Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 15

Whom do you really believe,

Kavanaugh or Ford?
A Short Study in Propaganda and Deceits

Alleged Lies by Kavanaugh

K1. Connection to Yale
FACT, A LEGACY STUDENT. Newsweek, 09/30/2018, by Jason Lemon.

TRUTH Newsweek and other media outlets intentionally left out a crucial detail in
Kavanaugh’s testimony. Kavanaugh was stating that he had no connections to YALE LAW
SCHOOL. Anyone who’s familiar with Ivy-league admissions would know that Yale Law
School is a separate entity and that one’s legacy status as well as his/her matriculation at
the Yale College offers no advantage as far as law school admission is concerned. This is
also confirmed publicly by the dean of Yale Law School. By conveniently and more
importantly, deceptively, dropping “law school,” the media managed to lure many suckers
into believing that Kavanaugh lied, WHEN IN FACT, HE DIDN’T.

K2. Drinking to Blackout

CLAIM Kavanaugh lied about his drinking to blackouts while his friends described him as a
drunkard who behaved uncontrollably when drunk.

TRUTH Kavanaugh admitted that he drank to excess sometimes. But he insisted that he
never blacked out. It’s very difficult to prove whether he was telling the truth or lying,
because only the drunk himself — did you catch my sexism — knew for certain whether he
blacked out or not. The so-called evidence the media has is really people saying
Kavanaugh drank a lot. They never said he blacked out. The distinction here is crucial.
Once again, the media is trying to conflate two things and hoping that you don’t notice their
sleight of hand.

K3. Devil’s Triangle

CLAIM Kavanaugh lied about the meaning of Devil’s Triangle in his yearbook. He claimed it
was a drinking game when in fact it described a threesome.

TRUTH Kavanaugh’s high-school friends have just written letters to the Senate (under oath
that is) showing that Devil’s Triangle was a drinking game. The letters are enclosed.

K4. Ford’s Witnesses Refuted Her Claims

CLAIM Kavanaugh lied about Ford’s witnesses refuted her claims when in fact Leland
Keyser didn’t.

TRUTH This is really word play here. Ms. Keyser denied, UNDER OATH, having attended
party described by Ford. She denied knowing Kavanaugh. She simply didn’t corroborate
Ford’s story. If that’s not a refutation, I don’t know what is.

FBI now has sworn statements from all 4 witnesses denying Ford’s version of the

Keyser did say that “she believed Ms. Ford.” But don’t you find this statement contradicts
her denial? We now have evidence that Ford’s longtime friend, former FBI agent Monica
McClean, who happens to live in Rehoboth Beach, DE where Ford wrote her July 30 letter,
pressured Ms. Keyser to change her statement to the Senator Judiciary Committee. This is
reported today by Wall Street Journal (https://www.wsj.com/articles/friend-of-dr-ford-felt-
pressure-to-revisit-statement-1538715152). This is witness tampering.

Some more interesting facts about Ford and Monica McClean

It is now known that Ford coached McClean on how to take the polygraph in early 1990’s,
despite Ford’s denial of knowing anything about polygraph at the hearing. She perjured herself!

Ford’s lawyer Bromwich worked in DOJ. McClean’s lawyer Laufman was also in the DOJ (or
FBI) and was one of the two agents who interviewed HRC on the email investigation and asked
the softball questions. Laufman abruptly resigned from his post in early 2018. It’s conceivable
that the small cabal of former (fired) FBI/DOJ officials are working together to smear and bring
down Kavanaugh.

Proven and Likely Perjuries by Christine B. Ford

The media has portrayed Ford as “extremely credible” and exhorted people to “believe her,”
despite lack of any credible evidence AND corroboration for her allegation. We are to take
Ford’s story at its face value when she in fact clearly perjured herself during the hearing.

F1. She is afraid of flying

CLAIM Ford claims her fear of flying during the initial negotiation with the Senate Judiciary
Committee in order to postpone or block her testimony to the committee.

TRUTH During the hearing, Rachel Mitchell made Ford admit that she flew a lot for work
and for her hobbies. On 10/02, the ex-boyfriend of Ford, whose name is being withheld,
wrote a letter (enclosed) to Senate Judiciary Committee, stating, inter alia, that Ford and he
never exhibited any fear of flying. In fact, they flew a lot in small planes when island
hopping in Hawaii.

