Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 5

S.

no Names Project Topics


General Exceptions to
1 LAKSHAY RATHI criminal Liability :
Theoretical foundation
Infancy and Criminal
2 CHIRAG VERMA
Liability
MUSKAN Mistake as a General
3 BHARDWAJ Exception
Accident and Criminal
4 SHISHANT
Liability
Intoxication and
5 PRAKHAR SINGH
Criminal Liability
Judicial interpretation of
6 PRERNA ROY
Unsoundness of mind
7 KUNJAL VASHISTH Consent as a Defence
8 JITESH KAUSHIK Good faith as an Excuse
Right of Private
9 JAI KESHWANI Defence: Judicial
Interpretation
Supreme Court on
10 MRIDULA
Section 100
Judicial interpretation of
11 ANMOL ARORA
Section 103
Commencement and
12 SHANVI TYAGI continuance of RPD:
Judicial interpretation
SHOBHIT Strict Liability:
13 BHARDWAJ Concerns and challenges

Strict Liability:
14 SIDHI SHARMA
Constitutional challenge/

Abyanand Mishra vs.


15 DEVANSH BHALLA State of Bihar, AIR 1961
SC 1698 : A Review
Offence of Sedation:
16 ISHA RAI
Judicial Interpretation
Kedarnath vs. State of
NEHA
17 SRIVASTAVA
Bihar, AIR 1962 SC
955: A Review
Offences of unlawful
18 KARTIK PANT assembly and Riot :
Judicial Interpretation
Riot & Affray : Judicial
19 CHANCHAL GUPTA
Interpretation
K.N. Mehra vs. State of
20 AMIT ARORA Rajasthan, AIR 1957 SC
369: A Review
Genesis of the Law of
21 TUSHAR MAHAJAN Insanity: Mc Naughten
Case (1843)
Medical Insanity v.
22 GAURAV DUBEY Legal Insanity: A
Review
AAKASH
23 KHURANA
Intoxication and Insanity
Basdev v. State of
24 KARAN SETHI Pepsu; AIR 1956 SC
488: A Review
Attempt and Preparation:
25 KARTIK MEHTA
Distinguish
Distinction between
26 SWEETY KUMARI section 307 and section
511 IPC
State of Maharashtra v.
27 ABHINAV PANDEY Mohd. Yakub, AIR 1980
SC 1111, A Review.
Attempt to Commit
28 ASHISH KUMAR Suicide section 309:
Constitutional Validity
Gian Kaur v. State of
29 PRIYA CHAWLA Punjab; (1996) 2 SCC
648, A Review.
Queen Empress v. K.N.
30 P. PREM PRAKASH Shah, (1896) ILR 23
Cal. 604, A Review
Mehboob Shah vs.
31 VARUN ARORA Emperor, AIR 1945 PC
118 : A Review
A combined analysis of
32 KARAN YADAV
sections 141, 142 & 149.
Distinction between
ABHISHEK
33 CHAUHAN
section 34 and section
149.
ANU PRIYA Criminal Conspiracy:
34 SHARMA Section 120A & 120 B
Principle of Constructive
35 PUNEET KHANNA
Criminality
State of Maharashtra v.
PRANAV KUMAR
36 BOBAL
M.H. George; AIR 1965
SC 722, A Review.
Distinction between
37 NIKHIL CHAUHAN section 76 and section 79
IPC.
Shrikant Bhosale v. State
38 RAJAT NANDA of Maharshtra; (2002) 7
SCC 748, A Review.
Traditional Crimes v.
MANIK MOHAN
39 SHARMA
Social and Economic
Offences
Deterrent Theory of
40 AGAM VERMA
Punishment
Death Sentence under
41 RAHUL
the IPC, 1860
Imprisonment for Life:
42 NIKHIL ANAND
Judicial Interpretation
ADITYA Reformative theory of
43 CHAUDHARY Punishment
44 RAJAT GABA Plea Bargaining
Retributive theory of
45 SUMIT TANWAR
crime
Elements of effective
46 VISHAL
criminal law
ASHUTOSH KUMAR Transferred Intention: A
47 MISHRA Review
State of Orissa v.
ADITYA PRATAP
48 SINGH
Bhagaban Barik, (1987)
2 SCC 498; A Review
Bachchan Singh v. State
49 ARUN KUMAR of Punjab, AIR 1980 SC
698; A Review
Machchi Singh v. State,
ARYAMAN
50 NAYYAR
AIR 1983 SC 957, A
Review.
Dhananjoy Chaterjee v.
ASHWIN State of West Bengal
51 ABRAHAM ALEX (1994) 2 SCC 220; A
Review.
Triveniben v. State of
DEEPANKAR
52 CHUGH
Gujarat, AIR 1989 SC
142; A Review.
Theories of Crime :
53 DEEPANSHI Natural Law vis-a vis
Positive Law
Reasonable belief in
54 HARSHIT GUPTA good faith vis a vis
mental culpability
Knowledge vis a vis
55 KARTIK SINGH
Intention
PRAACHEE Emperor v. Dhirajia; A
56 PATHAK Review
Queen v. Dudley and
57 SALONI GAUTAM Stephens; [1884] 14
QBD 273; A Review
Lakshmi v. State, AIR
58 VIVEK SINGH
1963 All 534; A Review

"Consent" as defined
1 Kartik under the Criminal Law
(Amendment) Act, 2013.
Muthu Naicker v. State
of Tamil Nadu, AIR
2 Sparsh
1978 SC 1647; A
Review
Distinction between
3 Dhruv section 34 and section
149.
Machchi Singh v. State,
4 Vishal AIR 1983 SC 957, A
Review.
Offence of Sedation:
5 Pulkit
Judicial Interpretation

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi