Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

CONTEXTUAL ISSUES & RISK ASSESSMENT

Impact/Severity Risk Abatement Plan

Existing Process / SOP / Plan (P) (I) Business


Current Non Impact of Failure to meet (P*I)
Internal / /Policy/etc. where control is Probability of Impact Score
Context Interested Party Contextual Issues Planned Desired Result Compliance Level desired results (Irrespective Risk Action Plan (where Risk Justification for Acceptance (if
External defined to achieve the desired Failure Legal EMS (Highest of the
(High/ Medium/Low) of the Existing Control) Level Level is > 27) Give MP Responsibility Risk level is > 27 and No
result. (H:9,M:3, L:1) Complaince Objectives Two)
No./SOP as applicable. Action taken)

Legal External PCB Compliance to Legal To comply with regulatory & Register of regulations Low 1 Breach of legal requirement 9 1 9 9
Requirements statutory requirements.
Legal External PCB Change in legislation Be updated and readiness for Legal Register & updation of e- Low 1 Litigation/Judiciary processes 9 9 9 9
change with the change in laws. compliance system resulting in poor image of the
HSE deptt continously monitoring company
the CPCB/MoEFCC website &
notifications for change if any &
communicating to relevant Deptts.
Changes reviwed & discussed in
Management Review Meeting.

Technological Internal Management Technology Upgrade the technology from time Latest technology comes from HO Low 1 Company can't run & market 9 3 9 9
Obsolescence to time to meet stringent market Having a well defined documented share will down.
requirements process..
Technological External Society NOX generation from DG Minimum emissions of NOX Stacks at safe height as per legal LOW 1 Air pollution will result in 3 3 3 3 Technological upgradation .
chimney requirement. environment deteroiation
Quaterly monitoring of emissions.
Fumes extraction system

Technological External Society SOX generation from Minimum emissions of SOX Stacks at safe height as per legal Low 1 Air pollution will result in 3 3 3 3
burning of HSD requirement. environment deteroiation
Quaterly monitoring of emissions.
Fumes extraction system
Low sulphur HSD used as fuel.

Competitive Internal/Ext Management/Soci Sustainable development Sustainable Development We have a team working on Low 1 Uncontrolled depletion of 1 3 3 3
ernal ety sustainable development in a natural resources.
structured process.
Continous monitoring & analysis of
envionment affecting contexts. All
materials are recyclable

Social External/ Management/ Energy Consumption/ Sustainable Development Daily power monitoring . Medium 3 Increase in Energy 1 9 9 27 Prog on reduction in Energy
Internal Society CO2 emission Programmes on Energy Consumption/ CO2 emissions consumption.
Conservation. leading to global warming

Social External Neighbours Hinderance by Local Maintaining harmonious Meeting with the local leaders Medium 3 Disturbance in Industrial 1 3 3 9
villagers relationship with villagers ,influnential people as when Peace
required
Social External Neighbours Fume emmission from Maintaining harmony contact with DG chimney provided at safe Low 1 Legal implications/ Poor 3 3 3 3
stacks of DG villagers, No pollution height, Quaterly monitoring of department Image
emissions thru Moef approved
labs. DG operation very low.
Generally Grid electricity being
used

Social External Neighbours Water table depletion Water table should remain high Water recycled and disposed Medium 3 Reduction in water table can 3 9 9 27 Recycling and reuse of water Maint
during drawal of water through drain once not useable result in drought & after inhouse treatment
during excavation and Disturbance in Industrial
borewell Peace
Social External Neighbours Emission of NOx from Should be minimized to control Meeting Legal requirements. Low 1 Climate change due to GHG 1 3 3 3
welding green House effect gas emissionst
Social Internal Management Education level of Should be suitable for plant Induction training imparted, E- Low 1 Increase in incidents. 1 3 3 3
personnel operation learning modules, EHS bulletins
etc.
Knowledge / Internal Employees Environment Knowledge Prequalified & Trained before Induction training, E-learning Low 1 Production loss & adverse 1 9 9 9
People assigning the responsibility to system, Animated modules, EHS environmental impact
handle the equipments Bulletins, EHS training manual etc
independently and efficiently.
Majority of employees familiar with
Product Application and critical
quality & environment aspects.

Knowledge / Internal Employees Knowledge of Safety Every employee aware of safety Timely refresher training on safety Low 1 Medical treatment/ First aid/ 9 9 9 9
People Norms norms/practices/SOPs/EPPs/Use of modules/Induction training lost time injury may occure
PPEs. process/HIRA/ AIA/Awarness
through EHS Bulletins, E-learning,
Animated Modules

Value Internal Management Moral Values & Mutual 1) Establishment of organizational Code of conduct Low 1 Non Adherance to Values 1 9 9 9
Trust values
2)Adherence to established values.

Culture Internal Employees Collaboration & Team To be able to resolve environment Ocuupational Health & Safety Not able to achieve target 1 3 3 3
Approach issues, when arise with cross Appraisal Committee, because of lack of Team
functional involvements Departmental Safety solutions Low 1 Work/ Missalignement of
team goals & targets of individual to
that of Group's.
Performance Internal/ Management & Zero Incidents, No ill Damage to brand image, increase Implemented OHSAS18001, Production & quality may
External Employees, Visitor, health of overhead cost, loss of life ISO14001 , Hot work permit suffer
Govt. Authority system, safety audit, Trainings, On Low 1 1 1 1 1
line injury system, Risk
Assessment. AIA
Performance External Management , Air Polutants 100% Compliance with PCB norms ISO14001, Periodic Ambient Air Air Polution, Fine & penulty
Employees, Quality Monitoring by third party Low 1 9 9 9 9
society
Knowledge / Internal Management & Environment facility Maintaine the facility as per PCB Daily monitoring in Env Lab, Check Treated water quality not
People Employees operation norms sheet Low 1 good & TNPCB norms not 9 1 9 9
met

Page 1 of 3
CONTEXTUAL RISK RATING CRITERIA
RATE THE RISKS: IMPACT / SEVERITY
AREA HIGH = 9 MEDIUM = 3 LOW = 1
Regulatory requirements are met No impact to the Legal
Regulatory requirements will not
Legal Compliance be met. but some specific requirements requirements/ employees or end
are not complied user.
Marginal Non-compliance to
Negligible impact on Company
Will not meet Company Company's Objective w.r.t IMS.
EMS Objectives Objectives with respect to EMS May be met if additional resources
Objectives w.r.t IMS with existing
resources.
are provided.
Unable to fully satisfy all customer
Significant Shortfall in satisfying requirements
Near 100% satisfaction of
Customer (External) critical customer requirements. (Quantity/Quality/Delivery).
customer requirements expected.
(Quantity/Quality/Delivery). Customer will experience limited
impact.

PROBABILITY OF NON-COMPLIANCE RATE


HIGH MEDIUM LOW
RATING
9 3 1
Very likely to occur based on
Likely occurrence current & past performance.
May occur but can be reasonably Unlikely to occur due to robust
Complete uncertainity OR
in future (next 6-12 Probability of occureance is not
controlled through current current Controls & Policies &
months) Processes, Policies & Practices Practices
preditable due to lack data or
process understanding

Current Rate of High Failure rate to achieve the Medium Failure rate to achieve
Low Failure rate & can miss the
Occurrence target. i.e. not likely to meet in the target. Not likely to meet in
target only in <5% situations i.e.
(Preceding 6 >20% situations i.e. Complaince >5% <20% situations i.e.
Complaince Rate >95%
months) Rate <80% Complaince Rate >80% & <95%
Note Please give the rating higher of the likely occurrence in future and current rate of occurrence.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi