Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Poly(ethylene terephthalate)
2
Hoechst Corporation, Spartanburg, South Carolina 29304
EXPERIMENTAL
Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and its copol- Figure 1. Effect of isothermal cold crystallization
ymer with 2.6 mol % isophthalate (PET-I/2.6) temperature (Tcc) on the density of PET and PET-I/2.6.
were supplied as pellets by the Hoechst Corpora-
tion, Spartanburg, SC. The pellets were dried in
vacuo at 120°C for 24 h prior to processing. Dried Tcc for PET and PET-I/2.6. Subsequently, barrier
pellets were placed in the 6 3 60 cavity of a 300 specimens of amorphous PET were wrapped in
mm-thick metal spacer and sandwiched between aluminum foil and cold crystallized for 10 min in
two 8 3 80 steel platens covered with Teflon- a press at temperatures of 100, 104, 116, and
coated aluminum foil. The platens were placed in 170°C. Barrier specimens of amorphous PET-I/2.6
a press and heated at 265°C for 5 min with no were cold crystallized in a similar manner at tem-
pressure. The pressure was increased to 20,000 peratures of 87, 100, 112, 116, and 171°C. The
psi and then released; this cycle was repeated densities of these samples, also shown in Figure
three times to ensure that the plaques would be 1, tended to be higher than those for the small
free of air bubbles. Finally, the platens were held samples that were crystallized at the same Tcc.
at 20,000 psi for 5 min and quenched in cold However, both sets of experiments showed that a
water. higher temperature was required to cold crystal-
A density gradient column was constructed lize PET-I/2.6.
from a solution of calcium nitrate/water in accor- Talc-filled PET-I/2.6 was also studied. The talc
dance with ASTM-D 1505 Method B. The column was Supra talc (Lot S01167), the talc platelets
was calibrated with glass floats of known densi- had an aspect ratio of 1-20 and a thickness of
ties. Small pieces (;25 mm2) from each plaque about 1–3 mm. Pellets of PET-I/2.6 with 19 vol %
were placed in the column and allowed to equili- (32 wt %) talc were used to extrude 30 and 60-wide
brate for 15 min before a measurement was sheets of 64-layer microlayers using the micro-
taken. layer coextrusion system described previously.5,6
The amount of crystallinity was determined The extrusion temperature was 265°C; the 30-
from both density and DSC measurements. A wide sheets were cooled in a 60°C water bath,
Rheometric Scientific Differential Scanning Calo- and the 60-wide sheets were cooled on a 60°C
rimeter (DSC) was calibrated with tin, indium, chill roll. The resulting sheets were 10 –20 mil
and sapphire standards. Heating and cooling thick. Three types of microlayer architecture
scans were recorded at 10°C/min over the temper- were prepared. In type U-U (unfilled-unfilled)
ature range of 30 to 300°C with a 3-min hold systems, all layers contained PET-I/2.6. In type
between heating and cooling scans. U-F (unfilled-filled) systems, PET-I/2.6 layers
To determine conditions for cold crystalliza- alternated with 19 vol % talc-filled PET-I/2.6
tion, small portions of the quenched plaques were layers to give an overall talc content of about 9
wrapped in aluminum foil and isothermally cold vol %. In type F-F systems, all 64 layers con-
crystallized for 10 min in a press at temperatures tained 19 vol % talc-filled PET-I/2.6.
of 84, 95, 105, 118, 131, 151, and 171°C. Figure 1 Single layer controls of various talc content
shows the dependence of density of individual were extruded from dry blends of PET-I/2.6 and
specimens on the cold crystallization temperature 19 vol % talc-filled PET-I/2.6 pellets. For this pur-
OXYGEN BARRIER PROPERTIES OF PET 849
O
Pp
` more. Such a low sensitivity of the diffusional flux
J~t! 5 @1 1 2 ~ 2 1!n exp~2Dp2 n2 t/l2 !# (2) to thickness variation meant that the accuracy of
l n51 P and D was determined mainly by the accuracy
of the average thickness measurement. For this
The solubility is then obtained from the relation- reason, special attention was paid to the average
ship P 5 DS. The fitting curves are included with thickness measurement as described in the Ex-
the experimental points in Figure 2; from the perimental section.
