Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/317211451
The Effect of hand and foot massage on alleviating pain and anxiety of
abdominal post-operative patients at a University Hospital: A randomized
control trial
CITATIONS READS
0 595
2 authors, including:
Naglaa Youssef
Cairo University
18 PUBLICATIONS 18 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Naglaa Youssef on 10 June 2017.
ABSTRACT:
Background: Controlling and relieving acute postoperative pain is one of the nurses' vital roles. Massage is an
independent nursing intervention that can be applied to a patient who is in pain. This study aimed to evaluate
the efficacy of hand and foot massage on alleviating pain and anxiety of patients who had abdominal surgery.
Methods: A randomized control trial was conducted over a period of eight months for 60 women who had
abdominal surgery. The participants were recruited from one of the big teaching hospitals in Cairo and quasi-
randomly allocated into the intervention or control group. The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the State-Trait
Anxiety Inventory (STAI-form Y-2) were used alongside a background/medical data sheet to collect the data. A
foot and hand massage was performed for twenty-minutes for three days. Results: Although there was no
significant difference between the massage and control groups' pain intensity at baseline (Day-1-pre test)
(p>0.05), the intervention group had a significantly higher decrease in pain intensity than the control group
after applying a massage (p ≤ 0.000). Over 96% of the intervention group experienced moderate/severe anxiety,
while 100% of the control group experienced moderate/very severe anxiety at baseline with no significant
difference (p > 0.05). After the three sessions of hand and foot massage, the intervention group showed a
remarkably lower score of anxiety than the control group (p= 0.000). Conclusion: Hand and foot massage was
significantly associated with the reduction of pain and anxiety intensity. It can therefore be used as a
complementary method to reduce pain and anxiety in post-operative patients. A larger randomized study of
males and females is required to generalize the findings.
Key words
Abdominal surgery, anxiety, foot massage, hand massage, postoperative pain
I. Introduction
Pain is one of the most common complaints of postoperative patients worldwide. Despite the drugs and
anesthetic techniques available, the prevalence of post operative pain is still high [1]. For instance, about 41% of
postoperative patients experienced moderate to severe pain, even though sedative drugs had been administered
[2]. A large survey reported that of 300 patients, 86% experienced postoperative pain; of whom 75% had
moderate/severe pain during the immediate postsurgical period. Although about 88% received pain medications
80% of them experienced adverse effects and 39% reported moderate/severe pain even after receiving it [3].
Anxiety is another unpleasant feeling that affects postoperative patients emotionally, psychologically
and physically. Facing surgery may cause some normal anxiety-related behavior, but health care providers
should monitor the patient’s anxiety level to preclude the development of an anxiety disorder [2]. Anticipated
postsurgical pain was the most prominent pre-surgical patient concern, and nearly half the patients reported a
high anxiety level about anticipated pain before surgery [3].
Additionally, acute postoperative pain is often still ineffectively managed. The poor management of
postoperative pain may increase the risk for patients to develop physiological responses to pain, which produce
harmful effects on the body after surgery [4] or even develop chronic pain conditions in some vulnerable
patients [5]. For instance, 74% of 300 postoperative patients were still experiencing high levels of pain after
their discharge from hospital [3].
Varieties of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to enhance optimal pain relief are
available; however, patients' responses are individualized [6]. Pain medication is still the current gold standard
treatment for acute postoperative pain relief [7]. However, there is an increasing global interest in applying
alternative modalities and non-pharmacological approaches for pain and anxiety relief to overcome the adverse
effects of medication, such as massage.
easy to apply, cheap and no special equipment is needed. It could be embedded into daily nursing activities.
However, a pertinent question is whether foot and hand massage relieves acute postoperative pain in patients
after abdominal surgery. A critical analysis needs to determine its effect on relieving acute postoperative pain.
Providing safe, effective pain management is a concern for all nurses caring for patients following surgery.
Registered nurses at all levels of practice are primarily patient advocates who have a vital role in managing
postoperative pain appropriately [8]. Massage therapy was found as essential element of the patients' healing
experience after surgery [9]. Postoperative cardiac patients who received a foot massage were highly satisfied
with the intervention and no barriers to implementing massage therapy were identified [9]. A growing body of
literature supports the application of massage therapy in post operative open heart surgery patients [2; 10].
