Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
3619,
THE COAST GUARD AUTHORIZATION ACT OF 2010
TITLE I. AUTHORIZATION
1
Carolina, to enter into reimbursable agreements to perform work for agencies in the
Department of Defense.
Section 205. Coast Guard Participation in the Armed Forces Retirement Home (AFRH)
System
This section would amend the Armed Forces Retirement Home Act of 1991 to include the
Coast Guard in the Armed Forces retirement home system. This would authorize Coast
Guard veterans to have the same access to the AFRH system as retirees from the other
military services.
2
Section 208.Enforcement Authority.1
This section would make a technical correction to transfer from title 46 to title 14, United
States Code, a provision regarding the Coast Guard's law enforcement authorities at
onshore facilities.
1
Italicized text indicates provisions not found in S. 1194, the Coast Guard Authorization Act for Fiscal
Years 2010 and 2011, or the Senate-passed version of H.R. 3619.
3
Section 214. Coast Guard District Ombudsmen
This section would require the appointment of a Coast Guard District Ombudsman in each
Coast Guard district. Those individuals appointed as District Ombudsmen must have
experience in port and transportation systems, and maritime commerce. The purpose of the
District Ombudsmen will be to resolve disputes between the Coast Guard and ports, labor,
ship owners, and terminal operators regarding requirements imposed or services provided
by the Coast Guard. The District Ombudsmen shall develop guidelines regarding the types
of disputes with respect to which the ombudsman can provide assistance; priority shall be
given to petitioners who believe they will suffer a significant hardship as the result of
implementing a Coast Guard requirement or being denied a Coast Guard service. The
District Ombudsman is empowered to consult with Coast Guard personnel, and review any
document that will aid an investigation. Complaints are to be addressed within four months
of being submitted to the District Ombudsman.
4
supplemental air and maritime navigation system as a backup to Global Positioning System.
This study would be submitted not later than 1 year after enactment.
5
This section would extend the Coast Guard's authority to establish anchorage grounds for
vessels from three nautical miles to 12 nautical miles, and also increases the civil penalty
fines imposed for a violation of rules concerning the anchorage grounds from $100 to up to
$10,000, with each day of a continuing violation constituting a separate violation. The
amount of the penalty was last adjusted in 1915.
6
Section 307 Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Implementation2
This section would require the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is
operating to work through the International Maritime Organization to establish agreements
to promote coordinated action between the United States, Russia, Canada, Iceland,
Norway, and Denmark and other seafaring and Arctic nations to ensure, in the Arctic: that
aids-to-navigation are placed and maintained; there are appropriate icebreaking escort, tug,
and salvage capabilities and oil spill prevention and response capability; maritime domain
awareness is maintained, including long-range vessel tracking; and search and rescue
capability is available. This section would also require the Commandant to conduct a
comparative cost-benefit analysis of rebuilding, renovating, or improving the existing fleet of
icebreakers or constructing new icebreakers for operation by the Coast Guard. The cost-
benefit analysis should also include the Coast Guard's ability to maintain a presence in the
Arctic regions through 2020 if constructing new or improving the existing ice breakers is not
fully funded. The Commandant would be required to submit a report containing the results
of the High Latitude Study assessing Arctic ice-breaking mission requirements 90 days after
the date of enactment of this Act or the date on which the study is completed, whichever
occurs later.
2
This section includes the polar icebreakers study requirement found in section 603 of the Senate-
passed version of H.R. 3619.
7
SUBCHAPTER 1 – GENERAL PROVISIONS
9
subcontractor. Excessive pass-through charges are defined as charges to the Government
by a contractor or subcontractor that is for overhead or profit on work performed by a lower-
tier subcontractor, other than reasonable charges for the direct costs of managing the
lower-tier subcontractors.
§ 569 Report on former Coast Guard officials employed by contractors to the agency
This section would require GAO to report annually on those Flag-level officers and
Members of the Senior Executive Service who have left the Coast Guard within the past five
years, and are now receiving compensation for employment with a Coast Guard contractor.
§ 572 Acquisition
This section would mandate that the Commandant clearly define the operational
requirements for the project, establish the feasibility of alternatives, develop an acquisition
project baseline, produce a life-cycle cost estimate and assess the relative merits of
alternatives to determine the preferred solution prior to establishing a major systems
acquisition program or project.