F2. She had never taken a polygraph or advised someone on

how to take one
CLAIM The following is an exchange between the sex-crime expert, Rachel Mitchell and
Ms. Ford during the hearing.

MITCHELL: Have you ever had discussions with anyone, beside your
attorneys, on how to take a polygraph?

FORD: Never.

MITCHELL: And I don’t just mean countermeasures, but I mean just

any sort of tips, or anything like that.

FORD: No. I was scared of the test itself, but was comfortable
that I could tell the information, and the test would reveal
whatever it was going to reveal. I didn’t expect it to be as long
as it was going to be, so it was a little bit stressful.

MITCHELL: Had—have you ever given tips or advice to somebody who

was looking to take a polygraph test?

FORD: Never.

Ford essentially denied any knowledge of the polygraph prior to hear Aug 7th polygraph

TRUTH In the 10/02 letter, Ford’s ex-boyfriend of Ford stated, UNDER PENALTY OF
PERJURY, that he saw Ford coach her life-long friend Monica L. McClean on how to take
the polygraph when she applied to a job with the FBI.

F3. The second door in her house

CLAIM Ford claimed that she and her husband had a fight about installing the second door
in her Palo Alto house and that fight led her to soul searching and subsequent recall of the
assault in 2012.

SPECULATION This is still being debated. But Google map and public records show that
Ford obtained a permit for renovation in 2008 and by February 2011 the second door had
already been installed and remained to this day. Furthermore, the second door seemed to
be for an extension of her house that was to be used as a rental, not the “escape door” as
Christine Ford described.

In addition, if having a second door is such an important issue to Ford, why is a second
installed at their beach house.

The Truth may be altogether different from what Ford wants us to believe. Ford saw her
therapist about the assault in 2012, shortly after Kavanaugh’s name was publicly mentioned
to be on then presidential candidate Romney’s short list. Let that sink in for a moment. She
could have planned the whole smear campaign as early as 2012

Propaganda and Deception by the Media

I hope by the aforementioned examples I have given you some glimpses into the campaign of
deception that is being waged on the unsuspecting populace. The media has been at it for
probably as long as you have lived. They have perfected their art to such a degree that they
can turn the truth upside down. Indeed, the pen is mightier than the sword.

Furthermore, the control by the media is TOTAL. Today one hardly hears any dissenting voice.
The social media sphere is also being controlled by the establishment. The minority opinions
and the alternative voices are one by one being forced off even the alternative media like
Reddit and YouTube, all under the specious charge of “violating content rules.” Under such
tight control, an average person has ZERO CHANCE of escaping indoctrination. Before reading
the examples of lies that I presented you, were you aware that the media might just be lying to

Our society, as controlled by the traditional media and the social media, is more totalitarian
than Soviet Union, because the indoctrinated BELIEVE what they are fed. Our republic cannot
function as it was intended if such manipulation and control continue.

Neither can our republic survive when the basic tenets of rule of law are abandoned. But this is
exactly what the Hill Democrats have been calling for. (I distinguish between the Democratic
Party leadership and their followers. The latter are good people.)

By claiming the allegations are made for a job interview, not at a criminal court and that
Kavanaugh must prove his innocence and Ford need not show any evidence, the Hill
Democrats hope to lure people into abandoning the American value of “innocence before
proven guilty.” I urge you to review what Democratic senators said after the Kavanaugh hearing
and think for a moment what our lawmakers ARE DOING.

Make no mistakes, as Harvard law professor Dershowitz pointed out, “Innocence before
proven guilty” is the fundamental principle of the American Way, both inside and outside the
criminal court. In that sense, what the Hill Democrats were doing in the past few weeks is
tantamount to subverting and turning upside down the very foundation of this Republic.

If they were successful, no one would be safe from false accusations; and we can kiss
our great country goodbye.

What is Justice? Do we have Critical Thinking?

This is probably the most tragic episode in the history of the United States. Half the country
sincerely believes that someone has the right to accuse an innocent man without a shred of
evidence, i.e., she is a victim and survivor, and that the accused is automatically guilty and he
lied under oath despite the contrary evidence. The people who believe in these lies act out of
their sense of justice when in fact their beliefs run counter to WHAT JUSTICE MEANS. Justice
means above all equality before the law. Both the accuser and the accused are to be treated
equally; they both must provide evidence-based corroborations and refutations. To give a blind
pass to Ms. Ford is simply abandoning justice altogether.

Make no mistakes. The rule of law, the concept of equal justice, has been under assault for the
last few decades. What have we seen this before? In the Clinton Email scandal and the illegal
spying on the Trump campaign. In the former, Clinton was exonerated despite the
overwhelming evidence of her wrongdoing that FBI Director Comey admitted to the congress.
In the latter, unverified gossip documents were used as a pretext to obtain FISA warrant to spy
on the Trump campaign and later used to bring down a duly elected president.

That a large number of educated people have failed to recognize or acknowledge the double
standards in our current system, because of their (misled) hatred for Trump, is a tragedy of an
epic proportion.

To quote an online blogger Rex,

Thinking critically - evaluating the truth of competing claims,

using evidence that you have triaged with logic & experience, is

You have to suspend inherent bias & reach an objective


Critical thinking is an ancient tradition, a set of skills,

passed on from ancient Greek thinkers (esp Socrates) and before.

The core message? Be sceptical.and humble. What others tell you

is true, may not be. Test it against objective criteria, not gut
feel or 'the herd’.

Any person with reasonable critical thinking skills, can see that
#DrFraud's allegations against Kavanaugh are not credible.

Not because she's a leftist stooge.

But because objectively, the numerous inconsistencies and

untruths in her tale, render it not believable.

When you have no critical thinking skills, such as Griffin, all

you have left is emotion. The only way to win an argument is via
bullying, hectoring, smear and violence.

And lies.

You must FORCE the other side to cower and hide. To do this, you
need a MOB, with pitchforks.

I mentioned the 'narcissistic blow' in the first tweet.

This is the moment when a narcissist's true nature is exposed.

For many leftists, this happened when Trump won the 2016
election. The night when all their self-reflecting mirrors
smashed into pieces.

Many forget that for 8 years, charlatans such as Obama had told
these people, that their grandiose view of themselves was TRUE.

What did he tell them?

Not just that they were the most intelligent, morally superior &
progressive people in the USA.


That they were the most amazing people in HISTORY.

Years ahead of everyone else.

Therefore, entitled to wealth, status and of course POWER.


Obama was the worst of the lot.

Only the most malign narcissist, could accept a Nobel Peace Prize
for doing nothing.

He is on record speaking of himself, as someone with God-like


But leftists lived him for it. He gave them never ending
narcissistic supply

In return, they looked the other way as he trampled the

Constitution and rule of law, weaponized the administration
against those who opposed him, divided the nation and weakened
the US overseas.

No other POTUS has done more damage to America. Obama was a


Leftists are astonished when it is pointed out to them, that

Obama & his stooges also destroyed the Democrat Party.

After the 2016 election, it was the weakest in a century.

It is weaker now, than it has ever been. A far left, extremist

group of wackos.

Of course, the ultimate expression of Obama & Clinton's

corruption, is their scheme to rig the 2016 election.

But from 2008, we also see a pronounced trend of innocent

citizens being targeted for destruction.

Obama LOVED spying. That power gave him huge pleasure, IMO.

Obama set the tone & playbook (ditto Clintons) for the politics
of personal destruction we have seen play out, against innocent
Kavanaugh and his family.

His foot soldiers in the Democrat Party, such as the despicable

Feinstein, are using the template they were given.
When malign narcissists suffer the blow, they typically respond
in exactly the way we have seen Griffin, Milano and the #FakeNews

Screeching, unhinged hysteria.

Mixed with the ignorance that a lack of critical thought

produces, it's a toxic combination.

These hysterical fools are gullible. Easily manipulated.

Feinstein, Obama & Clinton know how to exploit them, for their
own ends.

What is really happening?

One has to wonder why Senator Feinstein sat on Christine B. Ford’s letter for six weeks before
having it leaked to the media; why so many allegations of sexual misconduct against
Kavanaugh came one after another right before the vote at the Senate Judiciary Committee
was to take place?

You are witnessing the Democrats’ playbook. They have been using allegations of sexual
wrongdoings against innocent people for a long time, most recently Admiral Jackson who was
nominated to be the Secretary of Veteran’s Affair. The modus operandi for the Hill Democrats is
to coordinate with the MSM — which is really an arm of the Democratic Party (just as the
AntiFa is the militant arm of the party — to launch a wave of allegations, hoping the target
would buckle under public pressure.