However there is a shortage of knowledge regarding the effect of foot and hand massage on postoperative
abdominal surgery.
The researchers observed in their clinical practice that postoperative pain and anxiety levels, especially
in the days following surgery, were high; and the prescribed pain killers could not relieve the pain completely.
Hence, it was worth to investigate the effect of hand and foot massage on relieving pain and anxiety symptoms
in postoperative patients to establish evidence of its effectiveness and safety among these patients.
Inclusion criteria
Patients who met the following inclusion criteria were invited to participate in this study:
• Adults ≥ 18 years old
• Have the ability to answer the interviewer's questions
• Give informed consent and are hemodynamically stabilized
• Had abdominal surgery
• Received general anesthetics.
Exclusion criteria
Patients were excluded from this study if they had any of the following:
• History of chronic pain
• Metastasis cancer, on narcotic medication
• Hand or foot amputation
• Wound on foot/hand, dementia, or psychiatric diagnosis
• Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis, adrenal gland disorder, skin problems, dialysis fistula
• History of bone fracture in the past two months
• Previous history of message therapy
• Receiving warfarin
• Edema or ulcers in extremities
• Cardiac arrest during the past 72 hours
• Infectious diseases (skin, viral hepatitis, jaundice)
• History of second degree burn on more than 25% of the body surface
• Any problems related to blood vessels, diabetes
• Hypersensitivity to hand and foot massage
• Dependence on oxygenation apparatus
• Completely bedridden for a long time (risk of DVT).
1.5 Setting
The study was conducted in a general surgery wards in a teaching hospital in Cairo. This hospital is one of the
largest public teaching hospitals in the Cairo region, where a great number of patients from different socio-
demographic and economic backgrounds come to receive health care from different regions in Egypt.
1.6 Measurements
Socio-demographic and medical data sheet
The sheet had two parts, patients' characteristics and medical data, and it was used to collect the patients'
characteristics such as age, gender, education and employment status. The medical data sheet was used to record
the diagnosis, type of surgery, etc. The history of analgesic consumption was collected from the patient’s
medical records.
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain
The Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is the commonly used standardized pain measurement scale, which
measures pain intensity. However, its test–retest reliability has been shown higher among literate (r = 0.94) than
illiterate patients (r = r = 0.71) [13]. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a segmented numeric version of the VAS,
and it has a single 11-point numeric scale in which respondents select a number from 0 (no pain) to 10 (sever
pain) to reflect the intensity of their pain. NRS has high test–retest reliability in both literate and illiterate
patients (r = 0.96 & 0.95, respectively) [13]. Therefore, NRS was used in this study to assess the pain intensity
before and after each massage session. The patients were requested to select the number that represents their
pain intensity. The overall score of the NRS ranges from 0–10, and it can also describe pain intensity as no pain
(0), mild pain (1-3), moderate pain (4-6), and severe pain (7-10).
Spielberger’s State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was developed and used by Spielberger, Gorsuch, Lushene, Vagg,
and Jacobs (1983) [14]. This scale has two inventories, 20 items for each: (1) State anxiety (STAI Form Y-1/S-
AI) measures the subjective experience of fear, nervousness and anxiety of current or recent times or scenes, as
well as stress-state anxiety; (2) Trait anxiety (STAI Form Y-2/T-AI) measures the normal anxiety level. Only
form Y-1/ STAI was used in this study to examine state anxiety, which ranged from 1-not at all; 2-sometimes;
3-moderately so and 4-very much so. By adding 20 items the total score was obtained. Phrases which showed a
lack of anxiety were scored in reverse order. Scores of 20-42, 43-53, 54-64 and 65-75 were interpreted as mild,
moderate, severe and very severe anxiety respectively, a higher score indicating a greater anxiety level. Y-1/
STAI has proofed to have a high reliability, alpha = 0.86-0.90 [14]. The Arabic version, which has its validity
and reliability well established among the Egyptian population was used, coefficient > 0.80 [15]. Official
permission to use this scale was obtained from www.mindarden.com.
1.7 Intervention
Swedish massage is the most commonly used type of massage therapy, which is often known as light
or relaxation massage. Swedish massage therapy increases the circulation, which helps the body to be more
relaxed and energized by relieving muscle tension and pain, thus increasing overall health and well-being.
Swedish massage includes effleurage, petrissage, tapotement and friction techniques. Effleurage influences the
superficial tissues and is used to apply the lubricant, spreading it over the surface. It aims to warm the surface
layer of the tissue to create relaxation before applying other techniques. Petrissage is the kneading that follows
effleurage. Tapotement (i.e. beating percussion) is a rhythmic short taps’ application done with cupped hands,
fingers, or the edge of the hand. Friction consists of deep and circular movements, which aim to rub the layers of
tissue against each other in order to increase blood flow [16; 17].
These steps were followed to apply the massage technique mentioned above [17]:
1. Effleurage was used to spread the lubricant (olive oil) over the participant's hands and feet by massaging
from the base of the fingers to the wrist or from the toes to the ankle.
2. Petrissage as a short, gentle and rapid movement was used to squeeze, roll or knead the hands, feet, fingers
and toes.
3. Tapotement (i.e. beating or percussion) was used as short taps done with the fingers.
4. Friction was used to rub the layers of tissues against each other in order to increase blood flow.
The intervention group followed the routine ward care and in addition received 20 minutes of hand and foot
massage, 5 minutes for each extremity, at a time for three days; while the control group followed the routine
ward care, and received 20 minutes of rest time (to control for emotional reaction).
III. Results
The study results are presented in three sections: (1) Description of the study subjects' socio-
demographic characteristics and related medical information, (2) Comparison of pain intensity at T-0, T-1 and
T-2 between control and intervention groups, and (3) Comparison of state anxiety intensity at T-0 and T-2
between control and intervention groups.
The mean age of the 60 participants was 40.37±10.34 years, in the intervention group it was
38.07+11.39 years, whereas in the control group it was 42.67+8.76 years; however there was statistically no
significant difference between both groups (P = 0.085). TABLE 1 also shows that there is statistically no
significant difference between the two groups in education, marital status, employment status and smoking
habits (P > .05) which was calculated by chi-square test. However, there was a significant difference in the types
of surgery in the two groups (Chi-square = 8.92, p = 0.01). The control group had a higher prevalence of
herniectomy than the intervention group (53.3% vs. 23%); while the intervention group had a higher prevalence
of cancer colon, intestinal obstruction and stomach sleeve surgeries (see Fig. 1).
TABLE (1): Comparison Between Intervention And Control Groups' Characteristics (N=60).
Characteristics Intervention group (n=30) Control group (n=30) Pearson Chi-
N % N % square/t test
(p value)
Age (mean ± SD) 38.07+11.39 42.67+8.76 0.08
(20-65) (22-55)
Gender 30 100% 30 100% -----
Female
Marital status
Unmarried 5 16.7% 4 13.3% 0.13 (0.72)
Married 25 83.3% 26 86.7%
Education level
Uneducated 4 13.3% 1 3.3% 7.78 (0.10)
Can read & write 7 23.3% 17 56.7%
Primary/preparatory school 8 26.7% 4 13.3%
Secondary/diploma school
Higher education 8 26.7% 6 20.0%
3 10.0% 2 6.7%
Employment status
Yes 13 43.3% 19 63.3% 2.41 (0.12)
No 17 56.7% 11 36.7%
60
53.3
50
40
40 36.7 36.7
Percentage
30
23
20
10
10
0
Intervention Control
TABLE 2 presents the one way repeated measure ANOVA which compares the pain intensity scores at
T-0 (prior to the massage at day 2 after surgery), T-0 (following the massage at day 2 after surgery), T-1
(following the massage at day 3 after surgery) and T-2 (following the massage at day 4 after surgery). The
DOI: 10.9790/1959-0603035665 www.iosrjournals.org 60 | Page
The Effect of hand and foot massage on alleviating pain and anxiety of abdominal post-operative
results show that the mean score of pain intensity in the intervention group before and after the hand and foot
massage had changed significantly (p = 0.000). Also, the mean score of pain intensity in the control group
before and after routine care had changed significantly (p = 0.000). There was a significant effect of time on
pain intensity in the intervention and control groups, where Wilks' Lambda = 0.10 & 0.20 respectively and
multivariate partial eta squared = 0.90 & 0.80 respectively.