This section would require that the Coast Guard may not acquire an experimental or
technically immature capability or asset, or implement a Level 1 or Level 2 acquisition
unless it has prepared an analysis of alternatives that includes an assessment of the
technical maturity, an examination of capability, an evaluation of whether different
combinations of assets could meet the performance needs, and a discussion of key
assumptions and variables.
In addition, this section would mandate the development and use of a Test and Evaluation
Master Plan. This plan would require the establishment of a strategy to verify capability
design and development, and require that adequate developmental and operational tests
and evaluations are conducted. The Test and Evaluation Master Plan also would identify
10
critical operational issues, operational test and evaluation phases, require early operational
assessments, and would estimate the resources required for the test and evaluation
activities. The Coast Guard may not move forward with a major systems acquisition
program or project or award any production contract until the Test and Evaluation Master
Plan is approved by the Chief Acquisition Officer. These procedures are consistent with the
Department of Homeland Security's acquisition procedures.
Further, this section would require the Commandant to implement mechanisms to ensure
the development and regular updating of life-cycle cost estimates for each acquisition with
an acquisition cost of $10 million or greater and an expected service life of 10 years or
greater.
In addition, this section would require that the Coast Guard use independent third parties
with expertise in testing and evaluating the capabilities or assets being acquired whenever
the Coast Guard lacks the capability to do so. It would also mandate that communication
concerns identified during the development and demonstration phase be communicated no
later than 30 days after completion of the test, evaluation, or both as the case may be, to
the program manager and to the Chief Acquisition Officer.
This section also contains specific requirements that are to be met with regard to technical
certification of major systems acquisition programs or projects. The Coast Guard would be
mandated to certify major systems acquisition programs or projects through the Coast
Guard's technical authority after review by an independent third party. This review
requirement is not intended to diminish, limit, or otherwise affect the authority or
responsibility of the Coast Guard technical authority, nor is it intended to make the Coast
Guard technical authority subordinate to an independent third party or to impose a review
requirement when the Coast Guard possesses the capability to conduct the tests and
evaluations required by a master plan. All electronics on any asset that requires TEMPEST
certification would be tested and certified in accordance with the Master Plan standards by
an independent third party authorized by the federal government.
11
Lastly, this section would mandate that all cutters acquired by the Coast Guard be classed
by the American Bureau of Shipping before final acceptance.
In addition, this section makes clear that the Commandant would be required to execute the
production contracts, make sure the delivered products meet cost and schedule
requirements in accordance with the acquisition program baseline, validate manpower and
training requirements to support the operation of the acquired product or system, and
prepare transition plans for programmatic sustainment, operations, and support.
§ 581 Definitions
This section would define key terms used in the new chapter created by Sec. 402 of this
Act.
12
performance issues in the DHS IG Report OIG-07-23 all results of an assessment of the
proposed hull strengthening design.
13
Section 522. Marine Safety Mission Priorities and Long-term Goals
This section would require the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is
operating to develop a long-term strategy to improve vessel safety and the safety of
individuals on vessels, and to submit annually a plan and schedule to achieve specific
goals, including reducing the number of marine casualties and identifying and targeting
enforcement efforts on high-risk vessels and operators. The section outlines specific goals
to be included in the strategic plan.
14
Section 602 Vessel Size Limits
This section would allow fishing vessels in the rationalized Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands
pollock fishery to be documented with a fishery endorsement, if the vessel is a rebuilt or a
replacement vessel of a vessel that is authorized to hold a Federal fishery permit under the
American Fisheries Act, notwithstanding current limits on length, tonnage, and horsepower.
This section does not alter the fishery quotas established through the Federal fisheries
management process.
This section also would authorize the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard
is operating to establish Fishing Vessel Safety Grants, to fund training of operators and
crew of commercial fishing vessels. The grants are to be awarded on a competitive basis to
organizations or individuals that are approved by the Secretary and that provide hands-on,
skills-based training. Additionally, this section would authorize the Secretary to establish
Fishing Safety Research Grants, to provide funding for research on methods to improve the
safety of commercial fishing, specifically including investigation of enhanced vessel
monitoring systems.
16
Section 610 Safety Management
This section would authorize the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is
operating to require `Safety Management Systems' on passenger vessels and small
passenger vessels based on the number of passengers that could be killed or injured in a
marine casualty. A `Safety Management System' requires vessel owners to document
operational policy, chain of authority, and operational and emergency procedures that
specify responsibilities of the owner or operator, managers, and masters.
17
This section would require the Coast Guard to report to the appropriate committees of the
House and Senate, not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, on plans
to: (1) expand the streamlined evaluation that was implemented at Houston Regional Exam
Center; (2) simplify the application process of seamen and merchant mariner documents;
(3) provide notice to an applicant of the status of a pending application; and (4) ensure that
information collected from applicants is retained in a secure electronic format.
18
and explosions. This section would require the Secretary to conduct the study 36 months
after date of enactment.
Section 703. Improvements to reduce human error and near miss incidents.
This section would direct the Secretary to report on: (1) oil spills involving human error; (2)
near-miss oil spill incidents; and (3) actions taken domestically and at the International
Maritime Organization (IMO) to reduce the risk of oil spills caused by human error.
20
Section 710. Higher volume port area regulatory definition change.
This section would require the Commandant to modify the definition of the term "higher
volume port area" in a specified Coast Guard regulation by replacing "Port Angeles, WA"
with "Cape Flattery, WA." This section would require the Coast Guard to complete its review
of any changes to emergency response plans under the Federal Water Pollution Control Act
resulting from such modification within five years.
21
Section 802. Transportation worker identification credential.
Not later than 120 days after completing the pilot TWIC reader program required by 46
U.S.C. Sec. 70105(k)(1), this section would require the Secretary to submit a report
including the findings of the pilot program with respect to key technical and operation
aspects of deploying the TWIC readers, a listing of achievements during the pilot program,
and an analysis of the viability of those technologies used in the pilot program. The GAO
will then review the Secretary’s report and comment on its findings and recommendations.
22
This section would require the Secretary, acting through the Commandant, to conduct a
program for the mobile biometric identification of suspected individuals, including terrorists,
to enhance border security in the maritime environment. It further would require the Coast
Guard to provide a detailed cost analysis of resources necessary to further expand the
biometric program to other Coast Guard units likely to encounter individuals suspected of
making illegal border crossing in the maritime environment.
23
Section 813. Review of liquefied natural gas facilities
This section would codify existing practices whereby the Coast Guard conducts waterways
suitability assessments prior to new LNG facility licensing by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
Section 816. Assessment of the feasibility of efforts to mitigate the threat of small
boat attack in major ports.
This section would require the Secretary to report on the feasibility of efforts to mitigate the
threat of a small boat attack. At a minimum the report must consider transponder, radio
frequency identification device, and high frequency surface radar technologies.
Section 817. Report and recommendation for uniform security background checks.
This section would require the GAO to review background checks and forms of identification
required under State and local transportation security programs and determine whether
such programs duplicate or conflict with Federal programs. This section also would require
the GAO to submit recommendations for streamlining and eliminating any duplications or
conflicts.
Section 818. Transportation security cards; access pending issuance; deadlines for
processing; receipt.
This section would require the Secretary to coordinate with owners and operators to allow
individuals with pending TWIC applications, or whose card has been lost or stolen, to work
in secure areas if others already in possession of a TWIC card escort the individuals. This
section would establish deadlines for the processing of TWIC applications by the
Department, including Initial Determination of Threat Assessment letters, and appeal and
waiver requests. In addition, this section would require the GAO to conduct an analysis as
to the technical feasibility and cost associated with arranging for TWIC cards to be received
at an enrollment center of an individual’s choosing, or at their place of residence via the
mail. It then directs the Secretary to consider the GAO’s analysis in developing a process
24
wherein TWIC cards can be mailed to or sent to TWIC enrollment center of the applicant’s
choosing.
Section 822. Integration of security plans and systems with local port authorities,
state harbor divisions, and law enforcement agencies.
