Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
1. BACKGROUND
1 Paper submitted to 1st World Islamic Economics & Finance Conference (WIEFC2018)
2 Corresponding author azlinphduthm@gmail.com
or even the waqf itself (Ismail Omar, 2017). Therefore, the significant disparity
between the size and the revenue of waqf as presented in Figure 1 is generally terrified
as it would hinder the waqf sustainability in the long run.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Although many efforts and strategies such as Built Operates Transfer and waqf
Irsod had being implemented in enhancing the waqf property development
(Chowdhury et al., 2012) , Ismail and Possumah (2014) reminded waqf properties are
an inter-generational wealth distribution mechanism that underlies by; ‘continuously
usufruct-giving’ and ‘immovable things’ philosophies. It is, therefore, waqf property is
3
The result from the interview with MAINs
confronting a global market fluctuation risks that may affects its open market
investment value in the global market. As such, asset allocation in redistributing risks
is vital.
Yet, since each waqf asset is stipulated by an independent deed, therefore the
asset allocation based on waqf profile is highly recommended to safeguard the
endower wish (Osman et al. 2012;Alias, 2011; Alias, 2012) even Bahari and Abd
Rahman (2012) asserted that waqf is shield and must be highly protected from any
type of risk (especially the market volatility). Currently, majority of waqf assets
allocation in many Muslim countries except for Singapore are administered in an old
school way (Osman, Htay, and Muhammad; 2012) on the reason to preserve the
principal value of waqf (Ellias, Kadir and Haron, 2015).
4Endowment asset management companies that wholly owned by Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS),
3. CASE STUDY: WAKAF SEETEE AISHAH PULAU PINANG MALAYSIA
In Malaysia although only 11.34%5 of waqf land had been developed, property
is dominating 81.35%6 from the total value of waqf asset worth RM951.84 million7.
One of the effective and efficient waqf land development project is Wakaf Seetee
Aishah (WSA). The WSA land is 9.86 acres of padi field donated by Seetee Aishah Bt.
Haji Mahmood on 30 September 1901. Seetee Aishah requested the benefit from the
WSA land be used for the traditional religious activities during Ramadhan, paying and
supplying the kerosene for all mosques in Permatang Pauh and, sending alms to
Mecca and umrah and any philanthropic activity or for the benefits of the descendants
of Saedah and Family8.
Property, Plant & Equipment (PPE) would be measured at cost on initial recognition & value derived
from
8 Hydzulkifli & Asmak (2012)
Figure 2: Partnership model for Wakaf Seetee Aishah Development Project
The utmost achievement in WSA land development is the ability of MAINPP to fulfil
the request of the late Seetee Aishah after hundred years. MAINPP received the nine
triple-storey shop units as the consideration received for the leased land. By having
the shop unit MAINPP was able to generate a stable rental income. MAINPP also had
received 30% of the profit from the net sales of the double-storey houses. The houses
were sold by UDA at the range of affordable prices between RM 250,000 to RM
400,000 each. The price was lower by 20% from the current market price. Thus, it
provides a greater Muslim opportunity to consume a house. The success of CSP in
the waqfted land of Settee Aishah provides a new insight of viewing waqf in today’s
contemporary world. With reduction in cost of development and increased revenues
from selling, the CSP provides empirical evident that waqf property development using
partnership scheme is worth a while to be considered and undertaken in fulfilling
housing needs of the ummah. The scope and magnitude of contemporary
development of waqfted land provide a forward justification that waqf is still a relevant
socio-economic tool for social alleviation.
Suhaili (2016) noted asset allocation strategy is necessary to meet waqf property
liquidity needs. In the context of waqf property, assets allocation could be used to
distribute the waqf income (manfaat) between the stakeholders as well as the sinking
fund for the transactional and holding cost of the waqf property. Managing assets
allocation are varies according to the institutions policy and the size of funds held by
foundations, trusts and endowments (Ayuniyyah et al. 2014) This idea also was use
by MAINPP in distributing WSA revenue.
•Beneficiries •Management
40% 20%
20% 20%
•Sinking Fund •Maintenance
The MAINPP is engaging with Abdul Karim (2012) suggestion by employing the
asset allocation strategy in distributing the revenue derived from WSA. Basically, the
largest portion of the revenue is being apportion according to the deed of WSA.
Whereas the remaining sixty percent were shared equally between management fees,
WSA maintenance purposes and sinking fund. By having such revenue allocation, itt
was noted that this innovative waqf development tries to sustain the WSA financially,
functionally and physically
WSA is sample of comprehensive waqf. In the WSA deed, the waqf khayrri (either
general or specific) and waqf zurri being identified clearly by the late Seetee Aishah.
Thus, one of the beneficiaries is Saedahs’ family. In facilitating the distribution of waqf
revenue to this family, MAINPP had established the foundation. This foundation is
responsible to plan the utilization of the income received. By having this foundation,
MAINPP not only empowered the Saedah decent but also train them to collectively
accountable on the WSA deed. Besides, the use of the MAINPP manpower also could
be saved as it only requires minimal supervision.
3.4 LESSON FROM WSA
Waqf property is not only an investment asset but also a retaining wall” to the ummah.
The lack of innovation in developing the waqf land may cause the burdens to the waqf
trustees as well as hindered the waqf in meeting its objectives. The paradox of
innovation success in WSA land development could lead to an example that any
mission which involved collaboration as the leverage platform has given a new identity
and hope. Besides, in Malaysia there are still huge acreage of waqf land banks. It also
signifies that any method which does not contradict with the gist of waqf itself could
have been explored as Islam does not limit creativity. The same paradigm should be
done by the other trustee as the best of waqf is to dedicate things which people need
most.