FIGURE (2): Pattern of Change In Pain Intensity In The Intervention And Control Groups
Fig.2 illustrates the pattern of change in pain intensity at three measurement points (baseline, T-1 and T-2) in the
intervention and control groups. Interestingly, although both groups had a significant decrease in pain intensity
at the three measurement points (p ≤ 0.05), the massage intervention group had a higher decrease of pain
intensity than the control group, as the mean score illustrates.
Table (2): Comparison of Baseline And Post-Test Pain Scores In The Intervention And Control Groups Using
Repeated Measures Anova
Variable Pretest (T-0) Posttest (T-0) Posttest (T-1) Posttest (T-2) F p
Mean ± SD
Pain (intervention group) 8.10±1.18 4.70±1.89 3.20±1.80 1.66±1.97 75.95 0.000
n= 30
Pain (control group) n= 30 8.43±.73 7.83±.74 7.20±.80 6.66±.88 35.00 0.000
TABLE 3 compares the intervention and control groups' pain intensity over time (for three days measurements).
Although there is no significant difference between the two groups' pain intensity at baseline (Day-1-pre test) (p
= 0.16), there is a significant difference between them at the other points of measurement (p = 0.000).
TABLE (3): Comparison Of Intervention And Control Groups' Pain Intensity Over Time, Independent-T Test
(Mann-Whitney Test)
Variable Time of measure Intervention group (n = Control group p. value
30) (n = 30)
Mean rank Mean rank
Pain intensity Day-1
Pre massage 27.47 33.53 0.160
Post massage 17.32 43.68 0.000
Day-2
Pre massage 20.10 40.90 0.000
Post massage 16.82 44.18 0.000
Day-3
Pre massage 19.22 41.78 0.000
Post massage 16.47 44.53 0.000
Fig.3 shows the change in anxiety intensity at two points of measurement (baseline and T-2) in the intervention
and control groups. Interestingly, although both groups have a significant decrease in anxiety intensity between
pre and post massage, the massage intervention group has a greater decrease of anxiety intensity than the control
group.
60
Mean of anxiety score
50
40
30
20
10
0
Pre massage-T0 Post massage-T2
Intervention 51.3 56.67
Control group 35.1 50.13
FIGURE (3): Change In Anxiety Intensity In The Intervention And Control Groups
TABLE 4 shows the distribution of patients according to their anxiety level at T-0 and T-2. The results of the
STAI scale reveal that 96.7% of the intervention group experienced moderate to severe anxiety, while 100% of
the control group experienced moderate to very severe anxiety at time 0. However, there is no significant
difference between the massage and control groups at T-0 (p = 0.51). At T-2, after the three massage sessions,
the massage group has a remarkably lower anxiety score than the control group (p= 0.000).
TABLE (4): Comparison Of The Intervention And Control Groups' State Anxiety Over Time, Independent-T
Test (Mann-Whitney Test)
Variable Time of Intervention group Control group Independent t-test
measure (n=30) (n=30) (P. value)
Anxiety level % Mean Anxiety level % Mean
rank rank
Anxiety T-0 baseline Mild = 3.3 26.12 Moderate = 23.3 34.88 0.51
intensity Moderate = 50.0 Severe = 73.3
Severe = 46.7 Very severe = 3.3
T-2 2nd measure Mild = 83.3 19.53 Mild = 30.0 41.47 0.000
Moderate = 13.3 Moderate = 30.0
Severe = 3.3 Severe = 36.7
Very severe = 3.3
IV. Discussion
Pain is one of the commonly experienced symptoms by patients with acute and chronic conditions [7].
