Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Lauren Ritzer
In this case we can see an issue between a middle school student, and the school District.
Our student is Ray Knight; he was suspended for three days due to unexcused absences. Parents
are required to know about any suspensions, but Ray’s parents were not aware of the issue
because the one form of notification was thrown out by the student. The first day of suspension,
Ray was accidently shot while visiting a friend’s house. With this case we are going to see if
Ray’s parents have defensible grounds for liability charges against school officials.
In our first case, Robbie L. Johnson V. School District of Mallard (1998), we see that a
Nebraska teacher of an elementary school, had her students learn a new game for music class.
The students to get into a group of three, and lock arms, while they swing to the song “London
Bridge is Falling Down.” The argument is Robbie was thrown across the room and hit a library
case, and the teacher was not there to watch it. The students in the class claim that the teacher, at
this time was facing away from the incident, working on her black board, and could not see how
rough the students were playing. Robbie was awarded money for his injuries, and it was ruled
that the teacher should of payed close attention, especially of the start of a new game to
In our next court case, Rollins V. Concordia Parish School Board (1985). We see the
plaintiff, Lisa Rollins, is a nine-year-old fourth grade student. Unfortunately, the student
fractured her leg when she fell off a merry-go-round during a physical education class on school
grounds. The class consisted of about forty students, the girls were playing on the playground
equipment, and the boys were on the basketball court only fifteen feet away. The substitute
3
teacher, Mrs. Green observed that thy were going too fast on the merry-go-round, and told them
to slow down. Soon after, boys on the basketball court were now getting out of hand too. The
teacher attends the fight between the boys, and in the meantime, Lisa fell off the ride and hurt her
leg. On appeal, the defendant School Board contended that "the trial court erred in finding that
the School Board was negligent in failure to provide adequate supervision." The trial judge had
found Rollins guilty of contributory negligence because she was "riding on the inside of the
merry-go-round and apparently trying to get off of the merry-go-round while the machine was in
motion." The appeals court, therefore, affirmed the trial court's judgment against the defendant
school board awarding plaintiff Rollins $5,000 in damages. The award would have been
$10.000, but since it was mostly the students fault for playing that way, they awarded only half
of the amount.
The next two following court cases show us our con opinion. Our first one, L.R V.
Philadelphia School District (2016). Christina Regusters entered W.C. Bryant Elementary
Regusters proceeded directly to Jane’s classroom, where she encountered Defendant Reginald
Littlejohn, Jane’s teacher. The teacher asked Regusters to produce identification and verification
that student had permission to leave school. Regusters failed to do so. Despite this failure,
teacher allowed Jane to leave his classroom with Regusters. Later that day, Regusters sexually
assaulted Jane off school premises, causing her significant physical and emotional injuries.
Our last case, Anderson V. Independent School District 97 (2003). A school bus driver
was suspended was refusing to undergo a random drug test. Since then, the information was
4
made public, and the school bus driver sued for defamation. It turns out, the driver actually did
submit a sample and complete a test, but failed to supply enough urine to complete the test so he
These court cases were all very hard to rule, in my opinion. I know it is hard for teachers
to have an eye on their students all of the time, especially when their usually is only one teacher
to about thirty students at a time. It is hard to see parents and students winning cases because
they are injured at school. Injuries happen all of the time. I understand the teachers and
administration are supposed to protect the students, but sometimes things go wrong, s shown in
these cases, you close your eyes fir one second, and something could have happened. A teacher’s
whole life could change because of this. I understand the parents side of it too, being that the
child is their life, and when anything happens to them, they are wanting to try to defend
everything that happens at a school, or when the parent is not present. I think if a teacher is
wrong, and can absolutely avoid a situation, like the teacher that signed out the kindergarten
student to a stranger, that is a good case, but when things happen that the teachers cannot control,
References