Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CS 120 HYB
9/20/2018
by the FAA to modernize the aviation industry’s technology, is predicted to have massive ramifications
for the industry. The $35.5-billion-dollar project brings updates to multiple sectors of aviation, from
airport runway efficiency to satellite weather imaging. For example, one of these technologies is
Performance-Based Navigation, which seeks to optimize flight paths by using data from multiple flights
and routes to find the most efficient flight path. However, there exists multiple problems with this
technology. Of note to this, under the Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Title 14 Section 40, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is charged with the management of pollution as it relates to
aviation and transport. This often means the management of noise pollution, especially in communities
near airports. However, the more precise and “efficient” flight paths violate some of these regulations.
As mentioned by Kalev Leetaru, a specialist in data and it’s interaction with human factors, “The far
more efficient and precise flight paths have raised the level of aircraft noise in nearby communities and
prompted legal action in an attempt to reverse the modernization efforts and return to age-old
approaches” (Leetaru). Elsewhere in his article, he talks about the effect of efficiency and data as they
pertain to the human side of aviation, with noise pollution being a single factor in this.
However, many people argue that this is not a major concern compared to the potential
increase in efficiency that the new air routes provide. For example, on Boeing’s website, a report by
Senior Technical Fellow David Nakamura describes one of these methods. In his Report, Nakamura
claims that Boeing’s Performance-Based Navigation will include “Global airspace and airline operations
1
are moving to performance-based navigation (PBN), which provides a basis for designing and
implementing automated flight paths that will facilitate airspace design, traffic flow, and improved
access to runways. This change offers a number of operational benefits, including enhanced safety,
increased efficiency, reduced carbon footprint, and reduced costs” (Nakamura 1). While this is for the
most part true, the potential benefits are countered by the well-documented adverse effects of the
increase in noise pollution this system and its’ flight paths would cause. As per the EPA, “Studies have
shown that there are direct links between noise and health. Problems related to noise include stress
related illnesses, high blood pressure, speech interference, hearing loss, sleep disruption, and lost
report by Dr. Alice Suter1, who states in her conclusion “Noise has a significant impact on the quality of
American life. There is no evidence that the impact has diminished in the years since ONAC was
abolished. Rather, it appears that the impact is at least as great, and most probably greater, than it was
10 years ago, due to population growth, especially in urban areas, and the proliferation of certain noise
sources.” (Suter 36). These documented issues mean that Boeing’s flight paths would cause more harm
than they would good, especially for people who live or work on a permanent basis near airports.
In conclusion, there are myriad issues with NextGen technologies. Each potential increase in
aviation efficiency and safety carries with it inherent problems, with Performance-Based Navigation
being one of many potential areas of failure for the NextGen initiative.
1
Dr. Suter is a well-known occupational hearing specialist and was heavily involved in the committee that issued
the report cited by the EPA on their website.
2
Bibliography
Environmental Protection Agency. "Clean Air Act Title IV: Noise Pollution." EPA.gov (2018): 1. Website.
21 09 2018.
Leetaru, Kalev. "The FAA's NextGen Flight Paths and When Data Makes Government Too Efficient."
Forbes (2017): 1. Website Article.
Suter, Alice H. "Noise and it's Effects." Administrative Conference of the United States. 1991. 36.
Document.