Nurses have a crucial role to control postoperative pain. The two methods most commonly used for pain control
are pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic. However, the pharmacological approach may not entirely relieve all
aspects of postoperative pain. Therefore, non-pharmacological methods such as massage may potentially relieve
postoperative pain [7]. A review conducted by [7] concluded that foot massage as one of the complementary
therapies proved to decrease the pain level in patients with acute postoperative pain. Anxiety is another related
unpleasant feeling that affects postoperative patients emotionally, psychologically and physically. It is
characterized by a feeling of threat that could be real or unreal [2]. Therefore, our study aimed to investigate the
effects of hand and foot massage on relieving pain and anxiety symptoms in postoperative patients. The study's
findings are discussed in three sections: (1) Study subjects' socio-demographic characteristics and related
medical information, (2) Comparison of pain intensity at three time points in the control and intervention
groups, and (3) Comparison of state anxiety intensity at three time points in the control and intervention groups.
(1) Study subjects' socio-demographic characteristics and related medical information
Sixty patients with abdominal surgery participated in this study. They were quasi-randomly distributed into an
intervention and control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of their
socio-demographic and medical data, although the type of surgery was significantly different. However, the
baseline of pain and anxiety intensity was the same in the two groups.
DOI: 10.9790/1959-0603035665 www.iosrjournals.org 62 | Page
The Effect of hand and foot massage on alleviating pain and anxiety of abdominal post-operative
Only women participated in the current study, as gender as an extraneous variable has been found
related to the response of pain management. Gender is an important factor in the response not only to
postoperative pain but also to anesthetics and pain management. For instance, it has been reported that males
wake up more slowly than women after general anesthesia and that they have fewer postoperative gastro-
intestinal disturbances [18]. The literature supports that males and females differ in their response to pain, as
higher pain sensitivity is commonly observed in females. Females' sexual hormones seem to be linked to these
differences [18; 19]; however, further studies are needed to explain the underlying mechanisms, including the
contribution of hormonal and genetic factors [19]. The response to pharmacological and non-pharmacological
pain management in males and females is still under investigation. Women reported more pain in more bodily
areas with greater frequency and for a longer duration than men [20]. Our study sample was all females, which
may also explain why the majority in our study were non-smokers.
Pain medication is considered a confounding variable because each medicine has different
pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. According to previous research, these drugs give different
responses to patients’ pain; research studies need to control the effect of pain medication, for example by having
similar pain medication given to each patient [7]. In the current study, all participating patients routinely took
non steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAI) pain medication which provided the same analgesic effect. Also to
control any pain medications effect; the assessment of baseline data and the massage were applied at least three
hours after analgesics administration.
(2) Comparison of pain intensity at three points in time in the control and intervention groups
In relation to pain intensity, the current study's results show that the mean score of pain intensity
significantly decreased in the intervention group who received hand and foot massage in comparison to the
control group who received only routine care. This finding is consistent with previous studies, which support
our results that pain severity significantly decreased in the intervention group compared to the control group. All
had abdominal surgery, but the intervention groups had 20 minutes of hand and foot massage (effleurage and
kneading) on three days [21]. In postoperative patients, 20-minutes of foot and hand massage significantly
reduced both pain intensity and pain distress resulting from the wound on the first postoperative day [22].
Interestingly, in women who had a hysterectomy there was a significant reduction in pain in the experimental
group following a hand and foot massage compared to the control group [23]. Additionally, foot and hand
massage was effective in decreasing postoperative pain in open heart surgery patients [24]. This indicates that
whatever the surgery type, massage is effective in decreasing postoperative pain.
It is essential to highlight the important findings in the current study are congruent with previous
studies [21]. As our results show, hand and foot massage could help to decrease pain intensity and gave some
amount of comfort to the patients. A review study that aimed to identify the effect of foot massage on relieving
acute postoperative pain recommended that pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic management be used
together to relieve pain. Using a pharmacologic approach alone may not fully relieve all aspects of acute
postoperative pain [7].
Current evidence supports that massage has promising safe effects for the alleviation of pain, tension
and anxiety. Bauer and colleagues [9] investigated the effect of foot massage versus relaxation on postoperative
back and shoulder pain, anxiety and tension in a randomized group of cardiac surgery patients. Their results
show that patients receiving massage therapy had a significant decrease in pain, anxiety and tension.