References
Abas, Farah Nadia and Fauziah Raji. 2017. “Adoption Of Reinvestment Concept In
Waqf Property Management Practice: A Conceptual Framework.” in 5th South
East Asia International Islamic Philanthropy Conference 2017.
Al-Tarabulsi, Burhan al-Din Ibrahim Musa Abi Bakr Ibn al-Shaykh `Ali. 1981. Al-Is`af
Fi Ahkam Al-Awqaf. Beirut: Dar al-Rai’d al-`Arab.
Ali, Norinah Mohd, Rubi Ahmad, and Nurul Shanaz Ahmad Mahdzan. 2015. “The
Need of an Effective Business Model for Waqf Land Development in Malaysia.”
in 20th International Research Conferences on Business, Economics and Social
Sciences,.
Alias, Tunku Alina. 2011. “‘Tax Laws Affecting Waqf in Malaysia : A Comparison with
the United Stated and Turkey.’” in 6th UUM International Legal Conference.,
Pulau Pinang.
Alias, Tunku Alina. 2012. “Venture Capital Strategies in Waqf Fund Investment and
Spending.” ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance 4(1):99–126.
Ayuniyyah, Qurroh, Mustaffa Kamil Nazrol Kamil, and Mohamed Aslam Haneef. 2014.
“Investments of Endowment Fund in Higher Education : Best Practice,
Performance and Issues.” Pp. 29–53 in Prosiding Pelestarian Institusi Wakaf:
Memperkasa Pendidikan Tinggi Negara.
Azmi, Nur Farahiah, Siti Fariha Muhamad, and Mohd Khairy Kamarudin. 2014.
“Challenges in Developing the Waqf Properties: The Study on State Islamic
Religious Council in Kelantan.” International Journal of Management
SciencesInternational Journal of Management Sciences 3(7):487–90.
Bahari, Zakaria and Fakhruddin Abd Rahman. 2012. “Modes And Risks Of Financing
For Waqf Development:The Case Of Seetee Aisyah Waqf In Penang, Malaysia.”
in ISDEV paper Serieser Series.
Al Buhuti, Mansur Yunus Idris. 2000. Kasyaful Qina’ An Matn Al-Iqna’. Dar Alamil
Kutub, Riyadh - Arab Saudi.
Ellias, Mohd Ramadhan Fitri, Ahmad Firdaus Kadir, and Muhamad Nasir Bin Haron.
2015. “Cash Waqf and Its Operational Issues: Analysis from The Islamic
Perspective.” in Kolej Univerisiti Islam Selangor.
Ibrahim, Dahlia and Haslindar Ibrahim. 2013. “Revival of Waqf Properties in Malaysia.”
The 5th Islamic Economics System Conference (iECONS 2013) (September):4–
5.
Ismail, Abdul Ghafar and Bayu Taufiq Possumah. 2014. Waqf as Economic Matters
but Being Left Out as Policy Tools.
Ismail, Nur Azlin and Ismail Omar. 2017. “The Roles Of Asset Allocation As Waqf
Property Risk Diversification Tool.” in Seminar Wakaf Kontemporari 2017.
Mat Rani, Mohd Afendi and Che Zuina Ismail. 2012. “Penyewaan Tanah Wakaf Dari
Perspektif Hukum Syarak Dan Amalannya Di Malaysia.” Institut kajian Zakat
Malaysia (1991):1–15.
Mohammad, Mohamad Tahir Sabit and Abdul Hamid Mar Iman. 2006. “Obstacles of
the Current Concept of Waqf to the Development of Waqf Properties and the
Recommended Alternative.” Malaysian Journal of Real Estate 1(1):27–38.
Mohammad, Mohammad Tahir Sabit, Abdul Hamid Mar Iman, and Ismail Omar. 2005.
“An Ideal Financial Mechanism for the Development of the Waqf Properties in
Malaysia.” 1–168.
Omar, Abd Jalil et al. 2016. “Best Practices for Corporate Real Estate Management
in Malaysia.” in 12th NAPREC.
Omar, Ismail and Nur Azlin Ismail. 2016. Synergizing Cash Waqf Into Property Waqf
In Malaysia.
Osman, Amirul Faiz, Sheila Nu Nu Htay, and Mustafa Omar Muhammad. 2012.
“Determinants of Cash Waqf Giving in Malaysia: Survey of Selected Works.” Pp.
186–243 in Workshop Antarbangsa Pembangunan Berteraskan Islam V (WAPI-
5).
Sadr, Seyed Kazem and Hojjatullah Souri. 2010. “Iranian Economic Review, Vol.14,
No.25, Winter 2010.” 14(25).
Suhaili, Nur Aqidah. 2016. “The Paradigm Of Assets Allocation And Selection Of
Managers In Waqf Versus Endowments, Trusts And Foundations.” in the 11th
ISDEV International Postgraduate Workshop.
Sulaiman, Syahnaz and Aznan Hassan. 2016. “The Strategy of Sustainable Waqf
Development and Investment from the Perpective of Shariah.” Shariah Journal
24(2):237–70.
Thomas, Abdulkader, Abu Bakar Muhammad Musa, Shabnam Mokhtar, and Ihsan
Gonsalves. 2016. “Waqf- Are We Thinking Correctly?” islamicbanker. Retrieved
July 5, 2017 (https://www.islamicbanker.com/publications/waqf-are-we-thinking-
correctly).