This section would require facility owners or operators to provide copies of current
vulnerability assessments to the port authority or State or local law enforcement agencies
with jurisdiction over the facility. It also would allow the integration of facility security
systems with Federal security systems to expedite responses to transportation security
incidents.
25
Section 826. Area transportation security incident mitigation plan.
This section would require that Area Maritime Security Committees established by section
70103 of title 46 also develop area response and recovery protocols to prepare for, respond
to, mitigate against, and recover from a transportation security incident.
26
Section 904. Manning requirement.
This section would amend the Coast Guard and Maritime Transport Act of 2006 to prohibit
vessels from engaging a foreign citizen to meet a manning requirement unless it has an
annual safety examination conducted by the authorized enforcer delineated under the Act.
Section 907. Land conveyance, Coast Guard property in Marquette, Michigan, to the
City of Marquette, Michigan.
This section would authorize the Commandant of the Coast Guard to convey as surplus any
parcel of real property under administrative control of the Coast Guard within Marquette
County, Michigan to the City of Marquette, Michigan.
Section 908. Mission requirement analysis for navigable portions of the Rio Grande
River, Texas, international water boundary.
This section would direct the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is
operating in to prepare a mission requirement analysis for the navigable portions of the Rio
Grande River, Texas within ninety days of enactment of this act.
27
Section 911. Study and report regarding effects resulting from changes in United
States policy toward Haiti.
This section would direct the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is
operating in to conduct a study and submit a report to Congress within 180 days after the
date of enactment of this act examining the Coast Guard’s currently ability to respond to any
possible short- and long-term effects resulting from changes in U.S. immigration policy
toward Haiti.
Section 914. Technical amendments to chapter 313 of title 46, United States Code
This section would make technical amendments to laws regarding commercial instruments
and maritime liens in chapter 313 of title 46.
Section 917. Fresnel Lens from Presque Isle Light Station in Presque Isle, Michigan.
This section would direct the Commandant to determine the necessity and adequacy of
existing Federal aids to navigation at Presque Isle Light Station, Presque Isle, Michigan and
28
submit to Congress a determination of the analysis to include the feasibility of restoring the
Fresnel Lens, maintenance of the light and impact on the Fresnel Lens as an artifact. This
comparative analysis would be submitted not later than 1 year after date of enactment. This
section also permits the Commandant to convey or transfer possession of any personal
property of the United States, pertaining to the Fresnel Lens or the Light Station to the
Township.
29
Section 1012. Covered Vessels.
This section would require that, after the Convention enters into force for the United States,
the Act shall apply to a vessel documented under chapter 121 of title 46, United States
Code, or one that is operated under authority of the United States wherever located; any
vessel permitted by a Federal agency to operate on the Outer Continental Shelf; or any
other vessel if it is in the internal waters of the United States, in any port, shipyard, offshore
terminal or other place in the United States, lightering in the territorial sea or anchoring in
the territorial sea of the United States.
This section also lists the vessels excluded from the title, including any warship, naval
auxiliary or other ship owned or operated by a foreign State, and used, for the time being,
only on government non-commercial service and any warship, naval auxiliary or any other
ship owned or operated by the United States and used for the time being only on
Government non-commercial service, provided that the Administrator of the Environmental
Protections Agency (Administrator) may determine that some or all of the requirements
under this Act shall apply to one or more classes of such ships, but any such determination
by the Administrator is subject to the concurrence of the head of the Federal department or
agency under which such ships operate. In no event shall these requirements apply to
combat-related ships.
This section would require a ship of at least 400 gross tons that engages in one or more
international voyages (except fixed or floating platforms, FSUs and FPSOs) that has
completed a successful survey required by the Convention, to be issued an International
Antifouling System Certificate upon the Convention's entry into force in the United States.
The Secretary is authorized to issue the Certificate required by this section, or may delegate
the authority to an organization the Secretary determines is qualified to undertake such
responsibility.
This section also states that the Certificate required by this section shall be maintained as
required by the Secretary and authorizes a Certificate issued by a country that is a party to
the Convention to have the same validity as a Certificate issued by the Secretary under this
section.
Notwithstanding subsection (a), this section would allow a ship of 400 gross tonnage and
above, having the nationality of or entitled to fly the flag of a country that is not a party to the
Convention, to demonstrate compliance through other documentation deemed acceptable
by the Secretary.