Additionally, massage versus vibration therapy was tested [25] for short-term postsurgical pain, negative affect
and physiologic stress reactivity on a randomized sample of women who underwent an abdominal laparotomy
for the removal of suspected cancerous lesions. The results showed that on the day of surgery, massage was
more effective than the usual care (UC) for affective and sensory pain, and better than vibration therapy for
affective pain. On postoperative day 2, massage was more effective than UC for distress, and better than
vibration therapy for sensory pain. However, after controlling for multiple comparisons and multiple outcomes,
no significant differences were found [25]. Several studies showed the efficacy of foot massage to decrease
acute postoperative pain [26; 22]. Our study findings support the efficacy of massage on relieving pain, where
skin contact by massage is effective in relieving pain and anxiety.
(3) Comparison of state anxiety intensity at two points in time in the control and intervention groups
Our study findings show that there was no significant difference between the intervention and control
groups regarding anxiety intensity before the massage. However, the anxiety level was significantly decreased
in the intervention group, who received hand and foot massage along with routine care, as compared to the
control group, who received only routine care. This difference indicates the positive effect of hand and foot
massage on decreasing the anxiety intensity after surgery. Our findings are similar to previous studies that
examined the effect of 20 minutes massage therapy on pain, anxiety and tension in cardiac surgical patients. The
anxiety score significantly decreased in those patients who received massage alongside standard care [9; 27]. A
previous study also showed that those patients who received massage therapy were highly satisfied with the
intervention and no major barriers to its implementation were observed [27]. These results suggest that massage
therapy is an important, safe and effective non-pharmacological intervention that should be considered for
inclusion in the management of postoperative recovery of surgical patients [10].
A recent review [10] of patients in the intensive care unit concluded that applying massage therapy as a
non-pharmacological method at least once a day for 20 min in the early days after cardiac surgery confirmed a
remarkable reduction in the pain and anxiety score. However, large and high quality randomized control trials
are needed to examine further important outcomes in the recovery of surgical patients.
V. Conclusion
This study's findings concluded that pain and anxiety are commonly experienced symptoms in the
majority of postoperative patients. Hand and foot massage as a non-pharmacological nursing intervention
showed a significant impact on decreasing these symptoms. An increase in nurses' awareness about the
importance of applying massage after surgery can relieve the feelings of pain and anxiety in many of these
patients. Also, nurses have a vital role in enhancing the knowledge and skills of post-operative patients and their
caregivers through teaching sessions of how to use massage to relieve pain and anxiety after surgery.
VII. Limitations
Further studies are required to assess patients' satisfaction with massage therapy and its association with
potential post-operative complications such as wound healing and length of hospital stay. There is a need to
replicate this study on a larger randomized trial on adult males and females to achieve more generalizable
results.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to all the patients who accepted to participate in this study. We
also extend our thanks to all respectful medical and nursing staff for helping us in conducting this study.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
[1] Hoogervorst-Schilp J, van Boekel RL, de Blok C, Steegers MA, Spreeuwenberg P, Wagner C. Postoperative pain assessment in
hospitalised patients: National survey and secondary data analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2016 Nov 30;63:124-
31.
[2] Kaur S, Lobo DJ, Latha T. Role of foot and hand massage on the anxiety for post operative open heart surgery patients: A
Randomized Control Trial. International Journal of Nursing Education. 2013 Jul 1;5(2):205.
[3] Gan TJ, Habib AS, Miller TE, White W, Apfelbaum JL. Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical pain:
Results from a US national survey. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2014 Jan 1;30(1):149-60.
[4] Asadizaker M, Fathizadeh A, Haidari A, Goharpai S, Fayzi S. The effect of foot and hand massage on postoperative cardiac surgery
pain. International Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2011 Oct 30;3(10):165-9.
[5] Deumens R, Steyaert A, Forget P, Schubert M, Lavand’homme P, Hermans E, De Kock M. Prevention of chronic postoperative
pain: Cellular, molecular, and clinical insights for mechanism-based treatment approaches. Progress in neurobiology. 2013 May
31;104:1-37.