It was an effective strategy and the Hill Democrats have used it over and over again. But this
time, they are dealing with a different opponent. Trump is a street fighter. He refused to back
down. Kavanaugh refused to back down. And the republican law makers, who have since been
freed by Trump from the lifelong blackmail by the Democrats, refused to back down. Trump
and team called the bluffs on the Hill Democrats. Christine B. Ford was never supposed to go
on the capitol to testify. Ditto with other accusers. Now that their allegations are falling apart,
the Hill Democrats still try to railroad Kavanaugh and pressure him to withdraw, as one dirty NJ
senator Cory Booker said below.

Doesn't Matter If Kavanaugh Is "Innocent Or Guilty," Trump Should Nominate

Someone Else — Cory Booker

Having political dissent is indicative of a healthy society. But what is happening is not political
dissent. It’s the established crime syndicate which consists of the Hill Democrats, some
republic law makers (RINOs), the MSM and many corrupt civil servants trying to retain their
power through any means possible.

We are not witnessing a political struggle. This is different from the Garland debacle. The GOP,
though playing politics with Garland’s nomination, rightly pointed out that they were invoking
the Biden rule that was laid down by Democratic Senator Joe Biden.

What we are witnessing is a despicable act of a cornered beast fighting for its survival, using
whatever dirty means at disposal. And the means at its disposal is indeed vast and powerful,
as demonstrated by the hypnotic power of the media.

But the good people will win. The corrupt elements of our society will go down this time. They
will mostly end up in jail. (See the 57,000 sealed federal cases, of which probably
10,000-20,000 are sealed indictments.) When that happens, pretty soon, it’ll be a bright day for
America. No more selling out this country to China. The country will become strong again. We
will still have partisan quarrels. But they will be done under RULE OF LAW.

The Day of Liberation is Coming; USA —> World

You have to ask yourself, why did the Hill Democrats sink to such despicable level this time,
throwing literally everything at Kavanaugh? It’s as if they are not even trying to hide anything.

Let me tell you, the corrupt politicians — part of the cabal — knew their end is near. Once
Kavanaugh is seated, 57,000 sealed federal cases, of which probably 10,000-20,000 are
sealed indictments, will be unsealed. Many of them will go down, go to jail or even face the
military tribunal for treason. (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/

Wait. You ask, how can a civilian be tried under the military justice? They can be if they
conspired or worked with the enemy of the United States to harm this country, as in the case of
John McCain. The precedents have already been set. I highly recommend that you watch this
exchange between Senator Lindsey Graham and Brett Kavanaugh during the confirmation
hearing. They went over precisely this issue of trying civilians in the military court. https://

Speaking of John McCain, I want to tell you a shocking revelation. You are all led to believing
that McCain had terminal cancer and that he eventually refused the treatment and died. How
come he didn’t get diagnosed much earlier? The timing seems a bit suspicious.

Well, John McCain was in fact executed on August 25, at 4:28 PM PDT. How do we know?
Because Governor Kasich accidentally slipped his tongue and told us that McCain “was put to
death.” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIbf6wB8LSU)

So yeah, Nancy Pelosi, HRC and possibly BHO will follow McCain’s footstep.

In case you still doubt, check the news article on GITMO being renovated and
tour-of-guant-namos-prison-complex-signs-of-expansion. And https://nypost.com/

If Trump is pulling troops out of the Middle East, why do we need to expand GITMO? To hold
the terrorists? Or traitors?

Remember what Trump said during his inauguration speech. “Return the power from
Washington DC back to the people.”

We are at the cusp of a Second American Revolution. We are sheep no more.

You have more than you know.

Additional Resources
Professor Margo Cleveland has thorough analysis. https://twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland

Sundance at The Conservative Tree House does outstanding analysis. https://twitter.com/

TheLastRefuge2 and https://theconservativetreehouse.com.

Rex Imperator often has insider information. https://twitter.com/_ImperatorRex_

Notable blogges: Steath Jeff, and Brian Cates, https://twitter.com/BrianDCates

Analysis of C. B. Ford Body Language: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGxr1VQ2dPI



James Ellul. Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes. https://www.amazon.com/


How Nihilism Consumed the Left. https://m.theepochtimes.com/postmodernism-how-nihilism-


Podcast by Dan Bongino. https://bongino.com/

Clearest explanation of the FISA scandal (aka SpyGate). http://www.targetliberty.com/2018/09/


Trump Executive Order, December 21, 2017. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/


Trump Executive Order, March 1, 2018. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2018-


