g f 2 hf 1z f 2 h f 1h f 2 z f 1 y f 2
⎡v1 ⎤ ⎡ A B ⎤ ⎡ v2 ⎤
⎢ i ⎥ = ⎢C D ⎥ ⎢ −i ⎥
⎣ 1⎦ ⎣ ⎦⎣ 2⎦
• Note the sign of i2 and also the reverse sense of signal flow. The sign is chosen so
the ABCD matrix of a cascade of two networks is just the matrix product of the
individual ABCD matrices (compare this to the messy loading calculation before!)
• The reverse sense of signal flow is to keep the matrix finite if an amplifier is
unilateral.
• The conversion from, say, Y to ABCD follows the same logic as the Y(H) calculation:
⎡v1 ⎤ ⎡ A B ⎤ ⎡ v2 ⎤ ⎡ 1 0 ⎤ ⎡ v1 ⎤ ⎡ A B ⎤ ⎡ 0 1 ⎤ ⎡ v1 ⎤
⎢ i ⎥ = ⎢C D ⎥ ⎢ −i ⎥ ⇒ ⎢Y Y ⎥ ⎢ v ⎥ = ⎢C D ⎥ ⎢ −Y −Y22 ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ v2 ⎥⎦
⇒
⎣ 1⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ 2 ⎦ ⎣ 11 12 ⎦ ⎣ 2 ⎦ ⎣ ⎦ ⎣ 21
⎡ A B ⎤ −1 ⎡Y22 1 ⎤
⎢C D ⎥ = Y ⎢ Δ Y ⎥ , Δ y = Y11Y22 − Y21Y12
⎣ ⎦ 21 ⎣ Y 11 ⎦
Remember that all ABCD parameters are inversely proportional to the gains. This
is the reason for formally choosing port 2 as the input port.
The intuitive choice of input at port 1 would make all parameters inversely
proportional to the reverse gains, which are small, and usually not very accurately
determined.
Y1 G1
Y1+Y2 G1+G2
Y2 G2
Z1 H1
Z1+Z2 H1+H2
Z2 H2
X1 X2 X1X2