quality of the fit, it can be concluded that there is
no concentration dependence of the oxygen diffu-
Effect of Crystallinity
sion coefficient in PET. The fit was equally good
for all the experiments in the study. The error in Figure 4 shows changes in the permeability, dif-
determining the two fitting parameters, P/l and fusion, and solubility coefficients with increasing
D/l2, was estimated not to exceed 2%. Thus, the density. Compression-molded specimens were
main source of error in calculating P and D from used for these experiments, and density was var-
the experimental flux curves lay in the determi- ied by cold crystallization at different tempera-
nation of film thickness l. tures. Essentially identical results for PET and
Because some thickness variation Dl was in- PET-I/2.6 meant that any effect of comonomer in
herent to all the specimens, it was deemed impor- PET-I/2.6 was small compared to the effect of
tant to determine an acceptable range of Dl for crystallization. The significant drop in permeabil-
obtaining reliable values of P and D. Therefore, ity with increased crystallinity is usually ex-
the diffusional flux through a sheet with periodic plained in terms of two factors.1,2 First, inclusion
thickness variation was modeled. The thickness of impermeable crystallites decreases the amount
OXYGEN BARRIER PROPERTIES OF PET 851
r 5 r cf c 1 r a~ r !~1 2 f c! (3)
higher than that in the supercooled liquid at the
same temperature T by free volume v 5 Dk (Tg
The values of fc obtained from eq. (3) were con- 2 T). This quantity is usually ascribed to packing
siderably higher than those estimated by the sim- defects frozen in by the restricted segmental mo-
ple model with constant phase densities. For ex- tion below the Tg and can be considered as micro-
ample, the volume fraction of crystallinity cavities where sorption of the gas molecules is
reached 50% for a specimen of density 1.39 g/cm3, considerably facilitated. This concept underlies
whereas the simple model gave the value of 35% the dual sorption model that distinguishes per-
(Fig. 5). meant molecules absorbed in the microcavities, or
The decrease of the amorphous density with “holes,” and those dissolved in the polymer ma-
increasing crystallinity was totally consistent trix.1,24,27 For oxygen in PET, it was shown that
with the behavior of the solubility coefficient [Fig. the contribution of the dissolution mechanism is
4(c)]. Figure 6(a) shows the dependence of the small, and that the permeant molecules are
specific solubility coefficient of the PET amor- mainly sorbed in holes.27 In this case, sorption is
phous phase, defined as Sa 5 S/(1 2 f c), on the process of filling the holes, and the solubility
amorphous density ra. As seen, this quantity coefficient should be proportional to the amount
gradually decreased with increasing amorphous of free volume.
density. This result permits a straightforward in- The increase of the specific volume of the amor-
terpretation in terms of free volume theo- phous phase, va 5 1/ra, with crystallinity [Fig.
ries.2,24 –26 It is well known that the thermal ex- 6(b)] indicated the appearance of additional free
pansion coefficient k undergoes a jump Dk upon volume. Accordingly, solubility also increased. If
cooling below the glass transition temperature Tg. this interpretation is correct, a linear extrapola-
Hence, the specific volume in the glassy state is tion back to zero solubility should give the specific
OXYGEN BARRIER PROPERTIES OF PET 853
v l 5 v a~0! 2 D k ~T g 2 T! (4)
ing of about 20% by volume increased the oxygen and extruded sheets was noticeable even at the
barrier by a factor of 3. The reduction in perme- highest loading used in the experiments (Fig. 8).
ability [Fig. 9(a)] was mainly caused by a signifi- The small or negligible effect of particle orien-
cant drop in the diffusion coefficient [Fig. 9(b)]. tation is hard to understand on the basis of cur-
Solubility decreased proportionally to the fraction rent theoretical approaches to diffusion in filled
of PET [dashed line in Fig. 9(c)], so the specific media.2,32 Even the most advanced treatments
solubility of PET was not changed by filling with assume either perfect orientation or close packing
talc. The points corresponding to zero loading rep- of fillers and employ solutions for diffusion
resent the appropriate PET-I/2.6 control, i.e., U-U through a hole, slot, or channel, or consider geo-
microlayer, extruded single layer or compression metrical impedance of a single particle and ne-
molded sheet. glect their mutual diffusional backscattering. A
Surprisingly, the effect of talc particle orienta- rigorous solution of the diffusion problem in an
tion was not systematically pronounced. Al- environment of multiple randomly located parti-
though compression molded sheets with ft of cles needs to be developed. This is especially im-
about 10% showed slightly higher permeability portant for the case of intermediate filler loading,
and diffusion coefficients than the extruded which includes the range used in the present ex-
sheets, the difference vanished with increasing periments.