Tracking Sealed Federal Cases. Check your district. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/


October 2, 2018
Ms. Debra S. Katz
Ms. Lisa J. Banks
Mr. Joseph E. Abboud
Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP
1718 Connecticut A venue NW
Washington, D.C. 20009

Dear Ms. Katz., Ms. Banks, Mr. Abboud, and Mr. Bromwich:
I write to renew my requests for material evidence relevant to
allegations of sexual assault made by your client, Dr. Christine
Blasey Ford, against Judge Brett Kavanaugh. During the hearing
last week, Senator Kamala Harris argued that it was only fair
for senators on the Committee to see the evidence that the
witness was being asked to address. The same principle applies
to this request. Your continued withholding of material evidence
despite multiple requests is unacceptable as the Senate
exercises its constitutional responsibility of advice and
consent for a judicial nomination. I urge you to comply promptly
with my requests.
First, I renew my request for the notes from therapy sessions in
which Dr. Ford discussed the alleged assault by Judge
Kavanaugh. The Washington Post reported that some notes were
provided to The Post, and Dr. Ford's testimony indicated that
these notes were highly relevant to her allegations. These notes
have been repeatedly cited as corroboration even while written
30 years after the alleged event and in apparent contradiction
with testimony and other public statements regarding several key
details of the allegations, including when the alleged attack
occurred, how many individuals were present in the bedroom in
which the attack was alleged to have occurred, and how many
individuals attended the party.
Your previous response to this request—that "[t]hese records
contain private, highly sensitive information that is not
necessary for the Committee to assess the credibility of [Dr.
Ford's] testimony"—is not justified, based on the fact that this
material has been presented as a key component supporting
allegations made by your client, including the presentation made
to The Washington Post.
Second, I renew my request for copies of all audio or video
recordings produced during the course of Mr. Hanafin's polygraph
examination of Dr. Ford, as well as all polygraph charts and
other data that Mr. Hanafin relied upon in preparing his report.
I made these requests both before and during the hearing, but I
have yet to receive them. Dr. Ford cited the results of this
polygraph examination to support her allegations. It's unfair to
rely on the results of a polygraph examination while withholding
the materials necessary to assess the accuracy of the results.
The full details of Dr. Ford's polygraph are particularly
important because the Senate Judiciary Committee has received a
sworn statement from a longtime boyfriend of Dr. Ford's, stating
that he personally witnessed Dr. Ford coaching a friend on
polygraph examinations. When asked under oath in the hearing
whether she'd ever given any tips or advice to someone who was
planning on taking a polygraph, Dr. Ford replied, "Never." This
statement raises specific concerns about the reliability of her
polygraph examination results. The Senate therefore needs this
Third, I renew my request for copies of any and all written,
audiovisual, or electronic materials relating to the allegations
raised by Dr. Ford against Judge Kavanaugh that Dr. Ford or her
representative previously provided to any reporter or anyone
else at a media organization. On the eve of our Thursday,
September 27 hearing, you provided a single screenshot of Dr.
Ford's WhatsApp correspondence with The Washington Post tip
line. But Dr. Ford testified the next day that she had continued
her conversation, "under the encrypted app," with a reporter.
Your failure to provide the entirety of Dr. Ford's
correspondence with The Post again suggests a lack of candor.
That the Senate is not a court of law does not change the
reality that Dr. Ford's allegations have put Judge Kavanaugh on
trial before the nation. A sitting federal judge and Supreme
Court nominee has been accused of committing a violent crime.
Dr. Ford, to her credit, offered her testimony to the Judiciary
Committee, notwithstanding attempts at obstruction by her
attorneys and Senate Democratic leadership. The testimony hinges
on evidence to which Dr. Ford has repeatedly referred—some of
which has already been provided to a nationally circulated
newspaper—but which you have refused to provide to the Senate.
If it is necessary to protect certain records from public
disclosure, then I'm happy to discuss how to achieve that goal.
And I can certainly understand, in light of Democrats' betrayal
of Dr. Ford's desire for confidentiality, that she may hesitate
to trust such an arrangement. Still, these records are central
to the credibility of Dr. Ford's allegations and must be
Please provide the requested materials to the Senate Judiciary
Committee immediately.

October 4, 2018
Ms. Debra S. Katz

Ms. Lisa J. Banks

Mr. Joseph E. Abboud
Katz, Marshall & Banks, LLP
1718 Connecticut Avenue NW
Washington, D.C. 20009
Dear Ms. Katz, Ms. Banks, Mr. Abboud, and Mr. Bromwich:
I’m writing in response to your response to my letter dated October 2.
You said that Dr. Ford is willing to turn her documents over to the FBI,
but my request of you was not for documents to be turned over to the
FBI. I asked you to provide the documents to the Senate Judiciary
Committee. Your response on behalf of your client is a non-sequitur. The
Constitution charges the Senate with advising the President on his
nomination. Senators have a constitutional obligation to investigate and
evaluate independently the President’s nominees. Our obligation is
unrelated to anything the FBI does. That’s why we don’t just vote on
nominees after the President loans us the FBI background investigation.
We have to make our own assessment.
The U.S. Senate doesn’t control the FBI. If you have an objection to how
the FBI conducts its investigations, take it up with Director Wray. But
don’t raise that objection as a reason not to respond to this Committee’s
demand for relevant evidence. The FBI’s investigative decisions aren’t
our concern. Even if the FBI never interviews Dr. Ford, or interviews her
ten times, this Committee has a constitutional obligation to investigate
Dr. Ford’s allegations, and that’s what we’ve been doing since we
became aware of her allegations.
It’s not even clear to me what purpose turning over these materials to the
FBI would accomplish. The FBI would simply turn over that evidence to
the Senate. That is precisely the outcome I seek with this request.
You have claimed repeatedly that the evidence I have requested
supports Dr. Ford’s allegations against Judge Kavanaugh. She even
provided some of this evidence to national news organizations.
Accordingly, there is no reason for you to not produce the evidence to
the Senate. Indeed, if the evidence supported your client’s allegations,
you surely would produce it as quickly as you could.
But you have repeatedly refused to produce this evidence to the Senate.
In doing so, you are preventing the Senate from considering the
evidence most crucial to Dr. Ford’s allegations. I don’t know what other
inference we should draw from your refusal but that the withheld
evidence does not support Dr. Ford’s allegations in quite the way you
have claimed.
I urge you once again, now for the third time in writing, to turn over the
therapy notes, polygraph materials, and communications with The
Washington Post that Dr. Ford has relied upon as evidence. In addition
to the evidence I requested in my October 2 letter, in light of recently
uncovered information, please turn over records and descriptions of
direct or indirect communications between Dr. Ford or her
representatives and any of the following: (1) U.S. Senators or their staffs,
particularly the offices of Senators Feinstein and Hirono, other than your
communications with me and my staff in preparation for the September
27 hearing; (2) the alleged witnesses identified by Dr. Ford (Leland
Keyser, Mark Judge, and Patrick “P.J.” Smyth); and (3) Debbie Ramirez,
Julie Swetnick, or their representatives.

Chuck Grassley
United States Senator
Chairman, Committee
on the Judiciary

Supplemental FBI Investigation Executive Summary

At the Senate Judiciary Committee’s request, the FBI opened a supplemental

background investigation into Judge Kavanaugh. It’s his seventh FBI
background investigation in 25 years, going back to 1993. The request was for
an investigation into current credible allegations against Judge Kavanaugh.

In the course of its investigation, the FBI decided to reach out to eleven people,
ten of whom agreed to be interviewed. The FBI reached out to all witnesses with
potential firsthand knowledge of the allegations. The FBI provided to the Senate
12 detailed FD-302 reports summarizing their interviews with the witnesses as
well as supporting materials cited by the witnesses during their interviews.

Interview Subjects

The FBI interviewed the following ten individuals:

Ford Allegations

• The three individuals identified by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford as having

attended the gathering where she was allegedly assaulted. Mark Judge PJ
Smyth Leland Keyser

• Mark Judge

• PJ Smyth

• Leland Keyser

• Two other individuals included on Judge Kavanaugh’s July 1, 1982

calendar entry. Timothy Gaudette Christopher Garrett

• Timothy Gaudette

• Christopher Garrett

• An attorney for one of the witnesses

Ramirez Allegations

• Deborah Ramirez

• Two alleged eyewitnesses named by Deborah Ramirez (a third alleged

eyewitness refused to submit to an interview)

• Deborah Ramirez’s close friend from college


The Supplemental Background Investigation confirms what the Senate Judiciary

Committee concluded after its investigation: there is no corroboration of the
allegations made by Dr. Ford or Ms. Ramirez.