31
This section would authorize the Administrator to participate in the technical group,
described in article 7 of the Convention, and in any other body convened pursuant to the
Convention for the consideration of new or additional controls on antifouling systems;
evaluate any risks of adverse effects on non-target organisms or human health presented
by a given antifouling system; undertake an assessment of relevant environmental,
technical and economic considerations necessary to evaluate any proposals for new or
additional controls of antifouling systems, including benefits in the United States and
elsewhere, associated with the production and uses of the subject antifouling system; and
develop recommendations based on such assessment.
This section would require the Secretary of State to convene a public meeting of the
Shipping Coordinating Committee upon referral of any antifouling system to the technical
group described in article 7 of the Convention, for consideration of new or additional
controls. The purpose of the meeting will be to receive information and comments regarding
controls on such antifouling system. Advanced notice of such meeting shall be published in
the Federal Register and on the State Department's website by the Secretary of State. The
Administrator shall assemble and maintain a public docket containing notices pertaining to
such meeting, any comments responding to such notices, the minutes of such meeting, and
materials presented at such meeting.
The Administrator shall promptly make any report by the technical group described in the
Convention available to the public through the docket established pursuant to this section
and announce the availability of such report in the Federal Register. The Administrator shall
provide an opportunity for a public comment for a period of not less than 30 days from the
time the availability of the report is announced in the Federal Register. Where practicable,
the Administrator shall take such comments into consideration in developing
recommendations pursuant to this section.
Section 1025. Scientific and Technical Research and Monitoring; Communication and
Information.
This section would authorize the Secretary, Administrator, and the Administrator of the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to each undertake scientific and technical
research and monitoring pursuant to article 8 of the Convention and to promote the
availability of relevant information concerning the scientific and technical activities
undertaken in accordance with the Convention; marine scientific and technological
programs and their objectives; and the effects observed from any monitoring and
assessment programs relating to antifouling systems.
This section also would prohibit vessels from bearing any antifouling system containing
organotin on its hull or outer surface, regardless of when the system was applied, unless
that vessel bears an overcoating that forms a barrier to organotin leaching from the
underlying antifouling system.
However, these hull restrictions would not apply to fixed and floating platforms, FSUs, or
FPSOs that were constructed prior to January 1, 2003, and that have not been in dry dock
on or after that date.
In addition, this section would not apply to the sale, distribution, or use pursuant to any
agreement between the Administrator and any person that results in an earlier prohibition or
cancellation date than specified in this title, or the manufacture, processing, formulation,
sale, distribution, or use of organotin or antifouling systems containing organotin used or
intended for use only for sonar domes or in conductivity sensors in oceanographic
instruments.
33
This section would authorize officers or employees of the Environmental Protection Agency
or of any State designated by the Administrator to enter any location, at reasonable times,
where organotin or antifouling systems containing organotin are held with the authority to
inspect and obtain samples of any container or labeling for organotin or other substance or
system regulated under the Convention. In case of refusal to obey a subpoena issued to
any person, the Administrator may request the Attorney General to compel compliance.
Consistent with section 1013 of this title, whenever any organotin or other substance or
system is found by the Administrator and there is reason to believe that a seller,
manufacturer, distributer or user has violated or is in violation of any provisions of this title,
or that such organotin or other substance or system has been or is intended to be
manufactured, distributed, sold, or used in violation of this title, the Administrator may issue
a stop manufacture, sale, use or removal order to any other person who owns, controls or
has custody of such organotin or substance or system regulated under the Convention.
After receipt of such order, no person shall manufacture, sell, distribute, use or remove the
organotin or other substance or system described in the order except in accordance with
the order
34
Section 1043. Liability in rem.
This section would require that a vessel operated in violation of the Convention, this title, or
any regulation issued thereunder to be liable in rem for any fine imposed under section 18,
United States Code, or civil penalty assessed pursuant to section 1042 and may be
proceeded against in the U.S. District court of any district in which the ship may be found.
35
Section 1048. Repeal.
This section would repeal The Organotin Antifouling Paint Control Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C.
2401 et seq.).
36