talc content. It is possible that increased loading Figure 10 shows the permeability coefficient of
improved the particle orientation in compression talc-filled materials plotted vs. volume fraction of
molding due to particle–particle interactions in an impermeable phase ft9, which consists of talc
the hydrodynamic flow. Nevertheless, a difference particles and sometimes a small amount of crys-
in the particle orientation of compression-molded tallinity. Because talc is well known as a nucle-
OXYGEN BARRIER PROPERTIES OF PET 855
1 1 1
5 1 (6)
P 2P 0 2P t Figure 11. Comparison of the effect of crystallinity
(fc) and talc (ft9) on the permeability coefficient; the
where P0 5 0.42 cc cm/m2/atm/day is the perme- curves were obtained from eq. (5) with the indicated
ability of extruded PET, obtained as an average of aspect ratio (a) of the impermeable phase.
856 SEKELIK ET AL.
CONCLUSIONS
Figure 12. Effect of processing on the stress–strain
behavior of talc-filled PET-I/2.6. The oxygen barrier of isotropic PET can be signif-
icantly improved by incorporating impermeable
phases such as crystallinity or talc platelet parti-
due to microlayering did not affect the data. For cles. However, changes in permeability of crystal-
the same volume content of impermeable phase, line PET cannot be ascribed to the filler effect of
talc produced more than twice the reduction in crystallites only. Our data on solubility, obtained
permeability as crystallinity. on the basis of measurements of the oxygen trans-
port coefficients, confirm a previous finding that
Mechanical Properties of Filled Materials the amorphous phase density of PET decreases
upon crystallization. The data are amenable to
Figure 12 shows typical stress–strain curves for interpretation by free volume theory. The reduc-
compression-molded, extruded single-layer, and tion of permeability in crystallized and talc-filled
microlayered talc-filled PET. The compression- PET is well described by Nielsen’s model. Talc-
molded sample with 9 vol % talc showed brittle filled materials processed by different methods
behavior, and fractured at about 2% strain [Fig. showed the same permeability; however, much
12(a)]. In contrast, the extruded single-layer sam- better mechanical properties were achieved by
ple with 10 vol % talc was ductile with formation microlayering.
of a stable neck that propagated some distance
along the gauge section before fracturing at 30% This research was generously supported by the Hoechst
strain [Fig. 12(b)]. The microlayered U-F sample Corporation.
with 9 vol % talc also showed ductile behavior,
and fractured at an even higher strain of 73%
[Fig. 12(c)]. REFERENCES AND NOTES
The increased fracture strain of microlayered
materials is attributed to two factors. For a filled 1. Vieth, W. R. Diffusion in and through Polymers;
polymer with poor particle adhesion, the ductility Hanser: Munich, 1991, p. 73.
is determined by the area of load-bearing matrix 2. Hedenqvist, M.; Gedde, U. W. Prog Polym Sci 1996,
in the cross-section when particles debond from 21, 299.
the matrix.34 Strain hardening of the matrix lig- 3. Weinkauf, D. H.; Paul, D. R. In Barrier Polymers
aments helps sustain the high local stresses dur- and Structures; Koros, W. J., Ed.; American Chem-
ing drawing. Nevertheless, ductility is lost when ical Society: Washington, DC, 1990, p. 60.
4. Bissot, T. C. In Barrier Polymers and Structures;
the area of matrix in the cross-section drops below
Koros, W. J., ed.; American Chemical Society:
a critical value. In this respect, debonded parti-
Washington, DC, 1990, p. 225.
cles oriented along the load direction produce a 5. Mueller, C. D.; Nazarenko, S.; Ebeling, T.; Schu-
smaller reduction in the load-bearing area than man, T. L.; Hiltner, A.; Baer, E. Polym Eng Sci
unoriented particles. Thus, the increased ductil- 1997, 37, 355.
ity achieved by microlayering resulted from a 6. Mueller, C.; Kerns, J.; Ebeling, T.; Nazarenko, S.;
higher degree of particle alignment. In this con- Hiltner, A.; Baer, E. In Polymer Process Engineer-
OXYGEN BARRIER PROPERTIES OF PET 857
ing 97; Coates, P. D., Ed.; Institute of Materials: delkern, L.; Samulski, E. T.; Koenig, J. L.; Wignall,
London, 1997, p. 137. G. W., Eds.; American Chemical Society: Washing-
7. Farrow, G.; Ward, I. M. Polymer 1960,1, 330. ton, DC, 1993, 2nd ed., p. 173.
8. Sharma, V.; Desai, P.; Abhiraman, A. S. J Appl 22. Wunderlich, B. Macromolecular Physics; Academic
Polym Sci 1997, 65, 2603. Press: New York, 1976, vol. 2, p. 357.
9. Roland, C. M.; Walton, J. H.; Miller, J. B. Magn Res 23. Lin, S.-B.; Koenig, J. L. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed
Chem 1994, 32, S36. 1982, 20, 2277.
10. Fischer, E. W.; Fakirov, S. J Mater Sci 1976, 11, 24. Petropoulos, J. H. In Polymeric Gas Separation
1041. Membranes; Paul, D. R.; Yampolski, Yu. P., Eds.;
11. Wunderlich, B. Macromolecular Physics; Academic CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1994, p. 17.
Press: New York, 1973, vol. 1, p. 389. 25. Rogers, C. E. In Polymer Permeability; Comyn, J.,
12. Fakirov, S.; Fischer, E. W.; Schmidt, G. F. Makro- Ed.; Elsevier: London, 1985, p. 11.
mol Chem 1975, 176, 2459. 26. Duda, J. L.; Zielinski, J. M. In Diffusion in Poly-
13. Brandrup, J.; Immergut, E. H. Polymer Handbook; mers; Neogi, P., Ed.; Dekker: New York, 1996, p.
Wiley–Interscience: New York, 1989, 3rd ed., p. 143.
V101. 27. Michaels, A. S.; Vieth, W. R.; Barrie, J. A. J Appl
14. Bove, L.; D’Aniello, C.; Gorrasi, G.; Guadagno, L.; Phys 1963, 34, 1.
Vittoria, V. Polym Adv Technol 1995, 7, 858. 28. Van Krevelen, D. W. Properties of Polymers;
15. Fu, Y.; Annis, B.; Boller, A.; Jin, Y.; Wunderlich, B. Elsevier: New York, 1990, p. 93.
J Polym Sci Part B Polym Phys 1994, 32, 2289. 29. Manabe, S. In Diffusion in Polymers; Neogi, P.,
16. Fu, Y.; Busing, W. R.; Jin, Y.; Affholter, K. A.; Ed.; Dekker: New York, 1996, p. 211.
Wunderlich, B. Macromol Chem Phys 1994, 195, 30. Nielsen, L. E. J Macromol Sci 1967, A1, 929.
803. 31. Barrer, R. M.; Petropoulos, J. H. Br J Appl Phys
17. Huisman, R.; Heuvel, H. M. J Appl Polym Sci 1978, 1961, 12, 691.
22, 943. 32. Cussler, E. L.; Hughes, S. E.; Ward, W. J.; Aris, R.
18. Kilian, von H. G.; Halboth, H.; Jenckel, E. Kol- J Membr Sci 1988, 38, 161.
loid-Z 1960, 172, 166. 33. Groeninckx, G.; Berghmans, H.; Overbergh, N.;
19. Bornschlegl, E.; Bonart, R. Coll Polym Sci 1980, Smets, G. J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 1974, 12,
258, 319. 303.
20. Jog, J. P. Rev Macromol Chem Phys 1995, C35, 34. Li, T.; Topolkaraev, V. A.; Hiltner, A.; Baer, E. In
531. Toughened Plastics II; Riew, C. K.; Kinloch, A. J.,
21. Mandelkern, L. In Physical Properties of Polymers; Eds; Adv in Chem Series 252; American Chemical
Mark, J. E.; Eisenberg, A.; Graessley, W. W.; Man- Society: Washington, DC, 1996, p. 319.